dalit tries to friend steppe scythian jatt

[thonstuff]

Ancestry or illustrative

both would be nice, 2 in 1?

 

[thonstuff]

Case in point

View attachment 4180254

dravid can take all the whites I only want gooks anyway

 

[Jager]

a shitpost ragebait thread reached 2 pages state of org

 

[unstable]

iqcell Punjabi jatt

i am neither punjabi nor jatt

 

[Jager]

dravid can take all the whites I only want gooks anyway

all that green eyes and light brown hair to waste them on a gook whore youre low iq as fuck nigga

 

[Jager]

i am neither punjabi nor jatt

arent you pashtun

 

[Swarthy Knight]

dravid can take all the whites I only want gooks anyway

Have sum standards man

 

[thonstuff]

i am neither punjabi nor jatt

I make you honorary jatt, also what are u

 

[Swarthy Knight]

a shitpost ragebait thread reached 2 pages state of org

Mb for the bump

 

[psychomandible]

1. all steppe is not scythian
2. indian steppe especially in jats has affinity towards scythians
3. this is accompanied by scythian like haplogroups in jats.
4. indo scythians were "pure scythian" when they came to india, actually calling them scythians is incorrect as they were sakas not scythian which is a misnomer.

Your point about steppe and haplogroup are easily explainable by the fact they both descend from sintashta.

Indo scythian/ Saka whatever you want to call them were not pure but had mixed when they had began rule over India (kushan??? I think that's the right group but I'm nost likely wrong) I think the Buddha was Saka tho and alot of his disciples aswell

 

[psychomandible]

both would be nice, 2 in 1?

No it's a waste of money to do two, I think illustrative will be cooler tbh

 

[unstable]

I make you honorary jatt, also what are u

thank you appreciate that, uhm i am not doxxing myself sir

 

[thonstuff]

all that green eyes and light brown hair to waste them on a gook whore youre low iq as fuck nigga

gooks look best imo or I have a fetish , and gooks are attracted to white features like that so it will be easy to bag a good looking one

 

[thonstuff]

thank you appreciate that, uhm i am not doxxing myself sir

Telling me your ethnicity isn’t doxxing nigga

 

[Jager]

gooks look best imo or I have a fetish , and gooks are attracted to white features like that so it will be easy to bag a good looking one

ewe nigga they look ugly you have a fetish caucasian foids fog

 

[thonstuff]

ewe nigga they look ugly you have a fetish caucasian foids fog

Iprob do gooks look so good

 

[unstable]

Your point about steppe and haplogroup are easily explainable by the fact they both descend from sintashta.

Indo scythian/ Saka whatever you want to call them were not pure but had mixed when they had began rule over India (kushan??? I think that's the right group but I'm nost likely wrong) I think the Buddha was Saka tho and alot of his disciples aswell

1. if i meant sintashta i would have clarified that, i mean high affinity to specifically scythians.
2. when they entered they were pure or very slightly mixed with bactrians and iranians.
3. kushan were not sakas(indo scythians) they were yuezhis
4. buddha was shaka (different clan) and he was born before the saka/scythian invasion
5. none of his disciples were sakas they were mostly gangetic brahmins.

 

[unstable]

Telling me your ethnicity isn’t doxxing nigga

still i don't prefer sharing it

 

[thonstuff]

still i don't prefer sharing it

Somali

 

[unstable]

Somali

yeah, somali who knows too much about indian genetics and history.

 

[thonstuff]

yeah, somali who knows too much about indian genetics and history.

gujew or high aasi bihar maybe dravid

 

[thonstuff]

@Jager kush phej page 3 chaida

 

[Jager]

@Jager kush phej page 3 chaida

 

[unstable]

gujew or high aasi bihar maybe dravid

paaji chinta na karo mai ona dur nahi ha

 

[thonstuff]

View attachment 4180289

Women are the biggest liers this bitch is sub 3

 

[thonstuff]

paaji chinta na karo mai ona dur nahi ha

Himachal? Haryana? I hate Hindi so much lowk Punjabi Mogs so much, best language in South Asia

 

[psychomandible]

1. if i meant sintashta i would have clarified that, i mean high affinity to specifically scythians.
2. when they entered they were pure or very slightly mixed with bactrians and iranians.
3. kushan were not sakas(indo scythians) they were yuezhis
4. buddha was shaka (different clan) and he was born before the saka/scythian invasion
5. none of his disciples were sakas they were mostly gangetic brahmins.

