there’s a very large difference between a HTN and a Chad don’t you think? Chadlite is critical to reduce that disparity gap
The gap is not big. Its just that some chad are better than other chad but again at this level it gets subjective
Yes, no one is disputing the fact that attractiveness starts to get subjective at Chad, but that doesn’t render Chadlite useless
There are many chadlites who are more masculine than some chads. The rate is based on all pillars combined not just dimo
It does. They are practically the same. The gap between each level is big
“They are practically the same. The gap between each level is big“ That’s contradictory
That's because I think chadlite and chad is the sam level. That's what I mean.
Ahh I see. But that use that same logic is to be removing LTN to MTN, do you think that’s a large gap?
Between those tiers the gap exists. The only gap that shouldnt exist is the one between the top faces (chadlite/chad)
So you think a chadlite should just a be considered an LC (low chad)?
Yeah. Even tho the sub ratings of the ratings are pointless. Lhtn, mhtn, hhtn is all pointless for example. The ratings shouldn't be this strict.
Cl is definetly a crucial ranking
Still I want to call it out because no one does.
Explain why
For example look at an HTN, do you think that hes even a little close to being a chad?
“HMTN” implies someone has the ability and realistic potential to reach the threshold of HTN (LHTN), the sub-ratings are pretty useful in that regard, for example a MTN -> HTN is realistic, however a LMTN -> HHTN is not (very difficult without a low BF% + procedures)
True
I do not know. But rn they are not
