Christians vs Muslims

134applesauce456

134applesauce456

shooting stars NEVER fly for me
Joined
Jun 23, 2023
Posts
7,409
Reputation
19,422
8 pages long of ramblings holy
IMG 0468


imagine all these paragraphs and defense efforts just for there to be no God in the end jfl
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: rehabcel, sigma boii, sub5mumbaifinalboss and 11 others
Imagine believing in these those their nga THINGS

Only jews are right they are god
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: VV62, Down and 134applesauce456
I didn't cum on my face i fell asleep:feelswah:
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: 134applesauce456
I’m a man of facts :forcedsmile:
IMG 3274
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bakpaokukus, Swarthy Knight, VV62 and 1 other person
If you think Jesus was an incel you're low iq, Jesus was a volcel because his life served the purpose of spreading the gospel. He did not have the same earthly mindset we lock ourselves in where sex is put on a pedestal. For Jesus sex is a beautiful thing that creates another human being for him to love.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: degenblondie, PrinceLuenLeoncur, 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚛|𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚗 and 2 others
If you think Jesus was an incel you're low iq, Jesus was a volcel because his life served the purpose of spreading the gospel. He did not have the same earthly mindset we lock ourselves in where sex is put on a pedestal. For Jesus sex is a beautiful thing that creates another human being for him to love.
:lul: Is “volcel” code for swarthy Arab manlet or something :feelskek:. Bro couldn’t get any while Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) a High T BVLL had 12 wives
IMG 3276

IMG 3275
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Swarthy Knight and 134applesauce456
well yeah both are low iq, christcucks a bit less but still
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Swarthy Knight, VV62, 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚛|𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚗 and 3 others
Also what's wrong with being a pacifist? War is a product of imperfect society and it shouldn't be a coveted thing.

Jesus' followers were judged on heart and how they followed him, not by earthly properties such as looks and status. This is clear when he befriends heavily disliked groups of people such as tax collectors as he sees the good in their heart.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
well yeah both are low iq, christcucks a bit less but still
:feelskek: How could you say this when Prophet Muhammad was the founder of JB enjoyers :lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bakpaokukus, VV62 and 134applesauce456
:lul: Is “volcel” code for swarthy Arab manlet or something :feelskek:. Bro couldn’t get any while Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) a High T BVLL had 12 wives
View attachment 3944078
View attachment 3944082
It's evident in the Bible Jesus does not value sex, it would also be unethical for someone with Jesus' power and how he essentially fathered the human race to have sexual desires for his, in a sense, children.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, iblamexyz and 134applesauce456
It's evident in the Bible Jesus does not value sex, it would also be unethical for someone with Jesus' power and how he essentially fathered the human race to have sexual desires for his, in a sense, children.
Religion isnt real iqcel

You can’t quote the Bible to justify your manlet. :feelskek:

Accept the mog :forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 134applesauce456
It's evident in the Bible Jesus does not value sex, it would also be unethical for someone with Jesus' power and how he essentially fathered the human race to have sexual desires for his, in a sense, children.
this argument is interesting

you are lowkey right, Jesus would be extremely powerful so he would be easily able to control his flesh/lust so sex wouldn't even matter to him

that's if he exists
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz and Gymcelmidface
Religion isnt real iqcel

You can’t quote the Bible to justify your manlet. :feelskek:

Accept the mog :forcedsmile:
"You can't quote a historical text to justify a historical figure" jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
"You can't quote a historical text to justify a historical figure" jfl
Religious texts aren’t historical texts idiot
The Bible says dragons are real :lul: :lul:

If we look at it from a real historical POV Muhammed mogs ;)
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
this argument is interesting

you are lowkey right, Jesus would be extremely powerful he is easily able to control his flesh/lust so sex wouldn't even matter to him
If I could control myself to never have lustful desires again I think I would do it. Sex should not be a lustful event. I'll admit I am a very lustful person. Sex however is an intimate act which is designed to create a child.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: 134applesauce456
Religious texts aren’t historical texts idiot
The Bible says dragons are real :lul: :lul:

If we look at it from a real historical POV Muhammed mogs ;)
The Bible is described as a historical text by many scholars and muesums. To add on Jesus has records as a real person.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
@Gymcelmidface @lastredeemer arguing is pointless, my main point was to believe in what you want to believe in and don't waste time trying to argue the unanswerable questions of life :forcedsmile:

if you want to be Christian great👍
if you want to be Muslim great👍
If you want to be atheist/agnostic great👍
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: bakpaokukus, Gymcelmidface and lastredeemer
The Bible is described as a historical text by many scholars and muesums. To add on Jesus has records as a real person.
:lul::lul: I mean this is just the stupidest argument ever :lul:. I don’t even have to argue this but I will entertain you.

