SilvioMoltisantiDan
good things come to those who work their asses off
- Joined
- May 31, 2025
- Posts
- 7,245
- Reputation
- 7,539
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
28 is death tier T3-T4Cmon bro you KNOW his facial thirds are ass
i'm saying, why would he be chadlite lol0 zygo prominency and 0 zygo setness lol
he looks like a rectangle
i used low brownot even close to 28 middle third
Wallahi I'd walk my nuts through broken glass before i trip even for a SECOND about what a foid thinks of objective attraction
i think that pic doesnt work, he is squinting and making his brows lower, analyziz pic is more accuratei used low brow
that photo he is squinting and it is also heavily edited and distortedi think that pic doesnt work, he is squinted and making his brows lower, analyziz pic is more accurate
tier 2 for low brow28 is death tier T3-T4
wtf he doesnt have that middle third
that photo he is squinting and it is also heavily edited and distorted
Outercanthal distance is ideal 63 is T1
my formula is actually very concise, not bloated, good try thoOutercanthal distance is ideal 63 is T1
Intercanthal is T2 and you lack to much ratios wheres midface/fwhr/IAA etc
how tf fwhr and miface are bloated ratiosmy formula is actually very concise, not bloated, good try tho
yes bro fwhr is cope and you got tfwhr on formula
explain your reasoning behind this reply and i might take you seriouslyyes bro fwhr is cope and you got tfwhr on formula
both measure height and witdh but you think fwhr is cope and tfwhr nope even when they are correlatedexplain your reasoning behind this reply and i might take you seriously
both measure height and witdh but you think fwhr is cope and tfwhr nope even when they are correlated
just go to my harm threads and use more ratios bro, more professional and you will get higher harmony and not underrated shit like 67 basso
and bloat my formula with meaningless ratios that measure the same thing? nojust go to my harm threads and use more ratios bro, more professional and you will get higher harmony and not underrated shit like 67 basso![]()
fucking incomplete formula jfland bloat my formula with meaningless ratios that measure the same thing? no
show me ratios that measure literally anything differently than what mine already dofucking incomplete formula jfl
nigga using esr/outer/icdshow me ratios that measure literally anything differently than what mine already do
not even close for everyone but Jorge del Río, he's got no zygos, weird ears, and a really wide forehead, the others you're crazy if you genuinely think they're htn
ethmoid body breadth / lateral zygo body projectionnigga using esr/outer/icdall measures one thing a good eye area spacing
excellent! the same as Fwhr Witdhethmoid body breadth / lateral zygo body projection
ethmoid body projection / malar projection
lacrimal projection / ethmoid body projection
good try though little guy
Jorge is the worst and it's not even close you're crazy bro, no zygos and his forehead is so wide, he looks like )( from the frontnobody here is really chad besides Jorge del rio dumb fuck
Ian is high htn
guirao/Vito/Arvid/henry are cl
niggas are blind nowadaysJorge is the worst and it's not even close you're crazy bro, no zygos and his forehead is so wide, he looks like )( from the front
vito over henry is easy bro and arvid mogs Jorge del RíoArvid's hhtn that's for sure
Never seen him unfrauded so i can't say this with my utmost confidence
Vito above Henry is actually colossal bro how can you say this
he has the most glaring flaw out of all of them, how tf are you gonna call him chad when his bigonal and bitemporal is bigger than his bizygoniggas are blind nowadays
fwhr = mid brow setness, upper lip to bizygoexcellent! the same as Fwhr Witdh
midface Length
IAA Jfa Etc
just using your logic bro, a good esr of 46 in majority of cases has a ideal ICD and OCD you are using measurements that over measure one thing by your "Logic"so tell me how sound are those measurements when they are measuring the same growths over and over JFL
and wide esrs tend to have long medial canthus due to the frontal bone process with the ethmoid complex, these redundancies (which are inevitable) are actually calculated on my system and weighed respectively, meanwhile you guys do none of that, and slap random numbers for weights, so you guys are just bloatmaxxingjust using your logic bro, a good esr of 46 in majority of cases has a ideal ICD and OCD you are using measurements that over measure one thing by your "Logic"
dnr and fuck your 18 ratios formula tiny little cuck true jaw inclinationand wide esrs tend to have long medial canthus due to the frontal bone process with the ethmoid complex, these redundancies (which are inevitable) are actually calculated on my system and weighed respectively, meanwhile you guys do none of that, and slap random numbers for weights, so you guys are just bloatmaxxing
so you concede ?dnr and fuck your 18 ratios formula tiny little cuck true jaw inclination
Idk they chad or htn but im sure forb1 thing they terra ur soul
Alain should be here