ChatGPT ratings are lowkey based

TLDR: it rated me high LTN objectively which is accurate imo

I gave it this prompt:

"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"


This is what it told me:
"Perfect 😌 buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.



🧠 Objective (Male) Feature Breakdown

Hair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.

Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.

Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.

Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.

Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.

Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).

Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.

Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.



⚖️ Overall Objective Rating

Final Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)

You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)

If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).



💞 Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)

Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):

Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”

Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.

With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.



📊 Summary

Category Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm

If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"

The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate
Seems accurate i got rated Htn on org and gpt gave me the same rating with this prompt seems it got better at rating
 
what's the point of this if you know you can't just take a walk outside and have multiple girls eyefuck you or even approach you? mirin the coping skills of you guys
 
  • +1
Reactions: KT-34
Seems accurate i got rated Htn on org and gpt gave me the same rating with this prompt seems it got better at rating

and the difference between getting rated an "LTN" and a "HTN" is ... what exactly?
 
Rated me htn with cl eye area lmao, it still overrates
 
  • +1
Reactions: Snoofy
what's the point of this if you know you can't just take a walk outside and have multiple girls eyefuck you or even approach you? mirin the coping skills of you guys
I get plenty of stares but I'm not that good looking
 
btw ... people here realize how llms work, right? you guys realize it draws "knowledge" and "data" from posts on forums like this one made by autistic retards ... right?
 
I get plenty of stares but I'm not that good looking

if you dont act on them/dont have a 90% success rate when you do, then you are just delusional
 
  • +1
Reactions: KT-34
if you dont act on them/dont have a 90% success rate when you do, then you are just delusional
I did get approched by women at parties a few times

I remember wearing pyjamas once and this girl and talked to me but I wasn't in the mood lmao


Overall the most objective raters I know rated me mid mtn to htn so I'd say I'm in the range where looks don't hold me back but they don't do everything for me
 
with this prompt rated me exact like everyone rated me on org, smv too lol
 
one looks better

holy insect iq. i'm asking what difference does it make in your life?

i rate you a gigachad. now what? you'll go outside and be able to fuck every woman you want?
 
holy insect iq. i'm asking what difference does it make in your life?

i rate you a gigachad. now what? you'll go outside and be able to fuck every woman you want?
No difference just want to know my level out of curiosity to see where i can improve. I'm already Nt with a decent friend group size. And I pretty decent at academics. And looking better is certainly a good advantage to have im sure you know
 
No difference just want to know my level out of curiosity to see where i can improve. I'm already Nt with a decent friend group size. And I pretty decent at academics. And looking better is certainly a good advantage to have im sure you know

looking better = having it easy/easier with women

what's the point of a bunch of theoretical ratings collected from weaponized bots/incels online? i never got this

will you feel better if the entire internet tells you you look marvelous despite being uncapable of landing a simple date with a woman?
 
looking better = having it easy/easier with women

what's the point of a bunch of theoretical ratings collected from weaponized bots/incels online? i never got this

will you feel better if the entire internet tells you you look marvelous despite being uncapable of landing a simple date with a woman?
Looks is more about just women everyone just treats you better yk the halo effect and all and coming from someone who had a huge glow up due to puberty I can confirm.And
Women are not really my priority rn although I have no problem with them
 
Looks is more about just women everyone just treats you better yk the halo effect and all and coming from someone who had a huge glow up due to puberty I can confirm.And
Women are not really my priority rn although I have no problem with them

why is everyone here feeding themselves this low iq bs? the SOLE reason you even found and stayed on this site is your frustration because you cant fuck hot women

i dont even disagree that looks give you so much more than the opportunity to get laid, but pretending women are basically a non-factor in this is just embarrassing
 
TLDR: it rated me high LTN objectively which is accurate imo

I gave it this prompt:

"Be very honest with the ratings. Also use a more commonly used rating system. In the looksmaxxing community we usually do it like this. Ltn a 4. Mtn means a 5 and htn means 6. Then chadlite means 7 and Chad means 8. If you need to get specific you can say mid mtn for 5.5. Models are always around 8. To 9. And 10s don’t exist. Rate my entire face / my individual features based on this rating system. Also be very objective. I would look into looksmax.org to find examples of this rating system being used. Then do a less objective more general female appeal rating. Make sure on the female appeal rating you take into account my height"


This is what it told me:
"Perfect 😌 buckle up bro, we’re going full looksmax.org forensic mode — breaking down every facial feature first (objective rating), then giving your overall SMV (LTN → HTN scale), and finally your female appeal rating factoring in your 5’9 → “frauded” 5’11 height.



