Christians on the forum. Which denomination of Christianity you belong to?

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

People only swear or insult you;when they realize the argument, they have is on built on quicksand.

Looks sturdy and stable from afar;in reality if it gets tested,it collapses.

Basically brother

 

[Tyler1]

Retards like you truly piss me off sometimes, like your ego is so fragile that you cannot admit to be wrong, all you can say ”dnr” ”b-but your a s-shi-shitskin saar”

your worthless waste of sperm.
Lower your ego / humble yourself

I dont have time for this shitskin kike Jew lover

Like im not gonna respond to an full article lool
u fag

 

[DMA]

Presbyterian

 

[takethewhitepill]

It’s not even about resign the Bible because even Mormons and Jehovah witnesses read the Bible yet come to heretical low IQ conclusions. This is why Protestantism is self refuting because they say “I can read the Bible and I’m guided by the Holy Spirit into accurate discernment” ok if that’s the case how did Mormons and JW come to their conclusions because when you ask them THEY SAY THE EXACT SAME THING .

The idiots that spam slogans are the brainlets GAYthiests are used to bullying. When Gaytheists engage with an real Christian like myself they get stumped get flustered and panick and then rage literally happens every time because I completely dismantle all their bellies until in a panick they say “I BELIVE IN WHAG I BELIVE IN AND SO DO YOU NONE OF US ARE RIGHT” yeah Gaytheists are jsut bullies in disguise they hunt for the low IQ religious zealots usually Evanglicals (Muslims are also low IQ but will kill you if you upset them ) because they are unironically pacifists so easy targets for victimising and due to being low IQ and having no metaphysics or philosophy they are Bible alone and thus get rkt by the GAYtheist. It’s warily similar to how @takethewhitepill talks tbh he jsut says stupid shit but can’t back anything up with tradition all they have is their personal opinion of the Bible based on their own defective nous

We don't read the same bible as Mormons since they follow book of Mormon and remove parts from kjv. Jw read their own special translation made by the watchtower and interpreted by them too, they are being deceived by that a group that wants to profit. On the other hand, what is Protestantism? Fundamentally it starts because they reject people being able to go to confessional and buy forgiveness for future sins. While myself I don't care for really any of your traditions and solely the bible, you should probably understand that Protestants believe in tradition after scripture but still care about it. That means they don't do ridiculous things that the bible says you can't do, like pray to the dead. You have some traditions that go flat out against the bible and the rest are unfounded in it. I don't need to back anything up with tradition because I can do so with the Lord and He defeats all.

By the way, we are guided to understand by the Holy Spirit. Read 1 Cor 2 for example.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

We don't read the same bible as Mormons since they follow book of Mormon and remove parts from kjv. Jw read their own special translation made by the watchtower and interpreted by them too, they are being deceived by that a group that wants to profit. On the other hand, what is Protestantism? Fundamentally it starts because they reject people being able to go to confessional and buy forgiveness for future sins. While myself I don't care for really any of your traditions and solely the bible, you should probably understand that Protestants believe in tradition after scripture but still care about it. That means they don't do ridiculous things that the bible says you can't do, like pray to the dead. You have some traditions that go flat out against the bible and the rest are unfounded in it. I don't need to back anything up with tradition because I can do so with the Lord and He defeats all.

By the way, we are guided to understand by the Holy Spirit. Read 1 Cor 2 for example.

They also read the Protestant cannon of 66 books you forgot to method that. They also have the book of pearly price and Mormon so yes they do follow what you follow. Same with JW which also follow the prottie cannon of 66


Now what you said about the origins of prottie is actually legit and true and I myself agree with those grievances, it was called indulgences and it was corrupt

The issue is that denial of tradition destroys the foundation that built the Bible which you follow as that’s also tradition which took 600 years to even set through multiple councils debates and discussions it was finalised and set in council of Trullo in the 7th century. The issue is protties then decided to remove books from the Bible to save on the printing press directly destroying their credibility.

The sad thing is you talk about the prayers for the dead and saint veneration but all that’s biblical once again proving your Religion is make belief nonsense. Why is it every Christian before 15 hundreds practiced saint veneration? Tell me why the ancient is realities practiced it as well? Hell tell me why revelations 5:8 speaks about people praying to the saints and angels for intercession? Explain why 2 maccabies 15 speaks about jerimiah praying for the isrelaites when they ask for intercession to beat the Greeks? Explain why the Jews prayed to the “IDOL” ark of the covenant and bowed to it in Joshua 7 and in 29:20 king David does the same thing.

