PharmaPhaggot
Busy slaying stacies, brb
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2024
- Posts
- 12,738
- Reputation
- 17,301
Should be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Could u give examples for class traitsShould be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
Could u give examples for class traits
+ too wide frame, <1:1 mf ratio, non slandted forehead, narrow chin, <2 shoulder to waist, >1,9 fhwr, >0,47 esr<1,25 tfhwr, <2ctp, <0,18 pfl to bz, <6ft, >15% bf or low set zygos
You definitely can, atleast a lot easier than getting away with low vlass traits, look at any "dilf"skin, naso folds, s
These are both the epitome of low class, balding has nothing to do with health and overweight is only now considered unactractive when high class people tend to be skinny ad they can eat healthier and exercise more, its always been unhealthy but still it was considered attractive when rich people were fatsevere balding, overweight ect)
Could not be more wrongShould be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
Could not be more wrong
Should be water to anyone not sub 90 iq,
Name one low class trait that is considered attractiveIts the modern age now class indicators literally dont matter after thousands of propaganda about poor people good rich people bad from disney. You could even argue subtle low class traits benefit you. Obviously the low class traits that benefit you also happen to be ones that fit the psl scale as well. Ofc this doesnt apply to unmodernized deathnixs like browns.
ends itTldr: if you have <1,25 tfhwr, <2ctp, <0,18 pfl to bz, <6ft, >15% bf or low set zygos youre a subhuman and should end it asap
Chicos flat maxilla and side overall without it he wouldve just been another chad instead of the most attractive person oatName one low class trait that is considered attractive
Money can't buy love but it can make u pass on your genes. In societies without hypergamy, status is the only determinant of smvmuh statusView attachment 4589996
both important but health indicators and youth indicators are lawShould be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
true but thats a dysgenic society in certain aspects not entirely but yk what i mean love is better as its less arbitraryMoney can't buy love but it can make u pass on your genes. In societies without hypergamy, status is the only determinant of smv
Absolutely, aesthetic is eugenictrue but thats a dysgenic society in certain aspects not entirely but yk what i mean love is better as its less arbitrary
And they still say Shakespeare is deadAbsolutely, aesthetic is eugenic
Yeah recession is really what made him so attractive and not the damn near perfect harmonyChicos flat maxilla and side overall without it he wouldve just been another chad instead of the most attractive person oat
And recession is pretty much irrelevant in terms of class indication, bite and orthodntic issues is pretty much the only rhing that matters, recession litterally started with rich europeans and stay common as taller skulls have more of it and tall skulls are ideal so having flat faces in only this aspect is fineChicos flat maxilla and side overall without it he wouldve just been another chad instead of the most attractive person oat
shakespeare is a quality he just was the best at it so he coined the term and captured what it really meant to be a "shakespeare"And they still say Shakespeare is dead
heres another shakespeare
nigga i know you missed the point on purpose obviously if some jeet had all low class feature hed look subhumanYeah recession is really what made him so attractive and not the damn near perfect harmony
The point was that its not a low class feature, chico has good class indicators so he looks good, yes this jeet wpuld look bad and this would be in line with my thesisnigga i know you missed the point on purpose obviously if some jeet had all low class feature hed look subhuman
shakespeare is a quality he just was the best at it so he coined the term and captured what it really meant to be a "shakespeare"heres another shakespeare View attachment 4590120
alright dudeStill doesnt compare to @mohi_100's genius, "aestetic is eugenic" is the best shit ive heard rhis year, might just go ahead and tatto hat shit on my body
what about 1.37 tfwhr but 1.70 fwhr?Tldr: if you have <1,25 tfhwr, <2ctp, <0,18 pfl to bz, <6ft, >15% bf or low set zygos youre a subhuman and should end it asap
No one is fucking Elon over any ChadStatus mogs looks tbh
1,7 is goodwhat about 1.37 tfwhr but 1.70 fwhr?
1.90 is ideal tho i mean how much of a failo is 1.701,7 is good
I mean imo 1 8 mogs 1,9 any day, 1,9 looks stupid, 1,7 isnt too bad but at the same time eitht hat total it might mean you have a short lower third which sucks, so its not bad but might indicate something bad1.90 is ideal tho i mean how much of a failo is 1.70
Someone with money will have good health indicatorsShould be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health