Cumskins are overrated and are weak militarily

Hypersonic

Hypersonic

10x speed of sound
Joined
Nov 5, 2022
Posts
1,432
Reputation
1,383
Honestly, other than maybe Germanic/ saxonic people, most cumskins are very overrated and are weak militarily.
For example, cumskins from Anglo land and Portugal cope with muh Empire but in reality, THEY HAVE CONQUERED WHAT ?

basically cumskins simply got Lucky that colombus found the American continent, and it had virtually no competition only tribal folks.

Other than that, cumskins rarely win a war, infact they have never defeated a major power ever.

For example:
1: Alexander the great that great so called conquerer failed against much smaller army of a small Hindu north indian kingdom.
2: Britain failed everywhere, early battles in india were decisive defeats for the British and even french, Portugal. They failed militarily and lost major wars.
3: France fell easily to hitler
4: Japan alone defeated British, french, Dutch etc even USA, US would have lost without nukes.
5: US failed in Vietnam brutally, Afghanistan etc despite having the best army.
6: US is still too reluctant to take on Russia china india alone, they always ask for help from others and rarely fight 1 v 1.
You see, cumskins rarely have a good militarily victory.
 
  • +1
Reactions: juste
Generalizations that make no sense
 
  • +1
Reactions: darkness97
4: Japan alone defeated British, french, Dutch etc even USA, US would have lost without nukes.
Nonsense. The US would had won without nukes.

The US doesn't have to take on Russia. Ukraine is doing a good job destroying Russian military.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766 and XtrovertNTnormalfag
Stupid examples jfl

As soon as you see the word "cumskin" you know damn right it's a seething coping ethnic

Keep it professional next time
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wallenberg
Portuguese are ethnic, not cumskin
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Albeacho
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Hypersonic
so to demonstrate how weak cumskins are militarily, you compare wars between whites and other whites?

this is legit so retarded i can't even get into.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wallenberg
Nonsense. The US would had won without nukes.

The US doesn't have to take on Russia. Ukraine is doing a good job destroying Russian military.
Nah, without nukes would result in 1 million + more casualties and US would get bankrupt. This is why they nuked the civilians meanwhile Japs attacked the militarily and not American civilians.
 
so to demonstrate how weak cumskins are militarily, you compare wars between whites and other whites?

this is legit so retarded i can't even get into.
Which other whites?
 
Stupid examples jfl

As soon as you see the word "cumskin" you know damn right it's a seething coping ethnic

Keep it professional next time
Stupid ? How ?
 
Ukraine is doing a good job destroying Russian military.
1643760063310
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21766 and Hypersonic
Nah, without nukes would result in 1 million + more casualties and US would get bankrupt. This is why they nuked the civilians meanwhile Japs attacked the militarily and not American civilians.
They didn't attack large American population centres because they couldn't, not because they didn't want to JFL at this sentience

Between the huge distance needed to travel, logistics, and the fact that most Americans were armed it would be fucking impossible. You are braindead.
 
Imagine spending hundreds of billions in military only to fail to conquer Ukraine. A country that built its military from scratch in the last year.
I dunno man the main people I see pushing anything pro-ukraine are literally trannies and satanists, been hearing about "Ukraine Winning" for months now.

I think i'll stick to what people who are against trannies/satanists have to say about this matter until I have a reason to think otherwise, and they seem to be implying/reporting the exact opposite.

So uhh, Cope, Z, NATO Trannies on suicidewatch, still losing with CIA operations, lol + lmao.

Average Pro-Ukraine Poster
1621301203046
<-
 
Russians lost 1400 tanks (almost half of their operational ones they have) attacking poorest country in Europe, can you imagine what would NATO do with them.
Their elite units destroyed by Ukrainians.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Chasseur
War success is correlated with IQ


I let you think about that 🤗
 
Honestly, other than maybe Germanic/ saxonic people, most cumskins are very overrated and are weak militarily.
For example, cumskins from Anglo land and Portugal cope with muh Empire but in reality, THEY HAVE CONQUERED WHAT ?

basically cumskins simply got Lucky that colombus found the American continent, and it had virtually no competition only tribal folks.

Other than that, cumskins rarely win a war, infact they have never defeated a major power ever.

For example:
1: Alexander the great that great so called conquerer failed against much smaller army of a small Hindu north indian kingdom.
2: Britain failed everywhere, early battles in india were decisive defeats for the British and even french, Portugal. They failed militarily and lost major wars.
3: France fell easily to hitler
4: Japan alone defeated British, french, Dutch etc even USA, US would have lost without nukes.
5: US failed in Vietnam brutally, Afghanistan etc despite having the best army.
6: US is still too reluctant to take on Russia china india alone, they always ask for help from others and rarely fight 1 v 1.
You see, cumskins rarely have a good militarily victory.
And what language are you speaking right now?
 

Similar threads

Nodesbitch
Replies
28
Views
2K
Clav's Baseball Cup
C
idnap
Replies
53
Views
3K
Egyptidmaxx
Egyptidmaxx
Sloppyseconds
Replies
40
Views
2K
VerticalManiac
V
Nodesbitch
Replies
30
Views
3K
aabb123
aabb123

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top