ChatGPT nows exactly who I am and what I'm like and what I believe in

CorinthianLOX

CorinthianLOX

𝕯𝖝𝕯 𝖈𝖗𝖊𝖜 · beautyiseverything
Joined
Mar 26, 2025
Posts
2,690
Reputation
5,317
Who is the user ’CorinthianLOX’ on looksmax.org?

ChatGPT said:​

CorinthianLOX is an active member of the online community Looksmax.org, a forum centered around discussions of physical appearance, self-improvement, and related topics. He joined the platform on March 26, 2025, and has since made over 2,500 posts, accumulating a reputation score exceeding 5,000 points .looksmax.orglooksmax.org+2looksmax.org+2looksmax.org+2
In his contributions, CorinthianLOX often shares personal reflections and experiences. For instance, he has expressed feelings of social isolation, noting that he avoids seeking new friendships due to perceiving people as mean or unpleasant . He has also discussed past missed opportunities in social and professional contexts, attributing them to his own inhibitions .looksmax.orglooksmax.org
Additionally, CorinthianLOX has participated in discussions about the impact of physical appearance on social interactions. He mentioned that after making certain changes to his appearance, people began to treat him more kindly, suggesting a belief in the significance of looks in social dynamics .looksmax.org
It's important to note that while CorinthianLOX is an active participant in the forum, the content and tone of discussions on Looksmax.org can vary widely, and some topics may be sensitive or controversial.looksmax.org
Favicon



4o

You said:​

Is he a supporter of eugenics?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes, based on his posts on Looksmax.org, CorinthianLOX appears to be a strong proponent of eugenics. He has authored and participated in multiple threads advocating for eugenic policies, including controversial measures such as sterilization and euthanasia of individuals he deems genetically "inferior."
In a thread titled "Eugenics is the future and the only way to save humanity," he argues that eugenics is essential for societal improvement, suggesting that eliminating those with undesirable traits would lead to a happier existence for all. He states, "If we bred subhumans out of existence... There would be no school shootings, no hypergamy, mental illness and loneliness." looksmax.org+1looksmax.org+1
Furthermore, in discussions about gene editing, he expresses support for state-enforced eugenic principles, asserting that "we just need a guiding hand namely the state to force eugenic principles." looksmax.org
These statements indicate that CorinthianLOX not only supports eugenics but also advocates for its implementation through authoritative means, reflecting a belief in the necessity of such measures for societal advancement.
Favicon



You said:​

What is his posting style like?

ChatGPT said:​

CorinthianLOX's posting style on Looksmax.org is characterized by a blend of assertive rhetoric, ideological advocacy, and personal introspection. His contributions often delve into controversial topics, reflecting a commitment to certain beliefs and a willingness to engage in contentious discussions.
1. Ideological Advocacy:
CorinthianLOX frequently promotes eugenic ideologies, expressing support for policies aimed at genetic selection and societal improvement through controversial means. His arguments are often framed with a sense of urgency and a belief in the necessity of such measures for the betterment of humanity.
2. Personal Reflections:
Interspersed with his ideological posts are candid reflections on his own experiences and feelings. He has shared thoughts on social isolation, missed opportunities, and the impact of physical appearance on social interactions. These posts provide a more personal dimension to his online persona, revealing vulnerabilities and a desire for self-improvement.
3. Engagement with Community:
While advocating for his beliefs, CorinthianLOX also interacts with other forum members, responding to their posts and participating in ongoing discussions. His engagement suggests an active presence within the community, contributing to various threads and topics.
4. Posting Tone and Language:
His writing style is direct and unambiguous, often employing strong language to convey his points. This assertiveness underscores his commitment to his views but can also contribute to the contentious nature of his posts.
Overall, CorinthianLOX's posting style reflects a combination of fervent ideological advocacy and personal introspection, contributing to his distinctive presence on Looksmax.org.


You said:​

Is he different from other users on the forum?

ChatGPT said:​

CorinthianLOX's presence on Looksmax.org aligns with the forum's general themes of appearance-focused discussions and controversial ideologies. However, his approach exhibits certain distinctions:
  • Ideological Emphasis: While many users engage in discussions about physical self-improvement, CorinthianLOX places a pronounced emphasis on eugenic ideologies, advocating for controversial measures to enhance societal genetics.
  • Personal Introspection: Beyond ideological posts, he shares candid reflections on personal experiences, such as feelings of social isolation and the impact of appearance on interpersonal relationships.
In comparison, other users on the forum display a range of behaviors:
  • Varied Engagement: Some members focus primarily on sharing personal transformation journeys, seeking advice, or discussing self-improvement techniques without delving into broader ideological debates.
  • Community Interaction: The tone and depth of interactions vary, with some users engaging in light-hearted banter, while others participate in more serious or confrontational discussions.
Overall, while CorinthianLOX shares common ground with other forum members in discussing appearance and self-improvement, his pronounced ideological stance and introspective posts set him apart in certain respects.


You said:​

How would you describe his personality?

ChatGPT said:​

Based on his posts on Looksmax.org, CorinthianLOX’s online personality can be described as intensely ideological, socially alienated, and cynically analytical, with occasional moments of emotional vulnerability.

