Cooked low quality meat is good

sigma boii

sigma boii

Temp. Banned
Joined
Mar 26, 2025
Posts
7,181
Reputation
11,029
If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: thereallegend, ineonx and amin666bidelt
If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked
where tf can I get chicken for 2 dollars
 
If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked
Yes... Ideally, you would eat it cooked either way. Okay, maybe I can BARELY make an argument for retards eating raw beef, but eating raw chicken is beyond me, holy shit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Yes... Ideally, you would eat it cooked either way. Okay, maybe I can BARELY make an argument for retards eating raw beef, but eating raw chicken is beyond me, holy shit.
Raw chicken tastes better than raw beef
 
If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked
There’s way better muscle meat than chicken
 
Yeah it also has like 4x less nutrients and 2x more chances of giving you diarrhea from salmonella
They have the same volume of nutrients brainwashed kid
 
They have the same volume of nutrients brainwashed kid
Chicken:
1749433883700
1749433895767


Beef:
1749433922245
1749433932889


per 100g.
 
Niggas forget about pork chops. Literally almost the same macros as beef and way cheaper
 
So you proved me right cause the volume of micronutrients is near the same
No. Chicken, chicken is actually more nutrient dense in total micronutrient volume, it has way more B vitamins (except B12), the issue is that again, B vitamin deficiencies are very rare and about every fucking food as B vitamins. The reason why beef is superior is that it's richer in iron, B12, zinc, and fat soluble vitamins as well fat in general, which people are on average more deficient in, and are objectively harder to get
 
No. Chicken, chicken is actually more nutrient dense in total micronutrient volume, it has way more B vitamins (except B12), the issue is that again, B vitamin deficiencies are very rare and about every fucking food as B vitamins. The reason why beef is superior is that it's richer in iron, B12, zinc, and fat soluble vitamins as well fat in general, which people are on average more deficient in, and are objectively harder to get
Nutrients are only in animal products so if your deficient in 1 your deficient in them all
 

Similar threads

averagenormie
Replies
20
Views
121
divisionpanzerfaust
divisionpanzerfaust
underatedgreycel
Replies
2
Views
40
underatedgreycel
underatedgreycel
Iblamezygomatics
Replies
4
Views
62
Claymoreboy0118
Claymoreboy0118
TrustintheBP101
Replies
0
Views
36
TrustintheBP101
TrustintheBP101

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top