Could you beat Dean Withers in a debate?

  • OP Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
  • Start date
Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ

Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ

American Kingfish Pioneer :kingfish:
Joined
May 1, 2024
Posts
9,059
Reputation
36,316
This site is like 90% right-wing, so do you think you could beat Dean Withers or any other leftist influencer in a debate?

I personally feel like I could, but he could definitely beat most right-wingers just because of how retarded they are.

But at the same time, the only way that these people win is by making up these questions that just make people look retarded like, "Zohran Mamdani wants to teach children Arabic numerals, what do you think of that?" :feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:, and of course the right winger falls for it even though it doesn't prove anything except make them look dumb. Same with the low IQ dolphin fetus thing.

But if you know your shit, you could easily win.

 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ltnbrownacnecel, Wildlife, Bugmaxxed and 6 others
@Bugmaxxed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bugmaxxed
just looking at him makes me mad
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: alwazzab, hypernormie, ltnbrownacnecel and 5 others
I would never worry about politics because stressing over things i can't control is slave behavior
 
  • +1
Reactions: hypernormie, Sprinkles, hye732 and 4 others
  • JFL
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
This site is like 90% right-wing, so do you think you could beat Dean Withers or any other leftist influencer in a debate?

I personally feel like I could, but he could definitely beat most right-wingers just because of how retarded they are.

But at the same time, the only way that these people win is by making up these questions that just make people look retarded like, "Zohran Mamdani wants to teach children Arabic numerals, what do you think of that?" :feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:, and of course the right winger falls for it even though it doesn't prove anything except make them look dumb. Same with the low IQ dolphin fetus thing.

But if you know your shit, you could easily win.

View attachment 4618493
This dude doing anything for fame and attention
 
  • +1
Reactions: staton and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
This site is like 90% right-wing, so do you think you could beat Dean Withers or any other leftist influencer in a debate?

I personally feel like I could, but he could definitely beat most right-wingers just because of how retarded they are.

But at the same time, the only way that these people win is by making up these questions that just make people look retarded like, "Zohran Mamdani wants to teach children Arabic numerals, what do you think of that?" :feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:, and of course the right winger falls for it even though it doesn't prove anything except make them look dumb. Same with the low IQ dolphin fetus thing.

But if you know your shit, you could easily win.

View attachment 4618493
im not a right winger but if i had to debate someone like him id deffo win
 
  • +1
Reactions: tarkdriad33 and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
You can't beat him in a debate lol, even if he is wrong. He controls the microphone.
The camera is also on him and not on you. Studies show over 50% of relatability during conversations comes from visual behaviour. body language, appearance, etc.
the other under 50% is your voice, how you're expressing it, and what you're actually saying

Same way charlie kirk bodyslams college students when he controls the zone, but when he argued in that brit uni [cambridge oxford forgot which one] because it was an equal playing field he got roasted
 
  • +1
Reactions: hye732, Deleted member 131540, kranerman23123 and 4 others
I would never worry about politics because stressing over things i can't control is slave behavior
Golden Freddy GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: staton, Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ and rj_0616
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: JasGews69x, hypernormie and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
I would never worry about politics because stressing over things i can't control is slave behavior
yeah its useless
i would rather make my own ideology from scratch and worship that then have to support movements and stuff
nun ever happens foreal
 
  • +1
Reactions: rj_0616 and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
I would never worry about politics because stressing over things i can't control is slave behavior
very true, if you're not a genetically gifted or born in a position of power, it will always be out of your control.

If you're just a random NPC and not in a position to make change, it's best to stay out of it and put your self interest above all else.

You can't beat him in a debate lol, even if he is wrong. He controls the microphone.
The camera is also on him and not on you. Studies show over 50% of relatability during conversations comes from visual behaviour. body language, appearance, etc.
the other under 50% is your voice, how you're expressing it, and what you're actually saying

Same way charlie kirk bodyslams college students when he controls the zone, but when he argued in that brit uni [cambridge oxford forgot which one] because it was an equal playing field he got roasted
It's really just an argument on what beating someone in a debate means.

If it means changing there opinion, you will almost never win because nobody will ever change their mind.

The amount of "free thinkers", that are willing to admit that they're wrong is very slim.

But from a more objective point of view, you can obviously tell who won, and who's the idiot.

I guess that would be considered more "besting" someone in a debate.

But yeah, I agree from a more subjective point of view, he would always have the upper hand, even if he's wrong.
View attachment 4618523

at LEAST 7 inches in his ass by that point
caging
 
  • JFL
Reactions: staton
I think i could in real life, because online hes getting fed information from 60 people
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
i could beat him up idk about a debate
 
  • +1
Reactions: hypernormie, Bugmaxxed and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
This site is like 90% right-wing, so do you think you could beat Dean Withers or any other leftist influencer in a debate?

I personally feel like I could, but he could definitely beat most right-wingers just because of how retarded they are.

But at the same time, the only way that these people win is by making up these questions that just make people look retarded like, "Zohran Mamdani wants to teach children Arabic numerals, what do you think of that?" :feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:, and of course the right winger falls for it even though it doesn't prove anything except make them look dumb. Same with the low IQ dolphin fetus thing.

But if you know your shit, you could easily win.

View attachment 4618493
Probably not but I would fucking kill him if we got into a boxing ring
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bugmaxxed and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
This site is like 90% right-wing, so do you think you could beat Dean Withers or any other leftist influencer in a debate?

I personally feel like I could, but he could definitely beat most right-wingers just because of how retarded they are.

But at the same time, the only way that these people win is by making up these questions that just make people look retarded like, "Zohran Mamdani wants to teach children Arabic numerals, what do you think of that?" :feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:, and of course the right winger falls for it even though it doesn't prove anything except make them look dumb. Same with the low IQ dolphin fetus thing.

But if you know your shit, you could easily win.

View attachment 4618493
I'm left wing and Dean Withers really fucking annoys me
 
  • +1
Reactions: silently_said and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
  • +1
Reactions: Bugmaxxed and Wildlife
I beat andrew wilson in a debate
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
could u beat nick fuentes in a debate?
I think I could, all of the guys who debate nowadays like Dean and Nick rely on insulting people's character. If I called Fuentes out on this I think it would be a good way to gain the upper hand at the start. My only problem would be that I'm not as well-versed in the very minute details of fascism. I know a lot about why I have my beliefs but I don't know as much on his beliefs so I would probably want prep time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
I beat andrew wilson in a debate
When was this? :lul:
I think I could, all of the guys who debate nowadays like Dean and Nick rely on insulting people's character. If I called Fuentes out on this I think it would be a good way to gain the upper hand at the start. My only problem would be that I'm not as well-versed in the very minute details of fascism. I know a lot about why I have my beliefs but I don't know as much on his beliefs so I would probably want prep time.
Really? Not to glaze, but I don't think many people could beat Fuentes in a debate. I don't necessarily think he attacks personal character either.

Do you have a specific left wing ideology you follow, like libertarianism, or socialism, or are you just overall more left leaning?

And what does fascism have to do with anything? :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wildlife
right wing and left wing is gay
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
When was this? :lul:

Really? Not to glaze, but I don't think many people could beat Fuentes in a debate. I don't necessarily think he attacks personal character either.

Do you have a specific left wing ideology you follow, like libertarianism, or socialism, or are you just overall more left leaning?

And what does fascism have to do with anything? :lul:
2 yrs ago when andrew was a lot smaller
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
Really? Not to glaze, but I don't think many people could beat Fuentes in a debate. I don't necessarily think he attacks personal character either.

Do you have a specific left wing ideology you follow, like libertarianism, or socialism, or are you just overall more left leaning?

And what does fascism have to do with anything? :lul:
It might've been an old clip but I've seen Nick describe himself as a fascist. Also I would say if I had to class myself under one category I'd say socialism or even communism but I do have some out of the norm beliefs for being on the left and I don't exactly fit the cookie cutter mold.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
2 yrs ago when andrew was a lot smaller
Mirin that :lul:
It might've been an old clip but I've seen Nick describe himself as a fascist. Also I would say if I had to class myself under one category I'd say socialism or even communism but I do have some out of the norm beliefs for being on the left and I don't exactly fit the cookie cutter mold.
Nah he isn't a fascist. There was a clip where he called for a military dictatorship, but that's all I'm aware of.

That's interesting, I've basically never met anyone who would openly identify as a communist :lul:

So did you just read the Communist Manifesto and fucked with it, or was there any point where that made you a fan, or what happened? :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wildlife
Mirin that :lul:

Nah he isn't a fascist. There was a clip where he called for a military dictatorship, but that's all I'm aware of.

