Cumskin Tries to Claim Hinduism is Descended from European

False every civilization is black in origin i tought everybody knew this. Something like 10 000 years ago there accured a mutation which gave the ligher melanin evryone before were black
This is how ancestors of all Eurasians looked like originally when arriving into Middle East from Africa
Images 9
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and persuss
not true, there are a few egyptian statues that have blue eyes, which reflects the real egyptian population, who there is a small minority of who have light eyes, most Egyptian statues depict brown eyes pharaoh or not, the only pharaoh we know of who would have look "white" is Ramses II who could hardly be credited with the creation of ancient egypt as we know it, and even then he was still an ethnic egyptian, he just had ginger hair.
No which reflects the pharaohs😑 the egyptians were black
 
I said that the egyptians were black you fucking idiot read it again. The whites were the pharaohs which were depicted with white skin and blue eyes
That’s the point…

Your saying the white man who is allergic to the sun was able to go take over Egypt, conquer the people there without vaccines and shit?

Do you know why Europeans couldn’t conquer Africa before the 19th century. I’ll tell you why, because THEY DIDNT HAVE THE MEDICINE TO VACCINATE THEMSELVES WHEN THEY WENT THERE.

Your saying they bypassed all of this and the native Egyptians just let these invaders take over? And this isn’t even historically documented ANYWHERE.

Yeah get fucking lost. The only white dynasty was the Ptolemaic dynasty And they were literally Alexander the greats generals lineage from his conquest
 
No which reflects the pharaohs😑 the egyptians were black
brother, read it again; most pharaohs had dark eyes and brown to olive skin, they were not white
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: persuss
nigger is now going to scrub through every thread talking about egyptians just to mention my name:lul:
We were talking about Egypt… he brought it up not me

I have relatives who are apart Egyptian as well so GTFO with that shit, and I have Freinds who live there keep coping. Besides Tomane Egyptians are basically curries lmfao fucking Bangalore ass Arabs
 
That’s the point…

Your saying the white man who is allergic to the sun was able to go take over Egypt, conquer the people there without vaccines and shit?

Do you know why Europeans couldn’t conquer Africa before the 19th century. I’ll tell you why, because THEY DIDNT HAVE THE MEDICINE TO VACCINATE THEMSELVES WHEN THEY WENT THERE.

Your saying they bypassed all of this and the native Egyptians just let these invaders take over? And this isn’t even historically documented ANYWHERE.

Yeah get fucking lost. The only white dynasty was the Ptolemaic dynasty And they were literally Alexander the greats generals lineage from his conquest
Allergig to the sun:forcedsmile: do you even know who the pharaohs came from? They could qonuer africa and they did before the 19th century nuthead. The pharaos didnt invade egypt either read it again retard the egyptian pharohs were descendants of fallen angels and were treated as gods so they got accepted as rulers.
 
w
We were talking about Egypt… he brought it up not me

I have relatives who are apart Egyptian as well so GTFO with that shit, and I have Freinds who live there keep coping. Besides Tomane Egyptians are basically curries lmfao fucking Bangalore ass Arabs
we arent arabs.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
brother, read it again; most pharaohs had dark eyes and brown to olive skin, they were not white
@persuss moment
IMG 1831


White man btw (Amenhotep)

Ngl he looks black I wasn’t even planning on this I just typed in a radom pharoah like Akhenaten or amenhotep and he looks like a BROTHA
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: persuss
@persuss moment
View attachment 3430206

White man btw (Amenhotep)

Ngl he looks black I wasn’t even planning on this I just typed in a radom pharoah like Akhenaten or amenhotep and he looks like a BROTHA
Which was his lineage it's obvious he was a black ruler but he certainly wasnt a royal lineage like the ones im takking abiut
 
@persuss moment
View attachment 3430206

White man btw (Amenhotep)

Ngl he looks black I wasn’t even planning on this I just typed in a radom pharoah like Akhenaten or amenhotep and he looks like a BROTHA
Yes, there was 100% black people in ancient egypt, some of whom may have been pharaohs such as the likes of pharaoh narmer, but like I said egypt is diverse, or as you would say "a nation of monrgrels" you can see people like ramses II and Nefertiti as examples of the opposite of this

Ramses II:
Statue of Ramesses II - Egypt Museum
Scientists reconstruct face of 'handsome' Ramses II, possible pharaoh of  Exodus | The Times of Israel



Nefertiti:
Images 7
3-D image of Egyptian queen 'not Nefertiti', local professor says | WGN-TV
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur
Which was his lineage it's obvious he was a black ruler but he certainly wasnt a royal lineage like the ones im takking abiut
He was a random royal.