IMG 3338


IMG 3339
:feelskek: SPOT THE DIFFERENCE SAARRRR
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
If I could control myself to never have lustful desires again I think I would do it. Sex should not be a lustful event. I'll admit I am a very lustful person. Sex however is an intimate act which is designed to create a child.
this is a very good way of thinking , this is an aspect of Christianity I like 👍
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gymcelmidface
Muhh god
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
JFL, too much low test is happing in here @PrinceLuenLeoncur
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and 134applesauce456
yes the universe came from nothing and we evolved from fish
trust me bro :soy:

:forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456 and iblamexyz
Both deny you free will so even if they are real no matter what you do you can't change the outcome
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456 and lastredeemer
well yeah both are low iq, christcucks a bit less but still
This. At least Christcucks mostly just pick out Bible verses they like and stick with it. Muzzies tho follow their book as the literal word of their god and will bend over backwards to defend every illogical verse. Both are generally dumb tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Proex and 134applesauce456
, yes the universe came from nothing and we evolved from fish
trust me bro :soy:

:forcedsmile:
i'm just an agnostic, i simply don't know and I won't deny either religions

I just thinking fighting between them is silly , for all we know God does not exist or God does not care
 
i'm just an agnostic, i simply don't know and I won't deny either religions
Do you have an explanation for the beginning of the Universe and the reality around us

I just thinking fighting between them is silly , for all we know God does not exist or he does not care
'Does not exist or does not care' - It seems like you dont want to know :what:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456 and PrinceLuenLeoncur
Do you have an explanation for the beginning of the Universe and the reality around us


'Does not exist or does not care' - It seems like you dont want to know :what:
i don't have an explanation

i don't know

I would like to know but obviously God doesn't communicate with us nor leave any feasible evidence for his existence
 
i'm just an agnostic, i simply don't know and I won't deny either religions

I just thinking fighting between them is silly , for all we know God does not exist or God does not care
This whole thread is retarded. You don’t know personally but then assert that there’s no way for others to know which is just fucking false.

I know for a fact gods real and that Christianity is true but your so fucking arrogant and puffed up on pride you project your own ignorance into others when it’s simply not needed.

Please if you don’t know that’s fine but sit the fuck back and keep quiet, because others know and we will discuss it at length we don’t need a idiot dumbass to tell us anything
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght, 134applesauce456 and JasGews69x
how would you know something is from God?
He cannot, infact he cannot know anything, his stupid worldview is contradictory like an GAYtheist, he belived in things without any reason of justification for it. He can’t even tell us why and how he trusts his senses all he can say is “well he may exist or he may not” but even if god exists in his stupid worldview he already has preconceptions about WHO God is and how he will behave (if he’s western I’ll admit it’s probably heavily based on the Christian god) so it’s just cringe hearing them chat shit

Agnostics are only one deviation away from being Gaytheists they aren’t as arrogant but they are one deviation away and in typical cumskin fashion they are KAFIR dogs which is why God is destroying their race
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght, 134applesauce456 and JasGews69x
how would you know something is from God?
I guess I wouldnt fair point

I would prefer more direct communication though can you blame me? using that logic basically anything ever could be "from God"
 
SpongeBob
 
  • Love it
Reactions: 134applesauce456
I guess I wouldnt fair point

I would prefer more direct communication though can you blame me? using that logic basically anything ever could be "from God"
How do you know anything? How can you even explain why you can know anything?


Knowing already presupposes orderly rational configuration of existence, reliability of your own sense data to tell you accurate information of the external world and Logic. All things which cannot exist in a chaotic “It just is broooooo” world, you need a rational being to explain this.

