Chads are also theoretically settled for

[VohnnyBoy]

Attraction not being binary, but a spectrum should be water (you'd invest way more in a relationship with Stacy than mtb)
Since everyone subconsciously has an abstract ideal of a partner, the question is:
Does such partner actually exist IRL, or do even Chads theoretically get settled for?

Think of attraction as an asymptote, with Chads being closer to it than the rest of us. Maybe "absolute 100% attraction" does not exist

 

[cigcel]

really ineresting but I cant think that hard right now

 

[Caravan]

If you aren’t a pet realistically you’re being settled for

 

[mrdouchebag]

True Chads(not "Chads" as in tall, fit, HTN) generally only end up with Stacies if they got with them really early and somehow still stayed together and got married. Most actual Stacies pick statusmaxxed moneymaxxed normies, so Chads tend to date down in looks when it comes to marriage.

So are Chads being settled for in terms of the woman's desire? Not really, since their wife is less attractive relative to them and has high desire for them. Do Chads themselves settle when it comes to their own desire? Yeah.

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

That doesnt apply to falling in love


When youre truly in love you feel the girl is the best girl in the world and a match made in heaven for you

 

[VohnnyBoy]

That doesnt apply to falling in love


When youre truly in love you feel the girl is the best girl in the world and a match made in heaven for you

It does. Just replace attraction with true love in the asymptote analogy. You may genuinely believe that they're the one, but theoretically you would love them even more if they were closer to your subconscious image of an ideal partner.

Also, is "falling in love" a biological instinct or a rational thought? At what point does sexual attraction translate into "true love". To me, love is just sexual attraction + compatible personalities + time.

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

It does. Just replace attraction with true love in the asymptote analogy. You may genuinely believe that they're the one, but theoretically you would love them even more if they were closer to your subconscious image of an ideal partner.

Also, is "falling in love" a biological instinct or a rational thought? At what point does sexual attraction translate into "true love". To me, love is just sexual attraction + compatible personalities + time.

Because its not only looks but also personality

Might sound like cope but after a certain looks threshold a girl that presses the buttons right is more infatuating than some girl with a better body or psl

And also, truly truly falling in love means the person is Absolute

You might admit theres better looking girls around but when you are in love you want 100% of the girl as it is because true love makes the loved one Absolute

Per your logic, the object of love becomes the assymptote itself

 

[crazyguy]

Because its not only looks but also personality

Might sound like cope but after a certain looks threshold a girl that presses the buttons right is more infatuating than some girl with a better body or psl

thats ur biology tho

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

thats ur biology tho

It being biological doesnt exclude what i said though

We are biological everything we do is biological

 

[crazyguy]

It being biological doesnt exclude what i said though

We are biological everything we do is biological

so u would choose a htb with a perfect personality over adriana lima with a flawed one

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

so u would choose a htb with a perfect personality over adriana lima with a flawed one

Ofc

 

[VohnnyBoy]

Because its not only looks but also personality

Might sound like cope but after a certain looks threshold a girl that presses the buttons right is more infatuating than some girl with a better body or psl

This is about your ideal partner as a whole, I did consider personality. No matter how good of a personality your current girlfriend has, there's always a better one (theoretically)

 

[crazyguy]

Ofc

what would be the limit then
as in how low would u go in terms of looks for a good personality

 

[tarkdriad33]

chads defy math and logic

 

[VohnnyBoy]

up

 

[Nectar]

Water and water and water again

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

chads are seen as stupid toys by women

 

[GodDeityEyeBro]

Attraction not being binary, but a spectrum should be water (you'd invest way more in a relationship with Stacy than mtb)
Since everyone subconsciously has an abstract ideal of a partner, the question is:
Does such partner actually exist IRL, or do even Chads theoretically get settled for?

Think of attraction as an asymptote, with Chads being closer to it than the rest of us. Maybe "absolute 100% attraction" does not exist

There is never 100% absolute attraction and even Chads at a first glance only fill the physical attraction part of attraction. Honestly, it's in my eyes that you need some sort of bonding experience along with looks, etc. to get the closest to a 100% package and even then it ain't perfect.

Also, welcome back @VohnnyBoy . How was your 2 month break?

 

[VohnnyBoy]

There is never 100% absolute attraction and even Chads at a first glance only fill the physical attraction part of attraction. Honestly, it's in my eyes that you need some sort of bonding experience along with looks, etc. to get the closest to a 100% package and even then it ain't perfect.

Also, welcome back @VohnnyBoy . How was your 2 month break?

Pretty decent, danke. Got hit with annual burst of motivation and lifefuel all of a sudden