Chralie Kirk situation pretty much sums up how to appeal to conservatives insanely easy

T

truthprovider1

Iron
Joined
Jun 22, 2025
Posts
245
Reputation
266
Step 1: Say the biggest bullshit you can
Step 2: Say some half true statement
Step 3 : ADD SOMETHING ABOUT FAMILY VALUES + MENTION JESUS

Profit
 
  • +1
Reactions: StuntmanMike, WKW, romanstock and 5 others
Libs showed their true colors that night,
So kirk deserved to die because of his opinions and takes, right? so you dont support free speech, democracy and are fascist
lets hear the opinions of palestinians about the stuff he talked about, ohh boy the shit you'd hear from them psst. theyre 99% muslim

I love libs for their unaware braindead takes, believed the shooter was in a trump shirt, believed he was republican, believed he was pro gun's, turns out he was at a lgbtq rally/protest
jfl iqcels
 
  • +1
Reactions: CreepyJewel1 and MentalistKebab
Libs showed their true colors that night,
So kirk deserved to die because of his opinions and takes, right? so you dont support free speech, democracy and are fascist
lets hear the opinions of palestinians about the stuff he talked about, ohh boy the shit you'd hear from them psst. theyre 99% muslim

I love libs for their unaware braindead takes, believed the shooter was in a trump shirt, believed he was republican, believed he was pro gun's, turns out he was at a lgbtq rally/protest
jfl iqcels
NIGGA HE SAID IF HIS 10 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER GOT RAPED SHE GOTTA KEEP THE KID
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
conservatives didnt really care much about what he had to say since its all water, but they can look at it and see that his reasonable views were apparently enough for him to deserve to die. if you think conservatives are grifting you are just retarded, if you want to grift its much easier and safer on the left so why would they choose a right wing grift?
 
  • +1
Reactions: MentalistKebab
NIGGA HE SAID IF HIS 10 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER GOT RAPED SHE GOTTA KEEP THE KID
so free speech isnt free speech when it doesnt cover your opinion
when u put these words in a sentence your brain thinks he raped a 10year old, hes just a hardcore pro life, thats it
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer
NIGGA HE SAID IF HIS 10 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER GOT RAPED SHE GOTTA KEEP THE KID
10 year olds cannot conceive a child but yes in principle that is absolutely right. why would 2 wrongs make a right? killing the baby only helps the rapist
 
10 year olds cannot conceive a child but yes in principle that is absolutely right. why would 2 wrongs make a right? killing the baby only helps the rapist
killing the "baby" who doesn't even have a developed functioning brain vs destroying the life of a 10 year old.

DID I MENTION HE ALSO SAID THERE SHOULD BE TELEVISED PUBLIC EXECUTIONS???
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
so free speech isnt free speech when it doesnt cover your opinion
when u put these words in a sentence your brain thinks he raped a 10year old, hes just a hardcore pro life, thats it
I will go yelling nigger on the street and start saying its free speech when I get beat up
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
I will go yelling nigger on the street and start saying its free speech when I get beat up
it is free speech to yell nigger on the street and beating someone up for free speech while supporting free speech is just dumb
youre probably like 14 with a undeveloped frontal lobe misguided by biased empathy
 
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer and takethewhitepill
it is free speech to yell nigger on the street and beating someone up for free speech while supporting free speech is just dumb
youre probably like 14 with a undeveloped frontal lobe misguided by biased empathy
niggers will call anything free speech nowdays lmfao this is why you don't got anyone.
and if you are wondering I am in college studying psychology
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
killing the "baby" who doesn't even have a developed functioning brain vs destroying the life of a 10 year old.

