curry slayer 3/10

GigaChaddam

GigaChaddam

Bronze
Joined
Aug 19, 2021
Posts
275
Reputation
465
 
  • +1
Reactions: subhuman incel and SubhumanCurrycel
is that you?
 
if hes 3 then im 1
 
he looks better than me, at least his nose is normal. mine is like the stereotypical jew but mine is even droopier than the stereotypical jew nose :feelsrope: so if hes a 3/10 then im a 1/10. facially we look very similar except for nose.
 
2cfc63bf2454915167687155eb7c21d16418d8bf363c720c45d191b1c9ec3a35 1
 
  • JFL
Reactions: fras and Haven
he looks better than me, at least his nose is normal. mine is like the stereotypical jew but mine is even droopier than the stereotypical jew nose :feelsrope: so if hes a 3/10 then im a 1/10. facially we look very similar except for nose.
:hnghn::hnghn:i mog him hard im a 7/10 green eyed turco-afghan warrior pheno
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BearBoy
:hnghn::hnghn:i mog him hard im a 7/10 green eyed turco-afghan warrior pheno
youre fully turk lol, you are not afghan or anything. i already knew you were just larping tbh.
 
i searched it up turkic genes
very so often an old story from 2006 pops back up and we get a whole load of emails with questions about its accuracy. The story in question looked at a study of 1,000 men in India and concluded that condoms "made to international specifications" were too large for the majority of them.
The study is correct.

But...

Condoms "made to international specifications" are too big for the majority of men full stop - not just Indian men.

The specification in question (an ISO document) calls for all condoms sold internationally, include the US and Europe, to be at least 170mm in length - about 6.8 inches. In fact, most condoms sold in these regions are 205mm (8.1") long.

But the average erection length of a fully grown adult male is approximately 5.5 inches. This average erection length holds true, give or take 1/5th of an inch, regardless of the country you gather data from.

So yes, condoms made to international specifications are indeed too big for most men in India. But the same holds true for most men anywhere in the world!
 
youre fully turk lol, you are not afghan or anything. i already knew you were just larping tbh.
nah im not afghan but i look turco-afghan due to my indo-european maternal lineage
 
nah im not afghan but i look turco-afghan due to my indo-european maternal lineage
right. i thought you were larping as pakistani/afghan before jfl.
 
i searched it up turkic genes
very so often an old story from 2006 pops back up and we get a whole load of emails with questions about its accuracy. The story in question looked at a study of 1,000 men in India and concluded that condoms "made to international specifications" were too large for the majority of them.
The study is correct.

But...

Condoms "made to international specifications" are too big for the majority of men full stop - not just Indian men.

The specification in question (an ISO document) calls for all condoms sold internationally, include the US and Europe, to be at least 170mm in length - about 6.8 inches. In fact, most condoms sold in these regions are 205mm (8.1") long.

But the average erection length of a fully grown adult male is approximately 5.5 inches. This average erection length holds true, give or take 1/5th of an inch, regardless of the country you gather data from.

So yes, condoms made to international specifications are indeed too big for most men in India. But the same holds true for most men anywhere in the world!
That's bs, where did you find this? Average condom is not 6.8 inches. Did you ever use one. It doesnt even fit all the way down your dick. Average condoms are like 5 inches at most, not supposed to cover the entire dick.
 
i searched it up turkic genes
very so often an old story from 2006 pops back up and we get a whole load of emails with questions about its accuracy. The story in question looked at a study of 1,000 men in India and concluded that condoms "made to international specifications" were too large for the majority of them.
The study is correct.

But...

Condoms "made to international specifications" are too big for the majority of men full stop - not just Indian men.

The specification in question (an ISO document) calls for all condoms sold internationally, include the US and Europe, to be at least 170mm in length - about 6.8 inches. In fact, most condoms sold in these regions are 205mm (8.1") long.

But the average erection length of a fully grown adult male is approximately 5.5 inches. This average erection length holds true, give or take 1/5th of an inch, regardless of the country you gather data from.

So yes, condoms made to international specifications are indeed too big for most men in India. But the same holds true for most men anywhere in the world!
All asiatic races including turkic deathnics have small dicks. Statistics and stereotypes don't lie.
Qi3m9ja5pxx11
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
That's bs, where did you find this? Average condom is not 6.8 inches. Did you ever use one. It doesnt even fit all the way down your dick. Average condoms are like 5 inches at most, not supposed to cover the entire dick.
theyre saying that the average condom *should be* 6.8 inches. as far as i know most condoms are around 7" in length. but condom arent based on length its based on girth. that determines what kind of condom you need.
 
theyre saying that the average condom *should be* 6.8 inches. as far as i know most condoms are around 7" in length. but condom arent based on length its based on girth. that determines what kind of condom you need.
You're low iq. Read again. The specification in question (an ISO document) calls for all condoms sold internationally, include the US and Europe, to be at least 170mm in length - about 6.8 inches

"The specification calls for" means that's how it' produced.
 