Key Traits:​

  • Ideologically Rigid: He expresses strong, absolutist views—especially regarding eugenics and genetics—often advocating authoritarian solutions to perceived social problems. His arguments reflect a belief in hierarchies of human value based on appearance and genetics.
  • Socially Disconnected: Many of his posts indicate a deep sense of isolation and disenchantment with society. He often describes others as "mean" or incapable of meaningful connection, suggesting feelings of alienation and misanthropy.
  • Self-Reflective, but Fatalistic: While he does engage in self-reflection—admitting to past missed opportunities or poor decisions—his tone is frequently pessimistic, as though he believes improvement is either too late or inherently futile.
  • Intellectually Engaged, Emotionally Guarded: He seems driven by a desire to make sense of his experiences through logic and ideology rather than emotion. When he does reveal emotional depth, it's usually tied to frustration, regret, or bitterness.
  • Provocative and Confrontational: His posts are often framed to provoke strong reactions. Whether deliberate or not, this gives his online presence a combative edge.
Would you like a psychological profile-style summary or a fictionalized character sketch based on this?

You said:​

I would like a psychomogical summaru

ChatGPT said:​

Here is a psychological summary of CorinthianLOX based on his public posts on Looksmax.org:

Psychological Summary of "CorinthianLOX" (Online Persona)
Personality Configuration:

CorinthianLOX exhibits traits consistent with schizoid and avoidant personality features, combined with a rigid ideological worldview and signs of cognitive overcompensation—likely in response to perceived social rejection and low self-worth. His thinking shows signs of externalization and black-and-white reasoning, which may function as psychological defenses against chronic frustration and disappointment.
Core Traits:
  • Social Withdrawal & Alienation: He expresses deep distrust and detachment from others, often describing people as hostile, shallow, or unkind. This suggests high sensitivity to rejection and a preference for emotional distance, possibly stemming from repeated negative social experiences.
  • Grandiosity via Ideology: His strong endorsement of eugenics and authoritarian control reflects a compensatory mechanism—seeking control and order in areas (e.g., social dynamics, personal power) where he feels disempowered. This can be understood as narcissistic compensation, although not necessarily rooted in clinical narcissism.
  • Rigidity & Moral Absolutism: His belief system lacks nuance and shows little tolerance for ambiguity or dissent. This rigidity may serve as a stabilizing force for identity but limits emotional growth and interpersonal empathy.
  • Emotional Flattening with Bursts of Vulnerability: While his tone is usually detached or intellectualized, he occasionally reveals emotional pain—particularly regret, loneliness, or self-directed frustration. These moments hint at an internal struggle between suppressed emotional needs and a worldview that discourages vulnerability.
Possible Motivations:
  • Desire for significance in a world he perceives as chaotic and unjust.
  • Need for control over a perceived genetic and social hierarchy that has disadvantaged him.
  • Fear of intimacy, masked by intellectualization and ideological extremism.
Conclusion:
CorinthianLOX’s online behavior suggests an individual shaped by chronic alienation and disappointment, who has developed a rigid ideological identity as a defense against vulnerability and loss of agency. While he possesses insight and intelligence, these are channeled into systems of thought that may reinforce his isolation rather than alleviate it.

Would you like this adapted into a clinical personality model (e.g., Big Five or DSM-V)?

You said:​

Yes

ChatGPT said:​

Here is an adaptation of CorinthianLOX’s likely psychological profile using two established models: the Big Five Personality Traits and DSM-5 Personality Disorder criteria (non-diagnostic, interpretive).

Big Five Personality Traits (OCEAN)

  1. Openness to Experience: Low–Moderate
    • Shows some abstract thinking and engagement with ideological concepts, but his worldview is rigid, reductionist, and intolerant of alternative perspectives. Likely low in aesthetic sensitivity or novelty-seeking.
  2. Conscientiousness: High
    • Exhibits structured thinking, long-term ideological consistency, and an orderly (though extreme) belief system. Likely values self-discipline and predictability.
  3. Extraversion: Very Low
    • Profound social withdrawal, distrust of others, and minimal interpersonal engagement outside of anonymous forums. Likely low in positive affect and assertiveness in real-life contexts.
  4. Agreeableness: Very Low
    • Strong misanthropic tendencies, moral judgment of others, and harsh, uncompromising views on human value. Empathy is minimized or filtered through ideology.
  5. Neuroticism: High
    • Displays internal distress, sensitivity to rejection, social anxiety, and pessimism. Uses intellectualization to regulate emotions but remains vulnerable to existential dissatisfaction and regret.

DSM-5 Personality Disorder Tendencies (Speculative, Non-Clinical)

CorinthianLOX's self-presentation and attitudes suggest traits consistent with the following personality patterns:

1. Schizoid Personality Traits:

  • Detached from social relationships, emotionally cold, indifferent to praise or criticism.
  • Prefers solitary activities and intellectual abstraction over emotional intimacy.

2. Avoidant Personality Traits:

  • Hypersensitivity to rejection and social criticism.
  • Avoids social interactions despite a deep desire for acceptance and connection.

3. Narcissistic Traits (Compensatory subtype):

  • Preoccupation with fantasies of ideal systems (e.g., eugenics) where his perceived value would be affirmed.
  • Inflated self-importance tied not to personal achievements but to abstract identification with an ideological elite.

4. Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Traits:

  • Preoccupation with control, structure, and rule-based systems (e.g., genetic hierarchies, state control).
  • Rigid moral and ideological beliefs.