DID I MENTION HE ALSO SAID THERE SHOULD BE TELEVISED PUBLIC EXECUTIONS???
you are only making emotional arguments but ill bite. looking at mental and physical health her life will be more destroyed undergoing an abortion than not. the baby is in fact alive but lets say we dont know what defines life and neither of us make a claim, we should assume it is alive the same way if we are told there is a box that may have a person in it we shouldnt shoot the box over and over so that we may kill the person in it, its sort of a pascals wager. you definition of functioning brain is intentionally vague because you havent got a proper definition, brain waves start at 2 weeks iirc.
I dont see a problem with televised public executions if someone deserves to be executed, i dont see what your point here is? is it the televised or execution part? for televised you have no issue with his assassination being televised because it is important, and execution is the morally and economically correct thing to do when necessary. it would also show the public the consequences of breaking the law.
 
niggers will call anything free speech nowdays lmfao this is why you don't got anyone.
and if you are wondering I am in college studying psychology
who won the popular vote?
 
niggers will call anything free speech nowdays lmfao this is why you don't got anyone.
and if you are wondering I am in college studying psychology
wow psychology
wow reading statistics and analysing basic behaviour wow youre so smart
you dont even know whats free speech when youre literally studying psychology, your major is a backup plan if you fail biology/math/chem/physics, and it seems you did
"you dont got anyone" bipolar libs, they attack like wild bears but defend abusing the emotional victim card
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
you are only making emotional arguments but ill bite. looking at mental and physical health her life will be more destroyed undergoing an abortion than not. the baby is in fact alive but lets say we dont know what defines life and neither of us make a claim, we should assume it is alive the same way if we are told there is a box that may have a person in it we shouldnt shoot the box over and over so that we may kill the person in it, its sort of a pascals wager. you definition of functioning brain is intentionally vague because you havent got a proper definition, brain waves start at 2 weeks iirc.
I dont see a problem with televised public executions if someone deserves to be executed, i dont see what your point here is? is it the televised or execution part? for televised you have no issue with his assassination being televised because it is important, and execution is the morally and economically correct thing to do when necessary. it would also show the public the consequences of breaking the law.
1757843837991

can a 2 week unborn "baby" do any of these
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and optimisticzoomer
can a newborn baby do any of this
why don’t we kill newborn babies then, what’s the difference
i guess you didn't read the list monkey but il explain it to you
as you can see the first point talks about SENSES.
A BABY THAT WAS BORN EVEN 10 SECONDS AGO WILL 100% SENSE IF YOU PUNCH IT
a 2 week old clump of cells however won't
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
you are only making emotional arguments but ill bite. looking at mental and physical health her life will be more destroyed undergoing an abortion than not. the baby is in fact alive but lets say we dont know what defines life and neither of us make a claim, we should assume it is alive the same way if we are told there is a box that may have a person in it we shouldnt shoot the box over and over so that we may kill the person in it, its sort of a pascals wager. you definition of functioning brain is intentionally vague because you havent got a proper definition, brain waves start at 2 weeks iirc.
I dont see a problem with televised public executions if someone deserves to be executed, i dont see what your point here is? is it the televised or execution part? for televised you have no issue with his assassination being televised because it is important, and execution is the morally and economically correct thing to do when necessary. it would also show the public the consequences of breaking the law.
ur reasons are kinda all over the place and ur arguing semantics instead of getting to the point. the simple reality is that the life of a 10 year old > the life of an unborn fetus. i don’t support late term abortions except in extreme cases. if adult women suffer and struggle greatly to give birth than what makes you think a 10 year old is somehow any more suited?

the issue with public executions is how it affects society, and if it even works. this isn’t even about the death penalty alone, but the public form where men, women and children can watch people die. it is well documented that people, especially children, who watch people die will often develop trauma and psychological issues. it normalises violence and enforces the idea that the state can take away your life. there is a wide range of studies on this that you can look up. secondly public executions are the not best form of prevention because most violent crime occurs in the spur of the moment. no one involved in a immediate emergency is going to be concerned with capital punishment. their minds are clouded with fear and impulsive thoughts
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: truthprovider1
View attachment 4111484
can a 2 week unborn "baby" do any of these
we don't know, why don't you go ask it? retard. you have to justify how you define life, and also try to respond to the entire rest of what i had to say. we know that neurulation occurs in weeks 2-3 of a babys development which indicates that they can do these things. issue is you arent actually cognisant while you are asleep for example, so would i be fine to kill you while you are asleep? no, thats insane.
 