I mean are and were the ancient isrelaited and ancient Christian’s who you claim to share the same faith with idolaters? We even had an entire ecumenical council over this (7th council) were the iconoclasts (idiots like you) were destroyed and lost just like at the council of nicea.

So the reality is your not a Christian you directly go against the holy councils that are presided over by the Holy Spirit and thus cannot error in any way they are literally infallible and you deny and denounce them which means you have forgotten your right to be Christian. So like the JW and the Mormons and every other prottie denomination that has differing views then yours your guided BY YOURSELVES not by god for if you were you’d not all be so fucking confused with 40K different denominations as god says 1Cor 14:33 "God is not the author of confusion" and Anglicans (high protties) to evangelicals (what you are
Low church) are worlds apart it’s not even funny


TLDR: nothing you belive is believed by the church fathers, apostles, their deciples like Polycarp ignites and irineas, and nothing you belive was followed by a single person prior to Martin Luther. It’s very sad even your iconocalasm was refuted by the early church and yet you idiots revived that ancient heresy and even revived Trithiesm (Mormons because yes they are born out of protties) and Arianism (Unitarians, JW) so much for MUH BIBLE GRANTS ME DISCERNMENT when none of us see eye to eye

 

[takethewhitepill]

They also read the Protestant cannon of 66 books you forgot to method that. They also have the book of pearly price and Mormon so yes they do follow what you follow. Same with JW which also follow the prottie cannon of 66

Okay, and? The fact that they add other things as more important than biblical canon is quite ironic to be your point considering you would argue to do the same except for with tradition. They do not hold to sola scriptura, which is fundamental to protestantism.

Now what you said about the origins of prottie is actually legit and true and I myself agree with those grievances, it was called indulgences and it was corrupt

The issue is that denial of tradition destroys the foundation that built the Bible which you follow as that’s also tradition which took 600 years to even set through multiple councils debates and discussions it was finalised and set in council of Trullo in the 7th century. The issue is protties then decided to remove books from the Bible to save on the printing press directly destroying their credibility.

This is wrong. Firstly, if I want to look at the oldest statement of biblical canon I have Melito of Sardis for old testament canon in 170 and we have the muratorian fragment from 170-200 showing 22 of the 27 books leaving out just the ones that arent that important really and could be considered similar in nature to something like the didache. The proper canonisation was a response to the spread of the church meaning that some were confused on what books they should preach and thus a formal decree was made. Isa 40 8 tells me that the Word of the Lord will never wither and that because of His providence, His people will always recognise the Word whether they have tradition or not to tell them. I would also consider this, treat the bible as a historic text for a moment and view it that way. If I can come to the conclusion that a piece of writing is trustworthy and an eyewitness account then I trust them to provide me with eyewitness testimony of what Jesus said. So I don't need a canon, I can just read texts and determine their authenticity, and if they are legit then I can read within the direct words of the Lord Jesus Christ.
The reason the apocrypha were removed is not to save money by the way, they were always considered outside of scripture. You would surely not deny St Jerome who wrote the same?

The sad thing is you talk about the prayers for the dead and saint veneration but all that’s biblical once again proving your Religion is make belief nonsense. Why is it every Christian before 15 hundreds practiced saint veneration? Tell me why the ancient is realities practiced it as well? Hell tell me why revelations 5:8 speaks about people praying to the saints and angels for intercession? Explain why 2 maccabies 15 speaks about jerimiah praying for the isrelaites when they ask for intercession to beat the Greeks? Explain why the Jews prayed to the “IDOL” ark of the covenant and bowed to it in Joshua 7 and in 29:20 king David does the same thing.