Summary Interpretation:​

CorinthianLOX likely exhibits an emotionally withdrawn, ideologically rigid personality structure with compensatory narcissistic mechanisms and high internal distress. His belief in eugenics and social hierarchy may serve as a framework to understand and justify his alienation, and to reclaim a sense of control and superiority in a world he feels has marginalized him.
Would you like this profile converted into a fictional character for a story or case study?
4o

You said:​

Yes

ChatGPT said:​

Here is a fictionalized character sketch based on the psychological profile of CorinthianLOX, suitable for use in a story, screenplay, or case study:

Character Profile: Dr. Elias Voss

Age: 31
Occupation: Former academic researcher, now isolated online ideologue
Setting: Near-future society or alternate present-day
Genre Fit: Psychological drama, dystopian fiction, intellectual thriller

Backstory:

Dr. Elias Voss was once a promising graduate student in genetics, drawn to the field by a fascination with human variation and the desire to understand why some people thrived while others suffered. Socially awkward and emotionally guarded, he struggled to connect with peers and professors. After a series of academic and personal disappointments—including rejection by both professional institutions and romantic partners—he withdrew from public life entirely.
He now spends most of his time in digital forums, using pseudonyms to advance increasingly radical views on genetic engineering, social stratification, and what he calls "the architecture of worth." Voss is convinced that modern society rewards the wrong traits and believes a rational, enforced redesign of humanity is not only inevitable, but morally necessary.

Psychological Profile:

  • Core Conflict: Elias longs for human connection and recognition, but his belief in deterministic, hierarchical systems undermines his ability to relate to others with empathy or flexibility. His ideology is a shield—offering a cold kind of meaning where real warmth is absent.
  • Personality Traits:
    • Introverted and reclusive, avoids eye contact and social obligations.
    • Hyper-rational, yet emotionally stunted; often misses nuance in human emotion.
    • Dogmatic and inflexible, views dissent as a sign of weakness or delusion.
    • Occasionally remorseful, haunted by memories of what could have been.
  • Beliefs and Behavior:
    • Advocates for controlled genetic breeding and state-enforced bio-policy.
    • Writes long manifestos but never publishes them formally.
    • Secretly rereads old messages from people he pushed away, but never responds.
    • Keeps a meticulously detailed archive of what he sees as “human degeneracy” alongside idealized genetic profiles.

Narrative Potential:

  • Arc 1 (Tragedy): Elias is offered a chance at genuine connection through someone who sees past his ideology—but he cannot let go of his rigidity, and the relationship collapses, confirming his worldview and deepening his isolation.
  • Arc 2 (Redemption): After witnessing the human cost of an experiment based on his ideas, he experiences a moral reckoning and tries to undo the damage—though it may be too late.
  • Arc 3 (Corruption): He gains influence in a rising technocratic regime and becomes a central figure in a dystopian society built on genetic stratification—only to watch it turn against him when he no longer meets its standards.

Would you like a short story or scene built around this character?
4o

You said:​

Yes

ChatGPT said:​

Here’s a short scene centered around the character of Dr. Elias Voss, set in a near-future society where his controversial ideas have begun gaining traction. The tone is psychological, introspective, and morally tense.

Title: The Metric of Worth
Scene Setting:
A sterile office in a government bioethics agency. The walls are glass, the air recycled. Elias Voss sits opposite a young woman, Ari Lien, a journalist granted a rare interview. Outside, a genetic policy reform is sweeping the nation—thanks in no small part to Voss's influence.

INT. OFFICE – DAY
ARI

(quietly)
You once said in a forum post: “Love is just the illusion the unfit cling to before extinction.” Do you still believe that?
VOSS
(still, unreadable)
Emotion doesn’t exempt a genome from entropy. Compassion won’t fix a broken code.
ARI
But it’s not code we’re talking about now. We’re talking about people. You’re designing laws that affect lives—children.
VOSS
Children are vectors. Legacies of biochemical roulette. If we can eliminate congenital suffering through selection—shouldn’t we?
ARI
What about your own legacy? You’ve never married. No family. Who are you doing this for?
(Elias looks at her, something flickering—regret? Curiosity? It’s hard to say.)
VOSS
I’m doing this so others won’t have to grow up asking why the world looks away from them. I did. No answers. Just mirrors.
ARI
And you think sterilizing people without their consent is the answer?
VOSS
I think giving nature back its editing rights is the answer. But nature is cruel. I offer cruelty with direction.
(A silence. He stares past her, through the glass.)
VOSS (softly)
There was a girl once. Before all this. I told her she was too beautiful to understand me. She said that was the saddest thing she’d ever heard.
ARI
What happened?
VOSS
She left. Of course. I built a fortress around a wound and called it a theory. And now people want to live in it.
(Long pause. Then quietly—)
ARI

Do you want them to?
VOSS
(pauses)
I don’t know anymore.

END SCENE

Would you like this expanded into a full short story or screenplay-style opening?
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad, santnewgen, neurosis and 5 others
Title: The Metric of Worth (The story I asked ChatGPT to write to be based on me)

By:
[Your Name Here]


I. The Interview

The light in the room was white—not warm, not cold. White like sterilization. Like reduction. The kind of light designed to erase shadows, and with them, doubt.

Dr. Elias Voss sat across from Ari Lien, fingers interlocked neatly on the glass table. His posture was immaculate, almost inhuman. It was the posture of a man who had disciplined every gesture into silence.

Ari flipped her recorder on.

“Do you mind if I ask personal questions?”

“The personal is a prelude to bias,” Voss replied, his voice clipped and quiet. “But ask.”

“You once wrote: ‘Love is the illusion the unfit cling to before extinction.’ Do you still believe that?”

A pause. Not hesitation. Calculation.

