![SecularIslamist](/data/avatars/l/24/24082.jpg?1711086744)
SecularIslamist
Islamist jihadi and intersectional feminist
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2022
- Posts
- 19,886
- Reputation
- 35,181
I find it so odd when people you look "Colombian" you look "Indian". We should just use general terms like south Asian, European, med or gook.
There are slight negligible differences between countries, but has nothing to do with the country. This is especially those with a large population (India) or those which have historically had a mixed genetic make up (Turkey). I probably have a 90% success rate in telling apart a Paki from a Indian. But someone else without my experience will probably not be as good and think they both look the same. Reasonably so.
This makes even less in genetically diverse countries like Brazil or Morocco. You can have black-passing and white or med-passing. While they fit in what a normal Brazilian or Moroccan would look like it makes no sense to say they look like a country. Just say they look black, nafri, Arab or white.
There are slight negligible differences between countries, but has nothing to do with the country. This is especially those with a large population (India) or those which have historically had a mixed genetic make up (Turkey). I probably have a 90% success rate in telling apart a Paki from a Indian. But someone else without my experience will probably not be as good and think they both look the same. Reasonably so.
This makes even less in genetically diverse countries like Brazil or Morocco. You can have black-passing and white or med-passing. While they fit in what a normal Brazilian or Moroccan would look like it makes no sense to say they look like a country. Just say they look black, nafri, Arab or white.