i guess you didn't read the list monkey but il explain it to you
as you can see the first point talks about SENSES.
A BABY THAT WAS BORN EVEN 10 SECONDS AGO WILL 100% SENSE IF YOU PUNCH IT
a 2 week old clump of cells however won't
so we should kill newborn babies if they have brain damage and can’t do those things
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
ur reasons are kinda all over the place and ur arguing semantics instead of getting to the point. the simple reality is that the life of a 10 year old > the life of an unborn fetus. i don’t support late term abortions except in extreme cases. if adult women suffer and struggle greatly to give birth than what makes you think a 10 year old is somehow any more suited?

the issue with public executions is how it affects society, and if even works. this isn’t even about the death penalty alone, but the public form where men, women and children can watch people die. it is well documented that people, especially children, who watch people die will often develop trauma and psychological issues. there is a wide range of studies on this that you can look up. secondly public executions are the not best form of prevention because most violent crime occurs in the spur of the moment. no one involved in a immediate emergency is going to be concerned with capital punishment. their minds are clouded with fear and impulsive thoughts
you used arguments and logic. wrong forum
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
i guess you didn't read the list monkey but il explain it to you
as you can see the first point talks about SENSES.
A BABY THAT WAS BORN EVEN 10 SECONDS AGO WILL 100% SENSE IF YOU PUNCH IT
a 2 week old clump of cells however won't
they do in fact sense being punched because they start to develop a nervous system in the second week
 
they do in fact sense being punched because they start to develop a nervous system in the second week
chill he studies psychology, chill he is exhausted memorising the parts of the brain and studying rat behaviour that a 8yo could figure out
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
we don't know, why don't you go ask it? retard. you have to justify how you define life, and also try to respond to the entire rest of what i had to say. we know that neurulation occurs in weeks 2-3 of a babys development which indicates that they can do these things. issue is you arent actually cognisant while you are asleep for example, so would i be fine to kill you while you are asleep? no, thats insane.
except a 2 week unborn baby does not have a life while I do.

and for your nerd wave shit:
If I was never exposed to language I can not learn language yet I do have the ability to speak if taught.

Same for your 2 - 3 week unborn baby.
It doesn't matter if it does have a little bit of cognition and the ability to understand things.
THERE IS NOTHING FOR IT TO UNDERSTAND WHILE ITS IN ITS MOTHERS WOMB HOLY FUCK
 
they do in fact sense being punched because they start to develop a nervous system in the second week
do you eat meat? if you do why. chicken also experience pain. every other animal does.

as long as you are not a vegan your point does not stand.
if you can choose to say MY DIET > CHICKEN LIFE
I can also choose to say A 10 YEAR OLD GIRL HAVING A NORMAL CHILDHOOD / A ADULT WOMENS LIFE BECOMING SHIT > unborn baby

Also HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT CHILD WILL HAVE A GOOD LIFE?
What if its born to a broke 20 year old whose condom broke when she was having sex and the guy left her.
 
so we should kill newborn babies if they have brain damage and can’t do those things
I totally agree with ending vegetative state life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: foxinthesnow
ur reasons are kinda all over the place and ur arguing semantics instead of getting to the point. the simple reality is that the life of a 10 year old > the life of an unborn fetus. i don’t support late term abortions except in extreme cases. if adult women suffer and struggle greatly to give birth than what makes you think a 10 year old is somehow any more suited?