1 Tim 2:5 "For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." If you wish to pray, you must pray to Jesus because He alone is the mediator. We are also only ever told to pray to God, see Mat 6 and Luk 11:1-2. We are told not to pray to the dead, Deut 18:10-12 "There shall not be found among you anyone… who inquires of the dead, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord." - you could try to argue this is the spiritually dead, but I think that would be reading it with itching ears. I haven't looked at the hebrew here but I am open to being wrong here especially. We should venerate the Lord alone, Isa 42:8, Rev 19:10.
I don't really care what many Christians before 1500 did, I care about what Jesus did and also what the apostles who followed His teachings did. There is no example in the new testament of anyone doing it, and by the way, this is just wrong. Early church was focused on venerating God and God alone, veneration of saints wasn't really a thing until the 4th century when it become a popular thing to be. This is like saying that fornication is not wrong because people in 2025 who have bible verses in their bio do it and we must just be misunderstanding scripture, if we moved forward. 1500 years is a long time, and we are told that people quickly stray as in Gal 1.
Rev 5:8 doesnt show that at all. It says that before God the angels will present the prayers of saints, and the saints here are just the believers who are on earth that God will judge as we see throughout all of revelation
Maccabees isnt canon and it never was, but if we read the verse this wouldnt even be what you say, from what I understand? I read through it and don't see where people are praying to the dead or to saints, but I see plenty of times people pray to God. In Joshua 7 and 29:10 they pray to God who was symbolically present above the arc, as in exodus 25:22 about the arc and 1 Chron 29:20 says "Then David said to all the assembly, ‘Bless the Lord your God.’ And all the assembly blessed the Lord… and bowed their heads and paid homage to the Lord and to the king." so not the arc but the Lord. Exodus 20:4-5 in fact forbids us from bowing to or serving any image. This is a major misreading on your part.

I mean are and were the ancient isrelaited and ancient Christian’s who you claim to share the same faith with idolaters? We even had an entire ecumenical council over this (7th council) were the iconoclasts (idiots like you) were destroyed and lost just like at the council of nicea.

I dont care one bit about anyone elses faith, I care about the Lord and how I can glorify Him, so I don't really understand who these people you compare me to are? If you mean like how David had multiple wives, then I would say that he isn't my Lord and also that we are both sinners who seek to repent and be with the Lord. The only one without sin is He. None of this is biblical reasoning and as a Christian we should only care about that, prove me wrong with the bible and not by calling me an idiot and saying people who agree with me got destroyed.

So the reality is your not a Christian you directly go against the holy councils that are presided over by the Holy Spirit and thus cannot error in any way they are literally infallible and you deny and denounce them which means you have forgotten your right to be Christian. So like the JW and the Mormons and every other prottie denomination that has differing views then yours your guided BY YOURSELVES not by god for if you were you’d not all be so fucking confused with 40K different denominations as god says 1Cor 14:33 "God is not the author of confusion" and Anglicans (high protties) to evangelicals (what you are
Low church) are worlds apart it’s not even funny

The fact you dont accept the bible and yet you claim the councils are infallible is laughable. The 40k denominations is not true, I looked it up after you went on about it last time. The person that found that number counted every countries separately, which is not really good faith counting whatsoever even though they were the same denom. But anyway, we are unified under Christ Jesus and there is only one true denomination which is following Him, and the way to do that is to submit yourself to His word. If you read it as x or y then we can talk about that but we are all unified under Him. I don't really believe in denominations among protestants to be honest.

TLDR: nothing you belive is believed by the church fathers, apostles, their deciples like Polycarp ignites and irineas, and nothing you belive was followed by a single person prior to Martin Luther. It’s very sad even your iconocalasm was refuted by the early church and yet you idiots revived that ancient heresy and even revived Trithiesm (Mormons because yes they are born out of protties) and Arianism (Unitarians, JW) so much for MUH BIBLE GRANTS ME DISCERNMENT when none of us see eye to eye

If nothing biblical is believed by them then arent you admitting you follow heretics?

 

[Sprinkles]

Curries go to church?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Okay, and? The fact that they add other things as more important than biblical canon is quite ironic to be your point considering you would argue to do the same except for with tradition. They do not hold to sola scriptura, which is fundamental to protestantism.



This is wrong. Firstly, if I want to look at the oldest statement of biblical canon I have Melito of Sardis for old testament canon in 170 and we have the muratorian fragment from 170-200 showing 22 of the 27 books leaving out just the ones that arent that important really and could be considered similar in nature to something like the didache. The proper canonisation was a response to the spread of the church meaning that some were confused on what books they should preach and thus a formal decree was made. Isa 40 8 tells me that the Word of the Lord will never wither and that because of His providence, His people will always recognise the Word whether they have tradition or not to tell them. I would also consider this, treat the bible as a historic text for a moment and view it that way. If I can come to the conclusion that a piece of writing is trustworthy and an eyewitness account then I trust them to provide me with eyewitness testimony of what Jesus said. So I don't need a canon, I can just read texts and determine their authenticity, and if they are legit then I can read within the direct words of the Lord Jesus Christ.
The reason the apocrypha were removed is not to save money by the way, they were always considered outside of scripture. You would surely not deny St Jerome who wrote the same?

