Chile is beautiful

Manchild_v2

Manchild_v2

He/Him | Muslim | Zionist | Latinx | Black ✊🏿
Joined
Feb 5, 2025
Posts
2,212
Reputation
3,103
What a mogger of a country, the only place thats filled with non-whites that is remotely civilized, free and with the western tradition.

Chile mogs Argentina so hard its not even funny, Argentinos just make fun of them because they are more indigenous looking (not even by that much anyway)
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Swarthy Knight, Sonneillon, SchizoParanoid_ and 3 others
Chileans are the only spics who have an IQ above 90
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: ShowerCelling and DeborahAnnWollFARTS
Ya, it looks incredibly beautiful. It’ll be my first choice if I ever make it to South America.

IMG 7386
IMG 7387
IMG 7388
IMG 7389
IMG 7390


It’s interesting how much it looks like the West Coast here, the south of the country looks like Washington and Oregon and the north looks like SoCal and Baja.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: HimmyButlerV2, Sonneillon, Bars and 4 others
Ya, it looks incredibly beautiful. It’ll be my first choice if I ever make it to South America.

View attachment 3637023 View attachment 3637024 View attachment 3637025 View attachment 3637030 View attachment 3637031

It’s interesting how much it looks like the West Coast here, the south of the country looks like Washington and Oregon and the north looks like SoCal and Baja.
Yeah this is super true, Im from Washington and southern chilean is very much like pacific north west. northern is more warm and people are more typically latino like, but still higher iq than argentines and peruvians
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Whatever
Ya, it looks incredibly beautiful. It’ll be my first choice if I ever make it to South America.

View attachment 3637023 View attachment 3637024 View attachment 3637025 View attachment 3637030 View attachment 3637031

It’s interesting how much it looks like the West Coast here, the south of the country looks like Washington and Oregon and the north looks like SoCal and Baja.
So literal turd world shitholes lul
Yeah this is super true, Im from Washington and southern chilean is very much like pacific north west. northern is more warm and people are more typically latino like, but still higher iq than argentines and peruvians
36416   SoyBooru
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Franco333, recai iskender, fukmylyf and 1 other person
Lol, we had some Chilean political refugees here in Romania back in the communist era, they attempted a communist revolution there but failed, they were offered asylum here and after a while the authorities wanted to integrate them in society and put them to work(everyone worked back then, there was no unemployment, it was in fact even illegal not to have a job).
When asked what qualifications and occupation they had back there in Chile, they all said they were "revolutionaries" and where very deeply offended by the fact they had to work - they received free food and housing until then by the authorities.
Eventually they all moved to other corrupt, capitalistic and imperialistic western countries, they preferred to live and work there than in a communist country, so much for their communist ideals....:ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Sonneillon
Lol, we had some Chilean political refugees here in Romania back in the communist era, they attempted a communist revolution there but failed, they were offered asylum here and after a while the authorities wanted to integrate them in society and put them to work(everyone worked back then, there was no unemployment, it was in fact even illegal not to have a job).
When asked what qualifications and occupation they had back there in Chile, they all said they were "revolutionaries" and where very deeply offended by the fact they had to work - they received free food and housing until then by the authorities.
Eventually they all moved to other corrupt, capitalistic and imperialistic western countries, they preferred to live and work there than in a communist country, so much for their communist ideals....:ROFLMAO:
Lmfao. That's so funny. most communist revolutionaries be like that. i say this as a communist

BTW are you one of those romanians who thinks that they are owed Moldova and how romanians and moldovans are the same people?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Gonthar
BTW are you one of those romanians who thinks that they are owed Moldova and how romanians and moldovans are the same people?
Huh, I don't know...:feelsthink:
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS, Sonneillon and Manchild_v2
What a mogger of a country, the only place thats filled with non-whites that is remotely civilized, free and with the western tradition.

