DA NAZIS did rapeee all frances, no they raped all Paris!!!! [ or how to make up lies, and say that negroes are better than Germans ]

[Reinhard_Heini]

I will show a essay, or rather a text from a man called Sartre, a philosophical French man during the German occupation.

In his essay "Paris under the Occupation", Sartre wrote that the "correct" behaviour of the Germans had entrapped too many Parisians into complicity with the occupation, accepting what was unnatural as natural:

Sartre noted when Wehrmacht soldiers asked Parisians politely in their German-accented French for directions, people usually felt embarrassed and ashamed as they tried their best to help out the Wehrmacht which led Sartre to remark "We could not be natural".[38] French was a language widely taught in German schools and most Germans could speak at least some French. Sartre himself always found it difficult when a Wehrmacht soldier asked him for directions, usually saying he did not know where it was that the soldier wanted to go, but still felt uncomfortable as the very act of speaking to the Wehrmacht meant he had been complicit in the Occupation.[39] Ousby wrote: "But, in however humble a fashion, everyone still had to decide how they were going to cope with life in a fragmenting society ... So Sartre's worries ... about how to react when a German soldier stopped him in the street and asked politely for directions were not as fussily inconsequential as they might sound at first. They were emblematic of how the dilemmas of the Occupation presented themselves in daily life".[39]

Da bad Nazis, true savages, not like the good soviets that raped the good French women,

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

Oh france, how good it was, sadly it’s a nigger country now

 

[AustrianMogger]

I will show a essay, or rather a text from a man called Sartre, a philosophical French man during the German occupation.

In his essay "Paris under the Occupation", Sartre wrote that the "correct" behaviour of the Germans had entrapped too many Parisians into complicity with the occupation, accepting what was unnatural as natural:

Sartre noted when Wehrmacht soldiers asked Parisians politely in their German-accented French for directions, people usually felt embarrassed and ashamed as they tried their best to help out the Wehrmacht which led Sartre to remark "We could not be natural".[38] French was a language widely taught in German schools and most Germans could speak at least some French. Sartre himself always found it difficult when a Wehrmacht soldier asked him for directions, usually saying he did not know where it was that the soldier wanted to go, but still felt uncomfortable as the very act of speaking to the Wehrmacht meant he had been complicit in the Occupation.[39] Ousby wrote: "But, in however humble a fashion, everyone still had to decide how they were going to cope with life in a fragmenting society ... So Sartre's worries ... about how to react when a German soldier stopped him in the street and asked politely for directions were not as fussily inconsequential as they might sound at first. They were emblematic of how the dilemmas of the Occupation presented themselves in daily life".[39]

Da bad Nazis, true savages, not like the good soviets that raped the good French women,

wehrmacht mogs

 

[Hess]

iirc the SS french volunteers (charlemagne) were one of the last battalions to defend in the battle of berlin

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

iirc the SS french volunteers (charlemagne) were one of the last battalions to defend in the battle of berlin

True Germanics/ the charlemagne division has my very respect/ god bless them all

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

wehrmacht mogs

True/ but the Schutzstaffel was also pretty good/ they aren’t a elite without reason

 

[AustrianMogger]

True/ but the Schutzstaffel was also pretty good/ they aren’t a elite without reason

unknown slayer

 

[Hess]

True/ but the Schutzstaffel was also pretty good/ they aren’t a elite without reason

iirc the SS was suppose to be the foundation of a new aristocracy, in a way trying to emulate knighthood and select for elites for the new age for when they won, It makes me wonder how they would of worked out if they won

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

unknown slayer
View attachment 5186617

Wittmann ?
He’s pretty known, he’s pretty known by the westerns [ Americans ], I think even more than people like peiper.
Wittmann before his death destroyed 13 tanks, or even more as I remember in 1944.

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

iirc the SS was suppose to be the foundation of a new aristocracy, in a way trying to emulate knighthood and select for elites for the new age for when they won, It makes me wonder how they would of worked out if they won

Well, if they did won no incel would be alive/ I think they would solve the problem with pure natural selection.
The SS was brutal, but not without reason/ they were bastards as Patton said/ but they weren’t different from any other soldier

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

follow ur leader

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

follow ur leader

Son

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Son

ur leader died like a dog lol bro shot himself

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

ur leader died like a dog lol bro shot himself

Germans are not living like dogs/ the irony we live better than any Russian - if you don’t count maybe Moscow - is just funny, I can’t even say anything on it.

 

[Hess]

ur leader died like a dog lol bro shot himself

Honor suicide isn't rly an own

 

[krieg]

Niggas genuinely make accounts now to just post racebait

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

Niggas genuinely make accounts now to just post racebait

Rage bait ? I’m not joking, you genuinely think france is better doing today ?
They are planning to build the biggest mosque/ and i mean in Europe not the biggest in the country.
Their crimes are higher than in any other country/ it’s just embarrassingly they let it do.
Their churches get burned, their sisters killed and raped/ and that’s good ?

