I bet your some skinny little bitch I’d prob fuck you up Twinkie all you have is height but I have muscle mass and a great body cry for me I’m considered above avg and tall in most countries excluding cumskin nations where everybody’s a lanklet like you. I also mogg you facially cos your an ugly little birch
manlet squirm, fingers going fast because someone dismissed your height. I'm 225lbs I'm not skinny at all, I'm a trained kickboxer I have muscle and fat
im puttin you on my ignore
im not a mentalcel im nt, clearly youre notB
im puttin you on my ignore
Jk I could care less the fact your on here despite those stats (I heavily doubt) proves that your a mental fuck up joker faggot
Press x for doubt
im depressed
Ding ding ding I fucking knew it you had an issue. Now brother, instead it being mean and mogging others show some courtesy to others, your depressed would you like it if I locked you for this?
Tell jesus to drop me 8 bags real quik then i wont be depressed
He will give you something much greater, if you speak to him and accept him you’ll get something that makes 8 bags look shit in comparison. Go ahead try it brother
Nah I like my money gonna stick to that
Why dumbass?
I dismissed your reply because you were not replying in full sentences "then it's taller", what is "it" genius?
you need every little thing explained to you but I'm the stupid one, lmfao, use your brain for 2 seconds.
"than 5'10"
No retard, if you have to argue 5'9=6'0 due to perception than you've lost the argument. And if women think 5'9 is 6'0 than you can tell them 5'6 is 5'9. Which a lot of men already do.
except your premise is false or at the very least you haven't provided an argument for why foids would believe a 5'9 guy claiming 6 foot.
and that is also a red herring, has nothing to do with the goal post of the debate.
Why would they lie if women can tell the difference and would call them out on it? They can only tell usually if they're the same height or taller
Women being able to tell that a 6 foot guy is taller than a legit 5'9 guy or that a 5'9 guy wouldn't get away with claiming 6 foot to them does not mean that 6 foot would be considered tall, low iq take.
It isn't, I have to walk you through why your logic is flawed cause you're slow
just replied with a faithful premise as to why i am right about that and you are wrong about saying that i am wrong about saying it is a red ehrring.
But somehow the inverse is true right? Fuck outta here
Yes because for the 5th time as you grow taller the extra inches have diminishing returns in the sense that women are less likely to tell the difference, for example 6'4 vs 6'3 has a smaller difference than 5'10 vs 5'9 : )
How many women are 5'9 and up? Exactly, you're dumb
proof of relevance to the goal post?
I'm explaining to you, you wanna deflect when proven wrong. You deflected with "muh social perception" when I told you the difference between 5'9 and 6'0 is the same as 5'6 and 5'9. So if one isn't tall the other isn't short.
The difference between 6'0 and 5'9 is the same as 5'9 vs 5'6 in the aspect of inches, but don't forget that socially, women tend to exaggerate the good rather than the bad, the bad is invisible, meaning that it is much more of a failo to be 5'6 than it is of a halo to be 6'0, assuming that the average height is 5'9 of course, this has relevance to the goal post because you tried to claim that "if 6'0 is not tall then 5'6 is not short"
If women exaggerate the good and ignore the bad than 6'0 is tall, you disproved your own argument
by that logic because women exaggerate the good and ignore the bad then 5'10 is tallIf women exaggerate the good and ignore the bad than 6'0 is tall, you disproved your own argument
Hey, it's your logic, but 6'0 is an extra 2 more inches
My logic is that women exaggerate the good and ignore the bad, My logic isn't that now any height above the average is immediately tall, you're the one who proposed that 6'0 is so because women exaggerate it.
Note that I am not saying that women exaggerate the good more than they exaggerate the bad, under the premiss ( which is not my premise) it would be true that if I also said 5'6 short, then implicitly I'd be calling 6'0 tall, though instead I said that they exaggerate the good and ignore the bad.If women exaggerate the good and ignore the bad than 6'0 is tall, you disproved your own argument
Linear interpolation does not fully capture the nuance of cultural perceptions, you're the one proposing it perhaps that only gives me an idea of you to make an argument for it
Three comments in a row, that's how you know someone is coping. You keep contradicting yourself
I didn't contradict myself. You just contradicted yourself not long ago by misconstruing my premise as saying that women exaggerate the good more than they exaggerate the bad, which is not only what I had not said but the only premise that I could have possibly said to deduce logically that I think 6'0 is tall.