Chile mogs Argentina so hard its not even funny, Argentinos just make fun of them because they are more indigenous looking (not even by that much anyway)
It’s not the only one. You’re forgetting America.:feelsez:
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Manchild_v2
USA is 60-70% white
At its height, America was about as European as Chile and less European than Argentina and Uruguay. Of course, there are still millions of Europeans in America. Probably 50% or higher, but they’ve been inundated with people from the third world since 1965. As has the southern cone. America’s in the same demographic predicament as Chile and Argentina.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS, Sonneillon and Manchild_v2
At its height, America was about as European as Chile and less European than the Argentina and Uruguay. Of course, there are still millions of Europeans in America. Probably 50% or higher, but they’ve been inundated with people from the third world since 1965. As has the southern cone. America’s in the same demographic predicament as Chile and Argentina.
Latino cope tbh, American white people are actually white people and not light skinned mestizos who have a self hatred for their indigenous ancestors. Lmfao at thinking Chile is more European than the USA is, even african americans have more european dna than some latino countries
 
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Sonneillon
What a mogger of a country, the only place thats filled with non-whites that is remotely civilized, free and with the western tradition.
ever heard of South Korea? Civilisationmogs any whiteoid city to alpha centauri
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Sonneillon
Latino cope tbh, American white people are actually white people and not light skinned mestizos who have a self hatred for their indigenous ancestors. Lmfao at thinking Chile is more European than the USA is, even african americans have more european dna than some latino countries
I’m not Latino. Lol. This is basic history. The Southern Cone received mass immigration from Europe. America had more white people, because they had northwestern Europeans. Note that I didn’t mention white people. I mentioned Europeans. Southern Europeans went to Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and Southern Brazil.



 
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
ever heard of South Korea? Civilisationmogs any whiteoid city to alpha centauri
A several Asian countries are just better tbh. Singapore mogs Europe.
 
I’m not Latino. Lol. This is basic history. The Southern Cone received mass immigration from Europe. America had more white people, because they had northwestern Europeans. Note that I didn’t mention white people. I mentioned Europeans. Southern Europeans went to Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and Southern Brazil.




Yes it did, but it always had less white people. The USA got way more Europeans, both as per capita and in total number than any country in Latin America.

Most of these countries have gigantic indigenous populations, especially Chile
 
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and JohnnyRamone
Yes it did, but it always had less white people. The USA got way more Europeans, both as per capita and in total number than any country in Latin America.

Most of these countries have gigantic indigenous populations, especially Chile
Less as an absolute number? Sure. Less per capita? No. America received a lot of black slaves. Not as many as Brazil, but a lot more than Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. In its golden age, America was about 85-90% European. The rest being primarily black or native (mostly black).

I never denied Chile having a lot of natives by the way. It has millions of Europeans too. That’s all I’m saying. The fact that they have such a relatively high IQ tells the story. IQ is mostly genetic. There’s a reason there’s a big drop off between Argentina, Uruguay and Chile and Brazil. Just like there’s a reason southern Brazil is disproportionately wealthy compared to the rest of the country.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
Less as an absolute number? Sure. Less per capita? No. America received a lot of black slaves. Not as many as Brazil, but a lot more than Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. In its golden age, America was about 85-90% European. The rest being primarily black or native (mostly black).

I never denied Chile having a lot of natives by the way. It has millions of Europeans too. That’s all I’m saying. The fact that they have such a relatively high IQ tells the story. IQ is mostly genetic. There’s a reason there’s a big drop off between Argentina, Uruguay and Chile and Brazil. Just like there’s a reason southern Brazil is disproportionately wealthy compared to the rest of the country.
America got very few slaves in totality, they just bred them a lot. Chile does not have millions of Europeans, the average chilean has 40-50% indian ancestry. they didn't need to import in brown people because the indigenous native population was already brown.

Most black people in the usa have 20-35% european DNA btw

Chile has very few Europeans, go google the actual immigration. most white chileans are descendant from spanish colonials before their independence. Argentina got europeans but mostly low IQ europeans from southern italy and spain.

You are utterly retarded brining up IQ. Chile is rich because they have valuable minerals they pull out of their mines and sell to western countries and because of that they can afford good eduation.

Even Cuba got way more European immigration per capita than did Chile
 
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
America got very few slaves in totality, they just bred them a lot. Chile does not have millions of Europeans, the average chilean has 40-50% indian ancestry. they didn't need to import in brown people because the indigenous native population was already brown.

Most black people in the usa have 20-35% european DNA btw

Chile has very few Europeans, go google the actual immigration. most white chileans are descendant from spanish colonials before their independence. Argentina got europeans but mostly low IQ europeans from southern italy and spain.