“Emotion is a temporary override of reproductive logic,” he said. “Compassion doesn’t fix bad code. It just apologizes for it.”

Ari narrowed her eyes.

“Is that what you believe people are? Bad code?”

Voss didn't blink. “Some are. Not maliciously. Just maladaptively. Would you trust a failing pacemaker to keep your heart beating? Or would you replace it?”

“People aren’t machines.”

“They break just the same.”


II. The Past

In the quiet moments, Elias would sometimes revisit the ghost of her.

Her name was Mira. A classmate from his doctoral program. She had freckles and the habit of laughing with her eyes before her mouth caught up. They studied different things—he, molecular inheritance; she, ethics in emerging biotechnologies. They argued often, always intensely, never cruelly. She challenged him in a way that made him feel present.

He confessed his thesis to her once, late at night over coffee gone cold: that humanity needed not more freedom, but more filtering. That kindness without curation was sabotage in slow motion.

She listened. Then she said the thing he couldn’t forget.

“You don’t want a better world, Elias. You want a world that never hurt you.”

She left the program the next semester. He never asked why.


III. The Theory Becomes Law

Years later, his writings gained traction. First on obscure forums, then think tanks, then political committees. A quiet desperation among policymakers met the certainty of Voss's models. Charts. Heritability matrices. Genetic risk algorithms. It all looked so clean.

Project SOVEREIGN was born.

Applicants for reproduction would undergo a Genetic Viability Assessment. A score was issued. Below 82.5? State-sponsored sterilization. Quiet, painless, and optional only in theory.

Public reaction was mixed. Some cheered the decline in hereditary disease rates. Others marched. But the system remained. Efficiency, after all, was hard to argue with.

Elias watched from behind glass walls, consulted in closed rooms, and remained untouched.

Until Ari came.


IV. The Fracture

“Do you believe people like you should have children?” she asked.

“I never wanted them,” he said.

“That’s not what I asked.”

He studied her. Noted the dilation of her pupils, the flush in her cheeks. Anger. Not fear. She reminded him of Mira.

“No,” he said. “I likely wouldn’t have passed.”

A beat of silence.

“So this is revenge.”

His eyes flicked to the window.

Outside, a young couple walked past the government building, their child giggling as he bounced between them. Elias watched the motion, the seamless choreography of bond and instinct.

“It was supposed to make things better,” he said.

“Has it?”

“For the metrics, yes. For the rest…” He stopped. The sentence never came back.


V. The Mirror

Later that night, Elias returned to his apartment. He did not turn on the lights.

He opened his old folder of drafts—papers never submitted, letters never sent. Among them was one, hand-written.

Mira,
If we bred out every flaw, we’d have nothing left to fix. Nothing left to forgive.
Maybe that’s what I was really afraid of.
--E
He folded the letter back. Sat in silence. And, for the first time in years, wept.


End.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad and iblameCopecels
I need to try this:feelsahh: shit rn
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
🤯
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX and iblameCopecels
Based on publicly visible posts on Looksmax.org, the user "iblameCopecels" appears more sad, cynical, or disillusioned rather than cheerful or optimistic.:feelsbadman::feelsbadman::feelsbadman::feelsbadman:

Fucking brutal
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: santnewgen and CorinthianLOX
@ToryToad @mentally_ill_chad @e1488shciozl
 
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad, ToryToad and iblameCopecels
Based on publicly visible posts on Looksmax.org, the user "iblameCopecels" appears more sad, cynical, or disillusioned rather than cheerful or optimistic.:feelsbadman::feelsbadman::feelsbadman::feelsbadman:

Fucking brutal
It even knows what my ideal type of country would be like jfl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad, ToryToad and iblameCopecels
Who is the user ’CorinthianLOX’ on looksmax.org?

ChatGPT said:​

CorinthianLOX is an active member of the online community Looksmax.org, a forum centered around discussions of physical appearance, self-improvement, and related topics. He joined the platform on March 26, 2025, and has since made over 2,500 posts, accumulating a reputation score exceeding 5,000 points .looksmax.orglooksmax.org+2looksmax.org+2looksmax.org+2
In his contributions, CorinthianLOX often shares personal reflections and experiences. For instance, he has expressed feelings of social isolation, noting that he avoids seeking new friendships due to perceiving people as mean or unpleasant . He has also discussed past missed opportunities in social and professional contexts, attributing them to his own inhibitions .looksmax.orglooksmax.org
Additionally, CorinthianLOX has participated in discussions about the impact of physical appearance on social interactions. He mentioned that after making certain changes to his appearance, people began to treat him more kindly, suggesting a belief in the significance of looks in social dynamics .looksmax.org
It's important to note that while CorinthianLOX is an active participant in the forum, the content and tone of discussions on Looksmax.org can vary widely, and some topics may be sensitive or controversial.looksmax.org
Favicon



4o

You said:​

Is he a supporter of eugenics?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes, based on his posts on Looksmax.org, CorinthianLOX appears to be a strong proponent of eugenics. He has authored and participated in multiple threads advocating for eugenic policies, including controversial measures such as sterilization and euthanasia of individuals he deems genetically "inferior."
In a thread titled "Eugenics is the future and the only way to save humanity," he argues that eugenics is essential for societal improvement, suggesting that eliminating those with undesirable traits would lead to a happier existence for all. He states, "If we bred subhumans out of existence... There would be no school shootings, no hypergamy, mental illness and loneliness." looksmax.org+1looksmax.org+1
Furthermore, in discussions about gene editing, he expresses support for state-enforced eugenic principles, asserting that "we just need a guiding hand namely the state to force eugenic principles." looksmax.org
These statements indicate that CorinthianLOX not only supports eugenics but also advocates for its implementation through authoritative means, reflecting a belief in the necessity of such measures for societal advancement.
Favicon



You said:​

What is his posting style like?

