Criticizing other men for using sex toys/dolls is a reflection of inadequacy

Reckless Turtle

Reckless Turtle

Fire
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Posts
17,904
Reputation
24,926
A man who can consistently have sex with attractive women probably doesn't care what other men do with sex toys/dolls (he's too busy having sex with attractive women).

A man with common sense who plans on have having sex with women would understand that other men using sex toys/dolls reduces competition.

Therefore, the men who criticize other men for using sex toys/dolls aren't having consistent sex with attractive women and/or simply lack common sense. Either way, they are inadequate in the eyes of women. You can find many of these individuals in this thread:

 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksOrDeath, thisend, Danish_Retard and 6 others
 

Attachments

  • 273525509_478187710530597_8111389754244969209_n.jpg
    273525509_478187710530597_8111389754244969209_n.jpg
    186 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 11610
D252A05B C43D 4AE6 A92D 211B7822377E

Black Ink Crew Laughing GIF by VH1
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 5'8manlet, Clark69, Gargantuan and 11 others
@n0rthface this thread is a perfecr example of Jewish pseudo intellectuality tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: YouLiveForYourself and n0rthface
  • +1
Reactions: n0rthface
in theory mtf transgenders reduce competition too yet it get despised and not encouraged by majority of men

it makes sense from an evolutionary point of view since men (outside of the sexual market) used to be not competitors but allies who were heavily dependent on each other. in issues like hunting or clashing with other tribes cooperation is crucial to make sure your own survival..and if in your tribe are only faggots, transgenders and weak minded guys then its not only game over for their genes but also for yours the moment the chad warriors from the competetive tribe decide to invade your village and kill all men

hence normal men are heavily disgusted when they see weakness and degeneracy by other men, it used to weaken their own chance of survival, its perfectly natural to get disgusted by it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Clark69 and n0rthface
in theory mtf transgenders reduce competition too
You could throw them in as well.
it makes sense from an evolutionary point of view since men (outside of the sexual market) used to be not competitors but allies who were heavily dependent on each other. in issues like hunting or clashing with other tribes cooperation is crucial to make sure your own survival..and if in your tribe are only faggots, transgenders and weak minded guys then its not only game over for their genes but also for yours the moment the chad warriors from the competetive tribe decide to invade your village and kill all men

hence normal men are heavily disgusted when they see weakness and degeneracy by other men, it used to weaken their own chance of survival, its perfectly natural to get disgusted by it
Tribalism is mostly a cope because the most successful men impregnate a disproportionate amount of women relative to the other tribe members. This goes back to my initial point that the men mostly likely to express their disgust are the ones who aren't consistently having sex with attractive women.
 
You could throw them in as well.

Tribalism is mostly a cope because the most successful men impregnate a disproportionate amount of women relative to the other tribe members. This goes back to my initial point that the men mostly likely to express their disgust are the ones who aren't consistently having sex with attractive women.
tribalism was crucial for survival in the past, as i noted. hence men are disgusted at weak men because weak men in the group lower the chance of survival of told group

its indeed cope by todays society, since the survival factor isnt there anymore

also if you think about: ugly looking ogre guys (big frame, bald, strong but also fat), the guys you see playing dart in a bar for example, are hated by women but not by guys. on the other hand guys hate faggots, transgenders for reasons i stated above
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
tribalism was crucial for survival in the past
Again, tribalism starts to fall apart when certain men have disproportionate sexual access to the women, which is necessary to have disproportionately higher fitness in certain men. There have always been men who were sexually selected by women over other men.

Even within tribalism, the men with greatest sexual access to women were probably the ones to least likely care about "degeneracy" in the group. I'm just restating the OP at this point.
 