This is why I was mean to you because you can’t even make knowledge claims if you’re an atheist or agnostic because neither of you can ACCOUNT for knowledge to begin with it’s just ridiculous. Like the dumbass below me says “religious people deny free will” you absolute retard if gods not real you don’t have free will you idiot your a slave to your chemical reactions and stimuli which control everything you do and think, you don’t choose it your chemicals and reactions choose how and what you do and think and yet he’s stupid enough to think he has free will as an GAYtheist. Fuckin pathetic but this is what being an dumbass does to you
Both deny you free will so even if they are real no matter what you do you can't change the outcome
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght, 134applesauce456 and JasGews69x
This whole thread is retarded. You don’t know personally but then assert that there’s no way for others to know which is just fucking false.

I know for a fact gods real and that Christianity is true but your so fucking arrogant and puffed up on pride you project your own ignorance into others when it’s simply not needed.

Please if you don’t know that’s fine but sit the fuck back and keep quiet, because others know and we will discuss it at length we don’t need a idiot dumbass to tell us anything
i literally said believe in what you want to believe in, why are you angry at me:lul:
 
you absolute retard if gods not real you don’t have free will you idiot your a slave to your chemical reactions and stimuli which control everything you do and think, you don’t choose it your chemicals and reactions choose how and what you do and think and yet he’s stupid enough to think he has free will as an GAYtheist. Fuckin pathetic but this is what being an dumbass does to you
Would rather get my free will taken by my love of pawgs than god tbh
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 134applesauce456
How do you know anything? How can you even explain why you can know anything?


Knowing already presupposes orderly rational configuration of existence, reliability of your own sense data to tell you accurate information of the external world and Logic. All things which cannot exist in a chaotic “It just is broooooo” world, you need a rational being to explain this.

This is why I was mean to you because you can’t even make knowledge claims if you’re an atheist or agnostic because neither of you can ACCOUNT for knowledge to begin with it’s just ridiculous. Like the dumbass below me says “religious people deny free will” you absolute retard if gods not real you don’t have free will you idiot your a slave to your chemical reactions and stimuli which control everything you do and think, you don’t choose it your chemicals and reactions choose how and what you do and think and yet he’s stupid enough to think he has free will as an GAYtheist. Fuckin pathetic but this is what being an dumbass does to you
you proved my point bro you are typing me essays for a God whose existence cannot be 100% proven :forcedsmile:
 
Last edited:
Would rather get my free will taken by my love of pawgs then god tbh
You don’t have free will to begin with in your stupid brainrott belief system that’s the point I’m making. You “just do” things you have no say in how your stimuli, chemicals and neurons are going to react behave and trigger thefore your a slave to yourself you don’t choose anything :lul::lul::lul: free will literally doesn’t exist for you everything you think and belive is already chosen 🥲 it’s so funny hearing Gaytheists stumble and trip over their own positions
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght and 134applesauce456
You don’t have free will to begin with in your stupid brainrott belief system that’s the point I’m making. You “just do” things you have no say in how your stimuli, chemicals and neurons are going to react behave and trigger thefore your a slave to yourself you don’t choose anything :lul::lul::lul: free will literally doesn’t exist for you everything you think and belive is already chosen 🥲 it’s so funny hearing Gaytheists stumble and trip over their own positions
You don't have to be chained by your stimuli once you are aware of your reactions and realize that you are not your reactions or your neurons you are free
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
you proved my point bro you are typing me essays for a God who's existence cannot be 100% proven :forcedsmile:
I just proved it by explaining that he is the necessary precondition for all the transandentals, he’s necessary for logic, knowledge, truth, ethnics etc. these things exist but aren’t material they cannot have an “empirical foundation” considering these are universal, invariant, abstract things they thefore require an invariant universal abstract thing to account for it existing the way it does in the first place and interaction with one another. That justification is God specifically the Christian God as he’s the only one that can provide a coherent justified basis and view without falling into contradictions and illogical fallacies. These things require a certain type of personal being not just “any god brooo” that’s the point I was making

You agnostics and Gaytheists (which unironically crib your ethics and other metaphysics from Christian worldview) cannot explain how you can know anything in any way, Con’t, Hume and Descartes all 3 atheists admit they can’t explain or know anything :lul::lul::lul: and admit this and these are high IQ philosophers
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght and 134applesauce456
I just proved it by explaining that he is the necessary precondition for all the transandentals, he’s necessary for logic, knowledge, truth, ethnics etc. these things exist but aren’t material they cannot have an “empirical foundation” considering these are universal, invariant, abstract things they thefore require an invariant universal abstract thing to account for it existing the way it does in the first place and interaction with one another. That justification is God specifically the Christian God as he’s the only one that can provide a coherent justified basis and view without falling into contradictions and illogical fallacies. These things require a certain type of personal being not just “any god brooo” that’s the point I was making