Here’s another one
IMG 1833



And here’s another one

Ramses
IMG 1835
IMG 1836
IMG 1834



And here’s another one
IMG 1837
IMG 1838




Blonde white aryans btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: persuss
  • JFL
Reactions: persuss
post IVC is North Brahmin like profile Vedic Aryans, IVC_45AASI + Steppe with 60% R1a. Cumskins can't claim anything, the highest Vedic is Gaur Brahmins and highest Dardic is Kohistani & Chitrali. Highest West Iranian is Yazd Persians, Mazandaranis, Khorasanis, East Iranian peaks in Yaghnobis, Pamiris, Pashtuns
Vedic Aryans were mix of sintashta and IVC folks. They would have been closely related to north brahmin/ rors/ haryanvi jatts not some nordic. Even pure sintashta would have looked like pamiri not white. Europeans have zero aryan ancestory, white nationalist make clown of themselves by trying to claim aryans from their actual descendants (modern day iranic, indic, turkic and dravadians).
And to be honest aryans were not that great, IVC's mogged them hard in every department.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep, NoHoesinOhio, Goatsie and 1 other person
Vedic Aryans were mix of sintashta and IVC folks. They would have been closely related to north brahmin/ rors/ haryanvi jatts not some nordic. Even pure sintashta would have looked like pamiri not white. Europeans have zero aryan ancestory, white nationalist make clown of themselves by trying to claim aryans from their actual descendants (modern day iranic, indic, turkic and dravadians).
And to be honest aryans were not that great, IVC's mogged them hard in every department.
This is my whole point. The "greatness" which Wignats wanna kang about comes from the IVC + Steppe fusion creating Vedics (peaking in Northern Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Agricultural Castes). So they're actually kanging on Indians (like me) by pretending that Steppe is responsible for the greatness achieved by Kuru-Panchala when infact only Kuru-Panchala/Vedics are alone responsible for it. Same goes for Romans, Ancient Greeks. Just because at one point they derived from Yamnaya doesn't mean Yamnaya gets the credit. The credit goes to when it started i.e. Iron Age Romans and Mycenaeans, etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Goatsie and GigaStacySexual
Vedic Aryans were mix of sintashta and IVC folks. They would have been closely related to north brahmin/ rors/ haryanvi jatts not some nordic. Even pure sintashta would have looked like pamiri not white. Europeans have zero aryan ancestory, white nationalist make clown of themselves by trying to claim aryans from their actual descendants (modern day iranic, indic, turkic and dravadians).
And to be honest aryans were not that great, IVC's mogged them hard in every department.
Aryans literally destroyed the Indus Valley civilisation, which was way more advanced and not a bunch of warmongering 70 IQ peons. What exactly did Aryans do that was so great, even?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, the_machinist_786, GigaStacySexual and 1 other person
Vedic Aryans were mix of sintashta and IVC folks. They would have been closely related to north brahmin/ rors/ haryanvi jatts not some nordic. Even pure sintashta would have looked like pamiri not white. Europeans have zero aryan ancestory, white nationalist make clown of themselves by trying to claim aryans from their actual descendants (modern day iranic, indic, turkic and dravadians).
And to be honest aryans were not that great, IVC's mogged them hard in every department.
Vedic Aryans were CHG/Iranian Neolithic / Some levantine and WSHG plus AASI. You cant write something with the life force epitomised in the Vedas in 200 years and make no mentions of invading culture/ historical records etc. Invasions of Huns, Kushans, Sakas, Greeks are recorded but somehow they dont note an entire civilisation conquered/ their original "homeland" ? And how tf do you cross the Hindu Kush which is among the most pernicious mountainzones in the world with little but horses and conquer an already established people. Kurganists are the most retarded, oblivious head stuck so far up their ass people in the world. The odds are stacked against them in every sense but they kept repeating the same shit like a schizo parrot. Most R1A in india is also not z93 but l657which isnt even sinthashta derived but indegenous to india/ iran.

