Cumskin Tries to Claim Hinduism is Descended from European

Chadeep

Chadeep

Investment Banker
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
35,451
Reputation
77,666


@LTNUser @greycel @Methylphenidate @NoHoesinOhio @n9wiff
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 666PSL, psychomandible, finnished and 10 others
It worked the opposite direction
 
  • +1
Reactions: finnished
@Debetro @psychomandible
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
There’s not much left of the early Vedic-Aryan Hinduism anymore. Their supreme god Indra is relegated to a low level demigod nowadays.
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible, Chadeep and GigaStacySexual
42 out of 45 swat valley samples have predominantly female mediated autosomal ancestry. Steppe ancestry is from using huwhite women as sex slaves

94790   SoyBooru
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 666PSL, DieVoGel6949, laaltin and 9 others
42 out of 45 swat valley samples have predominantly female mediated autosomal ancestry. Steppe ancestry is from using huwhite women as sex slaves

View attachment 3430032
So Dravidians are the OG Hindus? Makes sense tbh. They spread it to Indonesia and Malaysia too.
 


@LTNUser @greycel @Methylphenidate @NoHoesinOhio @n9wiff

Yes if you look at the norse pagan religion it's also very close to hindiusm but they weree the upper caste and dint mix with the other indians like how the pharao aryans ruled over black people in egypt
 
We iz indra and shiet
Images   2025 01 15T185519794
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: 666PSL, PrinceLuenLeoncur and Chadeep
So Dravidians are the OG Hindus? Makes sense tbh. They spread it to Indonesia and Malaysia too.
IVC wasn't Dravidian , it just collapsed and the people migrated eastward to form the kuru clan and following indo aryan civ ( heavily simplifying but yeah no cultural or paleontological discontinuity between ivc and indo aryan peoples)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep
Indians are aryans mixed with Abos
 
IVC wasn't Dravidian , it just collapsed and the people migrated eastward to form the kuru clan and following indo aryan civ
Pre Ivc were mixed Iranian farmer and aasi hunters
And post ivc had steppe genes?
 
  • +1
Reactions: 666PSL and Chadeep
Pre Ivc were mixed Iranian farmer and aasi hunters
And post ivc had steppe genes
Ivc already had west siberian hunter gatherer, and anatolian neolithic farmer / CHG / Iranian neolithic so this is false

Steppe ancestry trickled in past 800 bc slowly uptill 300 bce , too late for indo aryan civilization and language turnover

Received 1604369853619734
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep and NoHoesinOhio
Ivc already had west siberian hunter gatherer, and anatolian neolithic farmer / CHG / Iranian neolithic so this is false

Steppe ancestry trickled in past 800 bc slowly uptill 300 bce , too late for indo aryan civilization and language turnover
Where tf are you coming from nigger this is generic OIT trope
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the_machinist_786
Muh 800 bce Steppe ancestry saar
Muh Shrikant Talageri saar
Muh Iranian phrom Punjab saar
Muh IranN iz Indian saar
Average OITard:-
 
wHAt? Rip lil scoom 😢 :eek:


This guy is the root cause of these delusional theories

P.S. the Bengali foid interviewing is hot
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: LTNUser
Muh 800 bce Steppe ancestry saar
Muh Shrikant Talageri saar
Muh Iranian from Punjab saar
Muh IranN iz Indian saar
Average OITard:-
This isn't OIT but the currently most feasible model for language divergence retard. I don't know why you want to be a white rapebaby so bad but apart from midwit jews like David reich no one takes muh horse wheel chariot kanging seriously anymore.

Greek and indo Iranian language divergence was much earlier than thought making a steppe proxy untenable even if it wasn't 800 but 1500 bce. The current position is two homelands , with eastern fertile crescent being the major ones for anatolian greek and indo iranian
 
This isn't OIT but the currently most feasible model for language divergence retard. I don't know why you want to be a white rapebaby so bad but apart from midwit jews like David reich no one takes muh horse wheel chariot kanging seriously anymore.