ChatGPT said:​

CorinthianLOX's posting style on Looksmax.org is characterized by a blend of assertive rhetoric, ideological advocacy, and personal introspection. His contributions often delve into controversial topics, reflecting a commitment to certain beliefs and a willingness to engage in contentious discussions.
1. Ideological Advocacy:
CorinthianLOX frequently promotes eugenic ideologies, expressing support for policies aimed at genetic selection and societal improvement through controversial means. His arguments are often framed with a sense of urgency and a belief in the necessity of such measures for the betterment of humanity.
2. Personal Reflections:
Interspersed with his ideological posts are candid reflections on his own experiences and feelings. He has shared thoughts on social isolation, missed opportunities, and the impact of physical appearance on social interactions. These posts provide a more personal dimension to his online persona, revealing vulnerabilities and a desire for self-improvement.
3. Engagement with Community:
While advocating for his beliefs, CorinthianLOX also interacts with other forum members, responding to their posts and participating in ongoing discussions. His engagement suggests an active presence within the community, contributing to various threads and topics.
4. Posting Tone and Language:
His writing style is direct and unambiguous, often employing strong language to convey his points. This assertiveness underscores his commitment to his views but can also contribute to the contentious nature of his posts.
Overall, CorinthianLOX's posting style reflects a combination of fervent ideological advocacy and personal introspection, contributing to his distinctive presence on Looksmax.org.


You said:​

Is he different from other users on the forum?

ChatGPT said:​

CorinthianLOX's presence on Looksmax.org aligns with the forum's general themes of appearance-focused discussions and controversial ideologies. However, his approach exhibits certain distinctions:
  • Ideological Emphasis: While many users engage in discussions about physical self-improvement, CorinthianLOX places a pronounced emphasis on eugenic ideologies, advocating for controversial measures to enhance societal genetics.
  • Personal Introspection: Beyond ideological posts, he shares candid reflections on personal experiences, such as feelings of social isolation and the impact of appearance on interpersonal relationships.
In comparison, other users on the forum display a range of behaviors:
  • Varied Engagement: Some members focus primarily on sharing personal transformation journeys, seeking advice, or discussing self-improvement techniques without delving into broader ideological debates.
  • Community Interaction: The tone and depth of interactions vary, with some users engaging in light-hearted banter, while others participate in more serious or confrontational discussions.
Overall, while CorinthianLOX shares common ground with other forum members in discussing appearance and self-improvement, his pronounced ideological stance and introspective posts set him apart in certain respects.


You said:​

How would you describe his personality?

ChatGPT said:​

Based on his posts on Looksmax.org, CorinthianLOX’s online personality can be described as intensely ideological, socially alienated, and cynically analytical, with occasional moments of emotional vulnerability.

Key Traits:​

  • Ideologically Rigid: He expresses strong, absolutist views—especially regarding eugenics and genetics—often advocating authoritarian solutions to perceived social problems. His arguments reflect a belief in hierarchies of human value based on appearance and genetics.
  • Socially Disconnected: Many of his posts indicate a deep sense of isolation and disenchantment with society. He often describes others as "mean" or incapable of meaningful connection, suggesting feelings of alienation and misanthropy.
  • Self-Reflective, but Fatalistic: While he does engage in self-reflection—admitting to past missed opportunities or poor decisions—his tone is frequently pessimistic, as though he believes improvement is either too late or inherently futile.
  • Intellectually Engaged, Emotionally Guarded: He seems driven by a desire to make sense of his experiences through logic and ideology rather than emotion. When he does reveal emotional depth, it's usually tied to frustration, regret, or bitterness.
  • Provocative and Confrontational: His posts are often framed to provoke strong reactions. Whether deliberate or not, this gives his online presence a combative edge.
Would you like a psychological profile-style summary or a fictionalized character sketch based on this?

You said:​

I would like a psychomogical summaru

ChatGPT said:​

Here is a psychological summary of CorinthianLOX based on his public posts on Looksmax.org:

Psychological Summary of "CorinthianLOX" (Online Persona)
Personality Configuration:

CorinthianLOX exhibits traits consistent with schizoid and avoidant personality features, combined with a rigid ideological worldview and signs of cognitive overcompensation—likely in response to perceived social rejection and low self-worth. His thinking shows signs of externalization and black-and-white reasoning, which may function as psychological defenses against chronic frustration and disappointment.
Core Traits:
  • Social Withdrawal & Alienation: He expresses deep distrust and detachment from others, often describing people as hostile, shallow, or unkind. This suggests high sensitivity to rejection and a preference for emotional distance, possibly stemming from repeated negative social experiences.
  • Grandiosity via Ideology: His strong endorsement of eugenics and authoritarian control reflects a compensatory mechanism—seeking control and order in areas (e.g., social dynamics, personal power) where he feels disempowered. This can be understood as narcissistic compensation, although not necessarily rooted in clinical narcissism.
  • Rigidity & Moral Absolutism: His belief system lacks nuance and shows little tolerance for ambiguity or dissent. This rigidity may serve as a stabilizing force for identity but limits emotional growth and interpersonal empathy.
  • Emotional Flattening with Bursts of Vulnerability: While his tone is usually detached or intellectualized, he occasionally reveals emotional pain—particularly regret, loneliness, or self-directed frustration. These moments hint at an internal struggle between suppressed emotional needs and a worldview that discourages vulnerability.
Possible Motivations:
  • Desire for significance in a world he perceives as chaotic and unjust.
  • Need for control over a perceived genetic and social hierarchy that has disadvantaged him.
  • Fear of intimacy, masked by intellectualization and ideological extremism.
Conclusion:
CorinthianLOX’s online behavior suggests an individual shaped by chronic alienation and disappointment, who has developed a rigid ideological identity as a defense against vulnerability and loss of agency. While he possesses insight and intelligence, these are channeled into systems of thought that may reinforce his isolation rather than alleviate it.