1 Tim 2:5 "For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." If you wish to pray, you must pray to Jesus because He alone is the mediator. We are also only ever told to pray to God, see Mat 6 and Luk 11:1-2. We are told not to pray to the dead, Deut 18:10-12 "There shall not be found among you anyone… who inquires of the dead, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord." - you could try to argue this is the spiritually dead, but I think that would be reading it with itching ears. I haven't looked at the hebrew here but I am open to being wrong here especially. We should venerate the Lord alone, Isa 42:8, Rev 19:10.
I don't really care what many Christians before 1500 did, I care about what Jesus did and also what the apostles who followed His teachings did. There is no example in the new testament of anyone doing it, and by the way, this is just wrong. Early church was focused on venerating God and God alone, veneration of saints wasn't really a thing until the 4th century when it become a popular thing to be. This is like saying that fornication is not wrong because people in 2025 who have bible verses in their bio do it and we must just be misunderstanding scripture, if we moved forward. 1500 years is a long time, and we are told that people quickly stray as in Gal 1.
Rev 5:8 doesnt show that at all. It says that before God the angels will present the prayers of saints, and the saints here are just the believers who are on earth that God will judge as we see throughout all of revelation
Maccabees isnt canon and it never was, but if we read the verse this wouldnt even be what you say, from what I understand? I read through it and don't see where people are praying to the dead or to saints, but I see plenty of times people pray to God. In Joshua 7 and 29:10 they pray to God who was symbolically present above the arc, as in exodus 25:22 about the arc and 1 Chron 29:20 says "Then David said to all the assembly, ‘Bless the Lord your God.’ And all the assembly blessed the Lord… and bowed their heads and paid homage to the Lord and to the king." so not the arc but the Lord. Exodus 20:4-5 in fact forbids us from bowing to or serving any image. This is a major misreading on your part.


I dont care one bit about anyone elses faith, I care about the Lord and how I can glorify Him, so I don't really understand who these people you compare me to are? If you mean like how David had multiple wives, then I would say that he isn't my Lord and also that we are both sinners who seek to repent and be with the Lord. The only one without sin is He. None of this is biblical reasoning and as a Christian we should only care about that, prove me wrong with the bible and not by calling me an idiot and saying people who agree with me got destroyed.

The fact you dont accept the bible and yet you claim the councils are infallible is laughable. The 40k denominations is not true, I looked it up after you went on about it last time. The person that found that number counted every countries separately, which is not really good faith counting whatsoever even though they were the same denom. But anyway, we are unified under Christ Jesus and there is only one true denomination which is following Him, and the way to do that is to submit yourself to His word. If you read it as x or y then we can talk about that but we are all unified under Him. I don't really believe in denominations among protestants to be honest.

If nothing biblical is believed by them then arent you admitting you follow heretics?

Who said other traditions are more important than biblical tradition? I never said this biblical tradition is primary in most cases and in others is equal to the church and oral tradition. At least try to understand your opponents position before strawmanning them wtf is wrong with you lot? I’m only replying to your final statement because honestly your a lost cause and a heretic of the highest order like all protties thank god I saw the light and left that gay cult.

The church fathers belived in the bible obvs. It had the same interpretation the orthodox have that’s the difference our interpretations aren’t the same as yours that’s what makes your trinity false and demonic and mine true and accurate as affirmed by the fathers and councils. The Bible was compiled by these very men that’s the irony but even then they never had the same books at the same time as the early Christian’s only had segments of the book which is why in certain regions the tradition varied hence why Athanasus, John chrsytostm, Jerome and Cyril all had different cannons despite sharing the same faith as it wasn’t set back then. The setting of biblical cannon was a work in progress so your presupposing what is “biblical” whilst relying on these “heretics” as you put it for the inspired scriptures which these “heretics” compiled and put together. Point is your RELGION is fake and gay I have 0 reason to carry on this convo I have deduced your intellect is lacking and your on par with that of a Muslim or some other gay cultist

I mean the irony is your the heretic because you deny the ecumenical councils especially the 7th which denounced all iconoclasts as pagans and heretics and like all councils are led and guided by the Holy Spirit even GAYpritties like you agree with this so by your own standards you guys are not Christian’s but are pagans like Muslims and Jews . Even Roman Catholics aren’t this lost. Go read church history

 

[takethewhitepill]

I’m only replying to your final statement because honestly your a lost cause and a heretic of the highest order like all protties think god I saw the light and left that gay cult.

