data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7627d/7627d7eedc33581598d162c0af8c402db0cbc1bd" alt="Crusile"
Crusile
Kraken
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2021
- Posts
- 3,563
- Reputation
- 3,513
Yes it does.no it doesnt
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes it does.no it doesnt
and how does it lower the size?
U are literally removing a part of ur dick how would that not make it smallercircumcision doesnt make ur dick smaller
The difference is literally negligible
likely because foreskin is vascular and gives nutrients to a growing penis?and how does it lower the size?
the girl provides that with her wet pussyU are literally removing a part of ur dick how would that not make it smaller
When u have the skin during sex it provides a gliding motion. It’s smoother and more motion-y
I can't tell if you're trolling or notU are literally removing a part of ur dick how would that not make it smaller
how does it give nutrients to the penislikely because foreskin is vascular and gives nutrients to a growing penis?
This thread = debunked.
I’m not trollingI can't tell if you're trolling or not
no whatever feels best for the girl is the size and skillI’m not trolling
It’s basic logic, heard mutiple girls claim uncirc. Feels better
Why do dildos have no foreskin thenI’m not trolling
It’s basic logic, heard mutiple girls claim uncirc. Feels better
@notsocommonthumb disgusting foreskincel![]()
Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review - PubMed
The highest-quality studies suggest that medical male circumcision has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, sexual sensation, or satisfaction.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
What a strange but interesting copeWhy do dildos have no foreskin then
JFL if you take what foids say seriously tbh
so they just disregard the studies which found that it reduced sensitivity, because it had problems with the design? Just because a study has flaws does not mean it is invalid, so dnr you fucking jewboy![]()
Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review - PubMed
The highest-quality studies suggest that medical male circumcision has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, sexual sensation, or satisfaction.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I just sent a study that shows circumfused people have lower penis sizehow does it give nutrients to the penis
the reason ur dick grows is due to androgen receptors
i dont think the foreskin contains any androgen receptors
How is it copeWhat a strange but interesting cope
It does but 99% of dildos don't have a foreskin (material that replicates the feeling of the real one) because it literally has no difference JFLIdek how that would work but I’m sure it exists
this is true, sportsmogger has a ridiculously small penisI just sent a study that shows circumfused people have lower penis size
Nigga ofc if a study has flaws it's invalidso they just disregard the studies which found that it reduced sensitivity, because it had problems with the design? Just because a study has flaws does not mean it is invalid, so dnr you fucking jewboy
yeah and does it explain why it lowers the size?I just sent a study that shows circumfused people have lower penis size
yeah brothis is true, sportsmogger has a ridiculously small penis
thats such an arbitrary comparison,Nigga ofc if a study has flaws it's invalid
Which one do you think is reliable: a self-reported penis size study or one that was performed in a clinic?
It’s not rly needed because yes it’s an improvement but there’s even bigger improvements for dildos like vibration it would just over complicate thisHow is it copeYou claim that having a foreskin makes it more enjoyable for them
It does but 99% of dildos don't have a foreskin (material that replicates the feeling of the real one) because it literally has no difference JFL
Foids go for girthy ones
You said if a study has flaws it doesn't mean that it's invalid?thats such an arbitrary comparison,
by your logic we shouldn't trust newtons law of motion because it had flawsYou said if a study has flaws it doesn't mean that it's invalid?
I just gave you an example of a flawed study
Yeah but they did further research on it if it makes senseby your logic we shouldn't trust newtons law of motion because it had flaws
yeah... 200 years laterYeah but they did further research on it if it makes sense
you haven't linked a study dafuck? you don't know the difference between a systemic review and a study? thought you were jewishThe study I linked is the only one with no flaws and the most high quality
of course a person who was circumcised at birth won't know if they are less sensitive.Circumcision literally has no downsides if done at birth, some guys did allegedly lose some sensitivity (guys who got circumcised at adulthood) but you can find guys who were satisfied with doing it at adulthood too
Most guys get circumcised at birth anyway
The mechanisms of penis growth is unknown but it makes sense that it would stunt penis size growthyeah and does it explain why it lowers the size?
or did it just take a bunch of random uncircumcised and circumcised guys, measure them and claim circumcised guys are smaller
the mechanisms are what i just told youThe mechanisms of penis growth is unknown but it makes sense that it would stunt penis size growth
copethe mechanisms are what i just told you
sensitivity to androgen receptors in your dick, and high dht
Stillyeah... 200 years later
And it's a "systemic review" of what?you haven't linked a study dafuck? you don't know the difference between a systemic review and a study? thought you were jewish
Would it matter?of course a person who was circumcised at birth won't know if they are less sensitive.
Hormones stimulate growth but there are other factors, obviously. The specific mechanisms that cause penis growth are too complicated to unravel. It makes sense that mutilating a vascular sheath around a body part would stunt its growththe mechanisms are what i just told you
sensitivity to androgen receptors in your dick, and high dht
no not still. by your logic newtons law of motion should not have ever been taken seriousStill
its clearly biasedAnd it's a "systemic review" of what?
yore a cuck if you think its good to be less sensitive so you last longerWould it matter?my dick is sensitive af, I still enjoy fapping
If anything you're proving that circumcision is superior since it makes you last longer
True, but circumcision isn't a recent thingno not still. by your logic newtons law of motion should not have ever been taken serious
How soits clearly biased
I'm just saying that my dick is sensitive and I'm happy with ityore a cuck if you think its good to be less sensitive so you last longer
source that they've been trying to find negative effect of circumcision?True, but circumcision isn't a recent thing
It's older than newton's law of motion
Wouldn't they have had enough time like, 1000+ years later? They have been studying it for hundreds of years
as I said beforeHow so
source that they've been trying to find negative effect of circumcision?
Wdymas I said before
tbh im not reading, I dont think people should be circumcised without any real reason, phimosis etcCircumcision: a religious obligation or ‘the cruellest of cuts’? - PMC
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
read my other replies wdym?Quick google search, I'll admit
Wdym
so i couldve had a 10 inch dick is what ur sayingHormones stimulate growth but there are other factors, obviously. The specific mechanisms that cause penis growth are too complicated to unravel. It makes sense that mutilating a vascular sheath around a body part would stunt its growth
Sigma broliterally had to get it done due to phimosis and it was a good choice
not coping@notsocommonthumb @Crusile @WELOVELOOKS stop debating them, they need their copium or else they will rope
They do it for aesthetic reasons and because it lowers the risk of some diseases affecting the penis, also because of possible phimosis later in lifetbh im not reading, I dont think people should be circumcised without any real reason, phimosis etc
Bro I'm genuinely tweaking rn wdymread my other replies wdym?
ok faggoti like the way my dick looks now
mirin ur own dick = faggotok faggot
Did you notice any changes in your sensitivity?not coping
i like the way my dick looks now and i had to get it due to brutal phimosis
ill make sure to circumcise my kid too
a lot of people try and regrow their frenulum with pe, wdym?They do it for aesthetic reasons and because it lowers the risk of some diseases affecting the penis, also because of possible phimosis later in life
The saying that circumcision reduces sensitivity is false because they claim that they remove the frenulum in your penis (the most sensitive part) which isn't true
Maybe some people do get fucked up and have their frenulums removed but it wasn't in my case (also probably most circumcised users here as well)
nigga read my replies dafuck?Bro I'm genuinely tweaking rn wdym
Which reply
you brought it like it's a plus when it doesn't even mattermirin ur own dick = faggot
They probably got fucked up by shitty doctors thena lot of people try and regrow their frenulum with pe, wdym?
How is it biasednigga read my replies dafuck?