Damian kater is htn

Yes, you have the right to say that, but you can't objectively put it on a psl scale and limit it to htn.
Its not an objective matter, its based of opinions, learn what objective means, its the same as saying x food is tasty
 
Wow you can read, bravo!
Are you mad i insulted your faggotry?

:feelshaha:

,,Yes dad, im coming down for dinner, i just need to debate on which man looks better"
Ahmed, 16 years old
 
  • +1
Reactions: xqBandit
Looks are objective and subjective, there r objective traits and objective points on races to where it becoems unattractive, facial harmony formulas go in between them and for each formula each person who made it picks a subjective set point on what's "Perfect"

Theae studies dont prove anything, im notbsaying that beauty standards dont exist or that people dont have somewhat consistent opinions on looks. Im saying it doesnt matter in the slightest. The moment you have to mention the belief or act of a a single or many humans its subjective, to prove looks are objective youd havr to show that x trait is attractive even if every single person dissagreed, tou dont know what objective means, its not based of popularity but reliance, it has to rely on nothing
 
Its not an objective matter, its based of opinions, learn what objective means, its the same as saying x food is tasty
Harmony, ratios, angles—these are objective things. If you're going to form an opinion, it would be better if you provided a justification to support it.
 
btw rhGH isn't cope idk why u think that
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Ahmed88 and PharmaPhaggot
Theae studies dont prove anything, im notbsaying that beauty standards dont exist or that people dont have somewhat consistent opinions on looks. Im saying it doesnt matter in the slightest. The moment you have to mention the belief or act of a a single or many humans its subjective, to prove looks are objective youd havr to show that x trait is attractive even if every single person dissagreed, tou dont know what objective means, its not based of popularity but reliance, it has to rely on nothing
I get what you're saying, but attractiveness can be objectively studied because certain traits like symmetry or clear skin are consistently rated as appealing across many people, so it's not just "personal opinion". Objective in general means universal truth, but in attractiveness it just means traits that most people consistently find appealing.
 
I get what you're saying, but attractiveness can be objectively studied because certain traits like symmetry or clear skin are consistently rated as appealing across many people, so it's not just "personal opinion". Objective in general means universal truth, but in attractiveness it just means traits that most people consistently find appealing.
Screenshot 20260322 114728 Samsung Internet

Nigga consistently doesnt mean fuck all, notice how the definition says without "opnions" and not "an opinion" because the size is irrelevant, if youre correct how consistent does it need tonbe? Because attraction is not 100% agreed upon 99%? 90%? 50%? Also this is not a universal truth
Screenshot 20260322 114933 Samsung Internet
 

Similar threads

Troo_
Replies
2
Views
108
xqBandit
xqBandit
itsoverforme333
Replies
11
Views
192
Anakin_10k
Anakin_10k
thekey
Replies
23
Views
227
kisslessvirgin
K
Dathomirian Zabrak
Replies
18
Views
264
pallasbilli
P
itsoverforme333
Replies
6
Views
113
itsoverforme333
itsoverforme333

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top