You're low iq. Read again. The specification in question (an ISO document) calls for all condoms sold internationally, include the US and Europe, to be at least 170mm in length - about 6.8 inches

"The specification calls for" means that's how it' produced.
no dumbass, it said it calls for meaning it refers to a requirement they are proposing. jfl at calling me low iq when its you who cant read
 
theyre saying that the average condom *should be* 6.8 inches. as far as i know most condoms are around 7" in length. but condom arent based on length its based on girth. that determines what kind of condom you need.
And why would the specification make condoms too big for americans and europeans? Isn't it more likely that the size is right for them and too big for indians only? You said yourself, condoms are measured by girth yet the article tries to debunk the study by using length as measure of condoms.
 
And why would the specification make condoms too big for americans and europeans? Isn't it more likely that the size is right for them and too big for indians only? You said yourself, condoms are measured by girth yet the article tries to debunk the study by using length as measure of condoms.
im not using that article, im just saying that the article was calling for a change in condom length only. anyway if the western average is 5.5" and the global average is 5" then europeans and non-europeans alike should have no problems putting condoms on. also the article claims it affects most men and based on averages it probably makes sense, keep in mind 6" is above average (yes, bonepressed).
 
no dumbass, it said it calls for meaning it refers to a requirement they are proposing. jfl at calling me low iq when its you who cant read
The ISO is already existing. "Calls to be made" may go over the head of a bad english speaker like you, but it doesn't mean "should be". Calls to be made = what the existing specifications require.
 
The ISO is already existing. "Calls to be made" may go over the head of a bad english speaker like you, but it doesn't mean "should be". Calls to be made = what the existing specifications require.
im a great english speaker lol. if something is already existing then there cant be any calls to be made, it literally signifies a modification of the existing system. youre retarded dude.
 
just be tall and jacked… water
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
western average is 5.5" and the global average is 5" then europeans and non-europeans alike should have no problems putting condoms on
Not if they have smaller girth. I posted a pic above, curries and asians are 4in average.
 
That's bs, where did you find this? Average condom is not 6.8 inches. Did you ever use one. It doesnt even fit all the way down your dick. Average condoms are like 5 inches at most, not supposed to cover the entire dick.
thats the literal company who published the data you dick obsessed retard:ogre:
my dick is literally 6 inches
 
Not if they have smaller girth. I posted a pic above, curries and asians are 4in average.
youre really believing those statistics? theres way too many south asians and east asians to claim they have an average of 4" only. its nothing more than a cope just like how bbc is a cope. you probably believe highest average is 7.1" in congo lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
im a great english speaker lol. if something is already existing then there cant be any calls to be made, it literally signifies a modification of the existing system. youre retarded dude.
"An ISO calls condoms to be 6.8 inches" = present, existing
 
"An ISO calls condoms to be 6.8 inches" = present, existing
do you know what "to be" means? it refers to a future development, dude. you are going to be a doctor, you are going to be this, that, whatever. you are moronic if you think an article that is meant to correct a misconception is not going to call for any changes. ffs thats exactly what it wanted to achieve. b-but muh bad english speaker. dawg you cant even understand your own language jfl.
 
thats the literal company who published the data you dick obsessed retard:ogre:
my dick is literally 6 inches
It's not a study from theyfit. The article doesn't even imply it.
very so often an old story from 2006 pops back up and we get a whole load of emails with questions about its accuracy. The story in question looked at a study of 1,000 men in India and concluded that condoms "made to international specifications" were too large for the majority of them.
The study is correct.
 
do you know what "to be" means? it refers to a future development, dude. you are going to be a doctor, you are going to be this, that, whatever. you are moronic if you think an article that is meant to correct a misconception is not going to call for any changes. ffs thats exactly what it wanted to achieve. b-but muh bad english speaker. dawg you cant even understand your own language jfl.
An iso calls for condoms in factories to be made by their standards = not the future. Also english isn't even my first language faggot and I can still teach you.
 
It's not a study from theyfit. The article doesn't even imply it.
very so often an old story from 2006 pops back up and we get a whole load of emails with questions about its accuracy. The story in question looked at a study of 1,000 men in India and concluded that condoms "made to international specifications" were too large for the majority of them.
The study is correct.
Low iq coping pigskin retard sub 30 iq idiot cant even read the end of the paragraph 😂😂😂
The specification in question (an ISO document) calls for all condoms sold internationally, include the US and Europe, to be at least 170mm in length - about 6.8 inches. In fact, most condoms sold in these regions are 205mm (8.1") long.

