Countries weren't founded on phenotypes

SecularIslamist

SecularIslamist

Islamist jihadi and intersectional feminist
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Posts
24,555
Reputation
47,276
I find it so odd when people you look "Colombian" you look "Indian". We should just use general terms like south Asian, European, med or gook.

There are slight negligible differences between countries, but has nothing to do with the country. This is especially those with a large population (India) or those which have historically had a mixed genetic make up (Turkey). I probably have a 90% success rate in telling apart a Paki from a Indian. But someone else without my experience will probably not be as good and think they both look the same. Reasonably so.

This makes even less in genetically diverse countries like Brazil or Morocco. You can have black-passing and white or med-passing. While they fit in what a normal Brazilian or Moroccan would look like it makes no sense to say they look like a country. Just say they look black, nafri, Arab or white.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Beastimmung and n9wiff
Believe me sometimes I see a Moroccan and an Algerian and I can spot the difference, yes it’s small but sometimes it is there.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Zizou, MaghrebGator, SecularIslamist and 1 other person
Believe me sometimes I see a Moroccan and an Algerian and I can spot the difference, yes it’s small but sometimes it is there.
I don't think the average guy can tell. I won't be able to coz I've not met a lot.

But anyways my point is places like Morocco, Brazil and Turkey are highly diverse. It's better just to say nafri, Middle Eastern or Latino.
 
  • +1
Reactions: emeraldglass and alurmo
its like how bangladeshis look like pakistanis because it is pakistan :feelshah:
 
  • WTF
Reactions: SecularIslamist
its like how bangladeshis look like pakistanis because it is pakistan :feelshah:
No saaar, we don't look like Pakistan or India. We have east Asian blood in us saaar. My family have gook eyes saaar. I was mistaken as an Indonesian once saar.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: shia.jihadist
Who care about bunch of shitskins lol
 
  • WTF
Reactions: SecularIslamist
I find it so odd when people you look "Colombian" you look "Indian". We should just use general terms like south Asian, European, med or gook.

There are slight negligible differences between countries, but has nothing to do with the country. This is especially those with a large population (India) or those which have historically had a mixed genetic make up (Turkey). I probably have a 90% success rate in telling apart a Paki from a Indian. But someone else without my experience will probably not be as good and think they both look the same. Reasonably so.

This makes even less in genetically diverse countries like Brazil or Morocco. You can have black-passing and white or med-passing. While they fit in what a normal Brazilian or Moroccan would look like it makes no sense to say they look like a country. Just say they look black, nafri, Arab or white.
there's difference between European countries like northern Europe and southern Europe are totally different
 
there's difference between European countries like northern Europe and southern Europe are totally different
Yeah southern Europe ofc you're likely to come across med pheno.
 
There are slight negligible differences between countries
Ok, hindu
1723310984358
 
But anyways my point is places like Morocco, Brazil and Turkey are highly diverse. It's better just to say nafri, Middle Eastern or Latino.
suprised south africa is not included
im mixed with indegous southern African, European, bantu African and I think sea
any generalization then?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: SecularIslamist

Similar threads

buddhistking
Replies
100
Views
863
debonss
debonss
Va-qoh
Replies
21
Views
425
Va-qoh
Va-qoh
D
Replies
10
Views
606
Deleted member 134154
D
asdvek
Replies
62
Views
1K
asdvek
asdvek

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top