That's interesting, I've basically never met anyone who would openly identify as a communist :lul:

So did you just read the Communist Manifesto and fucked with it, or was there any point where that made you a fan, or what happened? :lul:
I read a lot on communism. I looked at failing communist countries, realized where they were messing up and realized they were still closer to my ideal society than capitalist countries were. I think the ideal society would be something between communism and socialism. All necessities paid for and a recreational currency with capitalist reminiscent wages, meaning harder jobs get paid more to incentivize hard work.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
I would never worry about politics because stressing over things i can't control is slave behavior

itโ€™s all rigged and scripted by Jews
 
  • +1
Reactions: rj_0616 and Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
I read a lot on communism. I looked at failing communist countries, realized where they were messing up and realized they were still closer to my ideal society than capitalist countries were. I think the ideal society would be something between communism and socialism. All necessities paid for and a recreational currency with capitalist reminiscent wages, meaning harder jobs get paid more to incentivize hard work.
Yeah, I'm definitely not as opposed to it as most right-wingers, especially National Socialism (even though that's not really the same thing), but it's still extremely flawed, and I'm overall against it.

You said to just pay the harder jobs higher wages, but if a job pays more, everyone will try to get that job. If loads of people have the hard skill and are getting payed more money, then everyone would want that job. Then the "easier jobs" will be neglected because everyone would want more money. You would then have to either make easy jobs pay more, or force people to do them, and then you're back where you started.

If there's any money involved, it will end up becoming capitalism anyways.

I don't think any communist country has gotten anywhere close to succeeding, let alone being as good as a capitalist country. The poorest people in capitalist countries still have food, water, and shelter, and a person in that situation could almost always enter at least the middle class by working hard enough.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bugmaxxed and Wildlife
Yeah, I'm definitely not as opposed to it as most right-wingers, especially National Socialism (even though that's not really the same thing), but it's still extremely flawed, and I'm overall against it.

You said to just pay the harder jobs higher wages, but if a job pays more, everyone will try to get that job. If loads of people have the hard skill and are getting payed more money, then everyone would want that job. Then the "easier jobs" will be neglected because everyone would want more money. You would then have to either make easy jobs pay more, or force people to do them, and then you're back where you started.

If there's any money involved, it will end up becoming capitalism anyways.

I don't think any communist country has gotten anywhere close to succeeding, let alone being as good as a capitalist country. The poorest people in capitalist countries still have food, water, and shelter, and a person in that situation could almost always enter at least the middle class by working hard enough.
Yeah I can see your points
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
Yeah, I'm definitely not as opposed to it as most right-wingers, especially National Socialism (even though that's not really the same thing), but it's still extremely flawed, and I'm overall against it.

You said to just pay the harder jobs higher wages, but if a job pays more, everyone will try to get that job. If loads of people have the hard skill and are getting payed more money, then everyone would want that job. Then the "easier jobs" will be neglected because everyone would want more money. You would then have to either make easy jobs pay more, or force people to do them, and then you're back where you started.

If there's any money involved, it will end up becoming capitalism anyways.

I don't think any communist country has gotten anywhere close to succeeding, let alone being as good as a capitalist country. The poorest people in capitalist countries still have food, water, and shelter, and a person in that situation could almost always enter at least the middle class by working hard enough.
Vevcred take those ladies home
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
You can't beat someone like Dean Withers in a debate because he's a leftist which means his go to tactics are going to be to argue in bad faith and lie.

The way you beat Dean Withers in a debate is by treating him like the little soy faggot he is and not debating him at all
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
the video you linked was staged but hes still annoying as fuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
I can see the devil in his eyes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Return to Nature ๐ŸŒฒ
You can't beat someone like Dean Withers in a debate because he's a leftist which means his go to tactics are going to be to argue in bad faith and lie.

The way you beat Dean Withers in a debate is by treating him like the little soy faggot he is and not debating him at all
View attachment 4619651
So true, Jeff Teague knows his stuff.

You can never beat someone that's unwilling to change their opinion.
the video you linked was staged but hes still annoying as fuck
Respect his anxiety pen bro...
High iq clipfarm
love to see it
I can see the devil in his eyes
๐Ÿ’ฏ
 
  • +1
Reactions: hypernormie, loxin and rawr

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top