the issue with public executions is how it affects society, and if even works. this isn’t even about the death penalty alone, but the public form where men, women and children can watch people die. it is well documented that people, especially children, who watch people die will often develop trauma and psychological issues. there is a wide range of studies on this that you can look up. secondly public executions are the not best form of prevention because most violent crime occurs in the spur of the moment. no one involved in a immediate emergency is going to be concerned with capital punishment. their minds are clouded with fear and impulsive thoughts
my reasons are only 'all over the place' because I am responding to a guy who didnt make a coherent point. a 10 year old will not die from having a child, what will happen to them is they have a child. you have falsely equivocated life as being and as the happiness or whatever bullshit (i.e. he says ruining her life). the life of a baby is infinitely more important than the liberty of anyone else. you are simply making appeals to emotion talking about the struggle of giving birth because you don't have a point. You know that when making laws we should treat it as alive which is why you didnt respond to that, but you think that life doesnt have inherent value (or at least that there is something else more valuable). If you think this we can agree to disagree because its a difference in values, but be honest about it and dont start with these motte-and-bailey fallacies.

nobody is forced to watch someone die. it should be up to parents to decide what children watch and up to adults to make their own decisions about what is best for them. we should be able to see on the news what is happening, this would prevent things like epstein from being as likely as well. I didnt say they were the best prevention and this is a nirvana fallacy. an immediate emergency is not something that would warrant the death penalty, this is simply shitty arguing, we are talking about executing clear cut premeditated murderers.
 
do you eat meat? if you do why. chicken also experience pain. every other animal does.

as long as you are not a vegan your point does not stand.
if you can choose to say MY DIET > CHICKEN LIFE
I can also choose to say A 10 YEAR OLD GIRL HAVING A NORMAL CHILDHOOD / A ADULT WOMENS LIFE BECOMING SHIT > unborn baby

Also HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT CHILD WILL HAVE A GOOD LIFE?
What if its born to a broke 20 year old whose condom broke when she was having sex and the guy left her.
I do not eat meat. I am not vegan but vegetarian though I am incredibly conscious of what animal products I consume, I can explain to you why I believe that vegetarianism is more utilitarian than veganism but its not really relevant. I live as morally consistent as possible, but keep trying to find something. Moot point.
It doesnt matter whether it has a good life, life has inherent value and to live while suffering is a better opportunity than to be killed. Do you think we should kill all disabled people to stop their suffering? Where should we draw the line at who we kill? There is a reason abortions are used for white supremacy and kill majority black children, this idea is propaganda to say only the lives of the superior people (rich aryans) should have value. Before you call me a conspiracist take a google of who founded planned parenthood and look at the stats. it is eugenics.
 
my reasons are only 'all over the place' because I am responding to a guy who didnt make a coherent point. a 10 year old will not die from having a child, what will happen to them is they have a child. you have falsely equivocated life as being and as the happiness or whatever bullshit (i.e. he says ruining her life). the life of a baby is infinitely more important than the liberty of anyone else. you are simply making appeals to emotion talking about the struggle of giving birth because you don't have a point. You know that when making laws we should treat it as alive which is why you didnt respond to that, but you think that life doesnt have inherent value (or at least that there is something else more valuable). If you think this we can agree to disagree because its a difference in values, but be honest about it and dont start with these motte-and-bailey fallacies.

nobody is forced to watch someone die. it should be up to parents to decide what children watch and up to adults to make their own decisions about what is best for them. we should be able to see on the news what is happening, this would prevent things like epstein from being as likely as well. I didnt say they were the best prevention and this is a nirvana fallacy. an immediate emergency is not something that would warrant the death penalty, this is simply shitty arguing, we are talking about executing clear cut premeditated murderers.
" I watched a few youtube videos about fallacies and now I throw the word around wherever I can even doe if you can use google you can say fallacy to literally any argument because , at the end of the day , the world we live in isnt black and white and except a few isolated cases you can argument pretty much anything as long as you make half sense"

fixed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
Step 1: Say the biggest bullshit you can
Step 2: Say some half true statement
Step 3 : ADD SOMETHING ABOUT FAMILY VALUES + MENTION JESUS

Profit
What bullshit was he talking about? Seems to me you're not a truth provider at all. You're just a darn fool. A FOOL!
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
" I watched a few youtube videos about fallacies and now I throw the word around wherever I can even doe if you can use google you can say fallacy to literally any argument because , at the end of the day , the world we live in isnt black and white and except a few isolated cases you can argument pretty much anything as long as you make half sense"

fixed
You're a fallacy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill
except a 2 week unborn baby does not have a life while I do.

and for your nerd wave shit:
If I was never exposed to language I can not learn language yet I do have the ability to speak if taught.

