Class indicators mog health indicators

PharmaPhaggot

PharmaPhaggot

Busy slaying stacies, brb
Joined
Oct 14, 2024
Posts
12,738
Reputation
17,301
Should be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Orka, Sayori, Deleted member 288890 and 3 others
Status mogs looks tbh
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Incelforeever, Orka, MaxorDie and 5 others
true
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and PharmaPhaggot
Tldr: if you have <1,25 tfhwr, <2ctp, <0,18 pfl to bz, <6ft, >15% bf or low set zygos youre a subhuman and should end it asap
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever, MaxorDie, Sayori and 4 others
Should be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
Could u give examples for class traits
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sayori and PharmaPhaggot
I’m sure that helped prince William when he started norwooding.

You can get away with having “low class” facial traits if you have bones. You can’t really get away from having shit health indicators ( Horrible skin, naso folds, severe balding, overweight ect)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel and PharmaPhaggot
But so many commoners are larping that most of them mean nothing now. You need a helicopter.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SamuraiCope and PharmaPhaggot
  • +1
Reactions: Sayori and egyptiansub5
skin, naso folds, s
You definitely can, atleast a lot easier than getting away with low vlass traits, look at any "dilf"
severe balding, overweight ect)
These are both the epitome of low class, balding has nothing to do with health and overweight is only now considered unactractive when high class people tend to be skinny ad they can eat healthier and exercise more, its always been unhealthy but still it was considered attractive when rich people were fat
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Sayori, egyptiansub5 and Saint Casanova
Should be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
Could not be more wrong
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: egyptiansub5
Its the modern age now class indicators literally dont matter after thousands of propaganda about poor people good rich people bad from disney. You could even argue subtle low class traits benefit you. Obviously the low class traits that benefit you also happen to be ones that fit the psl scale as well. Ofc this doesnt apply to unmodernized deathnixs like browns.
 
Its the modern age now class indicators literally dont matter after thousands of propaganda about poor people good rich people bad from disney. You could even argue subtle low class traits benefit you. Obviously the low class traits that benefit you also happen to be ones that fit the psl scale as well. Ofc this doesnt apply to unmodernized deathnixs like browns.
Name one low class trait that is considered attractive
 
  • +1
Reactions: egyptiansub5
Tldr: if you have <1,25 tfhwr, <2ctp, <0,18 pfl to bz, <6ft, >15% bf or low set zygos youre a subhuman and should end it asap
ends it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and PharmaPhaggot
Name one low class trait that is considered attractive
Chicos flat maxilla and side overall without it he wouldve just been another chad instead of the most attractive person oat
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot
High class for appeal, low class for psl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and Deleted member 288890
Status mogs looks tbh
muh status :forcedsmile:
13385b1c483f439aba9976f4283bb6d6tplv photomode image
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot, Sayori, Deleted member 328836 and 1 other person
Should be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
both important but health indicators and youth indicators are law
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot
Money can't buy love but it can make u pass on your genes. In societies without hypergamy, status is the only determinant of smv
true but thats a dysgenic society in certain aspects not entirely but yk what i mean love is better as its less arbitrary
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and mohito
true but thats a dysgenic society in certain aspects not entirely but yk what i mean love is better as its less arbitrary
Absolutely, aesthetic is eugenic
 
  • Love it
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and Deleted member 288890
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and mohito
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and mohito
Chicos flat maxilla and side overall without it he wouldve just been another chad instead of the most attractive person oat
Yeah recession is really what made him so attractive and not the damn near perfect harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: mohito and Deleted member 288890
Chicos flat maxilla and side overall without it he wouldve just been another chad instead of the most attractive person oat
And recession is pretty much irrelevant in terms of class indication, bite and orthodntic issues is pretty much the only rhing that matters, recession litterally started with rich europeans and stay common as taller skulls have more of it and tall skulls are ideal so having flat faces in only this aspect is fine
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
And they still say Shakespeare is dead
shakespeare is a quality he just was the best at it so he coined the term and captured what it really meant to be a "shakespeare" :AlienPls: heres another shakespeare
1769595266703
 
  • +1
Reactions: mohito and PharmaPhaggot
Yeah recession is really what made him so attractive and not the damn near perfect harmony
nigga i know you missed the point on purpose obviously if some jeet had all low class feature hed look subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot
nigga i know you missed the point on purpose obviously if some jeet had all low class feature hed look subhuman
The point was that its not a low class feature, chico has good class indicators so he looks good, yes this jeet wpuld look bad and this would be in line with my thesis
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890
shakespeare is a quality he just was the best at it so he coined the term and captured what it really meant to be a "shakespeare" :AlienPls: heres another shakespeare View attachment 4590120

Still doesnt compare to @mohi_100's genius, "aestetic is eugenic" is the best shit ive heard rhis year, might just go ahead and tatto hat shit on my body
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mohito and Deleted member 288890
Still doesnt compare to @mohi_100's genius, "aestetic is eugenic" is the best shit ive heard rhis year, might just go ahead and tatto hat shit on my body
alright dude :lul:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: mohito and PharmaPhaggot
Tldr: if you have <1,25 tfhwr, <2ctp, <0,18 pfl to bz, <6ft, >15% bf or low set zygos youre a subhuman and should end it asap
what about 1.37 tfwhr but 1.70 fwhr?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 288890 and PharmaPhaggot
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and Deleted member 288890
1.90 is ideal tho i mean how much of a failo is 1.70
I mean imo 1 8 mogs 1,9 any day, 1,9 looks stupid, 1,7 isnt too bad but at the same time eitht hat total it might mean you have a short lower third which sucks, so its not bad but might indicate something bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: mohito, Deleted member 288890 and Incelforeever
They mog dimorphic traits too btw
 
Youth indicators too
 
Should be water to anyone not sub 90 iq, theres way clearer trends of attractive traits assosiated with class rather than associations with health
Someone with money will have good health indicators
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot

Similar threads

D
Replies
24
Views
342
PharmaPhaggot
PharmaPhaggot
Prøphet
Replies
13
Views
188
lnceIs
lnceIs
Node
Replies
14
Views
121
Outlander
Outlander

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top