Women's opinion matters, not the opinion of PSL autists jfl
that’s the original black pilled st. hamudi meaning of chad tbh
That's because Chad's and chadlites are rare most slayers IRL are Htn
Nah bro Chad is 50% of men jfl
I edited it now read
nah, I can get sex with gl girls, but I have to jump through so many hoops. Chad gets it handed to him. I'm always a little non-ntness from rejection.
Gotta be at least bluecel to talk like that, pipe down greycel
I said easily, read
chad is literally a classification of looks. no amount of sex will make you a chad. there are popular normies with below average faces and average faces who get sex easily. are they chad? no, barely any men are chad tier, even chadlite tier is very rare to see irl let alone a chad, a chad id say is about top 0.05% or rarer not fucking 5%
Guess it depends on your definition of "ease." I don't have to beta bux or do too much, but I still have to approach smoothly. Chad doesn't have to.
I said due to looks, genius
They are jfl
lol at thinking 95th percentile guys just exist and get hot pussy thrown at them. Let me live in your delusional world, please.
back at you
My definition of Chad is the hot guys getting easy sex, your guys definition is he has to be a supermodel but ok lol
it's almost like being gl and getting easy sex are interconnected
Idk where I argued otherwise
You keep saying supermodel
It's a huge cope to say Chad is this otherworldly being that you see maybe once a month on the street if you're lucky. It's much harder on the ego if they're much more prevalent irl
i mean wouldn’t it be obvious that a psl chad is rarer to find than a appeal chad?
I see chads all the time. They're maybe top 0.5%. Definitely not top 5%.
You think this because....?
Yep and you stated it for no reason
I live in the world
so why would u ask the question ? slow
Zero question marks used
What good is some arbitrary PSL score if it doesn't translate to real life outcomes with women? You do realize that looks is only a means to an end right? Thats is getting sex from women with minimal effort. So by definition if you are getting that, you are Chad. If you think you are Chad according to some incel-devised PSL scale but don't have the outcomes to support it, then you are NOT Chad. When you type shit like this, it screams you are a virgin, unsuccessful with dating, very young in age with zero experience with women (and life in general)
The argument is about at what looks level chad treatment starts
The looks level where getting sex with women becomes minimal effort. Work backwards, reverse engineer. Otherwise you ll get caught up to weird ass theories that don't translate to real life outcomes (P in V). Meaning if you are not getting easy sex with women, you are not Chad (and you may never become one as well as this shit is mostly genetic anyway)
okay so some NTmaxxed social ugly idiot or average looking idiot who gets sex easily is a chad even though he would be a permavirgin for life if he had the mental state of users here? thanks for making me laugh
Clearly not if you think top 5% of men aren't getting easy sex
Ugly or average looking idiots who are "NT" do NOT get sex easily. They may CLAIM they do but they don't. And you as an inexperienced teenager, you believe them, because you yourself haven't experienced first-hand what dating or sex with multiple women is. You simply don't have the life experience to make sound judgements. Have you left your mom's basement lately?
You're arguing with no one here. No one is saying you should base chadness off of some aspie measurements in isolation. What we're saying is that certain looks lead to chad treatment, so generally you can tell based on looks who is a chad. If you're definiotion of a chad is just guy who gets treated like a chad, then it's just tautology. It's like we're trying to define what makes something a table, and you come in and say, "guys, a table is something people think is a table." Like, great dude. Thanks for the contribution.