You agnostics and Gaytheists (which unironically crib your ethics and other metaphysics from Christian worldview) cannot explain how you can know anything in any way, Con’t, Hume and Descartes all 3 atheists admit they can’t explain or know anything :lul::lul::lul: and admit this and these are high IQ philosophers
alright sure bro

I would rather a loving God exist then there not be one anyway
 
I just proved it by explaining that he is the necessary precondition for all the transandentals, he’s necessary for logic, knowledge, truth, ethnics etc. these things exist but aren’t material they cannot have an “empirical foundation” considering these are universal, invariant, abstract things they thefore require an invariant universal abstract thing to account for it existing the way it does in the first place and interaction with one another. That justification is God specifically the Christian God as he’s the only one that can provide a coherent justified basis and view without falling into contradictions and illogical fallacies. These things require a certain type of personal being not just “any god brooo” that’s the point I was making

You agnostics and Gaytheists (which unironically crib your ethics and other metaphysics from Christian worldview) cannot explain how you can know anything in any way, Con’t, Hume and Descartes all 3 atheists admit they can’t explain or know anything :lul::lul::lul: and admit this and these are high IQ philosophers
Saying truth and logic require the Christian God is just assuming what you're trying to prove. Plenty of spiritual paths explain these things without needing a personal god. If your God were the only foundation, you wouldn’t need to argue so hard for Him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
You don't have to be chained by your stimuli once you are aware of your reactions and realize that you are not your reactions or your neurons you are free
Nonsense, your stimuli aka neurons is what determines what you think do and act even you writing is due to your brain wiring and neuronic activations based on chemical reactions and things you don’t control but JUST IS. You are so fucking dumb :lul: imagine you are aware of anything which is a knowledge claim to begin with which you can’t even provide an justified account as to how you can have knowledge because you can’t even provide a reliable account as to how you can trust your sense data to give you an true account of the external world


This is called the “myth of the given” everything it’s filtered through your own paradigm and preconceptions your eyes brain etc you have no reliable way to ensure any of that is true or WHY it’ll be the case.


Therefore YOU KNOW NOTHING AND ARE A FUCKING SLAVE TO YOUR CHEMICALS LOOOL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght and 134applesauce456
Nonsense, your stimuli aka neurons is what determines what you think do and act even you writing is due to your brain wiring and neuronic activations based on chemical reactions and things you don’t control but JUST IS. You are so fucking dumb :lul: imagine you are aware of anything which is a knowledge claim to begin with which you can’t even provide an justified account as to how you can have knowledge because you can’t even provide a reliable account as to how you can trust your sense data to give you an true account of the external world


This is called the “myth of the given” everything it’s filtered through your own paradigm and preconceptions your eyes brain etc you have no reliable way to ensure any of that is true or WHY it’ll be the case.


Therefore YOU KNOW NOTHING AND ARE A FUCKING SLAVE TO YOUR CHEMICALS LOOOL
If your thoughts are just chemicals firing without control then so is your argument, and there’s no reason anyone should trust it including you. So either you admit consciousness can transcend raw stimuli, or you accept that even your rant and belief is just a random neuron spasm with no truth value. Pick one.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 134applesauce456
alright sure bro

I would rather a loving God exist then there not be one anyway
Once again why? Why not an evil god?

In your worldview much like an atheist you can’t have values, things just are you have no right or way to say “why” it’s better for god to be evil or loving both jsut “are bro”

The fact you want a loving god proves your soul longs for Christ but you deprive him of Christ you torture your soul your spirit from the one who made and loves you to spite yourself with frivolous questions and beliefs.

There’s reason for every paradigm the thing I’m asking for is a coherent account for the explanation for the existence of metaphysical realities as a whole. Atheists fail and fall short they can’t even explain bare basic shit which excludes their beliefs as being illogical and incomplete, your issue is one of continuity, you fall into hypocrisy as I displayed with my first paragraph and a contradictory worldview cannot be true esp one that once again can’t provide a logical framework.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght and 134applesauce456

Similar threads

ChadFucksYourOneitis
Replies
3
Views
57
psychomandible
psychomandible
iblameautistickids
Replies
29
Views
227
iblameautistickids
iblameautistickids

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top