Its made worse by monkeys like david reich who has no sense of nuance and will take one idea he read in a random book somewhere and run with it
 
Last edited:
Aryans literally destroyed the Indus Valley civilisation, which was way more advanced and not a bunch of warmongering 70 IQ peons. What exactly did Aryans do that was so great, even?
There's a reason why Wignats and Nazis kang on them (and ancient Iranians) though I agree the relevance and greatness is overstated and probably comes from Hitler's initial appropriation and EIC's Sanskrit exploration, combined with Western intellectuals looking to Hindu philosophy, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: persuss
There's barely any East Asian like ancestry in Indians required to suggest even traces of Scythian ancestry. Only working proxy are the Yuezhi and I doubt they left any significant genetic legacy in the subcontinent, if they did it would have been pretty obvious in genome studies.
It worked the opposite direction
Incorrect, there's barely any AASI admix beyond the Hindu Kush bar gypsies who are just Indian migrants into Europe.
post IVC is North Brahmin like profile Vedic Aryans, IVC_45AASI + Steppe with 60% R1a. Cumskins can't claim anything, the highest Vedic is Gaur Brahmins and highest Dardic is Kohistani & Chitrali. Highest West Iranian is Yazd Persians, Mazandaranis, Khorasanis, East Iranian peaks in Yaghnobis, Pamiris, Pashtuns
What are you even talking about, just an autistic incoherent sperg out of random information that you found out about through random Twitter pages.
>Highest Vedic is Gaur Brahmins
Vedic as in steppe ancestry? Then clearly not, there are groups with a higher raw steppe input than Gaurs in my runs. Mostly picking samples from G25.

>Highest West Iranian is Yazd Persians, etc.
Okay, what does this have to do with the original post? Although no clear indication of what you mean by West Iranian.

>Highest East Iranian...
Same as the previous point, serves no purpose in the discussion.
 
There's a reason why Wignats and Nazis kang on them (and ancient Iranians) though I agree the relevance and greatness is overstated and probably comes from Hitler's initial appropriation and EIC's Sanskrit exploration, combined with Western intellectuals looking to Hindu philosophy, etc.
yeah the aryans landed on the himalayas and later migrated trhough persia and the middle east to germanic lands
 
There's barely any East Asian like ancestry in Indians required to suggest even traces of Scythian ancestry. Only working proxy are the Yuezhi and I doubt they left any significant genetic legacy in the subcontinent, if they did it would have been pretty obvious in genome studies.

Incorrect, there's barely any AASI admix beyond the Hindu Kush bar gypsies who are just Indian migrants into Europe.

What are you even talking about, just an autistic incoherent sperg out of random information that you found out about through random Twitter pages.
>Highest Vedic is Gaur Brahmins
Vedic as in steppe ancestry? Then clearly not, there are groups with a higher raw steppe input than Gaurs in my runs. Mostly picking samples from G25.

>Highest West Iranian is Yazd Persians, etc.
Okay, what does this have to do with the original post? Although no clear indication of what you mean by West Iranian.

>Highest East Iranian...
Same as the previous point, serves no purpose in the discussion.
Europeans have 0% Sintashta with 0% Z93 (excl Balts and Northern Slavs with some 1-2%), there's no need for me to even break down your garbage geneticspajeet pointers
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
Most R1A in india is also not z93 but l657which isnt even sinthashta derived but indegenous to india/ iran.
Doesn't matter, the greater R haplogroup comes from ANE and the existence of any mutation in haplogroups is only because foreign invaders brought the already existing R haplogroup to the subcontinent.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NoHoesinOhio
Aryans literally destroyed the Indus Valley civilisation, which was way more advanced and not a bunch of warmongering 70 IQ peons

Tbh they were a lot less advance than IVC but were not total retards like those germanic barbarians that destroyed roman empire. They did had their own fair share of achievements
What exactly did Aryans do that was so great, even?
Sintashta were among the first people to invent wheel and also the first inventors of chariots. They were really good at Intensive metallurgy and had advance Fortified settlements like Arkaim
1736957851971
1736957876022
 
Europeans have 0% Sintashta with 0% Z93 (excl Balts and Northern Slavs with some 1-2%), there's no need for me to even break down your garbage geneticspajeet pointers
Because Europeans did not descend from the Sintashta/Andronovo branch of the Yamnayans.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: the_machinist_786
Because Europeans did not descend from the Sintashta/Andronovo branch of the Yamnayans.
So what's your point retarded genautist kanger
 
yeah the aryans landed on the himalayas and later migrated trhough persia and the middle east to germanic lands
A simple google search about the Corded Ware culture disproves whatever pseudbabble you're typing in.
 