The church fathers belived in the bible obvs. It had the same interpretation the orthodox have that’s the difference our interpretations aren’t the same as yours that’s what makes your trinity false and demonic and mine true and accurate as affirmed by the fathers and councils. The Bible was compiled by these very men that’s the irony but even then they never had the same books at the same time as the early Christian’s only had segments of the book which is why in certain regions the tradition varied hence why Athanasus, John chrsytostm, Jerome and Cyril all had different cannons despite sharing the same faith as it wasn’t set back then. The setting of biblical cannon was a work in progress so your presupposing what is “biblical” whilst relying on these “heretics” as you out it for the inspired scriptures which these “heretics” compiled and put together. Point is your RELGION is fake and gay

If all your low IQ was could gain from this was that then your low IQ and I made the right decision to end the convo here as your intellect is far to low to comprehend Christianity.

You are only replying to my last because you know that the scripture I cited to you exactly disproves your terrible reading of the Bible. You want to tell me that saying read the scripture is heresy? Jfl.

Denying the scriputal nature of the trinity and the supreme authority of scripture is heresy bro.

You are too scared to respond to me properly because you know I have the bible on my side and it's a losing battle for you. Go back and show me how I was wrong when I gave multiple verses for each point.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

You are only replying to my last because you know that the scripture I cited to you exactly disproves your terrible reading of the Bible. You want to tell me that saying read the scripture is heresy? Jfl.

Denying the scriputal nature of the trinity and the supreme authority of scripture is heresy bro.

You are too scared to respond to me properly because you know I have the bible on my side and it's a losing battle for you. Go back and show me how I was wrong when I gave multiple verses for each point.

lol a prottie whose beliefs and dogma wasn’t believed by anybody prior to Martin Luther and even then him and the Baptists slaughtered eachother like dogs in the Fields of Europe due to differences in beliefs due to this schizophrenic branch of Roman Catholicism not trying to say what’s biblical?

Nigger you don’t even know what the cannon is you don’t even know what the Bible is you can’t tell me how many books are supposed to be in the bible and why You can’t even tell me what makes these books inspired you know literally nothing you rely on ME for all of this shit study gtfo before I paled your dumbass on my ignore bitch prottie faggot.

Go follow your schitzo renaissance era Islamic religion where you belive the Bible fell from the sky into your lap with 66 books like a dumbass no wonder the GAYthiests are completely bodying you losers. I’ll continue following the ancient religion of Christianity thank you that started in 33 AD you go follow your religion that began in the 16th century or if your Evanglical 19th century

 

[takethewhitepill]

lol a prottie whose beliefs and dogma wasn’t believed by anybody prior to Martin Luther and even then him and the Baptists slaughtered eachother like dogs in the Fields of Europe due to differences in beliefs due to this schizophrenic branch of Roman Catholicism not trying to say what’s biblical?

Nigger you don’t even know what the cannon is you don’t even know what the Bible is you can’t tell me how many books are supposed to be in the bible and why You can’t even tell me what makes these books inspired you know literally nothing you rely on ME for all of this shit study gtfo before I paled your dumbass on my ignore bitch prottie faggot.

Go follow your schitzo renaissance era Islamic religion where you belive the Bible fell from the sky into your lap with 66 books like a dumbass no wonder the GAYthiests are completely bodying you losers. I’ll continue following the ancient religion of Christianity thank you that started in 33 AD you go follow your religion that began in the 16th century or if your Evanglical 19th century

All the books I quoted or cited to you were part of the Canon you accept. Now go respond to what I actually had to say and what the Lord has told us. I follow a religion that started with Moses 4000 years ago, was fulfilled by Jesus 2000 and written about within the next 50 by people that knew Him. I would recommend you hold your tongue when you insult the gospel, by the way.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

All the books I quoted or cited to you were part of the Canon you accept. Now go respond to what I actually had to say and what the Lord has told us. I follow a religion that started with Moses 4000 years ago, was fulfilled by Jesus 2000 and written about within the next 50 by people that knew Him. I would recommend you hold your tongue when you insult the gospel, by the way.

lol so what about the book of maccabies? What about the deterocannon? Last time I checked none of the early church held to you cannon.