Greek and indo Iranian split was much earlier than though making a steppe proxy untenable even if it wasn't 800 but 1500 bce.
You're just Iranian rapebaby retard the fact is by your logic everyone is rapebaby of one another, literally basic archaeogenetics :ROFLMAO:. That Heggarty paper is undone previous year by Harvard and Reich Lab and Kassian, Heggarty was not received well and criticised alot it's a fringe position nothing most plausible about it stop coping
 
1000013194
 
  • Love it
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
You're just Iranian rapebaby retard the fact is by your logic everyone is rapebaby of one another, literally basic archaeogenetics :ROFLMAO:. That Heggarty paper is undone previous year by Harvard and Reich Lab and Kassian, Heggarty was not received well and criticised alot it's a fringe position nothing most plausible about it stop coping
Reich is a midwit who gets a lot of things wrong. Andronovan hypothesis has been literally called a fairy tale by multiple non curry researches , the whole reich thing is downstream from David anthony who is another armchair philosopher
 
Reich is a midwit who gets a lot of things wrong. Andronovan hypothesis has been literally called a fairy tale by multiple non curry researches , the whole reich thing is downstream from David anthony who is another armchair philosopher
:lul: no one calls Andronovo hypothesis fairy tale, it's accepted by all scholars other than fringe OITard bank clerks like Shrikant Talageri, Heggarty is just minor position not the consensus and dominant academic opinion, and it has been debunked already
 