 

[Centurion Hunter]

Oh france, how good it was, sadly it’s a nigger country now

in theory its not as fucked as the uk since its rural areas are decent
menawhile for brits the whole fucking area from manchester to london is ethnicland

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Honor suicide isn't rly an own

>cons himself to supreme leader
>starts a war killing millions upon millions of white people
>aftermath creates a system that basically guarantees his political ideology will never be in power again
>kills himself from fear of consequences

very honourable

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

in theory its not as fucked as the uk since its rural areas are decent
menawhile for brits the whole fucking area from manchester to london is ethnicland

“Better” Anyways it’s seen

 

[Hess]

>cons himself to supreme leader
>starts a war killing millions upon millions of white people
>aftermath creates a system that basically guarantees his political ideology will never be in power again
>kills himself from fear of consequences

very honourable

Yes it is, and germany was fighting for its own interests (and a pan Germanic state), also what do you expect lol? fear of consequences? why would you ever give in to the enemy and let them try and condemn you and put you on trial and even let them have that power, I think its far more brave and honorable to accept that things are over and to take control of your own life and put an end to it

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Yes it is, and germany was fighting for its own interests (and a pan Germanic state), also what do you expect lol? fear of consequences? why would you ever give in to the enemy and let them try and condemn you and put you on trial and even let them have that power, I think its far more brave and honorable to accept that things are over and to take control of your own life and put an end to it

holy cope he got millions of his people killed for 0 gain and then killed himself like a dog lol
no difference between him and a mass shooter atp

 

[Hess]

holy cope he got millions of his people killed for 0 gain and then killed himself like a dog lol
no difference between him and a mass shooter atp

He fought for his beliefs and lost, then decided to take his last moments in his own hands and not let anyone take that from him, also shocking, war gets people killed, you could apply this to napoleon or Alexander the great as well

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

He fought for his beliefs and lost, then decided to take his last moments in his own hands and not let anyone take that from him, also shocking, war gets people killed, you could apply this to napoleon or Alexander the great as well

Just lol if you think Napoleon GAF about his people

 

[Centurion Hunter]

“Better” Anyways it’s seen

Yeah its bad
Overall Id say UK has it the worst
Then germany
Then Scandis
Then Benelux
Then France
Then austrians
then swiss
then iberians
then italians

 

[Hess]

Just lol if you think Napoleon GAF about his people

please tell me how he didn't

 

[Reinhard_Heini]

holy cope he got millions of his people killed for 0 gain and then killed himself like a dog lol
no difference between him and a mass shooter atp

Stalin wanted to attack Europe/ what the fuck did he need to do ?
All was hitler did was right/ he needed to attack them even earlier/ it wasn’t a good moment in the year of 1941.
We can look it up/ all his planes were great.
He attacked Poland cause of problems/ also cause the polacks didn’t let Posen/dazing be German.
They didn’t let the soviets in Czechoslovakia, also in 1938 cause the Czechs didn’t wanted to give away the territory they needed to give [ Versailles threat ].
Polacks are savages, so are Russians by most, you need to see it.
Benes the subhuman was worser, he was the one who killed 200 thousand Germans during the deportation/ why don’t you speak on them ?
Also that he annexed German territories even before WW1.

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

please tell me how he didn't

How didn't he, all he wanted was greatness. Any action that went towards helping the French people was either
1. A side effect of him helping himself reach greater heights
2. Him genuinely helping them, but not out of empathy, only out of ego.
I.E. when someone helps you so that anything you do as a result, any happiness you get from it, any greatness you yourself reach as a direct or indirect result of their help, is basically due to them. Without them, that is not possible, so they only helped you out of Ego.
Which just goes back to 1, - It;s just a side effect of him helping himself reach greater heights, out of ego

 

[Hess]

How didn't he, all he wanted was greatness. Any action that went towards helping the French people was either
1. A side effect of him helping himself reach greater heights
2. Him genuinely helping them, but not out of empathy, only out of ego.
I.E. when someone helps you so that anything you do as a result, any happiness you get from it, any greatness you yourself reach as a direct or indirect result of their help, is basically due to them. Without them, that is not possible, so they only helped you out of Ego.
Which just goes back to 1, - It;s just a side effect of him helping himself reach greater heights, out of ego

You're trying to claim he only seeked greatness in a vacuum when he consistently equated his own personal ambitions with the rise of france and its glory and had a care for the nation, despite his nature of treating individuals and soliders as expendable, he did consistently seek glory and went overboard but trying to say he didn't care about France or had any beliefs or principals besides seeking glory is just ridiculous

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

You're trying to claim he only seeked greatness in a vacuum when he consistently equated his own personal ambitions with the rise of france and its glory and had a care for the nation, despite his nature of treating individuals and soliders as expendable, he did consistently seek glory and went overboard but trying to say he didn't care about France or had any beliefs or principals besides seeking glory is just ridiculous

Humans are not 2 dimensional, maybe he did genuinely have principals or beliefs around the idea of making France a better country to live in for it's people - simply out of altruism. But all of those beliefs were an after thought when it came to achieving more greatness.

