Dark skins vs light skins

[loksr]

This depends heavily on location, a mulatto Tyrone could slay in almost every part of the world if he’s gl enough since he’s not viewed as black and more white passing

Mixrd people are always viewed as black, especially in America.

He is not American his is Canadian, I think there’s where his Uncle Ruckus tendencies come from

AHAHAHAHA A CANADIAN TELLING ME I DON’T KNOW BLACKS
The blackest canadians sound like white soccer moms, that or they force the shittiest fake new york accent

Autism, if you are an ugly midnight it would be FAR worse than if you are an ugly mulatto since you are deviating so far from what is expected from you as a dark skin male

If you’re ugly it’s over regardless, skin color’s not changing shit for that. Two mtn’s is more reasonable but again for every self hater like @Blackgymmax who only likes lightskins there’s a black supremacist black hebrew Israelite who only likes darkskins so who gives a fuck. Worry about your bones.

Brutal for us darkskincels, I just wanna slay snowbunnies

I mean dark or lightskin you’re on an uphill battle for that, studies show that racemixing is rare. But tbh self hating white snowbunnies like thugged out darkskins anyway, you don’t want to be a lightskin prettyboy for that. Colorism is black on black shit, don’t put it on white girls, and if you think I only know white people then you can trust me on that.

 

[darkness97]

but at the same time they’re just as likely to find a girl who likes a thugged out darkskin as they are to find a girl who likes a lightskin prettyboy.

But the reason coloring IS subjective, ALWAYS, is that a girl who ONLY likes lightskins WILL date a super good looking darkskin, but the reverse (ugly guy who has her ideal skin color) is NOT true.

we're saying the same thing. when i say it's "subjective to an extent" you literally just illustrated my point with an example.

you wrote that there is a woman who generally likes light skins. that suggests that there is an objectiveness to her preferences for a pattern to arise. But then you said they will make an exception for a super good looking darkskin. this refers back to my initial point of it being subjective to an extent. the extent being a super good looking darkskin.

If it was ABSOLUTELY subjective there wouldn't be a pattern of her ONLY dating light skins in the first place. Her dating history would be a mixed bag. my disagreement is in your claim that color is absolutely subjective.

My further argument after that is a bit more murky because I'm making a lot of assumptions about what the darkskin is likely to look like so i wont fight too hard on that.

 

[darkness97]

Mixrd people are always viewed as black, especially in America.


AHAHAHAHA A CANADIAN TELLING ME I DON’T KNOW BLACKS
The blackest canadians sound like white soccer moms, that or they force the shittiest fake new york accent

If you’re ugly it’s over regardless, skin color’s not changing shit for that. Two mtn’s is more reasonable but again for every self hater like @Blackgymmax who only likes lightskins there’s a black supremacist black hebrew Israelite who only likes darkskins so who gives a fuck. Worry about your bones.

I mean dark or lightskin you’re on an uphill battle for that, studies show that racemixing is rare. But tbh self hating white snowbunnies like thugged out darkskins anyway, you don’t want to be a lightskin prettyboy for that. Colorism is black on black shit, don’t put it on white girls, and if you think I only know white people then you can trust me on that.

You know nothing of canadian black men lol. wtf am i reading rn?!!?

black canadians especially in the GTA have jamaican/british dialect. you're telling me that rappers here sound like white soccer moms. WHA>>!>>!>!>!????



this sounds like a soccer mom to you LOOOOOL R U DUM FAHM>!>???

 

[loksr]

we're saying the same thing. when i say it's "subjective to an extent" you literally just illustrated my point with an example.

you wrote that there is a woman who generally likes light skins. that suggests that there is an objectiveness to her preferences for a pattern to arise. But then you said they will make an exception for a super good looking darkskin. this refers back to my initial point of it being subjective to an extent. the extent being a super good looking darkskin.

If it was ABSOLUTELY subjective there wouldn't be a pattern of her ONLY dating light skins in the first place. Her dating history would be a mixed bag. my disagreement is in your claim that color is absolutely subjective.

My further argument after that is a bit more murky because I'm making a lot of assumptions about what the darkskin is likely to look like so i wont fight too hard on that.

When I say subjective I mean different girls have different coloring preferences (there are two types of girls, ones who like exotic like a blonde girl who likes dark hair, and ones who like familiar, like a lightskin girl who likes lightskins)

So for THAT girl, her subjective preference is lightskins but she will ALWAYS make an exception for a very good looking darkskin, and the REVERSE is true as well for all those “I don’t like lightskins” type of girls, who know fully damn well they’re letting Meeks hit.

When I say it doesn’t matter I mainly mean two things, 1. Different girls will like different things in this regard, it’s one of the only subjective things about looks along with fashion choices and hair choices. And 2. Worrying about these subjective things instead of OBJECTIVE things like facial leanness, bones etc is high effort low reward, and you’ll find girls who like whichever one anyway. It’s like asking “do girls like surfers or do girls like goths?” And the answer is just “yes,” there are girls who like both of those things so don’t worry about the shit.

THAT is my point.

You know nothing of canadian black men lol. wtf am i reading rn?!!?

black canadians especially in the GTA have jamaican/british dialect. you're telling me that rappers here sound like white soccer moms. WHA>>!>>!>!>!????



this sounds like a soccer mom to you LOOOOOL R U DUM FAHM>!>???

Bro move to detroit, stop trying to make the canadian shit work, it won’t.
Canada is soft as hell it just is what it is
Same thing with england you’re not alone, the fact that you guys are biting ENGLAND is a bad sign already

 

[aesthetic beauty]

Yes there is. Ive ran the experiments. Just fuck off you annoying mayocel. Youre throwing out paragraphs knowing that youre clueless on the subject. Typing more wont make you seem less of a fucking idiot

Did black smv go down again?

 

[loksr]

Did black smv go down again?

No he’s autistic and doesn’t know how to chadfish so he thinks his shitty ass tinder experiments prove that tyrones are incels.

It’s retarded.

 

[aesthetic beauty]

No he’s autistic and doesn’t know how to chadfish so he thinks his shitty ass tinder experiments prove that tyrones are incels.

It’s retarded.

This shit is stressful as fuck. One day blacks are incel and should lynch themselves the next day bbc mogs, all black dudes are slayers with impeccable rizz and drip.

 

[loksr]

This shit is stressful as fuck. One day blacks are incel and should lynch themselves the next day bbc mogs, all black dudes are slayers with impeccable rizz and drip.

No race is automatically incel, ever, not even indians but they’re the closest ngl

All studies on the topic shows that the VAST majority of relationships are same race, so yes if you’re not white and ONLY want white girls you’re gonna struggle more than if you were normal, but it’s still possible regardless, gl is gl and gl is its own race, worry about being gl and everything else falls in place easy

 

[aesthetic beauty]

No race is automatically incel, ever, not even indians but they’re the closest ngl

All studies on the topic shows that the VAST majority of relationships are same race, so yes if you’re not white and ONLY want white girls you’re gonna struggle more than if you were normal, but it’s still possible regardless, gl is gl and gl is its own race, worry about being gl and everything else falls in place easy

If blacks have low smv compared to lightskins and whites I will accept it. It will hurt my feelings but I can’t deny the truth. I just hate how it keeps on changing and I keep getting false hope.

 

[aesthetic beauty]

No race is automatically incel, ever, not even indians but they’re the closest ngl

All studies on the topic shows that the VAST majority of relationships are same race, so yes if you’re not white and ONLY want white girls you’re gonna struggle more than if you were normal, but it’s still possible regardless, gl is gl and gl is its own race, worry about being gl and everything else falls in place easy

Also there is some truth to this but in the end jbw prevails.

 

[darkness97]

When I say subjective I mean different girls have different coloring preferences (there are two types of girls, ones who like exotic like a blonde girl who likes dark hair, and ones who like familiar, like a lightskin girl who likes lightskins)

So for THAT girl, her subjective preference is lightskins but she will ALWAYS make an exception for a very good looking darkskin, and the REVERSE is true as well for all those “I don’t like lightskins” type of girls, who know fully damn well they’re letting Meeks hit.

When I say it doesn’t matter I mainly mean two things, 1. Different girls will like different things in this regard, it’s one of the only subjective things about looks along with fashion choices and hair choices. And 2. Worrying about these subjective things instead of OBJECTIVE things like facial leanness, bones etc is high effort low reward, and you’ll find girls who like whichever one anyway. It’s like asking “do girls like surfers or do girls like goths?” And the answer is just “yes,” there are girls who like both of those things so don’t worry about the shit.

THAT is my point.

this reads like we have different understandings of the word subjective.

1. you're basically saying that the ability to switch between skin tones is subjective in and of itself. Regardless of any trend. basically as long as the man is attractive skin tone/style doesn't matter.

1. while I am saying that if someone has a general preference for something that makes them not completely subjective. subjectivity to means suggest more randomness. even if they make an exception. I predict that the exception is something approaching their original preference.

This is because i consider objective physical characteristics and whiteness are one in the same. that is my theory in most simple absolute terms. that super good looking black guy is going to be the whitest looking black guy facially and may be mixed without it being apparent. Especailly if our basis is a woman who only dates lightskins. even if the skin tones change they will still look white.

obviously there are exceptions but this is what i feel what the general trend in society is.

 

[loksr]

If blacks have low smv compared to lightskins and whites I will accept it. It will hurt my feelings but I can’t deny the truth. I just hate how it keeps on changing and I keep getting false hope.

No such thing as ethnic tax, there IS such a thing as indian tax to an extent, they’re the only group you can openly shit on with 0 repercussions even in the era of cancel culture. Good looking indian is still fine though. The reason guys here think it’s ethnic tax and not indian tax is because most of the people on this website are indian and they’re unable to realize that it’s not an ethnic problem it’s an indian problem.

There’s no such thing as racial smv, as I’ve said ALL studies show that racemixing is an extreme minority, people date within their own race. Even Asians (the reason asian racemixing stats are higher is because, if you look closer, you’ll see that it counts a KOREAN dating a CHINESE as RACEMIXING lmao. Same thing with filipino and vietnamese etc etc.) so yes if you want white girls only that’s gonna be harder for you than if you were white, but that’s not “jbw” that’s the “don’t racemix if you want everything on easy mode” pill, which tbh even bluepilled people know to an extent (if you’re black i KNOW you’ve been told by family members not to bring home a white girl before don’t lie lmao)

Also there is some truth to this but in the end jbw prevails.

If you’re not good looking, you’re only going to get ugly social outcast self hating asian girls with jbw. If you are good looking, you don’t need jbw, understand?
As a white guy, we all make fun of jbwmaxxers, and asian girls make fun of the ugly asian girls who get with jbwmaxxers too
Not something to aspire to on either side ngl

 

[loksr]

this reads like we have different understandings of the word subjective.

1. you're basically saying that the ability to switch between skin tones is subjective in and of itself. Regardless of any trend. basically as long as the man is attractive skin tone/style doesn't matter.

1. while I am saying that if someone has a general preference for something that makes them not completely subjective. subjectivity to means suggest more randomness. even if they make an exception. I predict that the exception is something approaching their original preference.

This is because i consider objective physical characteristics and whiteness are one in the same. that is my theory in most simple absolute terms. that super good looking black guy is going to be the whitest looking black guy facially and may be mixed without it being apparent. Especailly if our basis is a woman who only dates lightskins. even if the skin tones change they will still look white.

obviously there are exceptions but this is what i feel what the general trend in society is.

Subjective means different people like different things
Objective means all people like the same thing
So for example a subjective opinion is liking mullets, liking the color red, liking donuts
Objective is girls hating recessed chins, knowing that one car has a higher top speed than another car, etc

You think whiteness and physical attractiveness are the same thing because you believed the “eurocentric beauty standards” myth

(Objective, as we’ve discussed there are subjective features as well like hair, clothing and coloring) Physical attractiveness for men is based on two things, proper development and facial masculinization. You can figure out that looks are not related to whiteness through some basic logic, firstly have you noticed that ALL chads look related to each other? Regardless of race, even the darkest african chad has similar features to Chico. To realize that it’s not related to whiteness is as simple as understanding that the AVERAGE, MOST COMMON white person (or any person) DOES NOT look like that, thus it CANNOT be related to whiteness.

In fact, different races have different aspects of chad features, so as an example the average chinese person and the average black person tend to have squarer jaws than most white people. Scandinavian whites tend to have closer to hunter eyes on average than other groups of people, native americans have more cheekbone moggers, Indians tend to have great hair etc etc. and every race has its own weaknesses as well, from what I’ve noticed, whites are more likely to have nct, blacks are more likely to have weak chins, indians are more likely to have bug eyes with dark circles, native americans are more likely to have bloated looking lower thirds etc. it’s never as simple as “white = good”

This is why I always say chad is its own race, completely separate, related to each other but not to others. What I’ve noticed from people who don’t have a lot of experience with whites is that you think our top %’s are our average, it’s kind of insane. Your main exposure comes from tv and movies so you view it as a white pheno when in reality it’s some kind of perfect development chad pheno that exists in every race. I compare it to white people who don’t know any black people who think that EVERY black person is good at sports, or EVERY black person can sing etc.

 

[Gus17]

Who has a better SMV in general over the world

Black guys with darker skin or light skin, what's y'all opinion on this .


View attachment 2363079View attachment 2363081View attachment 2363082View attachment 2363085

Lightskin obviously

 

[Gus17]

light skins are seen as feminine and zesty .

That's just male gaze cope. Ugly niggers see light skins getting attention for their beauty so they have to cope with muh masculinity.

 

[darkness97]

View attachment 2363374
Subjective means different people like different things
Objective means all people like the same thing

that's not what objective means

So for example a subjective opinion is liking mullets, liking the color red, and disliking recessed chins.

comparing the data of the speeds of two vehicles is an objective measure.

fixed it for you. we are talking about the objective/physicals features that are a woman's preferences . not a woman's capacity of have a subjective preference. you absolute moron. that's not even the context in which we are using it.

all this is going to do is confuse you. now i gotta step back and explain everything again from the beginning. we're not even using objective in the LITERAL sense.

You think whiteness and physical attractiveness are the same thing because you believed the “eurocentric beauty standards” myth

yeah try explaining to everyone that having blue eyes is a failo.

(Objective, as we’ve discussed there are subjective features as well like hair, clothing and coloring) Physical attractiveness for men is based on two things, proper development and facial masculinization. You can figure out that looks are not related to whiteness through some basic logic, firstly have you noticed that ALL chads look related to each other? Regardless of race, even the darkest african chad has similar features to Chico. To realize that it’s not related to whiteness is as simple as understanding that the AVERAGE, MOST COMMON white person (or any person) DOES NOT look like that, thus it CANNOT be related to whiteness.

alright man. why is it all dark skin models look white, but there are no white models that look black. whether if it is a white thing or just a general harmony thing it's obvious that whites have it more commonly.

In fact, different races have different aspects of chad features, so as an example the average chinese person and the average black person tend to have squarer jaws than most white people. Scandinavian whites tend to have closer to hunter eyes on average than other groups of people, native americans have more cheekbone moggers, Indians tend to have great hair etc etc. and every race has its own weaknesses as well, from what I’ve noticed, whites are more likely to have nct, blacks are more likely to have weak chins, indians are more likely to have bug eyes with dark circles, native americans are more likely to have bloated looking lower thirds etc. it’s never as simple as “white = good”

This is why I always say chad is its own race, completely separate, related to each other but not to others. What I’ve noticed from people who don’t have a lot of experience with whites is that you think our top %’s are our average, it’s kind of insane. Your main exposure comes from tv and movies so you view it as a white pheno when in reality it’s some kind of perfect development chad pheno that exists in every race. I compare it to white people who don’t know any black people who think that EVERY black person is good at sports, or EVERY black person can sing etc.

last thing i'll say, the reason why it's all over the media is because it's what sells. do you think people are forcing images of white people on ads and television shows. or are they doing that so they can sell tickets, clothes, and fill up theatre seats.

im already bored of this debate because you're not really responding to what i am saying directly. and it's a lot of typing. just think about what i wrote man and look around you.

 

[darkness97]

@loksr i'm going out soon so this will be my last reply. when i get home i better have an actual good reply.

when we use the term subjective variable and subject to a persronal tastes. we are using objective as a synonym for physical.

this is the last time i will try and explain. all tastes are subjective because it is a matter of opinion. however when we try to break apart this opinion we will find objective biases. this is where it ceases to become variable, as now there is a trend. what i am suggesting is that the exceptioap]oqporj
fuck this

 

[darkness97]

Bro move to detroit, stop trying to make the canadian shit work, it won’t.
Canada is soft as hell it just is what it is

yeah tuff talk from the PC. you would get murked there for that kind of talk. go to jane and finch and speak all this nonsense.

Same thing with england you’re not alone, the fact that you guys are biting ENGLAND is a bad sign already

yeah as if the 6 and drake isn't something you know about. who tf knows detroit rappers other than ghetto niggas. nobody wants to go to detroit lol why you praising this

 

[Kamui]

This shit is stressful as fuck. One day blacks are incel and should lynch themselves the next day bbc mogs, all black dudes are slayers with impeccable rizz and drip.

JBB is law

 

[HeightPilledum]

Lightskins mog in SMV
But women who fetishize niggers will pick the most dark pitch black coal niggers from the butthole tribes of Nigeria

 

[Blackgymmax]

It isn't that dark skins don't slay they just have worse appeal compared to light skins. A dark-skinned Tyrone will still get stacies but only half the stacies of a lightskinned Tyrone from what I have seen.

Dark-skinned tyrone isn't getting stacies lol. The looks gap is astronomical

 

[Kamui]

Dark-skinned tyrone isn't getting stacies lol. The looks gap is astronomical

What about that one Tyrone @looksmaxxer234 used in a Tinder experiment?

 

[Blackgymmax]

What about that one Tyrone @looksmaxxer234 used in a Tinder experiment?

Except literally just him.

 

[Kamui]

Except literally just him.

Speaking of just him, @looksmaxxer234 what city did you do the experiment in