Chad = Chang = Chaddam = Chadpreet = Tyrone

[Deleted member 15004]

Very informative thread. I think Toshiro Mifune is a Chang imo a solid 9/10 as well
What do you think @thecel ?

 

[Anchor_Ship]

this quote too

you really love necroposting don't you faggot

 

[thecel]

you really love necroposting don't you faggot

It’s very relevant to the thread.

 

[Deleted member 15004]

you really love necroposting don't you faggot

meh this thread is better than most of the threads in the main page anyways

 

[Ziggy S]

Nah bro, dark anglo pheno mogs all. Only thing that comes close is med.

 

[Oberyn]

Chad>Chaddams=Chadpreets>tyrone>chang

on average but there are always outliers a tyrone may mog a chad and vice versa.

 

[EdouardManlet]

View attachment 1075220

The peak of east asian men BTFO'd by 5'11 Luke who lives down the street.

 

[Anchor_Ship]

It’s very relevant to the thread.

meh this thread is better than most of the threads in the main page anyways

muh relevant to the thread the thread is shit

 

[Deleted member 15004]

Nah bro, dark anglo pheno mogs all. Only thing that comes close is med.

Basically Cary Grant

 

[thecel]

Chad>Chaddams=Chadpreets>tyrone>chang

on average but there are always outliers a tyrone may mog a chad and vice versa.

Fuckin doofus you think Chadpreets > Tyrones

Tyrones > Chads in 2022

 

[yeeyeeslayer]

So many people here have the concepts of Chang, Chadpreet, Chaddam, Tyrone, and Chad wrong.

If you say stuff like—

• “Changs can never mog Chads”
• “He's a Chang but he's still mogged to oblivion by White Chad, brutal”
• “Chang can be mogged by even White Chadlites at times”
• “Chadpreets and Chaddams mog the hardest”

—then your understanding of basic looks knowledge is shaky.

Chang, Chadpreet, Chaddam, and Tyrone are only race-specific terms for Chad. They're subsets of the broader category of Chad. Changs are Chads, Tyrones are Chads, etc.

The looks level range that defines Chads, Changs, etc. are all the same. Chad is ≥ 8/10, and so is Chang, Tyrone, and all other Chad subtypes.

People who believe that Chads and Changs don't have the same standard make one of 2 errors in their thinking:

1. believing the definition of Chad is based on percentile within ethnicities, e.g. top 1% of men per ethnicity, not absolute attractiveness
2. believing the PSL and decile scales adapt to different geographic locations, like the standard for 8/10 is lower in places with less hot men

Both of these beliefs are incorrect.

Chad, Tyrone, Chang, Chaddam, and Chadpreet all correspond to the exact same 8–10/10 range on the universal decile scale.

Saying Chang gets mogged, facially, by Chadlite, is a logical impossibility.

It's utterly idiotic to say—

“Broootal! Gigachang doesn't even mog Indian Chadlite!”

—and post these pictures:

View attachment 1075210View attachment 1075208

Bro, if a man you call "Gigachang" gets mogged by a Chadlite, maybe you should reconsider your rating of the Asian man. He probably isn't a Gigachang at all.

Think about it, dude—does it make sense to say a Gigachad gets mogged by a Chadlite? No. Why is it any different for Gigachang? Gigachangs are Gigachads too.

Now, whether Gigachangs actually exist is another argument. I believe Gigachangs don't exist. To refute this, show me ONE EXAMPLE of a FULL ASIAN, NOT MIXED, guy who mogs Gandy, O’Pry, and other PSL gods FACIALLY.

bro said a whole bunch of nothing

 

[Kamui]

bro said a whole bunch of nothing

He is correct