d

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

Fairs!

 

[Tenres]

@Mods the original title was clearly sexualizing minors! Please check and take the appropriate actions. Thanks

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

@Mods the original title was clearing sexualizing minors! Please check and take the appropriate actions. Thanks

Correlation doesn't equal causation + How was it sexualizing? Do you know what you're talking about?

 

[Tenres]

Correlation doesn't equal causation + How was it sexualizing? Do you know what you're talking about?

Because you are attracted to older women, so if age is just a number then you are also attracted to women who are of any age. Otherwise it's not just a number.

How does the first part ever correlate with anything? Just threw out a random phrase

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

Because you are attracted to older women, so if age is just a number then you are also attracted to women who are of any age. Otherwise it's not just a number.

How does the first part ever correlate with anything? Just threw out a random phrase

Age is just a number tho, my vase is 30 years old, the 30 years old part is a number, im not gonna tap my vase tho especially if its 30 ya feel me dawg? So age really is just a number

 

[Tenres]

Age is just a number tho, my vase is 30 years old, the 30 years old part is a number, im not gonna tap my vase tho especially if its 30 ya feel me dawg? So age really is just a number

You didn't index your claim to only non living objects though, so it'd also apply to humans. And in that the general claim entails you being a pedophile

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

You didn't index your claim to only non living objects though, so it'd also apply to humans. And in that the general claim entails you being a pedophile

Yes, my statement applies to things in general. Did I specify humans only? No. Even if I did would it still not be logical to deduce that a 14 year old human contains a number (age) and a placeholder (human). The context you're implying is subjective and weird. Honestly age truly is a number.

 

[Tenres]

Yes, my statement applies to things in general. Did I specify humans only? No. Even if I did would it still not be logical to deduce that a 14 year old human contains a number (age) and a placeholder (human). The context you're implying is subjective and weird. Honestly age truly is a number.

You're not tracking. So for our background let me just clarify three things (a) age being 'just a number' implies that there are no second order effects of age that are relevant to you (b) your statement, due to its generality, includes humans and (c) we take it to be assumed that you have some attraction to some humans.

Then we can simply say:

P1) Age is just a number to you
P2) Age being just a number means no second order effects of age relevant to you (semantic thesis)
P2) If age is a constraining factor on your attraction to human beings, then it is a relevant second order effects of age
C) Age is not a constraining factor on your attraction to human beings

So
P1) X
P2) X = Y
P3) P --> not Y
C) not P

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

You're not tracking. So for our background let me just clarify three things (a) age being 'just a number' implies that there are no second order effects of age that are relevant to you (b) your statement, due to its generality, includes humans and (c) we take it to be assumed that you have some attraction to some humans.

Then we can simply say:

P1) Age is just a number to you
P2) Age being just a number means no second order effects of age relevant to you (semantic thesis)
P2) If age is a constraining factor on your attraction to human beings, then it is a relevant second order effects of age
C) Age is not a constraining factor on your attraction to human beings

So
P1) X
P2) X = Y
P3) P --> not Y
C) not P

Making shitty options basing it off illogical jumps and exploiting the generality of the context to infer I'm a pedo.

Yes, I am tracking. "implies that there are no second order effects of age that are relevant to you" how so? If not this is an illogical jump.
"due to its generality, includes humans and", yes, it does, along with vases, books, and roblox. "we take it to be assumed that you have some attraction to some humans." I do, still doesn't correlate with me sexualizing minors.

"If age is a constraining factor on your attraction to human beings, then it is a relevant second order effects of age"
Yes, Age is a constraining factor. However, jumping from a construct being a limitation of my attraction and correlating that with me saying the construct itself is a number, not the context in which it is used, then your point is a clear illogical jump. Age is still just a number

 

[Tenres]

Making shitty options basing it off illogical jumps and exploiting the generality of the context to infer I'm a pedo.

Yes, I am tracking. "implies that there are no second order effects of age that are relevant to you" how so? If not this is an illogical jump.
"due to its generality, includes humans and", yes, it does, along with vases, books, and roblox. "we take it to be assumed that you have some attraction to some humans." I do, still doesn't correlate with me sexualizing minors.

"If age is a constraining factor on your attraction to human beings, then it is a relevant second order effects of age"
Yes, Age is a constraining factor. However, jumping from a construct being a limitation of my attraction and correlating that with me saying the construct itself is a number, not the context in which it is used, then your point is a clear illogical jump. Age is still just a number

I think I edited it, at least in the argument to be clear I take it to mean it, not entail it. So yeah it's just a standard interpretation of what age being just a number would mean. If it had relevant second order effects then it wouldn't be just a number lol. God plans, man backtracks.

You did not say age was a number, you said it was just a number which are not logically equivalent at all because they have wildly different truth conditions.

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

I think I edited it, at least in the argument to be clear I take it to mean it, not entail it. So yeah it's just a standard interpretation of what age being just a number would mean. If it had relevant second order effects then it wouldn't be just a number lol. God plans, man backtracks.

You did not say age was a number, you said it was just a number which are not logically equivalent at all because they have wildly different truth conditions.

"I take it to mean it, not entail it" spamming words lil bro

"So yeah it's just a standard interpretation of what age being just a number would mean" not standard, just an opinion.

"If it had relevant second order effects then it wouldn't be just a number lol" - Due to the generality of the statement would the cherry picked second order effects apply to my 30 year old vase?

which are not logically equivalent at all because they have wildly different truth conditions.

Contextual and subjective

Age is just a number

 

[Tenres]

"I take it to mean it, not entail it" spamming words lil bro

"So yeah it's just a standard interpretation of what age being just a number would mean" not standard, just an opinion.

"If it had relevant second order effects then it wouldn't be just a number lol" - Due to the generality of the statement would the cherry picked second order effects apply to my 30 year old vase?


Contextual and subjective

Age is just a number

None of this is a response except the last part so I'll just respond to that.

"Age is a number" and "Age is [just] a number" are going to have different truth conditions because the latter will have all the conditions that the first one has (x being an age implies x being a number) but the qualifier of 'only' which adds that this is the only relevant fact about age within some domain.

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

None of this is a response except the last part so I'll just respond to that.

"Age is a number" and "Age is [just] a number" are going to have different truth conditions because the latter will have all the conditions that the first one has (x being an age implies x being a number) but the qualifier of 'only' which adds that this is the only relevant fact about age within some domain.

Contextual and Subjective.

 

[Tenres]

Contextual and Subjective.

Ok ggs bro you were ass

 

[PSLgodBlackPerson]

Ok ggs bro you were ass

I like ass yes?