You are utterly retarded brining up IQ. Chile is rich because they have valuable minerals they pull out of their mines and sell to western countries and because of that they can afford good eduation.

Even Cuba got way more European immigration per capita than did Chile
America was objectively 10-15% black before 1965. Chile absolutely has millions of Europeans. Even Mexico does. Europeans exist in pretty much all Latin American countries. Just as a minority. When America gained its independence, it had a population of a little under 2.5 million with 1/2 a million negroes. That’s 20%. That number went down, in part because America received mass immigration from Europe.

Between 1882 and 1932 alone, Chile received almost 1 million immigrants. That seems like a small number and it’s certainly a lot less than Argentina and even Brazil, but it only had a population of about 4 million. Chile is rich, primarily because of IQ like most countries. Africa is rich in natural resources. So is India. They still have low per capitas.

To be fair though, when I talk about them being European, I’m not just talking about Criollos. I count Castizos as well. Nick Fuentes is Castizo and he looks basically European.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
America was objectively 10-15% black before 1965. Chile absolutely has millions of Europeans. Even Mexico does. Europeans exist in pretty much all Latin American countries. Just as a minority. When America gained its independence, it had a population of a little under 2.5 million with 1/2 a million negroes. That’s 20%. That number went down, in part because America received mass immigration from Europe.

Between 1882 and 1932 alone, Chile received almost 1 million immigrants. That seems like a small number and it’s certainly a lot less than Argentina and even Brazil, but it only had a population of about 4 million. Chile is rich, primarily because of IQ like most countries. Africa is rich in natural resources. So is India. They still have low per capitas.

To be fair though, when I talk about them being European, I’m not just talking about Criollos. I count Castizos as well. Nick Fuentes is Castizo and he looks basically European.
A lot of those immigrants were from the Middle East, probs around 1/4th of them from Syria, Palestine, Turkey and Lebanon aka non European countries.

No, India is not rich in resources. If European DNA is was so imporant for a rich country, moldova, Albania and Ukraine wouldn't be poor, and Japan and Korea wouldn't be rich.

You can't even prove any examples of how Chileans are high IQ. the country has very low innovation, heavily educated people or industry. They are rich in the same way Saudi Arabia is rich

Castizos are not white, what are you some coping brown med european or some latino coper? Nick Fuentes isn't a castizo, he has one mexican grandparent(50/50 mestizo/euro) he is likely 90% european
 
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
A lot of those immigrants were from the Middle East, probs around 1/4th of them from Syria, Palestine, Turkey and Lebanon aka non European countries.
Honestly? You could be right. I’ll drop it. I know much more about Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil anyways.

No, India is not rich in resources. If European DNA is was so imporant for a rich country, moldova, Albania and Ukraine wouldn't be poor, and Japan and Korea wouldn't be rich.
I didn’t say it was the only thing. I think in this thread, I’ve said several Asian countries are just better than Europeans ones broadly.

You can't even prove any examples of how Chileans are high IQ. the country has very low innovation, heavily educated people or industry. They are rich in the same way Saudi Arabia is rich
You could be right.

Castizos are not white, what are you some coping brown med european or some latino coper? Nick Fuentes isn't a castizo, he has one mexican grandparent(50/50 mestizo/euro) he is likely 90% european
Nick Fuentes is 80% European. Again, I never said white. I said European. I’m just not a sperg about this stuff.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Manchild_v2
Honestly? You could be right. I’ll drop it. I know much more about Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil anyways.


I didn’t say it was the only thing. I think in this thread, I’ve said several Asian countries are just better than Europeans ones broadly.


You could be right.


Nick Fuentes is 80% European. Again, I never said white. I said European. I’m just not a sperg about this stuff.

The number of people in the USA who are 100% European is wayyyy more in number and percentage than any Latino country due to anti miscgenation laws. outside of argentina immigration was rather low in the total scheme, but argentina also got a lot of immigrants from bolivia and peru and colombia aka super brown countries
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and JohnnyRamone
The number of people in the USA who are 100% European is wayyyy more in number and percentage than any Latino country due to anti miscgenation laws. outside of argentina immigration was rather low in the total scheme, but argentina also got a lot of immigrants from bolivia and peru and colombia aka super brown countries
That’s probably true, but I don’t think it matters if someone 1 or 2% native or black from colonial times. That’s insignificant. They’d still cluster genetically with Europeans. Also, I’ve had this debate about Argentina before so I looked it up. Until the 1990’s, most Argentinian immigration was still from Europe (mostly Spain and Italy). More mixed areas of Latin America only started overtaking Europe in the mid 1990’s. As we can see from videos at the time, Argentina was overwhelmingly Mediterranean European before mass immigration. Uruguay even more so. Chile not as much. Brazil was always very diverse (at it’s height, it was about 2 thirds European), but got a bunch of European immigrants in the southern provinces.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Manchild_v2
That’s probably true, but I don’t think it matters if someone 1 or 2% native or black from colonial times. That’s insignificant. They’d still cluster genetically with Europeans. Also, I’ve had this debate about Argentina before so I looked it up. Until the 1990’s, most Argentinian immigration was still from Europe (mostly Spain and Italy). More mixed areas of Latin America only started overtaking Europe in the mid 1990’s. As we can see from videos at the time, Argentina was overwhelmingly Mediterranean European before mass immigration. Uruguay even more so. Chile not as much. Brazil was always very diverse (at it’s height, it was about 2 thirds European), but got a bunch of European immigrants in the southern provinces.
they are much more than 1-2% black or indigenous. Only 15% of argentines have no non-european or mena ancestry in their genome, for uruguay its like 30%. average argentine is 1/4-1/3 indigenous. but even in that number a lot have ancestry from west asia and north africa from mediterrean european ancestry.

in countries like mexico or peru that number is literally 1%
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and JohnnyRamone
they are much more than 1-2% black or indigenous. Only 15% of argentines have no european ancestry in their genome, for uruguay its like 30. average argentine is 1/4-1/3 indigenous. but even in that number a lot have ancestry from west asia and north africa from mediterrean european ancestry.
The study that I saw was that 56% had some traceable non European ancestry. Meaning 44% would have had none. But I was just using that as an example. Under the Spanish racial classification system, if the children of Castizos and Criollos were considered Criollos. Hell, I’m pretty sure the Nazis had a similar method. In Buenos Aires it’s more European. When you get into the interior, it’s more Native.
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Manchild_v2
The study that I saw was that 56% had some traceable non European ancestry. Meaning 44% would have had none. But I was just using that as an example. Under the Spanish racial classification system, if the children of Castizos and Criollos were considered Criollos. Hell, I’m pretty sure the Nazis had a similar method. In Buenos Aires it’s more European. When you get into the interior, it’s more Native.
The spanish didn't have a real racial classification system. There were just pure europeans born in iberia at the top, europeans born in hte new world in the middle and the rest at the bottom, with slaves being the lwoest
 
What a mogger of a country, the only place thats filled with non-whites that is remotely civilized, free and with the western tradition.

Chile mogs Argentina so hard its not even funny, Argentinos just make fun of them because they are more indigenous looking (not even by that much anyway)
can i slay there as blonde white twink
 
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Manchild_v2
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Manchild_v2
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
No. French. Are you? I used a translator.
no, I'm Cuban and Argentinian.

Spanish Wikipedia is a huge joke and says that the caste system never really existed. it was just some romanticized race mixing stuff that elites were into
 
  • Woah
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and JohnnyRamone
Uruguay, Costa Rica?
 
  • +1
Reactions: menas
  • +1
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and loyolaxavvierretard
Chile is also tiny, it's just stretched out lol.
Uruguay is better described as a city state. It's also very shitty in terms of workers laws and crime and drug. Chile is as safe as a western country

Chile has 20 million people vs Uruguay 3 million. its not comparable.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
many chileans are antisocials,not the shy type but the violent type, im from chile btw
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS and Manchild_v2
  • JFL
Reactions: DeborahAnnWollFARTS
the only logical thing you said
You chilean?

Latino white people are mixed heavily with ethnics. they arent white in the global sense, not to mention they descend from the darkest and most mena adjacent europeans
 

Similar threads

Paul Allen.
Replies
15
Views
518
KJ7
KJ7
leF
Replies
23
Views
810
Gaygymmaxx
Gaygymmaxx
albanianblackguy
Replies
119
Views
4K
Klasik616
Klasik616

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top