Countries where insulting Jesus is a criminal offence

MaghrebGator

MaghrebGator

Luminary
Joined
Dec 19, 2023
Posts
8,258
Reputation
13,562
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 76870, Deleted member 117288, Deleted member 62012 and 3 others
Fuck saddam i will rape his dead body fucking arab sand nigger
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 117288
Okay. And would jesus have cared?
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX, Deleted member 117288, LiL 369 and 2 others
  • JFL
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 42399, therewillbeblud and romanstock
Doesnt make sense. Like how is insulting jesus gonna affect him in any way lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyMagnetant, StacyAttractant, StacyRepellent and 1 other person
This is like if all Nordic countries made insulting Gandalf illegal. Grow up.
 
jesus respect button
 
Doesnt make sense. Like how is insulting jesus gonna affect him in any way lmao
Speech sins and crimes are not generally defined by how they physically affect a person but by how they destroy a society sanctities and barriers from within, normalising the destruction of all common shared values that are meant to be defended by the rest of the laws.

One of the reasons of the historical utter corruption of christian priests is due to the "Confessing a sin" doctrine that made such priests be subject to hearing and normalising within their circles all kinds of immoralities and indecencies, making them easily susceptible to corruption while they reached the highest possible positions in their domains like the papacy, and afterwards spreading and normalising such corruption towards society as they were organised in hierarchies, and the priest hierarchy was higher and therefore influential towards that of the common citizen. That made christian societies be the first and still unmatched to normalize all kinds of behaviours considered immoral by the rest of the world.

Islam forbids such doctrines as it spreads corruption and normalization of sin among society, as the human being is inclined to imitate and follow the behaviours of his closest ones, such that the one who never heard or frequented circles of smoking or drugs or drinking alcohol will never commit such act, but the one who is exposed to such will most probably fall into it due to it being considered "normal" by him, since his closest ones are what defines what's "normal" and what is not by mere exposition and lack of grounding.

The same happens with blasphemy but on a higher level, the one who insults the most important of sanctities is not only promoting a mere sin by a time, but is removing the most important and key pillar that holds all the rest of sins to be considered crimes, such that instead of a mere smoker or drinker who barely aims to just throw a stone (Crime, sin) from the cliff, the blasphemer's goal would seem to be like that of the one who tries to colapse the entire mountain into ash.

It was narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: β€œWhoever removes a worldly hardship from a believer, Allah will remove one of the hardships of the Day of Resurrection from him. Whoever grants respite to (a debtor) who is in difficulty, Allah will grant him relief in this world and in the Hereafter. Whoever conceals (the fault of) a Muslim in this world, Allah will conceal him (his faults) in this world and in the Hereafter. Allah will help a person so long as he is helping his brother.”

Abu Hurayrah said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) say: β€œAll of my Ummah will be forgiven except those who sin openly. It is a part of sinning openly when a man does something at night, then the following morning when Allah has concealed his sin, he says, `O So and so, I did such and such last night,’ when all night his Lord has concealed him and the next morning he uncovers what Allah had concealed.”
 
Yes, but in those countries "Jesus" is not Jesus.
Which is curious for a christian to mention such, to say the least

Because although according to the New Testament it is acceptable to insult Jesus, or "Son of Man", it is not "ok" to insult the Holy Spirity deeming it as "Unforgivable", neither it is ok to insult God "The Father", in line with all verses showing how grave it is to insult and blaspheme against God.

Again, clearly making a distinction and signalling how Jesus is not considered a God unless on evidently intended corruption of interpretation.

A continuation, for some reason, the Bible just keeps this constant narrative deviation of normalizing the insult towards prophets and messengers of God, almost as if the authors were passive-aggressive towards such figures who were meant to be respected. The impartial mind would interpret it as if some of the authors of the Bible intended to demonize and normalize blasphemy and desecration of the Prophets of God in many verses even though it is inconsistent with it's own main narrative

Reinforcing again the islamic narrative that the Bible was corrupted by men influenced by Satan.
 
notice how all those countries suck lol
 
notice how all those countries suck lol
Being born in Qatar or Kuwait is like winning the lottery since day 1, rich countries with every native living like a king, work guaranteed, can travel anywhere in the world.
 
Muzzie propaganda. Try preaching Christianity over Islam in these same countries and see how the so called Jesus lovers over there would react :forcedsmile:
 
Which is curious for a christian to mention such, to say the least

Because although according to the New Testament it is acceptable to insult Jesus, or "Son of Man", it is not "ok" to insult the Holy Spirity deeming it as "Unforgivable", neither it is ok to insult God "The Father", in line with all verses showing how grave it is to insult and blaspheme against God.

Again, clearly making a distinction and signalling how Jesus is not considered a God unless on evidently intended corruption of interpretation.

A continuation, for some reason, the Bible just keeps this constant narrative deviation of normalizing the insult towards prophets and messengers of God, almost as if the authors were passive-aggressive towards such figures who were meant to be respected. The impartial mind would interpret it as if some of the authors of the Bible intended to demonize and normalize blasphemy and desecration of the Prophets of God in many verses even though it is inconsistent with it's own main narrative

Reinforcing again the islamic narrative that the Bible was corrupted by men influenced by Satan.
The Quran says the word of God cannot be corrupted.
 

Similar threads

dinaroidd
Replies
5
Views
43
thickbitch
thickbitch
NarrowBoneMarrow
Replies
2
Views
30
iblamexyz
iblamexyz
Thodian
Replies
7
Views
49
Thodian
Thodian
π”’π”―π”Ÿπ”¦π”±π”žπ”©π” π”’π”©
Replies
23
Views
197
π”’π”―π”Ÿπ”¦π”±π”žπ”©π” π”’π”©
π”’π”―π”Ÿπ”¦π”±π”žπ”©π” π”’π”©
inversions
Replies
39
Views
265
smegor
smegor

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top