Would you like this adapted into a clinical personality model (e.g., Big Five or DSM-V)?

You said:​

Yes

ChatGPT said:​

Here is an adaptation of CorinthianLOX’s likely psychological profile using two established models: the Big Five Personality Traits and DSM-5 Personality Disorder criteria (non-diagnostic, interpretive).

Big Five Personality Traits (OCEAN)

  1. Openness to Experience: Low–Moderate
    • Shows some abstract thinking and engagement with ideological concepts, but his worldview is rigid, reductionist, and intolerant of alternative perspectives. Likely low in aesthetic sensitivity or novelty-seeking.
  2. Conscientiousness: High
    • Exhibits structured thinking, long-term ideological consistency, and an orderly (though extreme) belief system. Likely values self-discipline and predictability.
  3. Extraversion: Very Low
    • Profound social withdrawal, distrust of others, and minimal interpersonal engagement outside of anonymous forums. Likely low in positive affect and assertiveness in real-life contexts.
  4. Agreeableness: Very Low
    • Strong misanthropic tendencies, moral judgment of others, and harsh, uncompromising views on human value. Empathy is minimized or filtered through ideology.
  5. Neuroticism: High
    • Displays internal distress, sensitivity to rejection, social anxiety, and pessimism. Uses intellectualization to regulate emotions but remains vulnerable to existential dissatisfaction and regret.

DSM-5 Personality Disorder Tendencies (Speculative, Non-Clinical)

CorinthianLOX's self-presentation and attitudes suggest traits consistent with the following personality patterns:

1. Schizoid Personality Traits:

  • Detached from social relationships, emotionally cold, indifferent to praise or criticism.
  • Prefers solitary activities and intellectual abstraction over emotional intimacy.

2. Avoidant Personality Traits:

  • Hypersensitivity to rejection and social criticism.
  • Avoids social interactions despite a deep desire for acceptance and connection.

3. Narcissistic Traits (Compensatory subtype):

  • Preoccupation with fantasies of ideal systems (e.g., eugenics) where his perceived value would be affirmed.
  • Inflated self-importance tied not to personal achievements but to abstract identification with an ideological elite.

4. Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Traits:

  • Preoccupation with control, structure, and rule-based systems (e.g., genetic hierarchies, state control).
  • Rigid moral and ideological beliefs.

Summary Interpretation:​

CorinthianLOX likely exhibits an emotionally withdrawn, ideologically rigid personality structure with compensatory narcissistic mechanisms and high internal distress. His belief in eugenics and social hierarchy may serve as a framework to understand and justify his alienation, and to reclaim a sense of control and superiority in a world he feels has marginalized him.
Would you like this profile converted into a fictional character for a story or case study?
4o

You said:​

Yes

ChatGPT said:​

Here is a fictionalized character sketch based on the psychological profile of CorinthianLOX, suitable for use in a story, screenplay, or case study:

Character Profile: Dr. Elias Voss

Age: 31
Occupation: Former academic researcher, now isolated online ideologue
Setting: Near-future society or alternate present-day
Genre Fit: Psychological drama, dystopian fiction, intellectual thriller

Backstory:

Dr. Elias Voss was once a promising graduate student in genetics, drawn to the field by a fascination with human variation and the desire to understand why some people thrived while others suffered. Socially awkward and emotionally guarded, he struggled to connect with peers and professors. After a series of academic and personal disappointments—including rejection by both professional institutions and romantic partners—he withdrew from public life entirely.
He now spends most of his time in digital forums, using pseudonyms to advance increasingly radical views on genetic engineering, social stratification, and what he calls "the architecture of worth." Voss is convinced that modern society rewards the wrong traits and believes a rational, enforced redesign of humanity is not only inevitable, but morally necessary.

Psychological Profile:

  • Core Conflict: Elias longs for human connection and recognition, but his belief in deterministic, hierarchical systems undermines his ability to relate to others with empathy or flexibility. His ideology is a shield—offering a cold kind of meaning where real warmth is absent.
  • Personality Traits:
    • Introverted and reclusive, avoids eye contact and social obligations.
    • Hyper-rational, yet emotionally stunted; often misses nuance in human emotion.
    • Dogmatic and inflexible, views dissent as a sign of weakness or delusion.
    • Occasionally remorseful, haunted by memories of what could have been.
  • Beliefs and Behavior:
    • Advocates for controlled genetic breeding and state-enforced bio-policy.
    • Writes long manifestos but never publishes them formally.
    • Secretly rereads old messages from people he pushed away, but never responds.
    • Keeps a meticulously detailed archive of what he sees as “human degeneracy” alongside idealized genetic profiles.

