DAI Index - The explanation for online racism... (partially)

True truecel

True truecel

Kraken
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Posts
3,916
Reputation
5,303
1757651440649

Genghis Khan Picture - this picture has no relation to the post, Genghis is just tough.

Foreword: This is a strand of the Power & Tribalism theory. I will elaborate on the parent theory in the future, but I wanted to start off by making this post.

What is the DAI Index?
Digital Access Index (DAI) is a significant metric developed by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a specialized agency of the United Nations. Launched in 2003, the DAI was designed to measure the overall ability of a country's citizens to access and use new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the "digital divide" – the gap between those who have access to modern information technology and those who do not.

How does this relate to online racism?
Obviously racism exists in the real world. However, why does it feel like whenever you are online, the prejudice is magnified tenfold? As you soak in content, scrolling endlessly through reels, tiktok, twitter, whatever it may be, you begin to catch onto some major narratives/stereotypes.
Examples:
- 13/50 statistic
- Polish people have shit food
- Nordics are superior
- East asians commit less crimes
- Latinos larp as whites
- Blacks cannot live peacefully
- Islam is a evil religion
- Whites love cp


Now looking through this list, you may have noticed something. Why was I impartial, and why did I equally bring up bad stereotypes about people from all backgrounds? This feels wrong to you. The reason it feels wrong is because the majority of insults online are directed from whites (or at least people who LARP as white) to ethnics. So this list that I provided doesn't accurately represent the general trends of racism.

You may ask - Why is this the case? Why don't ethnics just fight back online? Why don't they just make fun of whites way more than vice versa? Whites make up 7% of the global population. There are more indians than whites. There are more chinese people than whites. There are more black people than whites.


ENTER: THE DAI INDEX THEORY
To be honest, this is a really simple theory, and there's nothing groundbreaking about it. Still, no one brings it up during debates and its puzzling to me. The theory states that whatever "tribe" (a group that most closely identifies with itself - which is based on how human biology and tribalism works, I will elaborate more on this in the future) has the best DAI index access generally, will ultimately triumph in all tribe related conflicts online for these reasons:
  • Better access to the internet
  • Stronger ability to create bots to spam in various ways:
    • Comments
    • Posts
    • Likes
    • Shares
    • General Engagement Statistics
  • Ability to make their presence stronger than it actually is - Paper Tiger Theory
    • Make themselves seem as if they are X times the number of people there actually are engaging with content
    • Alt accounts
    • Bot accounts as mentioned previously
  • Ability to LARP as tribal opposition
    • Making the opposition look bad: "As a black man, I think our race causes too much trouble and we should take accountability" or "As a muslim, I'm ashamed of my religion"
    • Creating conflict in the opposition: Deliberately aggravating and trolling people while pretending to subtly be "one of them" - this is more effective but takes a significantly longer time investment rather than the first option
  • Grifters will always prefer high DAI index tribes
    • Perpetuating cycle because high DAI index often means higher income, which means grifters will naturally grift to them. It's not profitable to grift to people with low DAI index:
      • Example: What is better, grifting to the extreme right wing spoiled teenagers vs. grifting to Mongolian nationalists (supposing they somehow had the same population)?
  • Shot calling
    • In the online landscape, the high DAI index tribes call the shots and the future trends. Although there is randomness (meme theory - hawk tuah, 67, ohio), the randomness is often trivial and has no outcome and does not significantly anger people.
      • Example: Every single incident of ethnic on white crime is heavily pushed to the algorithm by high DAI index individuals, whereas incidents of white on ethnic crime are somewhat suppressed
        • Note: ethnics still triumph in some cases due to sheer population which effectively negates the DAI index theory, when not accounting for bots and alt accounts

WARNING: Critical Analysis is Required
Although the DAI index explains some level of racism online, some narratives are pushed by higher forces. I prefer to use the term elites, which is the extreme left wing terminology, but again right wingers use Jews to describe this group. The generally safe assumption is to say that they are doing this to ensure class division, which ultimately polarizes people and keeps the elites in power, both by distracting the public and the public paying for the elite's needs.

Regardless, you must understand that the playing field was never level, is not level, and will never be level. I should have posted the Power & Tribalism theory first, this shit won't really make sense to the untrained eye.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: miles tioki, AverageCurryEnjoyer, wishIwasSalludon and 1 other person
BUMP TO THE MOON
 
IMG 2197
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Thief, BeanCelll, wishIwasSalludon and 2 others
High iq thread

Although about the CP thing. Whites never get called out for consuming CP so much because people view them as individuals.

Any ethnic person who does anything even remotely unacceptable and their entire race is blamed.

Also a big reason why ethnics don’t fight back against racism whites do is because ethnics love whites.
 
  • +1
Reactions: True truecel
BUMPPP
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
High iq thread

Although about the CP thing. Whites never get called out for consuming CP so much because people view them as individuals.

