Crazy how this was the beauty standard in the victorian era

Mess

Mess

Live together, Die alone
Joined
Oct 12, 2024
Posts
2,109
Reputation
3,066
Looks like mr burns :ogre:

1731286939000
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • Ugh..
Reactions: halloweed, lemonnz, The Grinch and 2 others
only trans women Norwood like that
 
  • +1
Reactions: lemonnz
just because some rich cunt paid to have her picture painted doesn't mean this was the beauty standard
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: HighTierSubhuman, Debetro, Clown Show and 3 others
just because some rich cunt paid to have her picture painted doesn't mean this was the beauty standard
Damn mixxed it up, not the victorian era, it's the late Middle Ages. Look it up this is one of the first examples

1731287320585
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Damn mixxed it up, not the victorian era, it's the late Middle Ages. Look it up this is one of the first examples

View attachment 3290103

actually a good skull.

1731287387848


you want to have a great deal of anterior depth and very little posterior depth.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Mess
I'm hitting
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Mess
Damn mixxed it up, not the victorian era, it's the late Middle Ages. Look it up this is one of the first examples

View attachment 3290103
yeah, again, paintings weren't the Victoria Secret catalog of their time. it was something rich or important people had done.
 
  • +1
Reactions: silently_said
yeah, again, paintings weren't the Victoria Secret catalog of their time. it was something rich or important people had done.
"A high forehead was considered beautiful and regal. Many women plucked their hairlines to create a large-looking forehead." It wasn't just documented thorugh portraits, but also literature
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Debetro
"A high forehead was considered beautiful and regal. Many women plucked their hairlines to create a large-looking forehead." It wasn't just documented thorugh portraits, but also literature
Well they painted dogs like this at the time

f16d94b78771be2a719fb603b9bed01c.jpg


So you can't take it as realistic. But I did notice in a lot of these paintings the women have five-finger foreheads. Everyone was very pale as well from what it seems.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mess
"A high forehead was considered beautiful and regal. Many women plucked their hairlines to create a large-looking forehead." It wasn't just documented thorugh portraits, but also literature
or it was some retarded fashion like those long nails all the women have that literally no man finds attractive. or those thin ass eyebrows all the women had in early 2000s. or foot binding.

this is why history isn't real science. it's just retards making shit up based on a dearth of evidence and their inability to think of other explanations for things
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mess

Similar threads

Zenis
Replies
39
Views
330
Zenis
Zenis
WeiWei
Replies
6
Views
279
Gonthar
Gonthar
J
Replies
40
Views
454
LancasteR
LancasteR
illusion
Replies
2
Views
132
elemanzelvadre
elemanzelvadre

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top