Someone can believe stealing is wrong, but that also becomes an afterthought when their heroin addiction kicks in

 

[Hess]

Humans are not 2 dimensional, maybe he did genuinely have principals or beliefs around the idea of making France a better country to live in for it's people - simply out of altruism. But all of those beliefs were an after thought when it came to achieving more greatness.

Someone can believe stealing is wrong, but that also becomes an afterthought when their heroin addiction kicks in

I don't disagree with this take i just think that claiming he had no care for his people is wrong, I think he had a care and love for his nation but at the same time defined himself through glory and through this he consistently sought it, and conflated the conquests as a benefit to his nation and didn't always just seek and take land for the sake of his glory alone, though this is a fairly interesting topic I will have to reread the biography that I have on him to debate this more in depth

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

I don't disagree with this take i just think that claiming he had no care for his people is wrong, I think he had a care and love for his nation but at the same time defined himself through glory and through this he consistently sought it, and conflated the conquests as a benefit to his nation and didn't always just seek and take land for the sake of his glory alone,

Goes back to

Just lol if you think Napoleon GAF about his people

He did not care enough for it to move his actions, therefore whether he had negative care about them, or a whole bunch of care. It does not matter, so comparing someone you're defending to Napoleon to prove they are honourable people is laughable

I can see Napoleon and be in awe of the greatness he achieved whilst still recognizing that he is an evil human being
Even in this respect though I would not compare him to Hitler, Hitler did go from homeless to leader of an entire nation but in the end he failed in his goals. People do not care about the joruney, only the end result. Him reaching this height then failing only makes him the most succesful conman in history
Atleast Napoleon is seen as a great man by all countries, unlike Hitler who is seen as Evil incarnate except for internet autists on obscure forums and edgelords on instagram reels

 

[Hess]

Goes back to

He did not care enough for it to move his actions, therefore whether he had negative care about them, or a whole bunch of care. It does not matter, so comparing someone you're defending to Napoleon to prove they are honourable people is laughable

I can see Napoleon and be in awe of the greatness he achieved whilst still recognizing that he is an evil human being
Even in this respect though I would not compare him to Hitler, Hitler did go from homeless to leader of an entire nation but in the end he failed in his goals. People do not care about the joruney, only the end result. Him reaching this height then failing only makes him the most succesful conman in history
Atleast Napoleon is seen as a great man by all countries, unlike Hitler who is seen as Evil incarnate except for internet autists on obscure forums and edgelords on instagram reels

His reforms such as the Napoleonic code and all of the lasting institutions? yeah you can argue he could of seen them and just used that to glorify himself more but that is just as subjective as saying he did those with genuine care and love for his people, and not to mention the fact he did share a paternal care for his soldiers, did lead on the front lines and was not 1d in this regard, and why would he be regarded as evil? leaders and men for hundreds of years have lead conquests and wanted to subjugate their enemies because they held morality that never applied to their out group (IE how they would condemn rapists but then allow it when soldiers rape and murder enemy nations) and i don't think hitler failing disqualifies him from this as well, he had a love for his people (Germany) and tried to restore its status and enforce his beliefs and ideals, he succeeded in a lot of ways and did hold control over most of europe, him failing doesnt disqualify his achievements and I think the choice to commit suicide was not really a pathetic thing to do as you seem it is, suicide after the defeat of your nation and ideology is a brave thing to do and he refused to let the allies condemn him or put him on trial to use as more justification against his ideals

 

[Hess]

His reforms such as the Napoleonic code and all of the lasting institutions? yeah you can argue he could of seen them and just used that to glorify himself more but that is just as subjective as saying he did those with genuine care and love for his people, and not to mention the fact he did share a paternal care for his soldiers, did lead on the front lines and was not 1d in this regard, and why would he be regarded as evil? leaders and men for hundreds of years have lead conquests and wanted to subjugate their enemies because they held morality that never applied to their out group (IE how they would condemn rapists but then allow it when soldiers rape and murder enemy nations) and i don't think hitler failing disqualifies him from this as well, he had a love for his people (Germany) and tried to restore its status and enforce his beliefs and ideals, he succeeded in a lot of ways and did hold control over most of europe, him failing doesnt disqualify his achievements and I think the choice to commit suicide was not really a pathetic thing to do as you seem it is, suicide after the defeat of your nation and ideology is a brave thing to do and he refused to let the allies condemn him or put him on trial to use as more justification against his ideals

Anyway im mentally checked out of this debate and gonna go eat and read, you did raise some good points and are good at articulating yourself so I respect that you were willing to engage in this convo with me, if you wanna continue this some other time im down as im gonna be rereading my biography on napoleon @mcmentalonthemic

 

[theonewhocantascend]

>cons himself to supreme leader
>starts a war killing millions upon millions of white people
>aftermath creates a system that basically guarantees his political ideology will never be in power again
>kills himself from fear of consequences

very honourable

Imagine actually believing Hitler killed himself.
He spent his last years in Argentine.

He did commit many mistakes but he deserves respect for being the only leader in the history of mankind to actively fight the people that destroyed modern civilization.

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Imagine actually believing Hitler killed himself.
He spent his last years in Argentine.