Chess grandmaster takes iq test

Mouthbreath

Mouthbreath

Looksmaxer
Joined
Apr 25, 2020
Posts
10,787
Reputation
14,423
And gets a score of 102.




Does this now mean iq tests are meaningless or that being good at chess won't translate being smart at other stuff like mathematics?

Or probably he is just an outlier.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Insecure03, bugeye, JustBeCurry and 3 others
Half-Japanese, half-Indian....It's over for him anyway.
EUX4JgBX0AEeKHc.png
 
  • JFL
Reactions: CupOfCoffee, ShowerMaxxing, Deleted member 5145 and 9 others
  • +1
Reactions: MentalistKebab, curryslayerordeath, Marsiere214 and 4 others
This means that being good at chess has nothing to do with iq.
I did that same test and got 110.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ShowerMaxxing, Deleted member 7240 and Danish_Retard
This means that being good at chess has nothing to do with iq.
I did that same test and got 110.
if he is a grandmaster there must be correlation
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
Not gonna watch it but is that even a real iq test
 
Iq is just reciting the same patterns you've seen before, people who aren't observant of their environment will prob do worse. Doesn't mean their actual pattern recognition and stuff are bad for their field/specialization
 
  • +1
Reactions: Insecure03, Clark69, The Bleach Pill and 4 others
cuz chess is just algorithms. You don't need to be exceptionally intelligent to play chess.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incoming, ShowerMaxxing, Deleted member 9837 and 2 others
IQ means very little this is water
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9090
Lets be real he is high iq
 
cuz chess is just algorithms. You don't need to be exceptionally intelligent to play chess.
its like that cube with bricks i forgot whats it called. it has a couple of movements u need to follow and then its easy
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Mouthbreath
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: sorrowfulsad, bugeye, Deleted member 6273 and 1 other person
Not gonna watch it but is that even a real iq test
its called mensa norway, it looked kind of real to me

he really was struggling with the easy puzzles already.
 
Last edited:
Then why does he looks exactly like that Indian?
He doesn't. If anything he looks a typical Japanese guy.

His mom married an Indian dude twice? Lifefuel for currycels

He was born to an American mother and a Japanese father, Shuichi Nakamura but they divorced and the father moved back to Japan.
 
its like that cube with bricks i forgot whats it called. it has a couple of movements u need to follow and then its easy
no jfl

you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9837
He was born to an American mother and a Japanese father, Shuichi Nakamura but they divorced and the father moved back to Japan.
I think his mother cheated with an Indian, that's why they divorced.
 
IQ is such a shit way to measure intelligence tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9837
i took a mensa norway IQ test piss-drunk absolutely shitfaced and got 117

"iq" is pseudoscience bullshit because i am dumb as a box of rocks.
 
Thee magnus carlsen has an iq of .....190 ,so?
 
Stepfather. His biological parents divorced when he was a kid.
So his mom did not only marry a ricecel but after that also a currycel. Lifefuel for ethnics jfl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6273
So his mom did not only marry a ricecel but after that also a currycel. Lifefuel for ethnics jfl
The mom is ugly though. I'm not sure that is a lifefuel for ethnics.
 
Practice and algorithmic thinking is more important than fluid intelligence in chess ngl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slayer
Chess nowadays is recognizing patterns and having genius levels of memory.

If you want true genius in chess, you have something like Bobby Fischer, Paul Morphy, Capablanca, Alekhine. Today is just "MUH LEMME CHECK MY ENGINE"
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6341
Practice and algorithmic thinking is more important than fluid intelligence in chess ngl.
Chess is not cognitively demanding and draining like STEM/programming IMO. It's harder to develop a new computer algorithm than becoming a chess master.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6273
And gets a score of 102.




Does this now mean iq tests are meaningless or that being good at chess won't translate being smart at other stuff like mathematics?

Or probably he is just an outlier.

top-tier chess players recognize chess patterns and can calculate dozens moves ahead. it's repetition
there was a study on beginners and top chess players testing their game calculations. beginners could only think 3-4 moves ahead at most while experts did >20. but once the board pieces were randomized to fit chess960, the beginners calculated three moves ahead and the experts could only muster four.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slayer
Chess nowadays is recognizing patterns and having genius levels of memory.

If you want true genius in chess, you have something like Bobby Fischer, Paul Morphy, Capablanca, Alekhine. Today is just "MUH LEMME CHECK MY ENGINE"
You're right that chess nowadays is about having good memory. My memory is slightly above average, and my blitz rating on chess.com is around 2300. I cannot play blindfold chess well. NM is achievable for most amateurs, GM is another level of chess. You need to have excellent chess memory and great calculation skills to be a GM. GM is impossible for untalented amateurs like me.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Mouthbreath and rockndogs
Chess nowadays is recognizing patterns and having genius levels of memory.