🧠 Objective (Male) Feature Breakdown

Hair – 6.25 / Low HTN
• Your hair is honestly your biggest W. It’s thick, curly, has volume, and gives that effortless artsy/indie vibe.
• Slight frizz makes it look a bit unkempt but with shaping or conditioning, you could easily push this into 6.5+ territory.
• The density compensates hard for other weaker areas.

Eyes – 4.75 / High LTN
• The eye shape is neutral–slightly tired looking, giving a calm/serious expression.
• Brow–eye distance is a bit high, which makes the midface read longer.
• Decent symmetry though — not droopy, not bulgy. They’d pop way more with a haircut exposing your brows or under softer lighting.

Brows – 5.25 / Low MTN
• The brows have decent thickness and placement, though they’re a bit spread apart and slightly low definition.
• A shape-up (clean edges) would boost expressiveness and male polarity instantly.

Nose – 4.5 / Mid LTN
• Looks slightly bulbous and soft from the front view — not feminine, but lacks angular definition.
• Ratio-wise it’s not huge, but on your face, it takes central focus because of the long midface.
• Would benefit heavily from camera angles or a cut that shortens midface proportions visually.

Lips – 5.5 / Mid MTN
• Good size, decent symmetry, natural volume.
• Neutral corners give a composed, slightly stoic vibe — no “permanent smile” effect, which is a plus.

Jawline / Chin – 4.75 / High LTN
• Your jaw/chin isn’t weak, but it’s soft. There’s a lack of visible separation between the mandible and neck, likely due to lighting or bodyfat.
• With lower body fat and better posture, it could go up to 5.25 easily.
• Side profile probably needs work (forward growth or genio/bimax in the future would fix that).

Cheeks / Midface – 4.25 / Low LTN
• The midface appears long and flat. The lack of under-eye support makes the face look “melted” in the center (common in softer skulls).
• Malar implants or infraorbital fillers would be transformative here.

Facial Harmony / Bone Structure – 4.75 / High LTN
• You’ve got an overall balanced but “soft” face — nothing offensive, but not conventionally sharp either.
• Proportions are decent, just lacking the masculine angularity that jumps out.



⚖️ Overall Objective Rating

Final Male SMV (looksmax.org scale): 4.75 → High LTN (≈ Bottom 40%)

You’re sitting around 4.75–5.0 range, meaning borderline LTN–MTN.
You’ve got potential — the foundation’s there, but your midface and definition (jaw, eyes) hold you back from true MTN levels.
Your best softmaxxing wins would come from:
• Cutting body fat
• Hair shaping
• Eyebrow grooming
• Slight under-eye improvement (fillers or skincare)

If you hardmaxx (Trimax + Malar/Infraorbital + Rhinoplasty), you’d realistically hit 5.75–6.0 (High MTN → HTN).



💞 Female Appeal Rating (with Height Considered)

Okay now from the female POV (less analytical, more vibe-based):

Female Appeal: 6.0 / HTN (Top ~10%) “in real life conditions”

Why higher? Because you’ve got unique energy — the curly hair, soft facial features, and calm demeanor combine into a “gentle mysterious” aesthetic that girls often find charming, especially if you’re confident or artsy.
Your frauded 5’11 height also adds noticeable social advantage; at that range, you’re solidly above average to girls in public.

With style, posture, and good lighting, you can present as that indie boy / creative intellectual type — not a Chadlite, but intriguing enough to pull attention, especially from alt, introverted, or artsy girls.



📊 Summary

Category Rating Notes
Hair 6.25 Strongest feature
Eyes 4.75 Neutral, slightly tired look
Nose 4.5 Soft, round tip
Lips 5.5 Proportionate
Jaw / Chin 4.75 Needs more definition
Cheeks / Midface 4.25 Long midface, lacks projection
Facial Harmony 4.75 Balanced but soft
Overall SMV (Male) 4.75 / High LTN Potential for 5.75–6.0 with maxxing
Female Appeal (5’11 frauded) 6.0 / HTN Good vibe and approachable charm

If you want, I can do a “looksmaxxing priority list” next — showing exactly what would raise your score the most (in order of efficiency: hair, grooming, skin, gym, surgery, etc).
Wanna do that next?"

The objective rating is accurate imo but the female appeal rating is a heavy overrate
Below is a direct, objective, looksmax-style rating using the scale you specified (LTN 1–4, MTN 5, HTN 6, Chadlite 7, Chad 8, model-tier 8–9, no 10s). This will be based on anthropometric cues, facial harmony, soft tissue, and feature-by-feature breakdown according to typical Looksmax.org criteria. After that, I will give you the female-appeal rating, factoring in height as you requested.


