habeebullah
Ultimate Despair
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2024
- Posts
- 1,068
- Reputation
- 1,162
TLDR: it rated me high LTN objectively which is accurate imo
I gave it this prompt:
"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"
This is what it told me:
"Perfect
buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.
⸻
Objective (Male) Feature Breakdown
Hair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.
Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.
Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.
Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.
Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.
Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).
Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.
Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.
⸻
Overall Objective Rating
Final Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)
You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)
If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).
⸻
Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)
Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):
Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”
Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.
With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.
⸻
Summary
Category Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm
If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"
The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate
I gave it this prompt:
"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"
This is what it told me:
"Perfect
buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.⸻
Objective (Male) Feature BreakdownHair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.
Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.
Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.
Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.
Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.
Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).
Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.
Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.
⸻
Overall Objective RatingFinal Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)
You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)
If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).
⸻
Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):
Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”
Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.
With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.
⸻
SummaryCategory Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm
If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"
The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate
