Complaining about the Parameters WE created.

Atakan

Atakan

softmaxxer (copemaxxer)
Joined
Jun 1, 2024
Posts
959
Reputation
1,029
Who decides who looks good?
Who decides who looks bad?

What objective reality do we follow to understand human beauty?

The parameters we have about beauty are still wildly undefined and up for debate, everybody tries to claim that beauty is totally objective and quantifiable but can't even get two people to agree on a single rating. I'm not saying that Objective beauty doesn't exist, what i'm saying is, there are Parameters that definitely work and definitely exist they're just a lot more complex than we understand.

We can somewhat observe these Parameters, We can all say that defined prominent zygos look better than undefined ones, we can all say that a Straight nose, a forwardly grown face, a symmetrical face is objectively better.

But these Parameters only work to an certain extent, A hyper accurate calculation of beauty isn't possible for us, stop claiming that we can do it, stop claiming that our reality is absolute.


This is what happens when you go to deep and try to surpass the human barricade, it's fucking depressing.
 

Attachments

  • Snaptik.app_7489595084854332694.mp4
    229.2 KB
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard, copercel123, flatcheck213 and 3 others
Who decides who looks good?
Who decides who looks bad?

What objective reality do we follow to understand human beauty?

The parameters we have about beauty are still wildly undefined and up for debate, everybody tries to claim that beauty is totally objective and quantifiable but can't even get two people to agree on a single rating. I'm not saying that Objective beauty doesn't exist, what i'm saying is, there are Parameters that definitely work and definitely exist they're just a lot more complex than we understand.

We can somewhat observe these Parameters, We can all say that defined prominent zygos look better than undefined ones, we can all say that a Straight nose, a forwardly grown face, a symmetrical face is objectively better.

But these Parameters only work to an certain extent, A hyper accurate calculation of beauty isn't possible for us, stop claiming that we can do it, stop claiming that our reality is absolute.


This is what happens when you go to deep and try to surpass the human barricade, it's fucking depressing.
Exactly
 
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard and They_are_all_whores
DNR STOP FUCKING COPING LOSER HAHAHAHA SUB5 hahahaha
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: menas, loyolaxavvierretard and They_are_all_whores
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: menas, loyolaxavvierretard, flatcheck213 and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard, They_are_all_whores and Atakan
apparently most models are recessed but look the best.

newcels on tiktok obsess over every feature and have brutal expectations for someone to be perfect or they should rope.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard and They_are_all_whores
Who decides who looks good?
Who decides who looks bad?

What objective reality do we follow to understand human beauty?

The parameters we have about beauty are still wildly undefined and up for debate, everybody tries to claim that beauty is totally objective and quantifiable but can't even get two people to agree on a single rating. I'm not saying that Objective beauty doesn't exist, what i'm saying is, there are Parameters that definitely work and definitely exist they're just a lot more complex than we understand.

We can somewhat observe these Parameters, We can all say that defined prominent zygos look better than undefined ones, we can all say that a Straight nose, a forwardly grown face, a symmetrical face is objectively better.

But these Parameters only work to an certain extent, A hyper accurate calculation of beauty isn't possible for us, stop claiming that we can do it, stop claiming that our reality is absolute.


This is what happens when you go to deep and try to surpass the human barricade, it's fucking depressing.
high iq but you can estimate ones atrractivness in a range aka htn to cl for ex or in percentiles


also video at the end was funny asf
 
  • +1
Reactions: flatcheck213
apparently most models are recessed but look the best.

newcels on tiktok obsess over every feature and have brutal expectations for someone to be perfect or they should rope.
Who decides who looks good?
Who decides who looks bad?

What objective reality do we follow to understand human beauty?

The parameters we have about beauty are still wildly undefined and up for debate, everybody tries to claim that beauty is totally objective and quantifiable but can't even get two people to agree on a single rating. I'm not saying that Objective beauty doesn't exist, what i'm saying is, there are Parameters that definitely work and definitely exist they're just a lot more complex than we understand.

We can somewhat observe these Parameters, We can all say that defined prominent zygos look better than undefined ones, we can all say that a Straight nose, a forwardly grown face, a symmetrical face is objectively better.

But these Parameters only work to an certain extent, A hyper accurate calculation of beauty isn't possible for us, stop claiming that we can do it, stop claiming that our reality is absolute.


This is what happens when you go to deep and try to surpass the human barricade, it's fucking depressing.

imagine making millions for jus looking the way you are and then comes a random sub5 saying this
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Loruki and CorinthianLOX
When willl you understand that pre-agriculture people had good zygos and better overall bone development BY DEFAULT? The fact that we have physically degenerated so much because of grains in the past thousands of years doesn't change our human nature, we're still drawn to those features on a subconscious level (good bone development -> good hunter -> able to provide for his family) even though modern lifestyles made them less common.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: They_are_all_whores

imagine making millions for jus looking the way you are and then comes a random sub5 saying this
model agencies are jewish liars org is the truth ofc
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: menas and They_are_all_whores
model agencies are jewish liars org is the truth ofc
model agencies think bella hadid is attractive meanwhile she is ltb
 
high iq but you can estimate ones atrractivness in a range aka htn to cl for ex or in percentiles


also video at the end was funny asf
you think we making it to BOTB with my thread 🔥🔥
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: menas and They_are_all_whores
model agencies think bella hadid is attractive meanwhile she is ltb
what do you think matters more 20k people saying she's LTB or 100 million people saying she's beautiful
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: menas and They_are_all_whores
what do you think matters more 20k people saying she's LTB or 100 million people saying she's beautiful
keep worshiping a surgery hungry old woman with lyme disease only women think she is hot
 
Who decides who looks good?
Who decides who looks bad?