Same for your 2 - 3 week unborn baby.
It doesn't matter if it does have a little bit of cognition and the ability to understand things.
THERE IS NOTHING FOR IT TO UNDERSTAND WHILE ITS IN ITS MOTHERS WOMB HOLY FUCK
crash out. you have shifted the goal post, you said it would be alive if it had cognition and now you say it does but that doesnt matter. you fail to define life or make a point. if you think it is alive but not worth keeping alive because you value the liberty of someone over anothers life, just say so. if not make a point
 
I do not eat meat. I am not vegan but vegetarian though I am incredibly conscious of what animal products I consume, I can explain to you why I believe that vegetarianism is more utilitarian than veganism but its not really relevant. I live as morally consistent as possible, but keep trying to find something. Moot point.
It doesnt matter whether it has a good life, life has inherent value and to live while suffering is a better opportunity than to be killed. Do you think we should kill all disabled people to stop their suffering? Where should we draw the line at who we kill? There is a reason abortions are used for white supremacy and kill majority black children, this idea is propaganda to say only the lives of the superior people (rich aryans) should have value. Before you call me a conspiracist take a google of who founded planned parenthood and look at the stats. it is eugenics.
Okay this is the only thing you have said which I can actually read and isn't nerd bullshit so I will reply seriously.

I do not have anything against ending people if they are suffering. My moral compass is not above anyone's suffering.

Secondly living, current life, will always be number 1 to me compared to non living life unless the living life is 60 + years old.

eugenics haters work for big pharma
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
crash out. you have shifted the goal post, you said it would be alive if it had cognition and now you say it does but that doesnt matter. you fail to define life or make a point. if you think it is alive but not worth keeping alive because you value the liberty of someone over anothers life, just say so. if not make a point
You said it has cognition. as @Shrek2OnDvD said, stop talking semantics nobody cares.
I said it has cognition to prove my point that even if it did have cognition it didn't matter.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
" I watched a few youtube videos about fallacies and now I throw the word around wherever I can even doe if you can use google you can say fallacy to literally any argument because , at the end of the day , the world we live in isnt black and white and except a few isolated cases you can argument pretty much anything as long as you make half sense"

fixed
No you just didnt make a real point and I can see through your bs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefty Rankin
Russia's a full on communist state funding far left antifa blm agitator shit and invading Europe and they did that tactic and got tonnes of western righrists believing it and supporting them :ROFLMAO:
 
Russia's a full on communist state funding far left antifa blm agitator shit and invading Europe and they did that tactic and got tonnes of western righrists believing it and supporting them :ROFLMAO:
Its because its very hard to understand politics when you just scratch the surface
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
Russia's a full on communist state funding far left antifa blm agitator shit and invading Europe and they did that tactic and got tonnes of western righrists believing it and supporting them :ROFLMAO:
Its not communist at all.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: romanstock
Okay this is the only thing you have said which I can actually read and isn't nerd bullshit so I will reply seriously.

I do not have anything against ending people if they are suffering. My moral compass is not above anyone's suffering.
those people should only be killed if they choose to
Secondly living, current life, will always be number 1 to me compared to non living life unless the living life is 60 + years old.
inconsistent with your earlier points
eugenics haters work for big pharma
nigga be fr
 
my reasons are only 'all over the place' because I am responding to a guy who didnt make a coherent point. a 10 year old will not die from having a child, what will happen to them is they have a child. you have falsely equivocated life as being and as the happiness or whatever bullshit (i.e. he says ruining her life). the life of a baby is infinitely more important than the liberty of anyone else. you are simply making appeals to emotion talking about the struggle of giving birth because you don't have a point. You know that when making laws we should treat it as alive which is why you didnt respond to that, but you think that life doesnt have inherent value (or at least that there is something else more valuable). If you think this we can agree to disagree because its a difference in values, but be honest about it and dont start with these motte-and-bailey fallacies.

