Clean Shaven nukes your SMV

VohnnyBoy

VohnnyBoy

Taleteller from Yugoslav mental wards
Joined
Jun 2, 2025
Posts
7,623
Reputation
13,974
water

1. "There was also a significant facial hair X relationship context interaction, so that preferences for light and heavy stubble were higher when rated for short-term than full beards and clean-shaven faces."
2. "Full beards and faces with stubble received higher ratings than clean-shaven faces for long-term than short term relationships."
3. "Heavy stubble received the highest ratings for general attractiveness followed by full beards and light stubble, which were rated almost evenly, with clean-shaven faces being rated least attractive."

1769095637624
AI enchanted for the sake of visibility:
Image 1

*Bonus (even more water) findings:
"Masculine faces were judged as least attractive, followed by feminized faces, with unmanipulated faces rated most attractive, which also replicates the general patterns reported elsewhere."

"Men with more masculine faces tend to report less interest in long-term relationships, more interest in short-term relationships and a greater number of short-term mates than less masculine men"

(n≈8,500 females)
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MiserableMan, Nectar, redeemthecard and 2 others
this reference guy in the photos is an ogre, prettyboys like me are youthful moggers when clean shaven

this is just a dalit issue
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: itisoverformeh101, MiserableMan, SomaliSub5 and 11 others
Clean shaven signals youth and status. Especially when bigonial width and the lower third aren't nerfed
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan, SomaliSub5, tes12 and 3 others
(n≈8,500 females)
Now check their ages and the relative difference between the men. It was like 3.2/10 vs 3.6/10, which is 0/10 IRL for both. This is a good example for studies being cope btw. Read it for more details.
 
  • +1
Reactions: VohnnyBoy
Only if you're boneless and not pretty :FeelsRainMan:
 
  • +1
Reactions: itisoverformeh101, VohnnyBoy and redeemthecard
water

1. "There was also a significant facial hair X relationship context interaction, so that preferences for light and heavy stubble were higher when rated for short-term than full beards and clean-shaven faces."
2. "Full beards and faces with stubble received higher ratings than clean-shaven faces for long-term than short term relationships."
3. "Heavy stubble received the highest ratings for general attractiveness followed by full beards and light stubble, which were rated almost evenly, with clean-shaven faces being rated least attractive."

View attachment 4567504
AI enchanted for the sake of visibility:
View attachment 4567510

*Bonus (even more water) findings:
"Masculine faces were judged as least attractive, followed by feminized faces, with unmanipulated faces rated most attractive, which also replicates the general patterns reported elsewhere."

"Men with more masculine faces tend to report less interest in long-term relationships, more interest in short-term relationships and a greater number of short-term mates than less masculine men"

(n≈8,500 females)
dnr trash take
 
clean shaven nukes YOUR smv nigga 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
 
Bs since it puts you right on the female gaze
 
  • +1
Reactions: VohnnyBoy
Now check their ages and the relative difference between the men. It was like 3.2/10 vs 3.6/10, which is 0/10 IRL for both. This is a good example for studies being cope btw. Read it for more details.
Women were of an adult age, couldn't find the mean average. Best bet mean is somewhere around 25-30yo.
JBs liking prettyboys should be water.

The difference might not seem big on a paper, but you have to acknowledge the women into more masculine faces tend to be more promiscuous and have less looks standard, therefore ideal for slaying.

Agreed on most studies being cope.:catNODDING:
Only if you're boneless and not pretty :FeelsRainMan:
So majority of men?
clean shaven nukes YOUR smv nigga 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Average 20yo+ males SMV.
Unless you're 70th percentile (in which you're SMV would be high nonetheless), stubble will decently ascend you.
Bs since it puts you right on the female gaze
Female gaze is just JB appeal. If you're into minors go for clean shaven looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: glaruz and Nectar
I descend hard with facial hair .
 
this reference guy in the photos is an ogre, prettyboys like me are youthful moggers when clean shaven

this is just a dalit issue
you are back
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
Admitting you have facial hair is just admitting you are boneless.

Clean shaven or light stubble is mandatory, anything else and you may as well just give up.
 
Women were of an adult age, couldn't find the mean average. Best bet mean is somewhere around 25-30yo.
JBs liking prettyboys should be water.

The difference might not seem big on a paper, but you have to acknowledge the women into more masculine faces tend to be more promiscuous and have less looks standard, therefore ideal for slaying.

Agreed on most studies being cope.:catNODDING:

So majority of men?

Average 20yo+ males SMV.
Unless you're 70th percentile (in which you're SMV would be high nonetheless), stubble will decently ascend you.

Female gaze is just JB appeal. If you're into minors go for clean shaven looks.
vohnny why did you reply to my shit with like 3 paragraphs. i could’ve sworn i only sent one message
 
Admitting you have facial hair is just admitting you are boneless.

Clean shaven or light stubble is mandatory, anything else and you may as well just give up.
Most men are boneless
"Muh Chad doesn't have to...", if you're Chad good for you, I'm not
 

Similar threads

jond
Replies
5
Views
210
Panchitosbroncs
Panchitosbroncs
Nectar
Replies
15
Views
276
eyeareamogger
E
MirinDaZygos
Replies
19
Views
1K
seeyenar
S
enchanted_elixir
Replies
30
Views
343
Cinnamon fan64
Cinnamon fan64
Abdou
Replies
51
Views
3K
avenox
avenox

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top