But the average erection length of a fully grown adult male is approximately 5.5 inches. This average erection length holds true, give or take 1/5th of an inch, regardless of the country you gather data from.

So yes, condoms made to international specifications are indeed too big for most men in India. But the same holds true for most men anywhere in the world!
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
An iso calls for condoms in factories to be made by their standards = not the future. Also english isn't even my first language faggot and I can still teach you.
keep coping retard, you cant even understand the article yet you want to teach me somehow :feelskek: jfl at your iq for falling for "4 inch is average in asia" meme.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and GigaChaddam
keep coping retard, you cant even understand the article yet you want to teach me somehow :feelskek: jfl at your iq for falling for "4 inch is average in asia" meme.
nigga didnt read till the end of the paragraph i sent him:feelswhy:

1630500685986
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and Gengar
nigga is obsessd with dicks probably gay😂
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and Deleted member 14166
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, Chadeep, Deleted member 12669 and 1 other person
Low iq coping pigskin retard sub 30 iq idiot cant even read the end of the paragraph 😂😂😂
The specification in question (an ISO document) calls for all condoms sold internationally, include the US and Europe, to be at least 170mm in length - about 6.8 inches. In fact, most condoms sold in these regions are 205mm (8.1") long.

But the average erection length of a fully grown adult male is approximately 5.5 inches. This average erection length holds true, give or take 1/5th of an inch, regardless of the country you gather data from.

So yes, condoms made to international specifications are indeed too big for most men in India. But the same holds true for most men anywhere in the world!
But condoms arent too long for western men. Otherwise they wouldn't be made like that, by western standards, for westerners. The entire article's premise is that condoms are too long when condom sizes are by girth. And condom girth is too big for curries. My stats above said curry and asian dicks are 4in on average. That means they have a small girth as well which would cause condoms to be too big.
 
hes a coping retard jfl at him for being too low iq to understand basic english
Finns have mongoloid y-dna, gypsys have indian y-dna and female maternal ancestry from europeans, tatar have turkic y-dna european female mtdna, shows how ehtnics were slaying white girls even before globalism
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and GigaChaddam
But condoms arent too long for western men. Otherwise they wouldn't be made like that, by western standards, for westerners. The entire article's premise is that condoms are too long when condom sizes are by girth. And girth is zoo big for curries. My stats above said curry and asian dicks are 4in on average. That means they have a small girth as well which would cause condoms to be too big.
no the average dick size around the world is 5.5 inches hard, taht study is probably wrong :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:why u obsessed with dicks faggot
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, Deleted member 14166, Chadeep and 1 other person
Those are self reported. Measured stats say 4 inches. How could america be smaller than indians when most of their men are black and white?
u want me to find a dick study on indians brah, the stats say dick size is 5.5 inches across the world FROM an actual codnom company u retard.

All those stats are self reported have similar dick sizes only about .50 mm diffrences the stats are reliable:hnghn::hnghn::hnghn::hnghn:
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
Finns have mongoloid y-dna, gypsys have indian y-dna and female maternal ancestry from europeans, tatar have turkic y-dna european female mtdna, shows how ehtnics were slaying white girls even before globalism
i guess its only natural they hate ethnic men then jfl. them colonizing ethnics was revenge for all that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and GigaChaddam
Finns have mongoloid y-dna, gypsys have indian y-dna and female maternal ancestry from europeans, tatar have turkic y-dna european female mtdna, shows how ehtnics were slaying white girls even before globalism
@TeraCope54 how can u cope😂😂😂 finns are sons of turks
 
Finns have mongoloid y-dna, gypsys have indian y-dna and female maternal ancestry from europeans, tatar have turkic y-dna european female mtdna, shows how ehtnics were slaying white girls even before globalism
The "european female dna" is not white women of today, but of a shared ancestor, that later split into what we today know as white and the other that are the maternal dna you're talking about. Shows how you don't have any idea about genetics work and peddle typical turkroach talking points.
 

Similar threads

Jason Voorhees
Discussion Mosh12 is not curry
Replies
4
Views
111
h111
h111
imthesupremecel
Discussion Gay nigger Curry
Replies
1
Views
105
StarvedEpi
StarvedEpi
BadmanPlayer
Replies
2
Views
89
BadmanPlayer
BadmanPlayer
Allan Jhonny
Replies
22
Views
524
Allan Jhonny
Allan Jhonny

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top