Wanna also learn something about else the book of revelation wasn’t present in any of the early church fathers cannons either provo g my point you have no way to say how you know that books inspired or part of the cannon do you?

I bet you don’t even know what Cannon 85 is, I’ll tell your dumbass it’s the earliest recorded normative cannon for the church and guess what…. IT ISNT THE PROTTIE CANNON. Once again proving you don’t “HAVE THE BIBLE”

So you can’t tell me how you know the books are divinely inspired, you can’t tell me how the biblical books were chosen as cannon, you can’t tell me who shared the same cannon as you (nobody did) prior to Yank printing press, you can’t tell me anything can you proving you don’t have the Bible or even know what it is.

What do you mean what the Lord has told us? The Lord told you protties nothing you idiots TELL YOURSELF stuff if the “lord” is In reference to you then sure I guess you like all protties are your own Popes prophets and apostles then yeah I guess you told yourself stuff.

You don’t follow anything Moses believed in if you did then you’d not call Saint veneration idolatry. You realise in Luke 16 the rich man prays to Abraham for mercy right ? You protties woudl call this “IDOLATRY “

You realise Moses created the tabernacle and ark with Cherebuim Icons and statues right? (Exodus 25) even Solomon (Kings 4-5) and you’d call both of them heathens, I already showed you how according to your made up Industrial Revolution dogmatic religion that King David and St John the apostle and even King Jerimiah were all Idolater pagans so I gave you more examples using the Bible a book which you claim to follow but don’t actually follow because if you did then you’d have the correct cannon.

So how exactly do you have the faith of Moses? When by your own standards Moses is an idolater . I won’t hold my tounge when I insult your disgusting false doctrines, you don’t have the Gospel so me insulting you isn’t insulting the gospel you tone policing CUCK, I have the Gospel YOU DO NOT, I have the Bible YOU DO NOT, so I can cuss whatever TF abomination you have that has given rise to Mormons and Jehovah witnesses due to your abhorrent heresy you group of schitzo Roman Catholics.

@Arzenic @subhuman1996 @Vazelrr wstch these prottie dogs froth out the mouth 0 arguments 0 points all they have is “Don’t be mean” or “this isn’t the spirit your being mean” this is why men leave these faggots cults to join other faiths like Islam or orthodoxy or just hate religion and become GAYtheist. Anybody who follows Protestantism in 2025 has low IQ this same dog would call Moses an idolater and the church fathers Heathens for having icons and saint veneration. Yet the fuck wants to say his faith is that of Moses? lol he’d spit on you much worse than I

 

[Vazelrr]

lol so what about the book of maccabies? What about the deterocannon? Last time I checked none of the early church held to you cannon.

Wanna also learn something about else the book of revelation wasn’t present in any of the early church fathers cannons either provo g my point you have no way to say how you know that books inspired or part of the cannon do you?

I bet you don’t even know what Cannon 85 is, I’ll tell your dumbass it’s the earliest recorded normative cannon for the church and guess what…. IT ISNT THE PROTTIE CANNON. Once again proving you don’t “HAVE THE BIBLE”

So you can’t tell me how you know the books are divinely inspired, you can’t tell me how the biblical books were chosen as cannon, you can’t tell me who shared the same cannon as you (nobody did) prior to Yank printing press, you can’t tell me anything can you proving you don’t have the Bible or even know what it is.

What do you mean what the Lord has told us? The Lord told you protties nothing you idiots TELL YOURSELF stuff if the “lord” is In reference to you then sure I guess you like all protties are your own Popes prophets and apostles then yeah I guess you told yourself stuff.

