whiteegyptian
πΉππππ βπππππ
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2025
- Posts
- 13,546
- Reputation
- 23,551
the Slavic people are an inferior sub Europid race that insist on claiming the achievements of the White man. I will be debunking all of this.
1 - predominantly light features. the first cope. Slavs like to cope and insist they have predominantly light features, like man, haven't you seen Rina? but that's not usually the case. now, that's false on everything.
statistically, Slavs don't have light features as much as North-West Europeans, as Finns, Swedes, and Danes are the blondest people on earth. while the English, the Irish, and the Scottish are the palest, with the most red-hair, and straw berry hair color.
which is completely fine. as the best looking Slavic phenotype is the North Pontid. which is not pasty pale.
but Slavs historically have an inferiority complex to the Finns, and the Baltic people. so they want to be like them.
even fucking Vasiliy dyed his hair and he had dark brown hair. Slavs really just wish they were Finnish.
2 - we share the same components as Whites. the second cope. light features is highly variable, some Slavs can be swarthy, and some British / Scandinavian people can be light, and vice versa, BUT, Slavs like to cope that they share the same components as Whites. such as the Farmer ancestry, Yamnaya ancestry, and WHG. which is cool. and they even argue that actually makes them Whiter due to them having higher Yamnaya ancestry.
let's debunk this:
first of all it's false. since the Russian people carry Asiatic markers, and derive 13% of their ancestry from Asians, and have Asian haplogroups. not to mention their Jewish, and Paleo-Balkan, and Caucasian admixtures down South. same thing counts for most Slavs. West Slavs have Balkan haplogroups, making them more shitskin shifted. meanwhile the British and the Nordics are predominantly R1b and I1.
I might make another thread soon. which is civilization debunks.
@killuacel @horseman. @JewishNationalist @shedontluv-U
no shade to @Bully but us Slavs should accept ourselves for who we are.
1 - predominantly light features. the first cope. Slavs like to cope and insist they have predominantly light features, like man, haven't you seen Rina? but that's not usually the case. now, that's false on everything.
statistically, Slavs don't have light features as much as North-West Europeans, as Finns, Swedes, and Danes are the blondest people on earth. while the English, the Irish, and the Scottish are the palest, with the most red-hair, and straw berry hair color.
which is completely fine. as the best looking Slavic phenotype is the North Pontid. which is not pasty pale.
but Slavs historically have an inferiority complex to the Finns, and the Baltic people. so they want to be like them.
even fucking Vasiliy dyed his hair and he had dark brown hair. Slavs really just wish they were Finnish.
2 - we share the same components as Whites. the second cope. light features is highly variable, some Slavs can be swarthy, and some British / Scandinavian people can be light, and vice versa, BUT, Slavs like to cope that they share the same components as Whites. such as the Farmer ancestry, Yamnaya ancestry, and WHG. which is cool. and they even argue that actually makes them Whiter due to them having higher Yamnaya ancestry.
let's debunk this:
first of all it's false. since the Russian people carry Asiatic markers, and derive 13% of their ancestry from Asians, and have Asian haplogroups. not to mention their Jewish, and Paleo-Balkan, and Caucasian admixtures down South. same thing counts for most Slavs. West Slavs have Balkan haplogroups, making them more shitskin shifted. meanwhile the British and the Nordics are predominantly R1b and I1.
I might make another thread soon. which is civilization debunks.
@killuacel @horseman. @JewishNationalist @shedontluv-U
no shade to @Bully but us Slavs should accept ourselves for who we are.
