Chad is top 5%, not top 0.1%

[DrTony]

You're arguing with no one here. No one is saying you should base chadness off of some aspie measurements in isolation. What we're saying is that certain looks lead to chad treatment, so generally you can tell based on looks who is a chad. If you're definiotion of a chad is just guy who gets treated like a chad, then it's just tautology. It's like we're trying to define what makes something a table, and you come in and say, "guys, a table is something people think is a table." Like, great dude. Thanks for the contribution.

Absolutely valid point. My argument is in fact a tautology.

 

[Meteor21]

I’m not going to consider half or more of the population chad lol

Bro really just said 50+% of men get sex easily

 

[Deleted member 54067]

Ugly or average looking idiots who are "NT" do NOT get sex easily. They may CLAIM they do but they don't. And you as an inexperienced teenager, you believe them, because you yourself haven't experienced first-hand what dating or sex with multiple women is. You simply don't have the life experience to make sound judgements. Have you left your mom's basement lately?

my age or experience with women has nothing to do with this. i know my country better than you do, plenty of guys who are uglier than this whole forum get laid here, this is nothing like america where im guessing you are from

 

[DrTony]

Bro really just said 50+% of men get sex easily

Thts because he is a teenager who doesn't have experience with women or life yet. Thats why I am not being harsh on him. I was like that at his age. Give him 10-15 years to mature, get experience and his prefrontal cortex mature

 

[Seth Walsh]

I love Dr Tony lmaooooo

 

[czwarty]

It's a huge cope to say Chad is this otherworldly being that you see maybe once a month on the street if you're lucky. It's much harder on the ego if they're much more prevalent irl

Nah bro it's totally logical see. Chad is this top 0,000000001% ethereal unwordly being existing between boundaries of planes of reality that you can't see physically ("I have never seen Chad IRL" ~every second elite scholar of .org), but also each woman somehow had sex with hundreds and more of such Chads, and also this Chad fucks your oneitis in this very moment. While never being seen or registered with any means of documenting reality, obviously.

.org truly operates in matters crossing eyes of most exquisite minds of quantum mechanics. Bohr, Planck, Dirac and Rutherford ain't got no single SHIT on scholars able to create such absolutely waterproof theories indeed

 

[Meteor21]

Nah bro it's totally logical see. Chad is this top 0,000000001% ethereal unwordly being existing between boundaries of planes of reality that you can't see physically ("I have never seen Chad IRL" ~every second elite scholar of .org), but also each woman somehow had sex with hundreds and more of such Chads, and also this Chad fucks your oneitis in this very moment. While never being seen or registered with any means of documenting reality, obviously.

.org truly operates in matters crossing eyes of most exquisite minds of quantum mechanics. Bohr, Planck, Dirac and Rutherford ain't got no single SHIT on scholars able to create such absolutely waterproof theories indeed

The Ontological argument proves the existence of Chad imo but it is still widely disagreed on