Narrative Potential:

  • Arc 1 (Tragedy): Elias is offered a chance at genuine connection through someone who sees past his ideology—but he cannot let go of his rigidity, and the relationship collapses, confirming his worldview and deepening his isolation.
  • Arc 2 (Redemption): After witnessing the human cost of an experiment based on his ideas, he experiences a moral reckoning and tries to undo the damage—though it may be too late.
  • Arc 3 (Corruption): He gains influence in a rising technocratic regime and becomes a central figure in a dystopian society built on genetic stratification—only to watch it turn against him when he no longer meets its standards.

Would you like a short story or scene built around this character?
4o

You said:​

Yes

ChatGPT said:​

Here’s a short scene centered around the character of Dr. Elias Voss, set in a near-future society where his controversial ideas have begun gaining traction. The tone is psychological, introspective, and morally tense.

Title: The Metric of Worth
Scene Setting:
A sterile office in a government bioethics agency. The walls are glass, the air recycled. Elias Voss sits opposite a young woman, Ari Lien, a journalist granted a rare interview. Outside, a genetic policy reform is sweeping the nation—thanks in no small part to Voss's influence.

INT. OFFICE – DAY
ARI

(quietly)
You once said in a forum post: “Love is just the illusion the unfit cling to before extinction.” Do you still believe that?
VOSS
(still, unreadable)
Emotion doesn’t exempt a genome from entropy. Compassion won’t fix a broken code.
ARI
But it’s not code we’re talking about now. We’re talking about people. You’re designing laws that affect lives—children.
VOSS
Children are vectors. Legacies of biochemical roulette. If we can eliminate congenital suffering through selection—shouldn’t we?
ARI
What about your own legacy? You’ve never married. No family. Who are you doing this for?
(Elias looks at her, something flickering—regret? Curiosity? It’s hard to say.)
VOSS
I’m doing this so others won’t have to grow up asking why the world looks away from them. I did. No answers. Just mirrors.
ARI
And you think sterilizing people without their consent is the answer?
VOSS
I think giving nature back its editing rights is the answer. But nature is cruel. I offer cruelty with direction.
(A silence. He stares past her, through the glass.)
VOSS (softly)
There was a girl once. Before all this. I told her she was too beautiful to understand me. She said that was the saddest thing she’d ever heard.
ARI
What happened?
VOSS
She left. Of course. I built a fortress around a wound and called it a theory. And now people want to live in it.
(Long pause. Then quietly—)
ARI

Do you want them to?
VOSS
(pauses)
I don’t know anymore.

END SCENE

Would you like this expanded into a full short story or screenplay-style opening?
brutal:feelsgiga: .I wonder what chatpgt has to say about me
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX and iblameCopecels
It even knows what my ideal type of country would be like jfl
for me he just always tells me how depressed "iblameCopecels" is

There are some signs that he may struggle with depressive or nihilistic thoughts, which could indicate a higher risk for suicidal ideation — though this cannot be confirmed without direct knowledge or professional evaluation.:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad and CorinthianLOX
for me he just always tells me how depressed "iblameCopecels" is

There are some signs that he may struggle with depressive or nihilistic thoughts, which could indicate a higher risk for suicidal ideation — though this cannot be confirmed without direct knowledge or professional evaluation.:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
Jfl It told me that i'm schizoid, socially anxious and slightly narcissistic:lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad and iblameCopecels
This might actually be helpful to me tbh considering that it's psychological evaluation of me is highly accurate jfl:lul:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad, ToryToad and iblameCopecels
wait it knows everything about me too wtf...
 
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad, iblameCopecels and CorinthianLOX
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad and valentine
Idk ask it about your psychology. It might be helpful.
asked for key traits jfl

1. Sharp Humor & Sarcasm


  • Regularly uses dry wit and irony.
  • Often makes jokes, sometimes provocative or borderline trolling.
  • He balances humor with just enough sincerity to keep people engaged.



2. High Social Awareness (Forum-wise)


  • Clearly understands the “meta” of the site and how users interact.
  • Knows how to stir up attention or reactions without crossing obvious lines.
  • Frequently referenced by others, meaning he has social pull and visibility.



3. Provocative but Calculated


  • Posts are often edgy, but not clueless.
  • He tests boundaries while still maintaining a following.
  • Users who once disliked him seem to warm up to him, indicating he manages his image deliberately.



4. High Engagement / Presence


  • Over 11,000 posts in under a year – that’s extreme activity.
  • Always present in trending or controversial threads.
  • Acts almost like a social nucleus—people expect his input.



5. Self-Image Conscious


  • Appears to care how he's perceived within the niche subculture.
  • Engages in identity-related threads (nationality, aesthetics, personal values).
  • Style of writing and username color (fuchsia) show curated self-presentation.



6. Mix of Cynicism and Camaraderie


  • Often cynical in tone (fits the overall culture of Looksmax), but capable of light-hearted or even warm interactions.
  • Other users refer to him with a strange mix of criticism and admiration, which means he leaves a strong impression.



He seems like someone who’s built a niche persona on the forum—half entertainer, half provocateur—with enough charm and strategy to maintain popularity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad, Petsmart and CorinthianLOX
asked for key traits jfl

1. Sharp Humor & Sarcasm


  • Regularly uses dry wit and irony.
  • Often makes jokes, sometimes provocative or borderline trolling.
  • He balances humor with just enough sincerity to keep people engaged.