Theres nothing minor about it

NoHoesinOhio
  • We should encounter obvious discontinuities in the prehistoric skeletal record that correspond with a period around 1500 B.C., the proposed time for the disruptive demographic event.... there is no evidence of demographic disruptions in the North‐Western sector of the subcontinent during and immediately after the decline of the Harappan culture..... Discontinuities are indicated in our skeletal data for early Neolithic populations in Baluchistan and for early Iron Age populations in the Northwest Frontier region, events too early and too late, respectively, to fit into the classic scenario of a mid-second millennium B.C. Aryan invasion...... At best, the skeletal biologist familiar with the record of human remains from South Asia can respond by asking "How could one recognize an Aryan, living or dead, when the biological criteria for Aryanness are non-existent?" (Kennedy 1995)
  • If Vedic Aryans were a biological entity represented by the skeletons from Timargarha, then their biological features of cranial and dental anatomy were not distinct to a marked degree from what we encountered in the ancient Harappans..... our multivariate approach does not define the biological identity of an ancient Aryan population, but it does indicate that the Indus Valley and Gandhara peoples shared a number of craniometric, odontometric and discrete traits that point to a high degree of biological affnity. (Kennedy 1995)
  • There is no archaeological or biological evidence for invasions or mass migrations into the Indus Valley between the end of the Harappan phase, about 1900 B.C. and the beginning of the Early Historic period around 600 B.C. (Kenoyer 1998: 174)
  • So far archaeology and palaeontlogy, based on multi-variate analysis of skeletal features, have not found a new wave of immigration into the subcontinent after 4500 BCE (a separation between the Neolithic and Chalcolithic populations of Mehrgarh), and up to 800 BCE: ''Aryan bones'' have not been discovered, not even of the Gandhåra Grave culture which is usually believed to have been IA… J. Lukacs asserts unequivocally that no significant population changes took place in the centuries prior to 800 BC. (Witzel 2002)
  • This [Aryan invasion] theory of Indian civilization is perhaps one of the most perduring and insidious themes in the historiography and archaeology of South Asia, despite accumulating evidence to the contrary (Johansen 2003. 195)
  • There is absolutely NO archaeological evidence for any variant of the Andronovo culture either reaching or infuencing the cultures of Iran or northern India in the second millennium. Not a single artifact of identifiable Andronovo type has been recovered from the Iranian Plateau, northern India, or Pakistan. (Lamberg-Karlovsky,2004)
  • The archaeological evidence for an expansion from the steppelands across historical Iran and India varies from the extremely meagre to total absence: both the Anatolian and the Kurgan theory find it extraordinarily diffcult to explain the expansion of the Indo-European languages over a vast area of urbanized Asian populations, approximately the same area as that of Europe. (Mallory and Adams 2006)
  • No support for the entry of ‘Aryan’ populations [in India] is found in physical anthropological data (Petraglia & Allchin 2007)
  • Over the course of the past half century, the model of an Indo-Aryan population invasion have been thoroughly problematized, and largely discredited within archaeology.. What the accumulation of archaeological evidence over the course of the twentieth century has inevitably demonstrated is that the major transitions in South Asian pre- and proto-history are gradual and often show little evidence for any outside origin… Archaeologists in particular have thus very much moved away from migrationist models, including the idea of Indo-Aryan invasions, as an explanation for cultural change in South Asia. (Boivin 2007)
  • The hypotheses regarding massive population movements during the protohistoric period cannot be supported on available skeletal data. (Walimbe 2007)
  • The incursions of ‘foreign’ people within the periods of time associated with the Harappan decline cannot be documented by the skeletal record … The physical anthropological data refutes the hypothesis of ‘Aryan invasion' (Walimbe 2014)
  • The archaeological record of Harappan decline in the Indus Valley itself has never revealed any obvious connection with the widely claimed origin for these Indo-European invaders in the Pontic steppes or central Asia. In my view, supported linguistically.. the Harappan decline had nothing whatsoever to do with any Indo-European arrival in Pakistan or India, since this language family had already been present there for several millennia beforehand. (Bellwood 2014, 156)
  • There is no evidence for an invasion or mass migration of new peoples from outside which destroyed the networks of the Integration Era. Instead, there is evidence in the form of both artefacts and structures which demonstrates that there was a degree of continuity, although the form, scale and patterns of human communities and their settlements altered; or as many researchers describe it, there was a distinct transformation…… Indeed, Sankalia’s statement of 1962 still remains valid, that despite almost a century of investigations, “we have not found anything “Aryan” on the ruins of the Indus Valley Civilisation” (Coningham and Young 2015)
  • ..the completely discredited idea that there had been an Aryan invasion in the first half of the second millennium BCE. There is absolutely no archaeological or skeletal evidence of such a large-scale conflagration.. (Robbins Schug, Parnell, and Harrod 2020)
  • We may admit that some steppe groups penetrated to the south, but there is no archaeological evidence of this migration, and the whole cultural genesis in both Iran and India was connected with the west. (Grigoriev 2021)
  • At least one thing is sure: the collapse of both these urban civilizations (i.e., those of the BMAC and the Indus) was not caused by attacks by Andronovan barbarians from the steppes. There are no traces of Andronovan objects south of the BMAC, and the same is true in the Hindu Kush mountain passes that lead to India. As we have seen, there are no traces either in the Indus Valley. But since the current languages spoken in Northern India indeed belong to the Indo-European group, there is only one solution left to save the invasionist model, or at least the concept of an “arrival of the Indo-Iranians”: invisible migrations. (Demoule 2023)
  • It has long remained a recognized weakness of the Steppe hypothesis that the archaeological record lacks any obvious impacts out of the Steppe in a time-frame early enough to fit well with the scale of linguistic divergence within Indo-Iranic. Advocates of the Steppe hypothesis have widely assumed that the Andronovo culture ‘must have’ been Indo-Iranic-speaking, but even Mallory “find it extraordinarily diffcult to make a case for expansions from this northern region to northern India”, and more generally finds no obvious connection to “the seats of the Medes, Persians or Indo-Aryans”. (Heggarty et al. 2023)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the_machinist_786


@LTNUser @greycel @Methylphenidate @NoHoesinOhio @n9wiff

GOLLYYY GEEEEEE AR YOU SAYING JOLLY OH RAMMMOOOO THAT WE (ZIPS TIE) WERE, NO PARDON MEH ARE KINGS AND STUFF REALLLLYYY (Buttons up shirt)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep
Yes if you look at the norse pagan religion it's also very close to hindiusm but they weree the upper caste and dint mix with the other indians like how the pharao aryans ruled over black people in egypt
Final part is so bullshit it’s too stupid to even fucking reply 2. Your takes on this are so bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and NoHoesinOhio
GOLLYYY GEEEEEE AR YOU SAYING JOLLY OH RAMMMOOOO THAT WE (ZIPS TIE) WERE, NO PARDON MEH ARE KINGS AND STUFF REALLLLYYY (Buttons up shirt)
I'm Waiting for a Cumskin to say they founded Islam.
 
I'm Waiting for a Cumskin to say they founded Islam.
They do…

Many claim Mohammed as a white man because he’s called “white” in the Hadiths lol :lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NoHoesinOhio and Chadeep
It is unbelievably ironic how SFcels try to envoke this grand Aryan mythology in reaction to mass immigration when the migrants are the Aryans and the SFcels where the people being invaded.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: moredatesmorerapes, Chadeep, the_machinist_786 and 1 other person
Pre Ivc were mixed Iranian farmer and aasi hunters
And post ivc had steppe genes?
post IVC is North Brahmin like profile Vedic Aryans, IVC_45AASI + Steppe with 60% R1a. Cumskins can't claim anything, the highest Vedic is Gaur Brahmins and highest Dardic is Kohistani & Chitrali. Highest West Iranian is Yazd Persians, Mazandaranis, Khorasanis, East Iranian peaks in Yaghnobis, Pamiris, Pashtuns
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NoHoesinOhio and Donquixote
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and GigaStacySexual
Final part is so bullshit it’s too stupid to even fucking reply 2. Your takes on this are so bad
Why does everyone say this? Lmao you guys are so fucking brainwahsed im caging
 
Why does everyone say this? Lmao you guys are so fucking brainwahsed im caging
Nigger you think the Egyptians were white :lul::lul::lul:

Whites can’t even go Egypt without being injected with vaccines and sun screen and Niga thinks they conquered and ruled over Egyptians.

Egyptians are unironically a race of Mongrels like @Goatsie I have Egyptian relatives myself they are mongrels :lul:. Egyptians are just Arabs who got fucked by BBC and then one or 2 Greeks
 
  • +1
Reactions: 666PSL and JeanneDArcAlter
Why does everyone say this? Lmao you guys are so fucking brainwahsed im caging
Every civilisation is white in origin
Non whites can’t create and I say this as an ethnic
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Flowerpot and JeanneDArcAlter
Nigger you think the Egyptians were white :lul::lul::lul:

Whites can’t even go Egypt without being injected with vaccines and sun screen and Niga thinks they conquered and ruled over Egyptians.

Egyptians are unironically a race of Mongrels like @Goatsie I have Egyptian relatives myself they are mongrels :lul:
I said that the egyptians were black you fucking idiot read it again. The whites were the pharaohs which were depicted with white skin and blue eyes
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter and the_machinist_786
Every civilisation is white in origin
Non whites can’t create and I say this as an ethnic
False every civilization is black in origin i tought everybody knew this. Something like 10 000 years ago there accured a mutation which gave the ligher melanin evryone before were black
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep and the_machinist_786
I said that the egyptians were black you fucking idiot read it again. The whites were the pharaohs which were depicted with white skin and blue eyes
The ancient pre-Arabic Egyptians were basically like Copts. :lul::lul::lul::lul: this is Wignat tier cope
 
I said that the egyptians were black you fucking idiot read it again. The whites were the pharaohs which were depicted with white skin and blue eyes
not true, there are a few egyptian statues that have blue eyes, which reflects the real egyptian population, who there is a small minority of who have light eyes, most Egyptian statues depict brown eyes pharaoh or not, the only pharaoh we know of who would have look "white" is Ramses II who could hardly be credited with the creation of ancient egypt as we know it, and even then he was still an ethnic egyptian, he just had ginger hair.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 666PSL
Nigger you think the Egyptians were white :lul::lul::lul:

Whites can’t even go Egypt without being injected with vaccines and sun screen and Niga thinks they conquered and ruled over Egyptians.

Egyptians are unironically a race of Mongrels like @Goatsie I have Egyptian relatives myself they are mongrels :lul:. Egyptians are just Arabs who got fucked by BBC and then one or 2 Greeks
nigger is now going to scrub through every thread talking about egyptians just to mention my name:lul:
 

Similar threads

Thinking_CEL
Replies
136
Views
1K
grandnomysz
grandnomysz
AverageConnoisseur
Replies
61
Views
880
dax922
dax922
ReadBooksEveryday
Replies
23
Views
2K
looksmaxxed
looksmaxxed
D
2 3 4 5
Replies
216
Views
6K
JustHereToLooksmax
JustHereToLooksmax

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top