nobody is forced to watch someone die. it should be up to parents to decide what children watch and up to adults to make their own decisions about what is best for them. we should be able to see on the news what is happening, this would prevent things like epstein from being as likely as well. I didnt say they were the best prevention and this is a nirvana fallacy. an immediate emergency is not something that would warrant the death penalty, this is simply shitty arguing, we are talking about executing clear cut premeditated murderers.
Are you religious? just curious

The risk of physical trauma and injury to a woman during pregnancy is very real, and that’s not counting the psychological impact it can have. A 10 year old is simply not fully developed enough to give birth in a healthy way. Her womb is too small, her reproductive organs have not achieved full maturity, she is more prone to infections and complications during her pregnancy. You downplay pregnancy like it’s nothing while portraying abortion as no different than murdering a toddler. Please be consistent

What I find funny is you accuse me of appealing to emotion which means nothing. Even if I appeal to emotion that doesn’t disprove my point. We have very real medical data proving the effects of pregnancy on underage and undeveloped girls. Who would you rather save? If there was a fire at a hospital with a 10 year old girl and a tray of fetus which would you rather save? Please be honest

Then you should have specified that in your earlier comment. Most death penalty advocates don’t agree with you. A lot of them I spoke to believe specific crimes should be punished by death regardless of circumstances. But I understand you don’t believe in that. Nonetheless when we watch someone die, we don’t just see a criminal getting hanged or shot, we see a human being, like us. And what is to say that the accused isn’t guilty or if they were falsely accused? How many innocent people being publicly executed is okay for you?
 
Are you religious? just curious

The risk of physical trauma and injury to a woman during pregnancy is very real, and that’s not counting the psychological impact it can have. A 10 year old is simply not fully developed enough to give birth in a healthy way. Her womb is too small, her reproductive organs have not achieved full maturity, she is more prone to infections and complications during her pregnancy. You downplay pregnancy like it’s nothing while portraying abortion as no different than murdering a toddler. Please be consistent

What I find funny is you accuse me of appealing to emotion which means nothing. Even if I appeal to emotion that doesn’t disprove my point. We have very real medical data proving the effects of pregnancy on underage and undeveloped girls. Who would you rather save? If there was a fire at a hospital with a 10 year old girl and a tray of fetus which would you rather save? Please be honest

Then you should have specified that in your earlier comment. Most death penalty advocates don’t agree with you. A lot of them I spoke to believe specific crimes should be punished by death regardless of circumstances. But I understand you don’t believe in that. Nonetheless when we watch someone die, we don’t just see a criminal getting hanged or shot, we see a human being, like us. And what is to say that the accused isn’t guilty or if they were falsely accused? How many innocent people being publicly executed is okay for you?
him being religious would actually make his point more valid as its the only way you could say such bullshit and still believe it.
if not than he is simply autistic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
him being religious would actually make his point more valid as its the only way you could say such bullshit and still believe it.
if not than he is simply autistic
Yeah I’m sure 90% of anti-abortion people do it because of religious beliefs. The rest of their arguments are mute, since ultimately only their holy book has the authority to judge and condemn
 
Yeah I’m sure 90% of anti-abortion people do it because of religious beliefs. The rest of their arguments are mute, since ultimately only their holy book has the authority to judge and condemn
we also can't really know if the current bible has ANYTHING to do with old bibles btw , since you know the catholic church was doing bullshit back in the day.
 

Similar threads

Сигма Бой
Replies
27
Views
2K
freedompanel
freedompanel
oadboueq1293
Replies
41
Views
2K
oadboueq1293
oadboueq1293
Sloppyseconds
Replies
12
Views
130
davidlaidisme67
davidlaidisme67
HighIQ ubermensch
Replies
16
Views
866
kiing_ronk
kiing_ronk
P
Replies
11
Views
119
pingo
P

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top