2. High Social Awareness (Forum-wise)


  • Clearly understands the “meta” of the site and how users interact.
  • Knows how to stir up attention or reactions without crossing obvious lines.
  • Frequently referenced by others, meaning he has social pull and visibility.



3. Provocative but Calculated


  • Posts are often edgy, but not clueless.
  • He tests boundaries while still maintaining a following.
  • Users who once disliked him seem to warm up to him, indicating he manages his image deliberately.



4. High Engagement / Presence


  • Over 11,000 posts in under a year – that’s extreme activity.
  • Always present in trending or controversial threads.
  • Acts almost like a social nucleus—people expect his input.



5. Self-Image Conscious


  • Appears to care how he's perceived within the niche subculture.
  • Engages in identity-related threads (nationality, aesthetics, personal values).
  • Style of writing and username color (fuchsia) show curated self-presentation.



6. Mix of Cynicism and Camaraderie


  • Often cynical in tone (fits the overall culture of Looksmax), but capable of light-hearted or even warm interactions.
  • Other users refer to him with a strange mix of criticism and admiration, which means he leaves a strong impression.



He seems like someone who’s built a niche persona on the forum—half entertainer, half provocateur—with enough charm and strategy to maintain popularity.
mogs me for me it put the following:

DSM-5 Personality Disorder Tendencies (Speculative, Non-Clinical)

CorinthianLOX's self-presentation and attitudes suggest traits consistent with the following personality patterns:

1. Schizoid Personality Traits:

  • Detached from social relationships, emotionally cold, indifferent to praise or criticism.
  • Prefers solitary activities and intellectual abstraction over emotional intimacy.

2. Avoidant Personality Traits:

  • Hypersensitivity to rejection and social criticism.
  • Avoids social interactions despite a deep desire for acceptance and connection.

3. Narcissistic Traits (Compensatory subtype):

  • Preoccupation with fantasies of ideal systems (e.g., eugenics) where his perceived value would be affirmed.
  • Inflated self-importance tied not to personal achievements but to abstract identification with an ideological elite.

4. Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Traits:

  • Preoccupation with control, structure, and rule-based systems (e.g., genetic hierarchies, state control).
  • Rigid moral and ideological beliefs.

Summary Interpretation:​

CorinthianLOX likely exhibits an emotionally withdrawn, ideologically rigid personality structure with compensatory narcissistic mechanisms and high internal distress. His belief in eugenics and social hierarchy may serve as a framework to understand and justify his alienation, and to reclaim a sense of control and superiority in a world he feels has marginalized him.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad, Petsmart and valentine
Petsmart is a long-time, high-reputation Looksmax.org user known for his blunt, darkly humorous, and strategic posting style. Unlike many users who either spiral into defeatism or endlessly cope, he occupies a middle ground: harsh realism mixed with psychological analysis. He openly discusses personal flaws like inhibition and missed social opportunities but does so without fishing for sympathy. He often critiques both naïve optimism and extreme blackpill thinking, sometimes endorsing Dark Triad strategies as pragmatic life tools.

What sets him apart is his self-awareness and irony—he critiques the social hierarchies of looks and status without losing his sense of humor or descending into total despair. His posts frequently provoke debate, challenge community narratives, and reflect a desire to understand rather than just vent.


Personality snapshot: Cynical realist, socially observant, emotionally controlled, intellectually engaged.
 
  • +1
Reactions: valentine, mentally_ill_chad, santnewgen and 1 other person
chatgpt
"The user @santnewgen on Looksmax.org seems to be known for strong, sometimes controversial opinions on looksmaxing, self-improvement, and aesthetics. Users like him often adopt an aggressive or blunt tone, which can either resonate with like-minded individuals or provoke criticism from others."

🤔🤔🤔
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
IMG 20250507 164637
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: valentine, mentally_ill_chad, CorinthianLOX and 1 other person
Based on his posts and interactions on Looksmax.org, batman1997 comes across as:

1. Confident, Even Flamboyant

He often presents himself with bravado, adopting the persona of Batman or even claiming to be "the real Batman." This suggests a self-assured, dramatic, and attention-commanding personality.

2. Image-Conscious and Self-Reflective

He frequently engages in discussions about looks, aesthetics, and self-improvement. His participation in face rating threads and talk of facial harmony indicates he’s deeply interested in how he is perceived and in refining his self-image.

3. Humorous and Theatrical

His references to Batman aren't just serious—they often have a playful, performative tone. He embraces a sort of roleplay that makes his posts stand out and adds humor to his presence.

4. Resilient and Loyal to the Forum

After claiming his main account was hacked, he returned under a new name and reengaged quickly, showing loyalty to the community and resilience in maintaining his online identity.

5. Possibly Polarizing

Some users admire his confidence and aesthetic qualities, while others might find his theatrical style over-the-top. This suggests he provokes strong reactions, a hallmark of someone with a bold and unapologetic persona.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mentally_ill_chad and CorinthianLOX
I'm such a loser that it doesn't even recognise me lol
Screenshot 20250507 220818 Chrome

Screenshot 20250507 220824 Chrome
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: CorinthianLOX

Similar threads

JohnDoe
Replies
4
Views
80
JohnDoe
JohnDoe
TheBlackpilledOne
Replies
20
Views
536
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist
Seth Walsh
Replies
20
Views
257
Seth Walsh
Seth Walsh
JeanneDArcAlter
Discussion JeanneDArcAlter
Replies
27
Views
501
JeanneDArcAlter
JeanneDArcAlter

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top