Debates are totally retarded

[idontchecklowkicks]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

 

[kisuke]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

debates aren't about convincing , it's all semantics and rhetoric , pure waste of time , conversations mog

 

[idontchecklowkicks]

debates aren't about convincing , it's all semantics and rhetoric , pure waste of time , conversations mog

Truth nuke

 

[thickbitch]

Cope

 

[idontchecklowkicks]

Cope

What am I coping with

 

[thickbitch]

What am I coping with

Life in general

 

[mangotimer]

Life in general

stfu

 

[highefforthreads]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

fr most ppl try to just win them instead of seeing both sides and also most people don't like seeing the other side

 

[idontchecklowkicks]

Life in general

max level midwit

 

[charlesmansonex]

that's true, after most debates each side thinks that they have won and don't get any new perspectives on things. This is why something like a discussion or a dialogue is better

 

[greylurker]

arguing with people in general is a watse of time. people dont change their minds, myself included

 

[Milktard]

True, and it's hard to win a debate over someone who's genuinely stupid

 

[thickbitch]

max level midwit

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position.

 

[DysgenicArtery]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

It's kinda strange, motherfuckers will have a 45 minute debate over if god exists, and are surprised when no productive discussion occurs

 

[idontchecklowkicks]

Okay

 

[Leidig]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

This is why a deep conversation between people who are all friends/have mutual respect is always superior. People in those settings are able to forgive or look past the other’s gaps in the argument if there are any. Either that we just go back to fucking killing everyone we disagree with like we used to up until recently because debating is gay

 

[Accursed]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

Doesn’t constantly debate with himself + imagine 29 spinning apples. Giga over

 

[idontchecklowkicks]

Doesn’t constantly debate with himself + imagine 29 spinning apples. Giga over

Debating with yourself is an entirely different thing. And for the record i do it constantly

 

[dys]

Cope

you're definitely one of those strawmanning theology retards

 

[Prøphet]

Debates suck

 

[surgerymaxxed1]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

Yes. this is why a much prefer "conversations"

 

[CloudyCuck]

Modern day debates (especially regarding politics religion) are always won by virtue of the debaters knowledge and use of rhetoric rather than the validity of their position. This is true even amongst the most educated and highly respected debaters. The reality is that one single individual will never manage to successfully defend a specific position repeatedly against multiple others who wish to attack it and expressly seek to find weaknesses and flaws within the debater himself and his pool of knowledge rather than his position. There are countless arguments for and against every religion and political ideology, it is simply impossible for one person to not only understand, but to remember and use them (correctly) over the course of multiple debates with different people without even once making a mistake

Keep coping fag