A simple google search about the Corded Ware culture disproves whatever pseudbabble you're typing in.
a simple rabbit hole dive proves that's what hitler believed:)
 
There's barely any East Asian like ancestry in Indians required to suggest even traces of Scythian ancestry. Only working proxy are the Yuezhi and I doubt they left any significant genetic legacy in the subcontinent, if they did it would have been pretty obvious in genome studies.
The east asian ancestry gets diluted, since there were multiple invasions - greece, huns, sakas . you dont need a nationwide influence but a few disparate groups who interbred but eventually entered back into the indo aryan manifold after the empires dwindled. Good evidence for this as some models show a steppe proxy that is not andronovo. The point is to explain steppe ancestry in modern day indians through multiple sources rather than a singular purported invasion which has bafflingly low evidence .
 
Sintashta were among the first people to invent wheel and also the first inventors of chariots. They were really good at Intensive metallurgy and had advance Fortified settlements like Arkaim
These people forget that modernity is a result of white inventions, white people - population that consistently scores the closest genetic distance to the ancient Aryans.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: GigaStacySexual
THat the aryans landed on the himalayas then migrated to modern day germaany.
Even if he did believe in that: do you believe that to be true just because Hitler believed so?
 
  • +1
Reactions: persuss
Doesn't matter, the greater R haplogroup comes from ANE and the existence of any mutation in haplogroups is only because foreign invaders brought the already existing R haplogroup to the subcontinent.
wtf are you talking about jfl

Where are the traces of Greek, Hun or Saka (Scythian group) ancestry in Indians? There is none.
I already told you, the steppe source is predominantly from these groups. Sinthasta is laughable.
 
Even if he did believe in that: do you believe that to be true just because Hitler believed so?
there's a lot of myths but everyone seem to agree that some species came from a different planet and came here and procreated creating the mutation that gave lighter melanin resolting in blonde hair, light skin and blue eyes. you can also search pleiadians and annunaki and you will understand what im talking about
 
wtf are you talking about jfl
R haplogroup is foreign to India.
I already told you, the steppe source is predominantly from these groups. Sinthasta is laughable.
Incorrect, it's largely from Andronovo and this has been proven through various genome studies. Steppe ancestry from Greeks, Huns and Saka simply isn't there since these groups had admix from various other groups which are largely absent in the South Asian genetic profile.
 
R haplogroup is foreign to India.

Incorrect, it's largely from Andronovo and this has been proven through various genome studies. Steppe ancestry from Greeks, Huns and Saka simply isn't there since these groups had admix from various other groups which are largely absent in the South Asian genetic profile.
R l657 is mostly Indian indegenous (and makes up around 17 percent of the pop) and r z93 the sinthasta/steppe associated haplo is so laughably low that the real miracle is how people even listen to kurganists without laughing.

I never said autosomal ancestry from andronovo is not possible (it is primarily female mediated) , the fact is the steppe source from these other groups have been discounted from the start and hence real attempts on wherther they influenced steppe admix was never made in the first place. Southern arc theory basically puts an end to andronovo fancy, as language divergence models developed by heggarty is the final nail in the coffin for an indo iranian speaking andronovo pop.
 
Southern arc theory basically puts an end to andronovo fancy, as language divergence models developed by heggarty is the final nail in the coffin for an indo iranian speaking andronovo pop.
Explain this:
Steppe ancestry from Greeks, Huns and Saka simply isn't there since these groups had admix from various other groups which are largely absent in the South Asian genetic profile.
 
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NoHoesinOhio and GigaStacySexual
Explain this:
AVvXsEhuH0-JW0NcnpGCWMDmAqBFXRJZLRUtPLZOwZ9YHjbVWhK0UdtJl6PDu-BQkL5nICt7XZFvsQkjZHbxgg8wABYI8LDnlDxpSQZhkCYm4AyBBxfBcQWOqZXgmkPYhq4W3tVyBOZsMPjbn5KtU745mF0bogfV9wlBvIvAEw6bnESXzvv_h3vxovBwySsamg



andronovo could have contributed a lot of autosomal ancestry although most of it seems to be female mediated , the best qpAdm source for steppe in India is prolly turkmenistan_ia from 950 bc or something. Although i would not discount the fact that repeated invasions from high steppe groups like greeks, scythians etc would not have contributed something.

1736959717049
 

Similar threads

Thinking_CEL
Replies
136
Views
1K
grandnomysz
grandnomysz
AverageConnoisseur
Replies
61
Views
880
dax922
dax922
ReadBooksEveryday
Replies
23
Views
2K
looksmaxxed
looksmaxxed
D
2 3 4 5
Replies
216
Views
6K
JustHereToLooksmax
JustHereToLooksmax

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top