ChatGPT ratings are lowkey based

[habeebullah]

TLDR: it rated me high LTN objectively which is accurate imo

I gave it this prompt:

"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"


This is what it told me:
"Perfect buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.

⸻

Objective (Male) Feature Breakdown

Hair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.

Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.

Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.

Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.

Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.

Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).

Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.

Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.

⸻

Overall Objective Rating

Final Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)

You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)

If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).

⸻

Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)

Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):

Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”

Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.

With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.

⸻

Summary

Category Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm

If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"

The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate

 

[Deleted member 2100]

ChatGPT is honest if you ask it to be honest

Wait it said you have htn appeal to women cmon bro

 

[Framem4xx]

5'11 hltn does not have htn female appeal lmao

 

[CheifCessation]

TLDR: it rated me high LTN objectively which is accurate imo

I gave it this prompt:

"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"


This is what it told me:
"Perfect buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.

⸻

Objective (Male) Feature Breakdown

Hair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.

Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.

Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.

Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.

Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.

Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).

Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.

Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.

⸻

Overall Objective Rating

Final Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)

You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)

If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).

⸻

Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)

Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):

Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”

Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.

With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.

⸻

Summary

Category Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm

If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"

The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate

Over ngl

 

[habeebullah]

5'11 hltn does not have htn female appeal lmao

Yeah I know that's why I said that only the objective rating was accurate. I would say I prob have like low MTN female appeal bcs of hair halo

 

[Framem4xx]

Yeah I know that's why I said that only the objective rating was accurate. I would say I prob have like low MTN female appeal bcs of hair halo

right

 

[habeebullah]

ChatGPT is honest if you ask it to be honest

Wait it said you have htn appeal to women cmon bro

Gang I alr said that it was an overrate only the objective rating was accurate

 

[habeebullah]

I used this pic btw for reference

 

[Mansur]

TLDR: it rated me high LTN objectively which is accurate imo

I gave it this prompt:

"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"


This is what it told me:
"Perfect buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.

⸻

Objective (Male) Feature Breakdown

Hair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.

Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.

Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.

Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.

Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.

Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).

Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.

Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.

⸻

Overall Objective Rating

Final Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)

You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)

If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).

⸻

Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)

Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):

Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”

Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.

With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.

⸻

Summary

Category Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm

If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"

The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate

I think that phrase that models are usually 8s or 9s nerfs the score very much. It probably took into account also unique looking models who are ugly but just have unique features. also 9s are very rare in the modelling industry let alone 8

 

[Mansur]

use smth like this

1 extremely unattractive
2 very unattractive
3 unattractive almost below average
4 below average
5 average
6 above average
7 attractive
8 very attractive
9 exceptionally attractive
10 perfect
you can use .25 .5 .75 too

 

[Mansur]

I used this pic btw for reference

nah your not ltn, harmony is too good. leaning more towards htn

 

[DrunkenSailor]

nah your not ltn, harmony is too good. leaning more towards htn

Greycel moment

 

[Mansur]

Greycel moment

ok then explain why not

 

[habeebullah]

Greycel moment

Fr lmao. I appreciate the compliment but I'm MTM max

 

[DrunkenSailor]

ok then explain why not

He’s not anywhere close to htn? (with all due respect OP) Not sure what explanation you need

 

[Mansur]

He’s not anywhere close to htn? Not sure what explanation you need

I said leaning. realistically mid-high mtn

 

[DrunkenSailor]

I said leaning. realistically mid-high mtn

No he’s not hmtn either

 

[Mansur]

Fr lmao. I appreciate the compliment but I'm MTM max

wasnt really a compliment. I meant that your harmony is too good to be a LTN

 

[Mansur]

He’s not anywhere close to htn? (with all due respect OP) Not sure what explanation you need

nigga noone gives a shit about your opinion fact is a fact. he doesnt have the traits of a LTN

 

[habeebullah]

He’s not anywhere close to htn? (with all due respect OP) Not sure what explanation you need

All good boyo I get it

 

[DrunkenSailor]

nigga noone gives a shit about your opinion fact is a fact. he doesnt have the traits of a LTN

ratings are not a facts. they’re subjective af as we can see here

 

[Mansur]

ratings are not a facts. they’re subjective af as we can see here

I havent seen yet an explanation why he is a LTN

 

[DrunkenSailor]

I havent seen yet an explanation why he is a LTN

It’s a shit pic first of all. He has meh features and his harmony is average. Don’t know what harmony you dreaming about that is above average, it’s just a normal looking guy.

