debunking Kant

[ChrisFletcher]

senses are limited, the reason is not

If reason isnt limited, would we not be able to recognize that the way we percieve things are the mind filtering it through our senses , and not the way things are in reality

 

[taai]

The thing in itself cannot be experienced you just cannot say something you experience is "the" thing in itself

 

[theRetard]

If reason isnt limited, would we not be able to recognize that the way we percieve things are the mind filtering it through our senses , and not the way things are in reality

why is mind not the reality

The thing in itself cannot be experienced you just cannot say something you experience is "the" thing in itself

so what interferes it?

 

[ChrisFletcher]

why is mind not the reality

Wdym? We cant percieve the mind as it rlly it is

 

[theRetard]

Wdym? We cant percieve the mind as it rlly it is

If the mind cannot perceive itself, then who now claims rn that it cannot?
your mind perceives itself, it's literally called the reflection

 

[ChrisFletcher]

If the mind cannot perceive itself, then who now claims rn that it cannot?
your mind perceives itself, it's literally called the reflection

Wait nvm kant didnt thi k the mind was a thing in itself

 

[theRetard]

Wait nvm kant didnt thi k the mind was a thing in itself

yes he actually didn't (because he was wrong)

 

[ChrisFletcher]

yes he actually didn't (because he was wrong)

His norwooding was actually a thing in itself so we cant percieve it

 

[theRetard]

His norwooding was actually a thing in itself so we cant percieve it

you made me cage