CJC vs HGH (GREYS GTFIH)

[Brutal4Melo]

Since I see so many RETARDS asking this fuck ass question I'll break it down so this question doesn't have to be asked anymore.

Spoiler: CJC

CJC is the synthetic analog of GHRH (Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone), meaning it essentially stimulates the pituitary gland to produce GH. CJC is often combined with IPA, which acts on ghrelin receptors to enhance GH release. When working together, the CJC stimulates the GHRH pathway and IPA amplifies the GH release. In essence, CJC, typically found with IPA stimulates the natural secretion of GH.
PROS:
Doesn't shut down natural GH production
Lower risk of side effects
CONS:
GH levels much less than HGH
Requires a functioning and healthy pituitary gland
Time sensitive (carbs blunt GH pulses)

Spoiler: HGH

Exogenous GH is synthetic but identical to the natural amino acid peptide released in the body. When pinned, HGH is supplied directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the pituitary gland. Effects are dependent on dosage and consistency rather than your bodies feedback to the peptide. Pining GH essentially forces your body to use the excess GH. In effect, HGH bypasses the pituitary gland, forcing your body to use the GH
PROS:
GH directly injected into your blood stream
Guaranteed GH spike
CONS:
Side effects (carpal tunnel, water retention, etc)
More expensive

Spoiler: Conclusion

In conclusion, these are two 'peptides' that elevate GH levels and stimulate growth. Neither of these two are going to magically make your taller or give you bone mass but they can definitely help if you're still in puberty. Thank you for reading my thread and stay consistent!

​

 

[rotation]

PROS:
Doesn't shut down natural GH production
​

not a bad thread, but why does this matter

Suppression and recovery of GH secretion after GH injection in non-GH deficient short children - PubMed

After 6 months of a thrice weekly GH treatment regimen in non-GH deficient short children, endogenous GH secretion was reduced from 24 to 36 h after injection compared to placebo and returned to control levels by 48 to 60 h after injection.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

the suppression does not last after you discontinue hgh

meaning this is not a "con" of growth hormone

 

[matiaslikeseveryone]

the bigger the side effects the bigger the help

 

[Stacyslayerᛉ]

Btw after deeper research, it might actually be ideal to take peptides from a young age over HGH, because the pulses/spikes are repsonsible for growth.
So yeah, i guess that might be one benefit.

 

[Brutal4Melo]

not a bad thread, but why does this matter

Suppression and recovery of GH secretion after GH injection in non-GH deficient short children - PubMed

After 6 months of a thrice weekly GH treatment regimen in non-GH deficient short children, endogenous GH secretion was reduced from 24 to 36 h after injection compared to placebo and returned to control levels by 48 to 60 h after injection.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

the suppression does not last after you discontinue hgh

meaning this is not a "con" of growth hormone

I think I misspoke, I just meant that it shuts down your gh while you’re using it. Honestly couldn’t find anymore cons so had to stretch jfl