circumcision is based

7kw87gy.png
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5028213/
and how does it lower the size?
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkeypox
circumcision doesnt make ur dick smaller
U are literally removing a part of ur dick how would that not make it smaller

When u have the skin during sex it provides a gliding motion. It’s smoother and more motion-y
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger
  • JFL
Reactions: monkeypox and sportsmogger
U are literally removing a part of ur dick how would that not make it smaller

When u have the skin during sex it provides a gliding motion. It’s smoother and more motion-y
the girl provides that with her wet pussy

and idc if it makes it smaller or not, i dont believe that and im fine with my penis size
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: WELOVELOOKS
likely because foreskin is vascular and gives nutrients to a growing penis?
This thread = debunked.
how does it give nutrients to the penis

the reason ur dick grows is due to androgen receptors

i dont think the foreskin contains any androgen receptors
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger
@Gengar
 
  • +1
Reactions: sportsmogger
I’m not trolling

It’s basic logic, heard mutiple girls claim uncirc. Feels better
no whatever feels best for the girl is the size and skill
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkeypox
I’m not trolling

It’s basic logic, heard mutiple girls claim uncirc. Feels better
Why do dildos have no foreskin then

JFL if you take what foids say seriously tbh
 
  • JFL
Reactions: WELOVELOOKS
Why do dildos have no foreskin then

JFL if you take what foids say seriously tbh
What a strange but interesting cope

Idek how that would work but I’m sure it exists
 
so they just disregard the studies which found that it reduced sensitivity, because it had problems with the design? Just because a study has flaws does not mean it is invalid, so dnr you fucking jewboy
 
  • WTF
Reactions: monkeypox
how does it give nutrients to the penis

the reason ur dick grows is due to androgen receptors

i dont think the foreskin contains any androgen receptors
I just sent a study that shows circumfused people have lower penis size
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: sportsmogger and notsocommonthumb
What a strange but interesting cope
How is it cope :lul::lul: You claim that having a foreskin makes it more enjoyable for them
Idek how that would work but I’m sure it exists
It does but 99% of dildos don't have a foreskin (material that replicates the feeling of the real one) because it literally has no difference JFL

Foids go for girthy ones
 
I just sent a study that shows circumfused people have lower penis size
this is true, sportsmogger has a ridiculously small penis
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger and Crusile
so they just disregard the studies which found that it reduced sensitivity, because it had problems with the design? Just because a study has flaws does not mean it is invalid, so dnr you fucking jewboy
Nigga ofc if a study has flaws it's invalid


Which one do you think is reliable: a self-reported penis size study or one that was performed in a clinic?
 
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb
I just sent a study that shows circumfused people have lower penis size
yeah and does it explain why it lowers the size?

or did it just take a bunch of random uncircumcised and circumcised guys, measure them and claim circumcised guys are smaller
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkeypox
Nigga ofc if a study has flaws it's invalid


Which one do you think is reliable: a self-reported penis size study or one that was performed in a clinic?
thats such an arbitrary comparison,
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: sportsmogger and monkeypox
How is it cope :lul::lul: You claim that having a foreskin makes it more enjoyable for them

It does but 99% of dildos don't have a foreskin (material that replicates the feeling of the real one) because it literally has no difference JFL

Foids go for girthy ones
It’s not rly needed because yes it’s an improvement but there’s even bigger improvements for dildos like vibration it would just over complicate this

Vibration mogs any male penis anyways I made a girl cum like 15 times in 20 minutes with a small vibrating toy
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: standardcel, sportsmogger and monkeypox
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb and sportsmogger
You said if a study has flaws it doesn't mean that it's invalid?

I just gave you an example of a flawed study
by your logic we shouldn't trust newtons law of motion because it had flaws
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: monkeypox
by your logic we shouldn't trust newtons law of motion because it had flaws
Yeah but they did further research on it if it makes sense

The study I linked is the only one with no flaws and the most high quality

Circumcision literally has no downsides if done at birth, some guys did allegedly lose some sensitivity (guys who got circumcised at adulthood) but you can find guys who were satisfied with doing it at adulthood too


Most guys get circumcised at birth anyway
 
  • JFL
Reactions: notsocommonthumb
Yeah but they did further research on it if it makes sense
yeah... 200 years later
The study I linked is the only one with no flaws and the most high quality
you haven't linked a study dafuck? you don't know the difference between a systemic review and a study? thought you were jewish

Circumcision literally has no downsides if done at birth, some guys did allegedly lose some sensitivity (guys who got circumcised at adulthood) but you can find guys who were satisfied with doing it at adulthood too
Most guys get circumcised at birth anyway
of course a person who was circumcised at birth won't know if they are less sensitive.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile, monkeypox and BimaxLaser
3B905A3F D26C 4A25 B00E D9F22210D6BF