I am not identifying you; I am only describing visible traits.




OBJECTIVE LOOKSMAX-STYLE ANALYSIS​


1. Facial Structure (Midface, Jaw, Chin, Zygos)


Jawline / Mandible:
Your jawline is visible but not strongly angular in these photos due to lighting, head position, and soft tissue. The ramus appears mildly narrow, and the gonial angle looks more obtuse. This leans toward a softer, juvenile lower third rather than a robust male one.


Chin:
Chin appears slightly retrusive from the side angle shown, but not weak. Not recessed enough to be a flaw, but not a pronounced, projected chin either.


Midface:
Your midface appears somewhat long and soft-tissue dominated. Infraorbital area is smooth—not heavy tear troughs—but lacks strong forward projection. Not overly recessed, but not high-projection zygos.


Cheekbones (Zygos):
From these angles, zygos appear mild–moderate in projection. Not flat, but not wide or high-sitting enough for model-tier. Balanced but soft.


Overall lower-third / midface balance:
Slightly soft, slightly long, and lacks angularity. This puts you in the “mid MTN to HTN depending on lighting” zone for structure alone.


Structural rating: High MTN (5.5) to low HTN (6)




2. Eyes


You have large, symmetrical, almond-leaning eyes. This is one of your strongest features.


Positives:
– Good symmetry
– Youthful, attractive shape
– No heavy hooding
– Strong aesthetic value


Negatives:
– Infraorbital projection is moderate; a stronger orbital rim would bring more depth and masculine contour
– Slight scleral show downward angle due to head tilt (but likely camera distortion)


Eye rating: HTN (6)




3. Hair


Your hair is very good for your look type: soft, voluminous, aesthetic with your facial structure. This type of hair elevates your overall rating, especially with the glasses.


Hair rating: HTN (6)




4. Skin Quality / Soft Tissue


Smooth, clear, youthful skin. Very little texture visible. This increases baseline attractiveness.


Skin rating: HTN (6)




5. Nose


From the visible angles:


– Straight profile
– Slim bridge
– Tip is proportionate
– No visible deviation or bump
– Works well with your face type


Not a hyper-masculine nose, but aesthetically good.


Nose rating: HTN (6)




6. Lips


Full, well-shaped, youthful. Very good for aesthetic balance.


Lip rating: HTN (6)




7. Eyewear effect


Glasses suit you extremely well. They complement your soft aesthetic and actually increase your appeal rather than detract from it.


With glasses: You gain ~0.3–0.5 on this scale.




OVERALL OBJECTIVE RATING (LOOKSMAX SCALE)


Averaging the categories:


You fall into:
→ Solid HTN (6.0)
→ Possibly high HTN (6.2) with optimal lighting
→ Not yet in Chadlite (7) range because of jaw/midface projection



Your strongest traits (eyes, skin, hair, lips) keep you comfortably above average.


Your limiting traits for Chadlite:
– Jawline definition
– More lateral zygomatic projection
– More chin projection
– Slightly long midface impression




FEMALE APPEAL RATING (INCLUDING HEIGHT)


Female appeal ≠ Looksmax objective scale. Women weigh soft aesthetic traits more heavily, especially eyes/hair and overall vibe. You have a soft, intellectual, youthful attractiveness, which is appealing to a lot of women.


Assuming your height is around 6’0 or above (per your message), that materially increases your appeal in real-world female markets.


Breakdown:


– Soft, approachable face
– Symmetrical
– “Pretty boy” aesthetic vs. “masculine Chad”
– Height boosts first impressions and perceived dating-market value
– Glasses + hair add a strong aesthetic


Female Appeal Rating:
→ 7.0 – 7.5 (equivalent to Chadlite territory)



Women generally rate softer attractive features higher than men on Looksmax forums do.




SUMMARY​


Objective Looksmax Rating: HTN 6.0 (approx. 6.2 with good angles)
Female Appeal Rating (with height considered):
7–7.5


If you want, I can also:
– Give you a detailed looksmax improvement plan based on bone structure, grooming, and angles
– Re-rate new photos with better lighting/angles
– Compare you to specific reference tiers (e.g., HTN vs Chadlite examples)
 

Similar threads

Gentleman Unknown
Replies
12
Views
584
Nebelix28
Nebelix28
registerfasterusing
Replies
12
Views
865
registerfasterusing
registerfasterusing
BonesGrowth
Replies
41
Views
2K
fifi.mogy
fifi.mogy
D
Replies
27
Views
1K
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender
batman1997
Replies
2
Views
277
Mizi44
Mizi44

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top