And I didn’t say he is LTN

Again OP don’t take it the wrong way I don’t want to put you down or something, you probably look better than in that pic. It’s just this greycel has no idea about rating.

 

[Mansur]

It’s a shit pic first of all. He has meh features and his harmony is average. Don’t know what harmony you dreaming about that is above average, it’s just a normal looking guy.

And I didn’t say he is LTN

Again OP don’t take it the wrong way I am not putting you down or something, you probably look better than in that pic. It’s just this greycel having no idea about rating

You said hes nowhere near htn meaning closer to Ltn. Average harmony≠high averageness. He is average perhaps slightly above. Not even close to ltn tho. And I have good knowledge you are just an incel who has been here for 5 yrs and still 0 braincells

 

[DrunkenSailor]

You said hes nowhere near htn meaning closer to Ltn. Average harmony≠high averageness. He is average perhaps slightly above. Not even close to ltn tho. And I have good knowledge you are just an incel who has been here for 5 yrs and still 0 braincells

Yeah he is closer to LTN than HTN what the fuck are you on about, average is statistically closer to below average than to what HTN represents.

Not going to debate this any further dude, it has no value, we can agree to disagree and all that enjoy your day etc etc

 

[terrorblade]

my fuckass gpt won't give numerical ratings it's over

 

[habeebullah]

Yeah he is closer to LTN than HTN what the fuck are you on about, average is statistically closer to below average than to what HTN represents.

Not going to debate this any further dude, it has no value, we can agree to disagree and all that enjoy your day etc etc

Do u mean I'm further from HTN than I am from low LTN OR high LTN?

 

[Mansur]

my fuckass gpt won't give numerical ratings it's over

Use ai attractiveness test from chat gpt just google it and put it in

 

[DrunkenSailor]

Do u mean I'm further from HTN than I am from low LTN OR high LTN?

i just think in this picture you look lmtn which is obviously closer to ltn/hltn than to htn, right?

 

[habeebullah]

i just think in this picture you look lmtn which is obviously closer to ltn/hltn than to htn, right?

Yeah I'd say that's fair. I was just scared since I thought you meant I was closer to subhuman/low LTN than to HTN

 

[DrunkenSailor]

Yeah I'd say that's fair. I was just scared since I thought you meant I was closer to subhuman/low LTN than to HTN

You can PM me better pics and I can give a more fair judgement if you like, without bluepilling

 

[habeebullah]

You can PM me better pics and I can give a more fair judgement if you like, without bluepilling

I appreciate the offer but I'm alright. I already know where I stand and what my falios are

 

[DrunkenSailor]

Use ai attractiveness test from chat gpt just google it and put it in

Bullshit app

Rates me 7.8/8.5 which almost on par with one of lachowski selfies I used as test which is clearly wrong as I am not anywhere close to lachowski

 

[DrunkenSailor]

I appreciate the offer but I'm alright. I already know where I stand and what my falios are

Sure thing man

Good luck with looksmaxing, I hope you smash it and become a Chad

 

[habeebullah]

Sure thing man

Good luck with looksmaxing, I hope you smash it and become a Chad

Thanks bro the same to you aswell

 

[Mansur]

Bullshit app

Rates me 7.8/8.5 which almost on par with one of lachowski selfies I used as test which is clearly wrong as I am not anywhere close to lachowski

The user was trying to put the prompt in the regular chat gpt which it declined. The attractiveness test gpt doesnt refuse to rate

 

