Cjc plus ipa peptides

Whatsamaxilla__

Whatsamaxilla__

Greyest of greys
Joined
Aug 31, 2025
Posts
139
Reputation
105
Should i pin cjc no dac/dac + ipa at 17 for bones instead of hgh or is there no point?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: autisticntmaxer⠀ and HtnGymcel
Are growth plates open? get an X-ray
HGH >
 
  • +1
Reactions: jjitkilledme and gigacumster3000

Attachments

  • image_2025-10-14_175134849.png
    image_2025-10-14_175134849.png
    39.6 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: gigacumster3000
not sure if you're just looking for advice from a looksmaxxer or someone with experience injecting peptides but i can tell you that pinning cjc-dac/ipa at 17 isn't typical for maximizing bone growth.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jjitkilledme and autisticntmaxer⠀
not sure if you're just looking for advice from a looksmaxxer or someone with experience injecting peptides but i can tell you that pinning cjc-dac/ipa at 17 isn't typical for maximizing bone growth.
Yeah Im thinking of doing reta, glow and mt1
 
How the fuck does it justify that hgh don’t grow bones
holy dumbass look at the graph its the ages where bones stop devopling and unless your pinning HGh at the age at 4 its over. :lul:
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Whatsamaxilla__
holy dumbass look at the graph its the ages where bones stop devopling and unless your pinning HGh at the age at 4 its over. :lul:
Hgh is a anabolic hormone which have a property of net building bones it doesn’t give a fuck how much you can naturally gain bones or at what age you have fully maximised , as long as you growth plates are open hgh will elongate the bone and will make it denser .
 
  • +1
Reactions: jjitkilledme
Hgh is a anabolic hormone which have a property of net building bones it doesn’t give a fuck how much you can naturally gain bones or at what age you have fully maximised , as long as you growth plates are open hgh will elongate the bone and will make it denser .
Hgh isnt anabolic :lul::lul:
 
holy dumbass look at the graph its the ages where bones stop devopling and unless your pinning HGh at the age at 4 its over. :lul:
There are studies on teens and alot of adolescents taking GH and GH + AI all increased growth by 3-7 cm normally and lower the later in their growth stages they were ofcourse some even grew 9-11 who were very deficient but that study about 1 year and 5 year olds is naturally decided assuming they just live their life
 
There are studies on teens and alot of adolescents taking GH and GH + AI all increased growth by 3-7 cm normally and lower the later in their growth stages they were ofcourse some even grew 9-11 who were very deficient but that study about 1 year and 5 year olds is naturally decided assuming they just live their life
Yes because they had Deficiencies people with normal levels dont grow. i speaked to my OWN endocrineoligist a SPECIALISt in that shit and she said the same thing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mizi44 and laworg
Yes because they had Deficiencies people with normal levels dont grow. i speaked to my OWN endocrineoligist a SPECIALISt in that shit and she said the same thing.
Youd be suprised how many adolescents are deficient
 
Hgh isnt anabolic :lul::lul:
Where is the the proof of this absurd Claim, so Rudman et al. (1990, NEJM) a study contradict you’re this fucked up claim . It was conducted on 21 healthy men with no deficiency for 6 mouths, later it was seen that lean body mass was increased by 9% and bone mineral density of spine was increased by 1.7 % directly promoting tissue growth, if gh was not anabolic how could we see those results. Another study Blackman et al. (2002, JAMA) which is conducted on 57 women and 74 men(all healthy), at the end it was seen that the LBM was increased in men by 3kg and in women 1 kg and the BMD of hip and spine was increased by 2% (independently), further testosterone was given to them , the result show further increase in LDM by 1.3 kg . If GH isn’t anabolic, why do these gold-standard trials show consistent increases in lean mass and tissue growth?
 
Where is the the proof of this absurd Claim, so Rudman et al. (1990, NEJM) a study contradict you’re this fucked up claim . It was conducted on 21 healthy men with no deficiency for 6 mouths, later it was seen that lean body mass was increased by 9% and bone mineral density of spine was increased by 1.7 % directly promoting tissue growth, if gh was not anabolic how could we see those results. Another study Blackman et al. (2002, JAMA) which is conducted on 57 women and 74 men(all healthy), at the end it was seen that the LBM was increased in men by 3kg and in women 1 kg and the BMD of hip and spine was increased by 2% (independently), further testosterone was given to them , the result show further increase in LDM by 1.3 kg . If GH isn’t anabolic, why do these gold-standard trials show consistent increases in lean mass and tissue growth?
Ur correct i ahould research
 
  • +1
Reactions: bpgonnakillme
Ur an idiot do research before asking org, cjc + ipa wont give u bones and at 17 will barely give you any height growth.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bpgonnakillme

Similar threads

iblameoverbite_01
Replies
31
Views
362
damiandyrbusch
damiandyrbusch
jjitkilledme
Replies
2
Views
74
jjitkilledme
jjitkilledme
iblameoverbite_01
Replies
24
Views
331
HtnGymcel
HtnGymcel
Whatsamaxilla__
Replies
13
Views
186
BrianFodder
BrianFodder
C
Replies
14
Views
195
6ft1sub5
6

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top