Crazy how this was the beauty standard in the victorian era

D

Deleted member 99995

remember me as mess, your friend
Joined
Oct 12, 2024
Posts
6,911
Reputation
15,470
Looks like mr burns :ogre:

1731286939000
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • Ugh..
Reactions: halloweed, lemonnz, The Grinch and 2 others
only trans women Norwood like that
 
  • +1
Reactions: lemonnz
just because some rich cunt paid to have her picture painted doesn't mean this was the beauty standard
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 77575, Deleted member 30845, Clown Show and 3 others
just because some rich cunt paid to have her picture painted doesn't mean this was the beauty standard
Damn mixxed it up, not the victorian era, it's the late Middle Ages. Look it up this is one of the first examples

1731287320585
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Damn mixxed it up, not the victorian era, it's the late Middle Ages. Look it up this is one of the first examples

View attachment 3290103

actually a good skull.

1731287387848


you want to have a great deal of anterior depth and very little posterior depth.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 99995
I'm hitting
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 99995
Damn mixxed it up, not the victorian era, it's the late Middle Ages. Look it up this is one of the first examples

View attachment 3290103
yeah, again, paintings weren't the Victoria Secret catalog of their time. it was something rich or important people had done.
 
  • +1
Reactions: silently_said
yeah, again, paintings weren't the Victoria Secret catalog of their time. it was something rich or important people had done.
"A high forehead was considered beautiful and regal. Many women plucked their hairlines to create a large-looking forehead." It wasn't just documented thorugh portraits, but also literature
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 30845
"A high forehead was considered beautiful and regal. Many women plucked their hairlines to create a large-looking forehead." It wasn't just documented thorugh portraits, but also literature
Well they painted dogs like this at the time

f16d94b78771be2a719fb603b9bed01c.jpg


So you can't take it as realistic. But I did notice in a lot of these paintings the women have five-finger foreheads. Everyone was very pale as well from what it seems.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 99995
"A high forehead was considered beautiful and regal. Many women plucked their hairlines to create a large-looking forehead." It wasn't just documented thorugh portraits, but also literature
or it was some retarded fashion like those long nails all the women have that literally no man finds attractive. or those thin ass eyebrows all the women had in early 2000s. or foot binding.

this is why history isn't real science. it's just retards making shit up based on a dearth of evidence and their inability to think of other explanations for things
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 99995

Similar threads

Latinolooksmaxxer
Replies
3
Views
60
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer
lifeishell88
Replies
6
Views
67
HXTRED999
HXTRED999
Suicidalcel
Replies
14
Views
155
Detective
Detective
mlglocalfatkid
Replies
3
Views
48
mlglocalfatkid
mlglocalfatkid
Jason Voorhees
Replies
13
Views
126
mr007
mr007

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top