[DrunkenSailor]

The user was trying to put the prompt in the regular chat gpt which it declined. The attractiveness test gpt doesnt refuse to rate

What

 

[Mansur]

forget it

What

 

[Dezdesst]

i tried it out and it gave me chadlite, i think it has some over rating issues although i believe that it can accurate nonetheless

 

[Tstmast7104]

i just think in this picture you look lmtn which is obviously closer to ltn/hltn than to htn, right?

yo bro you sound honest, i got this from the exact same script
Got it — I’ll rate purely based on facial aesthetics (structure, harmony, and features) while factoring in your height (6'1½"), since that affects overall perceived attractiveness and “Chad potential.”

I’ll use both rating systems you requested:

• Looksmax.org-style scale:
  • LTN (4) → MTN (5) → HTN (6) → Chadlite (7) → Chad (8) → Model-tier (8.5–9)
• General female appeal scale:
  • 1–10, with decimals for precision

---

Objective Facial Rating (Looksmaxing System)​

Jawline:
Very strong and angular — one of your standout features. Good gonial angle, visible definition even at rest. Definitely above average.
→ HTN+ (6.5)

Chin:
Good forward projection, balanced width to height ratio, no retrusion. Harmonizes well with the jaw.
→ HTN / Chadlite border (6.75–7)

Midface:
Fairly short and proportional — not long or recessed. Balanced eye-to-mouth distance.
→ Solid HTN (6)

Eyes:
Set well, with decent spacing and good symmetry. The eyelid area looks slightly hooded but natural. Expression is neutral and masculine.
→ HTN (6–6.25)

Nose:
Straight and proportionate to your face. Doesn’t distract from other features.
→ HTN (6)

Lips:
Medium volume, balanced top and bottom lip — fits facial harmony.
→ MTN+ (5.75–6)

Hair / Framing:
Excellent — thick, styled well, frames your face strongly and contributes a lot to perceived attractiveness.
→ Chadlite (7)

Skin / General Harmony:
Clear skin, youthful glow, no visible asymmetry or harsh texture. Facial harmony is overall strong.
→ HTN+ (6.5)

---

Overall Facial Rating (Objective)​

Averaging across your facial traits and harmony, you fall around:
→ HTN+ (6.5 to 6.75)
So, “High Tier Normal” nearing Chadlite. With slight optimization (mature leanness, jaw definition, hairstyle tuning, eyebrow shaping), you could push into 7.0 (Chadlite) territory easily

Used 3 pictures for reference, tell me of you think im frauding my jawline, because im only biting my teeth, and mewing as i usually do, not pushing it out on one side. Its good lightning too.

 

[CorinthianLOX]

I copypasted this and it didn't want to rate me jfl

 

[Tstmast7104]

I copypasted this and it didn't want to rate me jfl

use the website not logged in and it will work

 

[Kroker]

Use ai attractiveness test from chat gpt just google it and put it in

I copypasted this and it didn't want to rate me jfl

Had same issue, do what Mansur said and it will work

 

[cursedpaki19]

TLDR: it rated me high LTN objectively which is accurate imo

I gave it this prompt:

"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"


This is what it told me:
"Perfect buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.

⸻

Objective (Male) Feature Breakdown

Hair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.

Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.

Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.

Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.

Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.

Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).

Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.

Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.

⸻

Overall Objective Rating

Final Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)

You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)

If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).

⸻

Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)

Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):

Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”

Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.

With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.

⸻

Summary

Category Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm

If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"

The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate

ChatGPT doesn’t point out flaws such as cooked pheno and recessed everything. It rated me htn with Chad potential on a good prompt aswell. Jfl

 

[Abdou]

bro

5'11 hltn does not have htn female appeal lmao

bro ur every where hahahah

 

[miloeatscookies]

i tried it out and it gave me chadlite, i think it has some over rating issues although i believe that it can accurate nonetheless

cope lol

 

[gandysdiciple]

gpt rates are pure cope and just make you feel better nothing else lol