Cooked low quality meat is good

[sigma boii]

If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked

 

[amin666bidelt]

If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked

where tf can I get chicken for 2 dollars

 

[laworg]

If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked

Fuck no

 

[Zeekie]

If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked

Yes... Ideally, you would eat it cooked either way. Okay, maybe I can BARELY make an argument for retards eating raw beef, but eating raw chicken is beyond me, holy shit.

 

[sigma boii]

Yes... Ideally, you would eat it cooked either way. Okay, maybe I can BARELY make an argument for retards eating raw beef, but eating raw chicken is beyond me, holy shit.

Raw chicken tastes better than raw beef

 

[truelurker]

If you dont have $15 for 1 pound of high quality chicken you can get a lot shit quality for $2 and eat it cooked

There’s way better muscle meat than chicken

 

[Zeekie]

Raw chicken tastes better than raw beef

Yeah it also has like 4x less nutrients and 2x more chances of giving you diarrhea from salmonella

 

[sigma boii]

Yeah it also has like 4x less nutrients and 2x more chances of giving you diarrhea from salmonella

They have the same volume of nutrients brainwashed kid

 

[Zeekie]

They have the same volume of nutrients brainwashed kid

Chicken:

Beef:

per 100g.

 

[Zeekie]

Chicken:
View attachment 3810177View attachment 3810178

Beef:
View attachment 3810180View attachment 3810181

per 100g.

Chicken provides more B vitamins that's true, but no one is deficient in B vitamins, beef wins in every other department, specially when it comes to minerals.

 

[sigma boii]

Chicken:
View attachment 3810177View attachment 3810178

Beef:
View attachment 3810180View attachment 3810181

per 100g.

So you proved me right cause the volume of micronutrients is near the same

 

[pope]

Niggas forget about pork chops. Literally almost the same macros as beef and way cheaper

 

[Zeekie]

So you proved me right cause the volume of micronutrients is near the same

No. Chicken, chicken is actually more nutrient dense in total micronutrient volume, it has way more B vitamins (except B12), the issue is that again, B vitamin deficiencies are very rare and about every fucking food as B vitamins. The reason why beef is superior is that it's richer in iron, B12, zinc, and fat soluble vitamins as well fat in general, which people are on average more deficient in, and are objectively harder to get

 

[sigma boii]

No. Chicken, chicken is actually more nutrient dense in total micronutrient volume, it has way more B vitamins (except B12), the issue is that again, B vitamin deficiencies are very rare and about every fucking food as B vitamins. The reason why beef is superior is that it's richer in iron, B12, zinc, and fat soluble vitamins as well fat in general, which people are on average more deficient in, and are objectively harder to get

Nutrients are only in animal products so if your deficient in 1 your deficient in them all