You don’t follow anything Moses believed in if you did then you’d not call Saint veneration idolatry. You realise in Luke 16 the rich man prays to Abraham for mercy right ? You protties woudl call this “IDOLATRY “

You realise Moses created the tabernacle and ark with Cherebuim Icons and statues right? (Exodus 25) even Solomon (Kings 4-5) and you’d call both of them heathens, I already showed you how according to your made up Industrial Revolution dogmatic religion that King David and St John the apostle and even King Jerimiah were all Idolater pagans so I gave you more examples using the Bible a book which you claim to follow but don’t actually follow because if you did then you’d have the correct cannon.

So how exactly do you have the faith of Moses? When by your own standards Moses is an idolater . I won’t hold my tounge when I insult your disgusting false doctrines, you don’t have the Gospel so me insulting you isn’t insulting the gospel you tone policing CUCK, I have the Gospel YOU DO NOT, I have the Bible YOU DO NOT, so I can cuss whatever TF abomination you have that has given rise to Mormons and Jehovah witnesses due to your abhorrent heresy you group of schitzo Roman Catholics.

@Arzenic @subhuman1996 @Vazelrr wstch these prottie dogs froth out the mouth 0 arguments 0 points all they have is “Don’t be mean” or “this isn’t the spirit your being mean” this is why men leave these faggots cults to join other faiths like Islam or orthodoxy or just hate religion and become GAYtheist. Anybody who follows Protestantism in 2025 has low IQ this same dog would call Moses an idolater and the church fathers Heathens for having icons and saint veneration. Yet the fuck wants to say his faith is that of Moses? lol he’d spit on you much worse than I

I'm low key not this educated on the bible/gospel,so I can't give a high IQ response

 

[Vazelrr]

lol so what about the book of maccabies? What about the deterocannon? Last time I checked none of the early church held to you cannon.

Wanna also learn something about else the book of revelation wasn’t present in any of the early church fathers cannons either provo g my point you have no way to say how you know that books inspired or part of the cannon do you?

I bet you don’t even know what Cannon 85 is, I’ll tell your dumbass it’s the earliest recorded normative cannon for the church and guess what…. IT ISNT THE PROTTIE CANNON. Once again proving you don’t “HAVE THE BIBLE”

So you can’t tell me how you know the books are divinely inspired, you can’t tell me how the biblical books were chosen as cannon, you can’t tell me who shared the same cannon as you (nobody did) prior to Yank printing press, you can’t tell me anything can you proving you don’t have the Bible or even know what it is.

What do you mean what the Lord has told us? The Lord told you protties nothing you idiots TELL YOURSELF stuff if the “lord” is In reference to you then sure I guess you like all protties are your own Popes prophets and apostles then yeah I guess you told yourself stuff.

You don’t follow anything Moses believed in if you did then you’d not call Saint veneration idolatry. You realise in Luke 16 the rich man prays to Abraham for mercy right ? You protties woudl call this “IDOLATRY “

You realise Moses created the tabernacle and ark with Cherebuim Icons and statues right? (Exodus 25) even Solomon (Kings 4-5) and you’d call both of them heathens, I already showed you how according to your made up Industrial Revolution dogmatic religion that King David and St John the apostle and even King Jerimiah were all Idolater pagans so I gave you more examples using the Bible a book which you claim to follow but don’t actually follow because if you did then you’d have the correct cannon.

So how exactly do you have the faith of Moses? When by your own standards Moses is an idolater . I won’t hold my tounge when I insult your disgusting false doctrines, you don’t have the Gospel so me insulting you isn’t insulting the gospel you tone policing CUCK, I have the Gospel YOU DO NOT, I have the Bible YOU DO NOT, so I can cuss whatever TF abomination you have that has given rise to Mormons and Jehovah witnesses due to your abhorrent heresy you group of schitzo Roman Catholics.

@Arzenic @subhuman1996 @Vazelrr wstch these prottie dogs froth out the mouth 0 arguments 0 points all they have is “Don’t be mean” or “this isn’t the spirit your being mean” this is why men leave these faggots cults to join other faiths like Islam or orthodoxy or just hate religion and become GAYtheist. Anybody who follows Protestantism in 2025 has low IQ this same dog would call Moses an idolater and the church fathers Heathens for having icons and saint veneration. Yet the fuck wants to say his faith is that of Moses? lol he’d spit on you much worse than I

Mirin the reply though,high IQ I just can't digest it

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I'm low key not this educated on the bible/gospel,so I can't give a high IQ response

It’s fine just know Protestantism literally is diametrically opposed to the first 1k years of the religion to such a degree that if they went back in time with their beliefs Christian’s would consider them a entirely new religion like Islam.

