Conservatism is just ugly dudes trying to cockblock Chad/Tyrone

[Aladin]

But I’d bet my life on it that on average more leftists would favor child marriage than conservatives would.

Child marriage is not a bad thing, assuming puberty was reached. It’s better than some teen girl being pumped and dumped by a teen fuckboy.

The most active women fighting against child marriage is a woman born Jewish who is now atheist. I’m supposed to believe Christian tradition is wrong and some Jew turned atheist got it right?

 

[germanlooks]

Child marriage is not a bad thing, assuming puberty was reached. It’s better than some teen girl being pumped and dumped by a teen fuckboy.

The most active women fighting against child marriage is a woman born Jewish who is now atheist. I’m supposed to believe Christian tradition is wrong and some Jew turned atheist got it right?

But child marriage isn’t two teens marrying each other with both their consent.

It’s an adult marrying a child against the consent of the child or the child is pressured into it. And this is wrong in every possible way

 

[Aladin]

But child marriage isn’t two teens marrying each other with both their consent.

It’s an adult marrying a child against the consent of the child or the child is pressured into it. And this is wrong in every possible way

No, it really isn’t. You’re suggesting that Christian traditions made over thousands of years are wrong and the feminists were the ones who got it right. That’s ridiculous.

 

[germanlooks]

No, it really isn’t. You’re suggesting that Christian traditions made over thousands of years are wrong and the feminists were the ones who got it right. That’s ridiculous.

idk what this has to do with feminism. I would be equally against a young boy being pressured into marriage with an older woman.
And just because something was tradition it doesn’t make it right.
By that logic you can justify nearly every bad thing like slavery, witch burning, etc. because somewhere in history it was a common practice.

 

[Aladin]

View attachment 2582629
idk what this has to do with feminism. I would be equally against a young boy being pressured into marriage with an older woman.
And just because something was tradition it doesn’t make it right.
By that logic you can justify nearly every bad thing like slavery, witch burning, etc. because somewhere in history it was a common practice.

It has everything to do with feminism because most of the time it’s a younger girl getting married to an older man. This created a situation where the man had much more authority over his wife as opposed to today where women get educated in meme degrees, whore around, take birth control, get abortions, and practically none save themselves for marriage.

And comparing it to slavery or witch burning is stupid. When studying history people always discuss those as atrocities, meanwhile teenagers getting married is not seen as an atrocity, it’s just seen as a way of life. Teenagers are not children, they are adolescents, and adolescence is a modern social construct. Teenagers, biologically speaking, are adults.

 

[germanlooks]

It has everything to do with feminism because most of the time it’s a younger girl getting married to an older man. This created a situation where the man had much more authority over his wife as opposed to today where women get educated in meme degrees, whore around, take birth control, get abortions, and practically none save themselves for marriage.

And comparing it to slavery or witch burning is stupid. When studying history people always discuss those as atrocities, meanwhile teenagers getting married is not seen as an atrocity, it’s just seen as a way of life. Teenagers are not children, they are adolescents, and adolescence is a modern social construct. Teenagers, biologically speaking, are adults.

So if you had a 12 year old daughter you’d be totally fine with some 30 year old man marrying her?

 

[Aladin]

So if you had a 12 year old daughter you’d be totally fine with some 30 year old man marrying her?

If he’s wealthy and not some shitskin then sure. Better than her getting fucked by teenage boys who can’t provide anything. All that does is defile her. Then send her off to college to get brainwashed by leftists and gangbanged? Like holy shit that’s retarded and so many people think women benefit from this.

 

[BrendioEEE]

The breakdown of conservatism has done has given Chad this:

And given subhumans this:

Chads aren't winning unless you think having access to thousands of subhuman women who shouldn't be breeding, while the top brass of the white females are smoking the most subhuman poopskinned cocks of all time.

This is the future you choose with yet another dogshit post:

 

[germanlooks]

If he’s wealthy and not some shitskin then sure. Better than her getting fucked by teenage boys who can’t provide anything. All that does is defile her. Then send her off to college to get brainwashed by leftists and gangbanged? Like holy shit that’s retarded and so many people think women benefit from this.

You know that there is also a middle ground between those two extremes?
I would try to raise my daughter in a way that she wouldn’t turn out as a whore who sleeps with every boy/man. But I equally don’t want some creepy man to marry her no matter how rich or whatever he is.
With 12 she shouldn’t have sex at all.

 

[Aladin]

You know that there is also a middle ground between those two extremes?
I would try to raise my daughter in a way that she wouldn’t turn out as a whore who sleeps with every boy/man. But I equally don’t want some creepy man to marry her no matter how rich or whatever he is.
With 12 she shouldn’t have sex at all.

12 is a bit early I agree. 14-16 is better.

But at the same time I don’t think a rich man who wants an age gap to get a virgin is automatically “creepy”. I think a lot of that prejudice comes from social conditioning.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

I’d bet my life on it that on average more leftists would favor child marriage than conservatives would.

On what basis do you assume this? In the case of conservatives, there is no need to bet, since the fact is that the Church covers up paedophilia of priests.
​

And either way currently it’s the left which puts children into danger with their lgbtq indoctrination

You call it indoctrination to educate about STDs? Saying that there are different orientations? The real indoctrination is what religions do - circumcision when boys are not yet self-conscious and cannot make a decision, instilling that masturbation is the road to hell even though it is normal teenage behaviour, whitewashing the corrupt institution that is the Church. This is what indoctrination really looks like.
​

and also by letting in tons of Muslims who all come out of society’s in which child marriage is normal

Muslims are conservatives. They are simply more radical than the European Right - they are what the Right in Europe was in the Middle Ages. The gradual rise of the left has removed these barbaric habits.

And who is bringing in the immigrants? President Macron, a neoliberal and fierce enemy of the yellow vests. The right-wing government of Poland from 2015 to 2023, the most glaring example of hypocrisy. Angela Merkel, a German politician of the centre-right.... so perhaps the right-wing likes to create problems which it then tries to solve itself by posing as a saviour?

Let me remind you that there would not have been a migrant crisis if Western countries had not destabilised the Middle East. It wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for the greed of private owners who enjoy the influx of cheap labour. It would not have happened if the policy towards religion had been harsher.
​

 

[Meteor21]

There's truth to it but you're right in the sense that it's preached so much cause those people can't just sleep around.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

"Muh tradition "
"Muh culture"
"Muh religion"
"Muh stability"
"Muh values"
"Muh patriotism"

Jfl I admit that I also subscribes to this bullshit for the longest time but the rise of the manosphere nonsense made me realize that no matter how hard they try to hide behind this veneer of religion/nation/stability/etc, ultimately they're just afraid that without those things they'll get cucked by Chad/Tyrone/etc. Let's be real nobody genuinely gives a shit about any of this it's just about controlling women so they don't go fuck other men.

If you want proof of this, just go have a look at how nearly all the redpiller/alt-right/manosphere/etc dudes are almost always always balding ogres, incels, failed normies, etc there are almost no Chads.

I admit I like it all so I get to control women. If we don’t we get cucked by chad and Tyrone

 

[New Poster]

Aren't you a social conservative?

 

[disillusioned]

Aren't you a social conservative?

I was until I suffered a total blackpill overdose.