Current surgery savings timeline (brutal evisceration of hopes and dreams)

[Acquiescence]

Today Jan 2026: 30k

Savings rate: 15k/yr (should hopefully increase as the years go on but if not this is a sustainable worse case scenario)

End 2026: 45k

End 2027: 60k

Summer 2028: 67.5k; OBO, (maybe Tripod), Infras, Supras, and Cantho w Giant (after performing the black magic ritual to 1) schedule a consult w him and 2) convince my employer to grant a month+ off to fuck off to Istanbul for, from their pov, absolutely outta-nowhere obscure bespoke cosmetic osteotomies)

Meaningful savings wiped out instance numero uno

End 2028: 7.5k

Summer 2029: 15k; periorbital fat grafts

Assume 5k; 10k left over

Finally free from trade apprenticeship program and no longer restricted to the summer months for surgery-having

End 2029: 17.5k

End 2030: 32.5k

Start 2031: Trimax + lower third implants with Giant

Meaningful savings wiped out instance numero dos

End 2031: 15k

End 2032: 30k

2033: throughout this year get commisuroplasty, lip lift, lip filler, and HT

Meaningful savings wiped out instance numero tres

Start 2034: finally fully facially hardmaxxed at age 32 ; can now properly start saving for retirement and the once a decade face / neck / eye lifts + fat grafts anti-aging strat grind (and increased frequency of medspa treatments like co2 laser) till death do us part

Obviously things subject to change (pushed back EVEN LATER) if any interruptions happen to muh jawb, or surgery prices continue to climb or blah blah blah

Gotta love it

 

[Acquiescence]

Yeah anyways here’s Rope-GPT to explain why even this 8 year plan is a pitiful optimistic delusion:

“

A) Stress test — where this plan breaks, specifically

1. Cash-flow fragility (the biggest risk, not price inflation)

Your plan assumes:

• uninterrupted employment
• steady or improving savings rate
• surgeries happening roughly when planned

Single failure mode:

If you lose or change your job once during a wipe-out phase, you don’t delay one surgery — you delay everything downstream by 1–3 years.

Why this matters:

• Your plan has three full resets to near-zero liquid savings.
• There’s no true emergency buffer after any “meaningful savings wiped out” moment.
• That makes every year psychologically high-stakes → burnout risk increases.

Stress-tested fix (minimal):

• Never let post-surgery liquid cash drop below 12 months of bare-bones expenses, even if that means:
  • pushing one procedure 6–12 months
  • or breaking a bundle into staged work
• This doesn’t make you “less serious.” It makes the plan survivable.

2. Surgeon / sequencing risk (quietly enormous)

You’re stacking:

• periorbital + midface work
• then lower-third reconstruction
• then soft-tissue refinements later

Stress-test questions:

• What if Giant retires, raises prices 30–50%, or limits cases?
• What if one early procedure changes how a later one must be done?
• What if you need revision that you didn’t budget emotionally or financially for?

Hard truth:

Plans that assume zero revision are fantasy plans.

Stress-tested fix:

• Add a “revision contingency fund” of ~10–20% of total surgical spend, mentally earmarked.
• Accept upfront that one “wipe-out” may not be the last one you intended.

This reduces shock later.

3. Time compression illusion

On paper:

• “Fully hardmaxxed at 32”

In reality:

• Recovery overlap
• swelling timelines
• neural adaptation
• social reintegration

Stress test:

• The felt endpoint may land at 33–35, not 32.

If your emotional payoff is pinned to a precise age, that mismatch can hit harder than expected.

“

Yea it’s over, but better this sense of purpose than the rope or cope path tbh tbh ngl

 

[ybuyhgui]

No escape for we goyim; looksmax is a privilege only affordable for the nepo babies (our wealthy Jewish superiors).