Protties claim the same title as Christian’s but in truth aren’t Christian’s they are their own Religion. And actually denounce all the church fathers apostles and prophets as idolaters and heretics because Protestant doctrine is renissance age/Industrial Revolution era and is contrary to anything the ancient isrelaites and the early Christian’s believed in.

Basically Protestantism is just Islam with extra steps

 

[Arzenic]

lol so what about the book of maccabies? What about the deterocannon? Last time I checked none of the early church held to you cannon.

Wanna also learn something about else the book of revelation wasn’t present in any of the early church fathers cannons either provo g my point you have no way to say how you know that books inspired or part of the cannon do you?

I bet you don’t even know what Cannon 85 is, I’ll tell your dumbass it’s the earliest recorded normative cannon for the church and guess what…. IT ISNT THE PROTTIE CANNON. Once again proving you don’t “HAVE THE BIBLE”

So you can’t tell me how you know the books are divinely inspired, you can’t tell me how the biblical books were chosen as cannon, you can’t tell me who shared the same cannon as you (nobody did) prior to Yank printing press, you can’t tell me anything can you proving you don’t have the Bible or even know what it is.

What do you mean what the Lord has told us? The Lord told you protties nothing you idiots TELL YOURSELF stuff if the “lord” is In reference to you then sure I guess you like all protties are your own Popes prophets and apostles then yeah I guess you told yourself stuff.

You don’t follow anything Moses believed in if you did then you’d not call Saint veneration idolatry. You realise in Luke 16 the rich man prays to Abraham for mercy right ? You protties woudl call this “IDOLATRY “

You realise Moses created the tabernacle and ark with Cherebuim Icons and statues right? (Exodus 25) even Solomon (Kings 4-5) and you’d call both of them heathens, I already showed you how according to your made up Industrial Revolution dogmatic religion that King David and St John the apostle and even King Jerimiah were all Idolater pagans so I gave you more examples using the Bible a book which you claim to follow but don’t actually follow because if you did then you’d have the correct cannon.

So how exactly do you have the faith of Moses? When by your own standards Moses is an idolater . I won’t hold my tounge when I insult your disgusting false doctrines, you don’t have the Gospel so me insulting you isn’t insulting the gospel you tone policing CUCK, I have the Gospel YOU DO NOT, I have the Bible YOU DO NOT, so I can cuss whatever TF abomination you have that has given rise to Mormons and Jehovah witnesses due to your abhorrent heresy you group of schitzo Roman Catholics.

@Arzenic @subhuman1996 @Vazelrr wstch these prottie dogs froth out the mouth 0 arguments 0 points all they have is “Don’t be mean” or “this isn’t the spirit your being mean” this is why men leave these faggots cults to join other faiths like Islam or orthodoxy or just hate religion and become GAYtheist. Anybody who follows Protestantism in 2025 has low IQ this same dog would call Moses an idolater and the church fathers Heathens for having icons and saint veneration. Yet the fuck wants to say his faith is that of Moses? lol he’d spit on you much worse than I

I'm low key not this educated on the bible/gospel,so I can't give a high IQ response

Same, mirin hard though.

I remember when i was 15 and at the time i already knew that evangelic/protenstant is heretic asf, but i was still apart of the church. So at the Jesus camp or how you say it in english; it pissed me off so much the amount of heresy the pope was speaking. (The pope was a woman too btw)

I literally wanted to raise and call her a complete retard, i did debate her about certain topics though.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Same, mirin hard though.

I remember when i was 15 and at the time i already knew that evangelic/protenstant is heretic asf, but i was still apart of the church. So at the Jesus camp or how you say it in english; it pissed me off so much the amount of heresy the pope was speaking. (The pope was a woman too btw)

I literally wanted to raise and call her a complete retard, i did debate her about certain topics though.

JFL that soy boy church had female pastors


Literal heresy Paul himself even says women should be in such positions women cannot be in leading roles this is heresy of highest order because women are overly emotional and will fuck everything up. Women should stick to teaching the children the faith and leave it like that.

Protties have lost the plot even RC still only
Allow Homosexual male priests the western Church of England has Tranny priests as well and that’s what my family are they are Chruxh of England but her ethnic branch so they are ultra trad (so no gay white people shit)