Clavicular is HTN+, and its not debatable.

[santnewgen]

dnr

 

[watah]

Implying he’s one tier off basso is crazy ngl

 

[NoaA99]

lol, that part wouldnt be emotional or logical per say, thats an assumption using intuitional reasoning (that being submissive is an feminine trait)

also the act of non-transactional submission is biologically tied to femininity silly billy, it wasnt emotional, just a given truth and a conclusion

What??
I never directly claimed being emotional is inherently feminine.
However, as both of us are aware- it’s a fact that, that on average, women are more emotionally expressive than men, and this is supported by data.

What I’m saying is that your comment, in this case, is irrational and subjective.
Your comment, claiming a man loses his manhood for defending another man (non transactional if you will) is based purely on emotional bias, not logic. Or perhaps you can tell me the source of your claim?
It’s an emotionally charged, subjective judgment, is it not?

I’m simply pointing out the inconsistency. There’s no false assumption here.
There’s nothing causally factual in your initial statement .

 

[esoterik]

What??
I never directly claimed being emotional is inherently feminine.
However, as both of us are aware- it’s a fact that, that on average, women are more emotionally expressive than men, and this is supported by data.

What I’m saying is that your comment, in this case, is irrational and subjective.
Your comment, claiming a man loses his manhood for defending another man (non transactional if you will) is based purely on emotional bias, not logic. Or perhaps you can tell me the source of your claim?
It’s an emotionally charged, subjective judgment, is it not?

I’m simply pointing out the inconsistency. There’s no false assumption here.
There’s nothing causally factual in your initial statement .

by what emotional bias would that be based off of? do u understand the difference of logical and emotional thinking as processes?

i believe your mistaken with concluding something based on emotions to form a judgement and using a intuitive process to form a judgement, these processes are different, just because something is based on a empirical observation rather than a objective fact does not make it a emotional process

which is what me and op differ from, op made a intuitive observation that newgens rate him low then formed a judgement with emotional thinking, thereby literally "letting emotions dictate every word he speaks" there is a difference between the statements that me and op provided

 

[edodalic29]

 

[NoaA99]

by what emotional bias would that be based off of? do u understand the difference of logical and emotional thinking as processes?

i believe your mistaken with concluding something based on emotions to form a judgement and using a intuitive process to form a judgement, these processes are different, just because something is based on a empirical observation rather than a objective fact does not make it a emotional process

which is what me and op differ from, op made a intuitive observation that newgens rate him low then formed a judgement with emotional thinking, thereby literally "letting emotions dictate every word he speaks" there is a difference between the statements that me and op provided

Again, if your claim is valid, then provide concrete evidence. I’ve spent considerable time exploring these dynamics and have yet to encounter any such information. So let’s, for the sake of argument, call it intuition from my side.

But even if that’s the case, you’re missing the point. Your own use of emotionally loaded language - such as "silly billy" or "kek" - suggests that your responses are also shaped by intuition or emotion.

Nowhere did I claim that OP’s take was free of emotional bias. Most people operate with some emotional influence. It's incredibly difficult to eliminate that entirely.
My point was simply to highlight that your accusation, that men are losing their manhood by defending another man, is, in itself, a subjective and unsupported claim. Unless you back it with empirical evidence, it remains a non-rational judgment.

Calling out emotional reasoning in others while relying on it yourself, is inconsistent, and arguably hypocritical, which is what I wanted to tell you.

 

[Meteor21]

We know it's you and your 10 alts, Clavicular

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

He is htn. Anything above that or below that is cope. After he hardmaxes it might be a different story

 

[greycel]

He's like 97th percentile
Just walk outside and see how many men look better than him (barely any)

Yeah facially he's High HTN, in his best he's in the Chadlite range

 

[sub5outsider]

i dont get why so many people are envious of him if i was Clavicular i wouldve just left this community and focus on career

 

[Hardmaxx]

dnr

Dni, ghost

 

[wollet2]

he looks ok before he got botched, i see better looking guys regulary outside

 

[RXnd]

I tend to see many people in Claviculars comments calling him mtn, this always makes me cage, it Is Utterly comical.

Clavicular facially is easily HTN, his teeth and nose are his main flaws (his nose being minor), when you see him stood next to a group of normies, the mog is eviscerating, facially he is above average.

The newfag rating parade needs to stop instantly. Newfags cannot help but be absolute retards.

End : I'm you call clavicular MTN and seriously believe it, YOU ARE A RETARD! @Clavicular

Gay

 

[Bugmaxxed]

it Is Utterly comical.

Go back to reddit

 

[Hardmaxx]

Go back to reddit

Newfag, dni

 

[Bugmaxxed]

Newfag, dni

@Volksstaffel @vevcred2_0 @The Homelander

Look at this retard

 

[Hardmaxx]

@Volksstaffel @vevcred2_0 @The Homelander

Look at this retard

You joined in late 2024 you faggot, you have a jb pfp

 

[ShowerCelling]

@Volksstaffel @vevcred2_0 @The Homelander

Look at this retard

nigga is calling his brahmin gang

 

[Hardmaxx]

nigga is calling his brahmin gang

The newfag army is coming for me