What objective reality do we follow to understand human beauty?

The parameters we have about beauty are still wildly undefined and up for debate, everybody tries to claim that beauty is totally objective and quantifiable but can't even get two people to agree on a single rating. I'm not saying that Objective beauty doesn't exist, what i'm saying is, there are Parameters that definitely work and definitely exist they're just a lot more complex than we understand.

We can somewhat observe these Parameters, We can all say that defined prominent zygos look better than undefined ones, we can all say that a Straight nose, a forwardly grown face, a symmetrical face is objectively better.

But these Parameters only work to an certain extent, A hyper accurate calculation of beauty isn't possible for us, stop claiming that we can do it, stop claiming that our reality is absolute.


This is what happens when you go to deep and try to surpass the human barricade, it's fucking depressing.

Nonsense most people know what a really attractive male or female is and even in the middle when you take away virtue signaling ratings most people will be rated within a point of most people's ratings. Biology makes us see looks as attractive or subpar etc. If you want to see this in action just look at the dating market for a single male in his 20s after college - if he is average looking he has things on very hard mode while Chad has things on easy mode. Females can do this because higher looks males have no issue banging them in short situationships. The smaller % of females that will looksmatch young are usually in a LTR by their early 20s.
 
Nonsense most people know what a really attractive male or female is and even in the middle when you take away virtue signaling ratings most people will be rated within a point of most people's ratings. Biology makes us see looks as attractive or subpar etc. If you want to see this in action just look at the dating market for a single male in his 20s after college - if he is average looking he has things on very hard mode while Chad has things on easy mode. Females can do this because higher looks males have no issue banging them in short situationships. The smaller % of females that will looksmatch young are usually in a LTR by their early
objectively not true.
 
  • +1
Reactions: menas
It's 100% true and because it's true it's why so many guys get treated as subpar in society.
only if ur deformed the average LTN can live a normal life since its average
 
  • +1
Reactions: menas
only if ur deformed the average LTN can live a normal life since its average

The average LTN lives a shit life unless you consider being mostly sexless and video games being the highlight of a weekend. The west is turning into Japan for those guys.
 
They were always there, we just discovered them
 
Who decides who looks good?
Who decides who looks bad?

What objective reality do we follow to understand human beauty?

The parameters we have about beauty are still wildly undefined and up for debate, everybody tries to claim that beauty is totally objective and quantifiable but can't even get two people to agree on a single rating. I'm not saying that Objective beauty doesn't exist, what i'm saying is, there are Parameters that definitely work and definitely exist they're just a lot more complex than we understand.

We can somewhat observe these Parameters, We can all say that defined prominent zygos look better than undefined ones, we can all say that a Straight nose, a forwardly grown face, a symmetrical face is objectively better.

But these Parameters only work to an certain extent, A hyper accurate calculation of beauty isn't possible for us, stop claiming that we can do it, stop claiming that our reality is absolute.


This is what happens when you go to deep and try to surpass the human barricade, it's fucking depressing.
Gg:feelsokman:
 
  • +1
Reactions: jeff1234
They were always there, we just discovered them
we didn't we created an illusion that doesn't fit accurately into the real standard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: menas
Who decides who looks good?
Who decides who looks bad?

What objective reality do we follow to understand human beauty?

The parameters we have about beauty are still wildly undefined and up for debate, everybody tries to claim that beauty is totally objective and quantifiable but can't even get two people to agree on a single rating. I'm not saying that Objective beauty doesn't exist, what i'm saying is, there are Parameters that definitely work and definitely exist they're just a lot more complex than we understand.

We can somewhat observe these Parameters, We can all say that defined prominent zygos look better than undefined ones, we can all say that a Straight nose, a forwardly grown face, a symmetrical face is objectively better.

But these Parameters only work to an certain extent, A hyper accurate calculation of beauty isn't possible for us, stop claiming that we can do it, stop claiming that our reality is absolute.


This is what happens when you go to deep and try to surpass the human barricade, it's fucking depressing.
People just crazily overhype PSL Celebrities. Gandy is HTN maybe.

But I agree with the whole "ideal ratios" being absolutely dumb. Its just some people prefer masculine vs feminine features and also rate people not based on objectivity but rather with a filter of their own subconcious and subjective view.
 
  • +1
Reactions: penaldinho

Similar threads

0hMan
Replies
61
Views
2K
iblameCopecels
iblameCopecels
got.daim
Replies
29
Views
672
KekLord
KekLord
got.daim
Replies
41
Views
530
disillusioned
disillusioned
got.daim
Replies
14
Views
731
got.daim
got.daim

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top