David Laid is fucking TINY (GTFIH if ur feeling insecure)

D

Deleted member 19798

Wearing gucci, drive bys and gang shit
Joined
May 23, 2022
Posts
4,853
Reputation
7,310
1679508375475
1679508384089


Woah he look like a 6’5 fucking horse beast unit of a man

D6B238FB 01BE 4A04 95CC 8A6BC9D86541


Oh nvm he’s barely any bigger than an average zoomer

David is the biggest frauder of 2015-2020
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Kazzy, MaxillaMaxing and 11 others
We are the same height 6’2.5 and i mogg most zoomers so i call cope
 
We are the same height 6’2.5 and i mogg most zoomers so i call cope
Ur saying he’s shorter than 6’2? He look 5’11 in that pic jfl
 
He can be a skinny twink and he'd still slay cuz Chad face
 
  • +1
Reactions: SteveLorde, Deleted member 30446, PrinceofDarkness and 7 others
Frauding techniques. People way uglier than they want us to think on instagram.
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover, Mr.Proper, Deleted member 24940 and 1 other person
Keep crying for him you wish you were him nigga
 
David would mog hard if he was Indian. Brutally over him.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21531, Supreme, Deleted member 25377 and 2 others
for reference here's a picture of someone else in the same settings taken during what appears to be the same shoot.
E111


same guy in less than favorable light.

b91e5ae20d0c9d5885c916924fb4a439.png


JUST.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, SteveLorde, bignosesmallchin and 7 others
Keep crying for him you wish you were him nigga
Holy fuck can u not make a thread without some soy nigga bitching in the replies. Ofc I wanna be him he has the biggest ramus I’ve ever seen. I’m just pointing out his insane fraud. Like fuck chill bitch ass nigga
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25377
hes is 6'2 but still mogs everyone due to proportions and muscle bellies
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jigen and Deleted member 24940
He is infamous for his tiny, narrow bones - which make him look very good by himself due to ratios. But whenever he's around people he looks puny and pathetic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard
White boy body proportions. 6'4 niggas be looking 5'4
 
  • +1
Reactions: Supreme
Isn't David laid the same height as @Arborist too?

This is seriously making me reconsider if Arborist is frauding natty. @Blackgymmax thoughts?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 25377 and khvirgin
you guys gay af no offense
 
Its the angle in the pic that makes him look smaller then reality, he is more behind then the other guy, which makes him look bigger infront of the camera
 
All the more proof that good looking people RARELY exist, especially men. Outside of the faketernet lies most of these "gl" people aren't even that gl, they're just somewhat more appealing than the average turd but often times nowhere near as great as what you've been deceived to think they really are. It's like your standards of "Chad" or "Stacy" keep climbing but each & every example of such is almost always deceptive.

This is why most men get zero attention IRL, girls go on the net and see these hulking TeraChads to see IRL they're only HTN/Chadlite at best. It's a false sense of yearning -- we see these incredible looking people who turn out to be not so incredible when they're in front of us.

Reality is no good anymore. People live online, so what they see there is more "real" to them than what they see outside that often doesn't phase them. So since internet/online is bonafide, and it sets false examples, it's all the more reason more & more people aren't interested in IRL sex.

You have to actually be very good looking -- not just in pics -- to really stand out and be Chad. No more do frauded Damian Katercels cut it. And even if you don't have to be Chad or ARE "Chad" good luck because the internet/Jews have bugged out the system to stop birth rates.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: zeshama, Mewton, SAQUIB66 and 6 others
All the more proof that good looking people RARELY exist, especially men. Outside of the faketernet lies most of these "gl" people aren't even that gl, they're just somewhat more appealing than the average turd but often times nowhere near as great as what you've been deceived to think they really are. It's like your standards of "Chad" or "Stacy" keep climbing but each & every example of such is almost always deceptive.

This is why most men get zero attention IRL, girls go on the net and see these hulking TeraChads to see IRL they're only HTN/Chadlite at best. It's a false sense of yearning -- we see these incredible looking people who turn out to be not so incredible when they're in front of us.

Reality is no good anymore. People live online, so what they see there is more "real" to them than what they see outside that often doesn't phase them. So since internet/online is bonafide, and it sets false examples, it's all the more reason more & more people aren't interested in IRL sex.

You have to actually be very good looking -- not just in pics -- to really stand out and be Chad. No more do frauded Damian Katercels cut it. And even if you don't have to be Chad or ARE "Chad" good luck because the internet/Jews have bugged out the system to stop birth rates.
Yup most chads online are just HTN who angle fraud and use faceapp editing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Acne Victim, Jigen and Deleted member 20704
Any gymcelled nigga knows this, only the bluepilled normies think that way.
 
All the more proof that good looking people RARELY exist, especially men. Outside of the faketernet lies most of these "gl" people aren't even that gl
photogenic people just respond well to camera distortion, in reality they're not actually out of the ordinary.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Deleted member 19798 and Deleted member 20704
Watch his video with Chris bumsted and another video with Alex eubank....you are coping....he is around 6'3 and An absolute Chad!
 
  • +1
Reactions: madmofo
Photoshop+ being very lean + lightning --> cheatcode for frauding pictures
 
  • +1
Reactions: Polish Chincel
All the more proof that good looking people RARELY exist, especially men. Outside of the faketernet lies most of these "gl" people aren't even that gl, they're just somewhat more appealing than the average turd but often times nowhere near as great as what you've been deceived to think they really are. It's like your standards of "Chad" or "Stacy" keep climbing but each & every example of such is almost always deceptive.

This is why most men get zero attention IRL, girls go on the net and see these hulking TeraChads to see IRL they're only HTN/Chadlite at best. It's a false sense of yearning -- we see these incredible looking people who turn out to be not so incredible when they're in front of us.

Reality is no good anymore. People live online, so what they see there is more "real" to them than what they see outside that often doesn't phase them. So since internet/online is bonafide, and it sets false examples, it's all the more reason more & more people aren't interested in IRL sex.

You have to actually be very good looking -- not just in pics -- to really stand out and be Chad. No more do frauded Damian Katercels cut it. And even if you don't have to be Chad or ARE "Chad" good luck because the internet/Jews have bugged out the system to stop birth rates.
This is ironcally so true, it was the opposite for me. I meet guys irl and they just look above avg to me then when I see their Instagram after they legit look HTN+-chadlite

Point being it’s hilariously difficult to be very gl irl
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 20704
photogenic people just respond well to camera distortion, in reality they're not actually out of the ordinary.

So I wonder if it's better to NOT be photogenic & less unrealistically gl IRL vs. being GL in pics but IRL you're underwhelming/manlet/etc.

Like it's probably better to be a solid HTN than some fraud-capable guy who can make himself look/appear in pics better than he really is.

Also that faggot @loox or @androgenic showing us his "progress" when I bet he's an example of this, looks "insane" through a lens

zk9ivlwvjqia1.png


But IRL he's probably a bit tall, a bit wide and has a somewhat appealing face but isn't so damn Herculean/"Godly" looking in front of you as he tries to convince a horde of virgins online here of him being so superior when it's all very well known he doesn't have that much IRL success.
 
Last edited:
So I wonder if it's better to NOT be photogenic & less unrealistically gl IRL vs. being GL in pics but IRL you're underwhelming/manlet/etc.
doesn't most dating below 30 happen online now? probably best to be good looking on pictures if that's the case.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862
doesn't most dating below 30 happen online now? probably best to be good looking on pictures if that's the case.

Yeah but what would be the point? Everyone has to fraud online, for most there won't be an IRL because you can't live up to the fraud.

That's the whole point, you can find some who look great online but IRL they get bumped down. Bad news for guys who want a harem or don't want to be tied to a single option if they can find one. I mean you can fraud all day online but IRL that's a whole different ball game sadly.

I tried OLD and it's terrible. Yeah, you can find many guys can fraud appeal but it's always a major disconnect between fraud and IRL appeal.

You really have to live up to what you fraud/come across as online whereas IRL you can't fraud the same way with angles, it's more genuine then if you get appeal because girls see you in 3-D and like your presence/essence/looks more, online it could all be a ruse. Look at Damian Kater.

3316768_DAMIANKATERISATRUECEL.jpg



He frauds with the right one but IRL he looks barely like the left, low contrast and needs to be quite lean to have any facial definition. Let's not also forget the fact that he Omegle frauds on the right and sits the whole time, it's well known he's a HTN manlet of like 5'8" at best
 
Last edited:
So I wonder if it's better to NOT be photogenic & less unrealistically gl IRL vs. being GL in pics but IRL you're underwhelming/manlet/etc.

Like it's probably better to be a solid HTN than some fraud-capable guy who can make himself look/appear in pics better than he really is.

Also that faggot @loox or @androgenic showing us his "progress" when I bet he's an example of this, looks "insane" through a lens

zk9ivlwvjqia1.png


But IRL he's probably a bit tall, a bit wide and has a somewhat appealing face but isn't so damn Herculean/"Godly" looking in front of you as he tries to convince a horde of virgins online here of him being so superior when it's all very well known he doesn't have that much IRL success.
7D14F731 0886 4B61 8669 69C5ABCC8076

Nah Loox actually is massive
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 20704
Yeah but what would be the point? Everyone has to fraud online, for most there won't be an IRL because you can't live up to the fraud.
doesn't appear to be a realistic problem, women fraud the fuck out of all of their pictures, every image you see on tinder went through several edits + filters, and rarely anyone calls them out for it.

that being said, preferential treatment from strangers on the internet can't compare to what you're able to get away with if you're good looking in reality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and It'snotover
3328855_7D14F731-0886-4B61-8669-69C5ABCC8076.jpeg

Nah Loox actually is massive

Yeah, just put a slightly big guy next to a framecel, sub 18 inch bideltoid, manlet Asian. That definitely is a legit way to demonstrate size JFL

Plus he is to the back and turned a bit to fraud/conceal just how truly wide he is. Couple that with the Asian guy being natty & it's a joke.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, just put a slightly big guy next to a framcel, manlet Asian ... That definitely is a legit way to demonstrate size, sure. JFL
There’s another pic of him standing next to a bbc. I don’t have it tho, still size mogged him to oblivion
 
There’s another pic of him standing next to a bbc. I don’t have it tho, still size mogged him to oblivion

He's bigger than an average guy for sure signficantly but he frauds just like everyone else, in a normal pic with anothet gymcel he'd not be halo'd that much besides the fact he's tall, yeah. In reality it's all cope, unless he's in front of you and looks insane it's the work of deception.

This nigga also posts on TikTok and his goal was to impressive incels on here, no fucking way he's gonna be legit in that case JFL
 
This nigga also posts on TikTok and his goal was to impressive incels on here, no fucking way he's gonna be legit in that case JFL
if I remember correctly he's only like 23 inches wide which while broad compared to the general population isn't actually that outrageous for his height.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 20704
Isn't David laid the same height as @Arborist too?

This is seriously making me reconsider if Arborist is frauding natty. @Blackgymmax thoughts?
arborist just kept grinding and hustling
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Orc and Deleted member 24940
if I remember correctly he's only like 23 inches wide which while broad compared to the general population isn't actually that outrageous for his height.

Yeah 23 sounds big "on paper" but IRL it's not that impressive if he were around other naturally wide clavicle/scapula people even with no muscle, or any multi-year gymcel with dedication to shoulders and normal frame, or near any fat people lol

I measured myself against a wall with a ruler to see how wide I am and I got like 19 or 20 inches, which isn't bad considering I'm only 5'10"

12s


And I don't really gymcel at all. Most guys can probably get to 21 or 22 max at least which means it'd take like 24 or 25 to look "big big"
 
arborist just kept grinding and hustling



@Arborist giving a motivational speech to natty gymcels who are 1/4th his size after ten years of lifting:



 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, atlantean, life is suifuel and 2 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 24940 and Orc
Yeah 23 sounds big "on paper" but IRL it's not that impressive
the only statistics that exist appear to be based on population samples that are relatively short, i.e americans or asians and don't have any details besides that, i.e what's their economic background, they also don't make any mention of correlation between the two, i.e you'd expect taller people to realistically also be wider, but they won't realistically look wider because skull size also tends to increase, and pelvic width likely also goes up according to the circumference of the rib-cage, which on pictures could make it look roughly the same.

so it could be that he just has a pinhead, which if you compare it to the skull size of the short asian man he's standing next to might actually be the case.

the average height is around 6'1 or 6'2 in my part of the netherlands, and if I look around and compare I wouldn't be surprised if 22~ inch or so was quite common.
@Arborist giving a motivational speech to natty gymcels who are 1/4th his size after ten years of lifting:



View attachment 2120947
I never blew up my progress has just been slow consistent and steady over the years.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862
So I wonder if it's better to NOT be photogenic & less unrealistically gl IRL vs. being GL in pics but IRL you're underwhelming/manlet/etc.

Like it's probably better to be a solid HTN than some fraud-capable guy who can make himself look/appear in pics better than he really is.

Also that faggot @loox or @androgenic showing us his "progress" when I bet he's an example of this, looks "insane" through a lens

zk9ivlwvjqia1.png


But IRL he's probably a bit tall, a bit wide and has a somewhat appealing face but isn't so damn Herculean/"Godly" looking in front of you as he tries to convince a horde of virgins online here of him being so superior when it's all very well known he doesn't have that much IRL success.
Loox is like 80kg at 6'3. Probably doesn't look freakish at all in a shirt (dyel).

A lot of naturally athletic 6'3 guys are 85kg+ and 15% bf without having ever touched a weight. Loox is juicing hard and yet has an FFMI lower than a gym bro.

Gym lighting copes are the same as ppl posting their best pics in the rating section. No reflection of real life at all.

You need to see in motion compared to others for a true evaluation of how a person looks.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: madmofo, androgenic, Deleted member 24940 and 1 other person
Loox is like 80kg at 6'3. Probably doesn't look freakish at all in a shirt (dyel).

A lot of naturally athletic 6'3 guys are 85kg+ and 15% bf without having ever touched a weight. Loox is juicing hard and yet has an FFMI lower than a gym bro.

Gym lighting copes are the same as ppl posting their best pics in the ratings section. No reflection of real life at all.
Need to see in-motion compared to others for a true evaluation of how a person looks.
Someone like KSI even is 83 kg at 5’10” after 4 months gymcelling natty jfl, at 6’3 with roiding it’s actually unimpressive

12832343 E9C1 4D5C A81A 8FA52CDBF2F5
 
  • +1
Reactions: EverythingMattersCel
Yup most chads online are just HTN who angle fraud and use faceapp editing.
Exactly that is what I've been theorizing/saying all along.


99% of chads online are frauds and would fall into this category. Therefore, tall HTNs/Chadlites with good pheno are IRL chads. But baboons like @David Rothschild and @Blackgymmax can't accept that and cope hard
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover and Deleted member 24940

Similar threads

D
Replies
72
Views
14K
BonesmashFinalBoss
BonesmashFinalBoss
D
Replies
28
Views
14K
realshit
realshit
chaddyboi66
Replies
64
Views
12K
abdullah23k
abdullah23k
dreamcake1mo
Replies
56
Views
15K
Joshrc
Joshrc
VeryFuglyNiyguhs
Replies
148
Views
18K
actualunderstander
actualunderstander

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top