Show me proof that a significant amount of both steppe and their haplogroups derive from specifically scythian

With the kushan I had a feeling I was wrong as I said

With the Buddha the claim of saka heritage isn't from the scythian invasion but that the shaka were a tribe of saka who went very deep into India. There is also alot of correlations between the shaka and saka in their practices. There is a nice article on substack that I could share if you're interested

 

[unstable]

Show me proof that a significant amount of both steppe and their haplogroups derive from specifically scythian

With the kushan I had a feeling I was wrong as I said

With the Buddha the claim of saka heritage isn't from the scythian invasion but that the shaka were a tribe of saka who went very deep into India. There is also alot of correlations between the shaka and saka in their practices. There is a nice article on substack that I could share if you're interested

1. unfortunately there not a lot of studies on ethnicity based genetics in India, but juts score a lot of Q1 in their results which is generally used as a marker for Saka/Scythian influence.
2. Kushans were Indo Europeans but Yuezhi not Saka.

3. I don't usually buy that kind of pseudoscience as it is mostly nationalists trying to claim Buddha, share if it is a genuine theory.

4. most of the theories about his Saka origin come from later Buddhist sources compiled many centuries after his birth calling him blue eyed, 40 teethed, blue hair follicles and other bull shit which is probably not true as any sane person could conclude.

5. Shakya culturally show close affinity to native Munda groups in lineage and cultural practices (like revering sacred groves and ikshavakus lineage) i don't think any fringe theory of Scythian origin could match it in real proof.

 

[psychomandible]

1. unfortunately there not a lot of studies on ethnicity based genetics in India, but juts score a lot of Q1 in their results which is generally used as a marker for Saka/Scythian influence.
2. Kushans were Indo Europeans but Yuezhi not Saka.

3. I don't usually buy that kind of pseudoscience as it is mostly nationalists trying to claim Buddha, share if it is a genuine theory.

4. most of the theories about his Saka origin come from later Buddhist sources compiled many centuries after his birth calling him blue eyed, 40 teethed, blue hair follicles and other bull shit which is probably not true as any sane person could conclude.

5. Shakya culturally show close affinity to native Munda groups in lineage and cultural practices (like revering sacred groves and ikshavakus lineage) i don't think any fringe theory of Scythian origin could match it in real proof.

Sure it's called the Buddha's genetics by sectionalism archive

 

[MiserableMan]

Your point about steppe and haplogroup are easily explainable by the fact they both descend from sintashta.

Indo scythian/ Saka whatever you want to call them were not pure but had mixed when they had began rule over India (kushan??? I think that's the right group but I'm nost likely wrong) I think the Buddha was Saka tho and alot of his disciples aswell

Buddha wasn't a saka, he was a Shakya a vedic clan, saks arrived in India around 100Bc, Budhha was already dead by 400 years at that point. Kushans weren't scythians either, they were an entirely different group which started migrating and mixing with North Indians around 1 AD.

 

[unstable]

Sure it's called the Buddha's genetics by sectionalism archive

i read it, blatant word play in action.

shaka = saka
mallians and vrijs= malla and vrijji

and also the claim incest is a saka trait indians didn't do it
he then himself says that he is not convinced of that gay jew witzel's arguments

then he resorts to finding vague theological similarities between buddhism and zoroastrianism
he also makes false claims that mitra is a demon in vedic religion.

stupas were in india before buddhist, i get they non vedic but going as far to say that they were made by scythians is dishonesty at this point.

he also adds a porn in there?
He also admits that buddha's appearance was written long after his death.
he is not convinced by his own argument.