We should settle this on an uncut vs cut table tennis match
 
  • JFL
Reactions: standardcel and sportsmogger
yeah and does it explain why it lowers the size?

or did it just take a bunch of random uncircumcised and circumcised guys, measure them and claim circumcised guys are smaller
The mechanisms of penis growth is unknown but it makes sense that it would stunt penis size growth
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger
The mechanisms of penis growth is unknown but it makes sense that it would stunt penis size growth
the mechanisms are what i just told you

sensitivity to androgen receptors in your dick, and high dht
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: notsocommonthumb
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: sportsmogger and Crusile
yeah... 200 years later
Still
you haven't linked a study dafuck? you don't know the difference between a systemic review and a study? thought you were jewish
And it's a "systemic review" of what?
of course a person who was circumcised at birth won't know if they are less sensitive.
Would it matter? :lul: my dick is sensitive af, I still enjoy fapping

If anything you're proving that circumcision is superior since it makes you last longer
 
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb
the mechanisms are what i just told you

sensitivity to androgen receptors in your dick, and high dht
Hormones stimulate growth but there are other factors, obviously. The specific mechanisms that cause penis growth are too complicated to unravel. It makes sense that mutilating a vascular sheath around a body part would stunt its growth
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile and monkeypox
no not still. by your logic newtons law of motion should not have ever been taken serious
True, but circumcision isn't a recent thing

It's older than newton's law of motion

Wouldn't they have had enough time like, 1000+ years later? They have been studying it for hundreds of years
its clearly biased
How so
yore a cuck if you think its good to be less sensitive so you last longer
I'm just saying that my dick is sensitive and I'm happy with it

Also I want to last longer for myself, not the foid lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb
circumcision makes your dick shorter, it lessons sensitivity and pleasure, makes it look ugly dried and splotchy plus it supplies jews with material for their skin bank. why would you want to validate their religion or support the jews in any way.
 
  • +1
Reactions: first snow
True, but circumcision isn't a recent thing

It's older than newton's law of motion

Wouldn't they have had enough time like, 1000+ years later? They have been studying it for hundreds of years
source that they've been trying to find negative effect of circumcision?
as I said before
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkeypox
@notsocommonthumb @Crusile @WELOVELOOKS stop debating them, they need their copium or else they will rope
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Crusile, sportsmogger and WELOVELOOKS
Hormones stimulate growth but there are other factors, obviously. The specific mechanisms that cause penis growth are too complicated to unravel. It makes sense that mutilating a vascular sheath around a body part would stunt its growth
so i couldve had a 10 inch dick is what ur saying
 
@notsocommonthumb @Crusile @WELOVELOOKS stop debating them, they need their copium or else they will rope
not coping

i like the way my dick looks now and i had to get it due to brutal phimosis

ill make sure to circumcise my kid too
 
tbh im not reading, I dont think people should be circumcised without any real reason, phimosis etc
They do it for aesthetic reasons and because it lowers the risk of some diseases affecting the penis, also because of possible phimosis later in life

The saying that circumcision reduces sensitivity is false because they claim that they remove the frenulum in your penis (the most sensitive part) which isn't true

Maybe some people do get fucked up and have their frenulums removed but it wasn't in my case (also probably most circumcised users here as well)
read my other replies wdym?
Bro I'm genuinely tweaking rn wdym

Which reply
 
  • +1
Reactions: notsocommonthumb
not coping

i like the way my dick looks now and i had to get it due to brutal phimosis

ill make sure to circumcise my kid too
Did you notice any changes in your sensitivity?
 
  • +1
Reactions: sportsmogger
They do it for aesthetic reasons and because it lowers the risk of some diseases affecting the penis, also because of possible phimosis later in life

The saying that circumcision reduces sensitivity is false because they claim that they remove the frenulum in your penis (the most sensitive part) which isn't true

Maybe some people do get fucked up and have their frenulums removed but it wasn't in my case (also probably most circumcised users here as well)
a lot of people try and regrow their frenulum with pe, wdym?
Bro I'm genuinely tweaking rn wdym

Which reply
nigga read my replies dafuck?
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkeypox
mirin ur own dick = faggot
you brought it like it's a plus when it doesn't even matter

uncut looks the same as cut when erect so point destroyed
 

Similar threads

mrmogger2882
Replies
39
Views
656
Seong Gi-Hun
Seong Gi-Hun
Greypiller
Replies
60
Views
734
Numb The Pain
Numb The Pain
0ut0fN0ne
Replies
5
Views
236
0ut0fN0ne
0ut0fN0ne
NateJacobs
Replies
5
Views
176
14vic
14vic
GhostBoySwag
Replies
42
Views
1K
DOggo
DOggo

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top