Any ethnic person who does anything even remotely unacceptable and their entire race is blamed.

Also a big reason why ethnics don’t fight back against racism whites do is because ethnics love whites.
CP consumption wouldn’t even be bad if it wasn’t for adsense. It’s the production not the viewing which is the main issue.
 
BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP HIGH EFFORT THREAD I NEED VALIDATION PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!!
 
this is actually fairly high IQ. another aspect is, instead of larping as the "opposition," giving incentive for perhaps a 3rd player to do the same to ur opposition.
 
  • +1
Reactions: True truecel
Can you give more real world examples of this, e.g., geopolitics
sure

I guess I can scale it up to country level, that's what the Index is intended for originally anyway, rather than social media arguments

Nations with a higher DAI index score can push their narratives on global news more effectively.

Example: America has bombed/invaded a lot of countries. Here's the bombing list:
Afghanistan 1998, 2001-
Bosnia 1994, 1995
Cambodia 1969-70
China 1945-46
Congo 1964
Cuba 1959-1961
El Salvador 1980s
Korea 1950-53
Guatemala 1954, 1960, 1967-69
Indonesia 1958
Laos 1964-73
Grenada 1983
Iraq 1991-2000s, 2015-
Iran 1987
Korea 1950-53
Kuwait 1991
Lebanon 1983, 1984
Libya 1986, 2011-
Nicaragua 1980s
Pakistan 2003, 2006-
Palestine 2010
Panama 1989
Peru 1965
Somalia 1993, 2007-08, 2010-
Sudan 1998
Syria 2014-
Vietnam 1961-73
Yemen 2002, 2009-
Yugoslavia 1999
Literally no other sovereign nation in history has bombed foreign nations to this degree. We've also killed hundreds of thousands of people during the Invasion of Iraq, committed heinous war crimes with torture, killed middle eastern kids during that time etc.

But you can say - "But wait! Those were all justified!"

Were they though? Based on what? Based on XYZ news source and articles etc. And who pushes the narratives to the news? America, western powers in general are really effective at doing this

the DAI index is just the modern day reflection of that quote that goes something like - history is written by the victors
 
sure

I guess I can scale it up to country level, that's what the Index is intended for originally anyway, rather than social media arguments

Nations with a higher DAI index score can push their narratives on global news more effectively.

Example: America has bombed/invaded a lot of countries. Here's the bombing list:
Afghanistan 1998, 2001-
Bosnia 1994, 1995
Cambodia 1969-70
China 1945-46
Congo 1964
Cuba 1959-1961
El Salvador 1980s
Korea 1950-53
Guatemala 1954, 1960, 1967-69
Indonesia 1958
Laos 1964-73
Grenada 1983
Iraq 1991-2000s, 2015-
Iran 1987
Korea 1950-53
Kuwait 1991
Lebanon 1983, 1984
Libya 1986, 2011-
Nicaragua 1980s
Pakistan 2003, 2006-
Palestine 2010
Panama 1989
Peru 1965
Somalia 1993, 2007-08, 2010-
Sudan 1998
Syria 2014-
Vietnam 1961-73
Yemen 2002, 2009-
Yugoslavia 1999

Literally no other sovereign nation in history has bombed foreign nations to this degree. We've also killed hundreds of thousands of people during the Invasion of Iraq, committed heinous war crimes with torture, killed middle eastern kids during that time etc.

But you can say - "But wait! Those were all justified!"

Were they though? Based on what? Based on XYZ news source and articles etc. And who pushes the narratives to the news? America, western powers in general are really effective at doing this

the DAI index is just the modern day reflection of that quote that goes something like - history is written by the victors
Killing innocent people/kids is never justified of course so that's fairly deplorable. But yeah the US of course is a good example.

China I would say too; keep in mind the CCP rallies so much propaganda about other countries (negatively) while only showcasing the positive propaganda on their side (also the fact that barely anything comes out of China to begin with)
 
  • +1
Reactions: True truecel
Killing innocent people/kids is never justified of course so that's fairly deplorable. But yeah the US of course is a good example.

China I would say too; keep in mind the CCP rallies so much propaganda about other countries (negatively) while only showcasing the positive propaganda on their side (also the fact that barely anything comes out of China to begin with)
yeah China is really effective with this

especially bc they practically control one stream of the media, Tiktok, which is extremely influential to Gen Z
 
yeah China is really effective with this

especially bc they practically control one stream of the media, Tiktok, which is extremely influential to Gen Z
Yeah I forgot to add the TikTok component, very true.
 
  • +1
Reactions: True truecel

Similar threads

PrinceLuenLeoncur
Replies
43
Views
655
kazama
K
FiendFiend
Replies
45
Views
488
Chadeep
Chadeep
liberated
Replies
16
Views
540
liberated
liberated

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top