CHRISTIANITY (opinion)

[rrtzx]

View attachment 5524360
im fucking crying

nigga ur a twink

this is straight up harassment i said get out of my thread an hour ago but i hate that your right most will make him gay from this pic

 

[jervis]

this is straight up harassment i said get out of my thread an hour ago but i hate that your right most will make him gay from this pic

cry about it peon, u offered no substance the whole thread now cope harder ponk

 

[yushmaxx]

So the reason that God must exist, is because we have no explanation for all of this.

Science is an inferior explanation of existence, because life is so infinitely complex and intricate that there is literally no way to know all of it.

To be fair, I cannot give you a strict percent value for what we don’t know, because
listen carefully we don’t know the size of the pool of unknown/hidden information.

So you could just assume that we probably know more than we do not know, but there is absolutely no way to measure how much we don’t know.

And if you know anything about science, the more scientists look into a studied topic like microbiology, or quantum physics, you would of course know how much there is that is unknown about these things. And scientists continue to make discoveries that contradict their previous theories.

I argue that because we know an infinitely small percentage of what there is to know, that there is infinite amounts of knowledge to be known, therefore, the life we experience and what most would call our ‘universe’ is infinite, or at least is infinite in that the human mind is incapable of comprehending the ‘universe’ entirely.

Because the human mind is incapable of knowing the ‘universe’ (creation), the better explanation for it is that God exists, because we can know that what DOES exist is infinite relative to the human mind.

Im assuming you know what god of the gaps is right?, that you cant attribute what we dont know yet to god. I dont understand your last paragraph.

I agree with you, since the universe has been suspected to be infinite, that would also mean that there is an infinite amount of knowledge, and therefore we only understand an infinitely small part of that.

 

[IDontBlameAnybody]

So the reason that God must exist, is because we have no explanation for all of this.

Science is an inferior explanation of existence, because life is so infinitely complex and intricate that there is literally no way to know all of it.

To be fair, I cannot give you a strict percent value for what we don’t know, because
listen carefully we don’t know the size of the pool of unknown/hidden information.

So you could just assume that we probably know more than we do not know, but there is absolutely no way to measure how much we don’t know.

And if you know anything about science, the more scientists look into a studied topic like microbiology, or quantum physics, you would of course know how much there is that is unknown about these things. And scientists continue to make discoveries that contradict their previous theories.

I argue that because we know an infinitely small percentage of what there is to know, that there is infinite amounts of knowledge to be known, therefore, the life we experience and what most would call our ‘universe’ is infinite, or at least is infinite in that the human mind is incapable of comprehending the ‘universe’ entirely.

Because the human mind is incapable of knowing the ‘universe’ (creation), the better explanation for it is that God exists, because we can know that what DOES exist is infinite relative to the human mind.

God could very well be part of science though. The higher being who created the universe could have just been some civilization that figured out how to do that. I mean the science niggas can't 100% even disprove The Matrix theory that we live in a simulation.

It is because we do not know what happened before the big bang. Our knowledge doesn't reach there.

 

[jr49506]

Im assuming you know what god of the gaps is right?, that you cant attribute what we dont know yet to god. I dont understand your last paragraph.

I agree with you, since the universe has been suspected to be infinite, that would also mean that there is an infinite amount of knowledge, and therefore we only understand an infinitely small part of that.

Yes that is why I am arguing that God is a better explanation than science.

Just saying that science is more true than God doesn’t make any sense, because God is not something we can know, while science is our attempt at understanding a relatively infinite and unknowable (not-fully-knowable) existence.

God is an entity, but we really don’t know anything about what He is. Just like our existence.

The only things we can know which describe God:

—Infinite: Created the universe which seems infinite to us

—All knowing: The universe contains seemingly infinite knowledge. Because He made the universe we can know He is omniscient.

—All powerful: Because He has the power to create the universe.

So I agree with u that God isn’t something you can prove like science, but that’s because science is a shitty way to explain the entire universe and our existence, because there is a relatively infinite pool of knowledge that we do not know about existence/the universe.