If you want true genius in chess, you have something like Bobby Fischer, Paul Morphy, Capablanca, Alekhine. Today is just "MUH LEMME CHECK MY ENGINE"

Wasn't Bobby Fischer the same, he spent hours practicing the moves of his opponents and how to counter them. He memorised so much of it, it's basically insane. I remember the build up to Spasky where he had this massive red book containing all the moves he had played. Fischer would just sit alone and practice for hours using it.
 
You're right that chess nowadays is about having good memory. My memory is slightly above average, and my blitz rating on chess.com is around 2300. I cannot play blindfold chess well. NM is achievable for most amateurs, GM is another level of chess. You need to have excellent chess memory and great calculation skills to be a GM. GM is impossible for untalented amateurs like me.

To become a GM you have to dedicate a lot of your time studying chess, or being a genius like some players in the past. I don't consider any living player today as a genius. Perhaps kasparov.
 
Wasn't Bobby Fischer the same, he spent hours practicing the moves of his opponents and how to counter them. He memorised so much of it, it's basically insane. I remember the build up to Spasky where he had this massive red book containing all the moves he had played. Fischer would just sit alone and practice for hours using it.


He dedicated his life for chess, indeed. He studied a lot, he practiced a lot, but again, he is the best chess player of all time. A rare combination of genius + effort. Other chess players studied as much as him, but didn't get to his level.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6273
If I was to guess, it's probably because chess at the GM level heavily relies on rote memorization of openings and heuristically recognizing positions through repetition. GMs have played thousands upon thousands of games.

This is also why gooks and pajeets are so "good" at things like math and music despite being low IQ zombie bugmen in all other facets of life; they autistically study integration techniques and practice piano every waking hour until the patterns become second nature.

Truly high IQ people are more generalists. They can quickly absorb lots of diverse information and become proficient in many things, but usually don't have time to become top-tier experts in retarded useless shit like chess unless they choose to dedicate more time to it in lieu of other intellectual pursuits. It's why many of the greatest physicists and scientists of the world were also well-spoken philosophers who had ideas about many diverse topics outside of science.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Kmscurry and Deleted member 6273
To become a GM you have to dedicate a lot of your time studying chess, or being a genius like some players in the past. I don't consider any living player today as a genius. Perhaps kasparov.
Carlsen is a legend too.

After Kasparov lost the title the world oc chess was in this "first among equals" kind of state until Carlsen came along (No offense to Kramnik and Anand. They are just not as good as Carlsen). And Carlsen was the first to broke Garry Kasparov's chess rating record of 2851.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rockndogs
Engine era is boring as fuck, that's the reality. If you put Carlsen and Caruana classical chess over the board, 95/100 will be a draw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard and Mouthbreath
And gets a score of 102.




Does this now mean iq tests are meaningless or that being good at chess won't translate being smart at other stuff like mathematics?

Or probably he is just an outlier.

chess is not a IQ game anymore. You just need to have a great memory. He sais himself (Nakamura)
Take it from a chess player
 
Hikaru is no retard. His spatial intelligence must be 99.99th+ percentile. Video is taken down but I saw a short clip of it yesterday.. He just guessed answers in 2 seconds.. didn’t even apply himself. He plays at 2800 ELO, an impossible feat if you suck at pattern recognition. Watch his videos where he calculates lines. One needs insane mental horsepower to look away from the board and visualize all possible positional bifurcations. I fry my brain to calculate precisely 4 or 5 moves ahead, Takes me forever, and I score 135+ on IQ tests

he is a lol tier leftist though. Prob has more to do with the psychological phenomenon of being a public figure/streamer. One has an imperative to do approved, moral rightthink and adopt mainstream positions.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: _MVP_
chess is not a IQ game anymore. You just need to have a great memory. He sais himself (Nakamura)
Take it from a chess player
That’s true, but after 10 or 15 moves, the position on the board is not something you could have ever encountered before, so you can’t have the best move memorized. You can memorize principles if they’re taught to you, or you can discover them yourself. Prob have a more promising future playing chess if you’re able to discover them yourself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mouthbreath
Engine era is boring as fuck, that's the reality. If you put Carlsen and Caruana classical chess over the board, 95/100 will be a draw
That’s true with any 2 high rated players so close in ELO. Engine or no.
 
There is no amount of intelligence which can fix brain disorders
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: _MVP_ and Danish_Retard

Similar threads

fashioncel
Replies
31
Views
320
Snicket
Snicket
.zonic
Replies
22
Views
238
.zonic
.zonic
kana
Replies
10
Views
186
kana
kana
got.daim
Discussion Programs
Replies
5
Views
115
got.daim
got.daim
BWC_virgin
Replies
27
Views
592
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top