Again, tribalism starts to fall apart when certain men have disproportionate sexual access to the women, which is necessary to have disproportionately higher fitness in certain men. There have always been men who were sexually selected by women over other men.


in the past: if you were a small tribe and you had too many faggots and other degenerated weaklings in it, your tribe would have got wiped out (either by other tribes or by nature), hence men are naturally conditioned to sanctionise and despise faggotry and weakness in other men
 
in theory mtf transgenders reduce competition too yet it get despised and not encouraged by majority of men

it makes sense from an evolutionary point of view since men (outside of the sexual market) used to be not competitors but allies who were heavily dependent on each other. in issues like hunting or clashing with other tribes cooperation is crucial to make sure your own survival..and if in your tribe are only faggots, transgenders and weak minded guys then its not only game over for their genes but also for yours the moment the chad warriors from the competetive tribe decide to invade your village and kill all men

hence normal men are heavily disgusted when they see weakness and degeneracy by other men, it used to weaken their own chance of survival, its perfectly natural to get disgusted by it
@WannabeJock thoughts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15338
A man who can consistently have sex with attractive women probably doesn't care what other men do with sex toys/dolls (he's too busy having sex with attractive women).

A man with common sense who plans on have having sex with women would understand that other men using sex toys/dolls reduces competition.

Therefore, the men who criticize other men for using sex toys/dolls aren't having consistent sex with attractive women and/or simply lack common sense. Either way, they are inadequate in the eyes of women. You can find many of these individuals in this thread:

I can care the fuck less what you people do. You can shove intoxicated angry midgets inside your assholes for all I care. Fuck each other's shitholes all day and night. But when those fucking parasites push that perverted shit into schools, its time to remove the children. What the faggot organization SHOULD be doing is try pushing that degeneracy into PRIVATE schools and watch how fast your entire life is destroyed. The wealthy society sees it like that. It's better for them than for us. Let's encourage the faggot groups to push their faggot shit into PRIVATE privileged schools. Fair is fair.

Dear Faggots, don't allow rich people to scare you.
 
Again, tribalism starts to fall apart when certain men have disproportionate sexual access to the women, which is necessary to have disproportionately higher fitness in certain men. There have always been men who were sexually selected by women over other men.

Even within tribalism, the men with greatest sexual access to women were probably the ones to least likely care about "degeneracy" in the group. I'm just restating the OP at this point.
When we look at history, we can see that the most tribal group had greater success rate over other less Ethnocentric and tribalistic groups.





Look up group selection, is essentially Darwinism but for groups.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Again, tribalism starts to fall apart when certain men have disproportionate sexual access to the women, which is necessary to have disproportionately higher fitness in certain men. There have always been men who were sexually selected by women over other men.

Even within tribalism, the men with greatest sexual access to women were probably the ones to least likely care about "degeneracy" in the group. I'm just restating the OP at this point.
And you’re failing to realise that inceldom has only rapidly grown since technology has become widespread.


So in tribal societies, it wouldn’t of been much of a problem.
 
in the past: if you were a small tribe and you had too many faggots and other degenerated weaklings in it, your tribe would have got wiped out (either by other tribes or by nature), hence men are naturally conditioned to sanctionise and despise faggotry and weakness in other men
Men are naturally conditioned to not rely on degenerate weaklings. They would be wasting time criticizing them for sticking objects in their butts.
 
When we look at history, we can see that the most tribal group had greater success rate over other less Ethnocentric and tribalistic groups.
Obviously; power in numbers. This doesn't change the fact that men are not equal within a tribe, which is the point of this post (which you always seem to argue against). Certain men within the tribe will be sexually selected over others.
So in tribal societies, it wouldn’t of been much of a problem.
The top dogs in the tribe would have to force some women into submission so the majority of men could have sexual access. If they didn't, the power establishment couldn't be maintained, as the majority of men would revolt.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: n0rthface

Similar threads

L
Replies
1
Views
32
kaczynskiwasright
kaczynskiwasright
TrueNateJacobs
Replies
38
Views
1K
fwhr
fwhr
Liferuiner
Blackpill Nym>Gio Scotti
Replies
22
Views
400
Liferuiner
Liferuiner
Zeekie
Replies
66
Views
1K
bigwilly10
bigwilly10
NT Master
Replies
1
Views
181
Brus Wane
Brus Wane

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top