Come play against whyte boy in chess

Gdp mean gross product. Nigeria has a higher gdp than Ireland but which country would you rather live in.

European colonialism made drained Africa and was response for unseen destruction. And they looting of thousands of books, art and such in European museums
I’d rather live in Nigeria.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5802
British colonization in india was the best thing that has ever happened
@waqui98 thoughts ?
There was literally, and has literally never been a thing called "india", before the british. Indeed the term "india" is actually the literal anglicized version of the greek word "indos", which itself was a Hellenized version of the word indus, which itself was the persianized version of the sanskrit word SINDHU, which is the name of a river that which a majority flows, in the modern day country of PAKISTAN :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:

Current modern day north "indians" literally dont even have the right to call themselves indians, but hindus are a pathetic and pitiful people so no one should expect any better. India, or atleast north india should just be called Gangaland :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:, because the ganges is a river that majority flows in the northern part of the modern day Republic of India, and it is a holy river for curries up there. As someone who's origins are nowhere even near the ganges, i think i have the right to not have to refer to myself as either indian or gangan :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.
If we are going to name ourselves after rivers, i prefer to be named Godavarian, after the godavari river which is the main river which flows from the region where my family is from. :D:D:D


The subcontinent was made of up hundreds of chiefdoms, princedoms, kingdoms, and empires, with their own individual cultures and languages that they forced onto their neighbors, whenever they took them over. Hindus will say that the term "bharat" refers to india, but historically there has never been an actual state or nation with defined borders, called "bharat" that has actually ever existed, and was a term to refer to the entirety of the subcontinent by ancient peoples of NORTH INDIA. The ancestors of south indians have never used this term to refer to ANYTHING, the only people in south india who would've, would have been LITERAL BRAHMINS, WHO WERE MIGRANTS FROM THE NORTH.

My grandmother never referred to herself as "indian" even after Hyderabad was annexed by the INDIAN UNION, because she wasn't about to identify herself with the same term that dirty kaffir hindus were about to (she was wahabi). She had only ever called herself hyderabadi, and she never even bothered to learn hindi or telugu or the script, but only knew how to speak urdu and read perso-arabic script. Even after she migrated to america in the 80s, she barely spoke english and only knew a few basic phrases. If stupid mainland curries want to be thankful for the modern day republic of india, they should unironically be greatful to the brits who coined the fucking term, from which they got it JFL :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:. Because over 200 years ago, none their ancestors would've EVER referred to themselves as "indians".
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: volcelfatcel
There was literally, and has literally never been a thing called "india", before the british. Indeed the term "india" is actually the literal anglicized version of the greek word "indos", which itself was a Hellenized version of the word indus, which itself was the persianized version of the sanskrit word SINDHU, which is the name of a river that which a majority flows, in the modern day country of PAKISTAN :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:

Current modern day north "indians" literally dont even have the right to call themselves indians, but hindus are a pathetic and pitiful people so no one should expect any better. India, or atleast north india should just be called Gangaland :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:, because the ganges is a river that majority flows in the northern part of the modern day Republic of India, and it is a holy river for curries up there. As someone who's origins are nowhere even near the ganges, i think i have the right to not have to refer to myself as either indian or gangan :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.
If we are going to name ourselves after rivers, i prefer to be named Godavarian, after the godavari river which is the main river which flows from the region where my family is from. :D:D:D


The subcontinent was made of up hundreds of chiefdoms, princedoms, kingdoms, and empires, with their own individual cultures and languages that they forced onto their neighbors, whenever they took them over. Hindus will say that the term "bharat" refers to india, but historically there has never been an actual state or nation with defined borders, called "bharat" that has actually ever existed, and was a term to refer to the entirety of the subcontinent by ancient peoples of NORTH INDIA. Those ancestors of south indians have never used this term to refer to ANYTHING, the only people in south india who would've, would have been LITERAL BRAHMINS, WHO WERE MIGRANTS FROM THE NORTH. My grandmother never referred to herself as "indian" even after Hyderabad was annexed by the INDIAN UNION, because she wasn't about to identify herself with the same term that dirty kaffir hindus were about to (she was wahabi). She had only ever called herself hyderabadi, and she never even bothered to learn hindi or telugu and read the script, only knew how to speak urdu and read perso-arabic script. Even after she migrated to america in the 80s, she barely spoke english and only knew a few basic phrases. If stupid mainland curries want to be thankful for the modern day republic of india, they should unironically be greatful to the brits who even coined the fucking term from which they got it JFL :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:. Because over 200 years ago, none their ancestors would've EVER referred to themselves as "indians".
indeed i agree @curryslayerordeath
 
indeed i agree @curryslayerordeath
"we muslim curries arent like the hindu curries. we are more Arab and Persian and Turk and thus by proxy, also more white. we are superior to those dirty kaffirs" :hnghn::hnghn::hnghn:
-Waqui
 
  • JFL
Reactions: volcelfatcel
"we muslim curries arent like the hindu curries. we are more Arab and Persian and Turk and thus by proxy, also more white. we are superior to those dirty kaffirs" :hnghn::hnghn::hnghn:
-Waqui
average muslim curry:feelswhy:
1636489938130

average hindu curry
1636489968332
 
  • JFL
Reactions: curryslayerordeath

Similar threads

Big Boss
Replies
20
Views
137
Bars
Bars
A
Replies
1
Views
27
anr6hy
A
K
Replies
5
Views
74
Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo
tondro
Replies
10
Views
133
Jason5000
Jason5000
Anamnesis
Replies
12
Views
82
iluvanavar
iluvanavar

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →