D
Deleted member 26678
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2023
- Posts
- 475
- Reputation
- 634
pic used
head to height ratio
8:1
the head is 12.5% of the total height of the body
ideal
neck to height ratio
16.5:1
the neck is 16.5% of the total height of the body
basically ideal just slightly longer than ideal
torso to height ratio
3.77:1
the torso is 26.5% of the total height of the body
shorter than ideal but this is not bad because a shorter torso with long limbs makes you look gracile and aesthetic especially at laid's height
legs to height ratio
1.8:1
the legs are 55% of the total height of the body
legs are longer than ideal but again long limbs are not a bad thing unless they're kleinfelter tier
neck width to bigonial ratio
1:1 ideal
shoulder to waist ratio
2:1
exceeds the ideal by a little but it is a heroic proportion so again it is not a bad thing
waist circumference to height ratio
apparently dave is 6'2.5 and his waist is 31"
so that means this ratio is 41.6% which is ideal
hip to waist ratio
1:1
ideal
chest height to torso height
.6
ideal
shoulder width to bizygomatic width
3.8
ideal
there are other measurements like flexed arms to wrist, calves to arms, chest circumference to wrist, upper leg circumference to knee circumference, etc. but i dont have his numbers for that

head to height ratio
8:1
the head is 12.5% of the total height of the body
ideal
neck to height ratio
16.5:1
the neck is 16.5% of the total height of the body
basically ideal just slightly longer than ideal
torso to height ratio
3.77:1
the torso is 26.5% of the total height of the body
shorter than ideal but this is not bad because a shorter torso with long limbs makes you look gracile and aesthetic especially at laid's height
legs to height ratio
1.8:1
the legs are 55% of the total height of the body
legs are longer than ideal but again long limbs are not a bad thing unless they're kleinfelter tier
neck width to bigonial ratio
1:1 ideal
shoulder to waist ratio
2:1
exceeds the ideal by a little but it is a heroic proportion so again it is not a bad thing
waist circumference to height ratio
apparently dave is 6'2.5 and his waist is 31"
so that means this ratio is 41.6% which is ideal
hip to waist ratio
1:1
ideal
chest height to torso height
.6
ideal
shoulder width to bizygomatic width
3.8
ideal
there are other measurements like flexed arms to wrist, calves to arms, chest circumference to wrist, upper leg circumference to knee circumference, etc. but i dont have his numbers for that
Last edited: